Vortex of Corruption: Longitudinal Analysis of Normative Pressures in Top Global Companies

  • Leyla Orudzheva
  • Manjula S. SalimathEmail author
  • Robert Pavur
Original Paper


It is widely acknowledged that corruption by any firm is problematic. More importantly, its negative effects are compounded when (a) corruption is present in large firms with global reach and (b) corruption ceases to be a single instance but becomes a reoccurring or perpetuating phenomenon over time. Though the magnification of corruption over both time and size of operations creates scale effects that amplify its detrimental consequences, this context remains largely unexamined empirically. Thus, our research question is: What are the factors that contribute to corruption by large global firms? Drawing on institutional theory, we examine the normative pressures that interact to create a vortex of corporate corruption that persisted over several years. We analyze a 9-year longitudinal dataset of 469 unique FT Global 500 companies representing 31 primary industries and 33 countries with over 3700 company year observations. Results help disentangle a complex interaction of firm-level and headquarters country-level factors that drive corruption and impact performance among top global firms.


Organizational corruption Institutions Normative pressures Longitudinal Interaction 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Leyla Orudzheva declares that she has no conflict of interest. Manjula Salimath declares that she has no conflict of interest. Robert Pavur declares that he has no conflict of interest.


  1. Ades, A., & Di Tella, R. (1999). Rents, competition, and corruption. The American Economic Review, 89(4), 982–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agnew, R., Piquero, N. L., & Cullen, F. T. (2009). General strain theory and white-collar crime. In S. S. Simpson & D. Weisburd(Eds.), The criminology of white-collar crime (pp. 35–60). New York: Springer. Scholar
  3. Aguinis, H., Edwards, J. R., & Bradley, K. J. (2016). Improving our understanding of moderation and mediation in strategic management research. Organizational Research Methods. Scholar
  4. Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisition and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anand, V., Ashforth, B. E., & Joshi, M. (2005). Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Academy of Management Executive, 19(4), 9–23. Scholar
  6. Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25(03), 1–52. Scholar
  7. Ashforth, B. E., Gioia, D. A., Robinson, S. L., & Treviño, L. K. (2008). Re-viewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 670–684. Scholar
  8. Asiedu, E., & Freeman, J. (2009). The effect of corruption on investment growth: Evidence from firms in latin america, sub-saharan Africa, and transition countries. Review of Development Economics, 13(2), 200–214. Scholar
  9. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2016). Report to the nations on occupational fraud and abuse.Google Scholar
  10. Bakan, J. (2004). The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  11. Balch, D. R., & Armstrong, R. W. (2010). Ethical marginality: The icarus syndrome and banality of wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 291–303. Scholar
  12. Ballinger, G. A. (2004). Using generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 127–150. Scholar
  13. Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. Journal of Communication. Scholar
  14. Baucus, M. S., & Baucus, D. A. (1997). Paying the piper: An empirical examination of longer-term financial consequences of illegal corporate behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 129–151. Scholar
  15. Baucus, M. S., & Near, J. P. (1991). Can illegal corporate behavior be predicted ? An event history analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 9–36. Scholar
  16. Baughn, C., Bodie, N. L., Buchanan, M. A., & Bixby, M. B. (2010). Bribery in international business transactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(1), 15–32. Scholar
  17. BBC. (2016). Serious Fraud Office opens Airbus corruption investigation - BBC News. BBC News. Retrieved August 15, 2016 from
  18. Blau, P. M. (1970). A formal theory of differentation in organizations. American Sociological Review, 35(2), 201–218. Scholar
  19. Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63–82. Scholar
  20. Brockman, P., Rui, O. M., & Zou, H. (2013). Institutions and the performance of politically connected M&As. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(8), 833–852. Scholar
  21. Calathes, W., & Yeager, M. G. (2016). Sweetheart settlements, the financial crisis, and impunity: A case study of SEC v. citigroup global markets, Inc. Social Justice, 42(1), 53–69,146.Google Scholar
  22. Chen, C. J., Ding, Y., & Kim, C. (Francis). (2010). High-level politically connected firms, corruption, and analyst forecast accuracy around the world. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1505–1524. Scholar
  23. Chen, M.-J., & Hambrick, D. C. (1995). Speed, stealth, and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 453–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Child, J. (1973). Predicting and understanding organization structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18(2), 168–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Collins, J. D., Uhlenbruck, K., & Rodriguez, P. (2009). Why firms engage in corruption: A top management perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 89–108. Scholar
  26. Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2006). Who cares about corruption? Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 807–822. Scholar
  27. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  28. Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42(5), 693–716. Scholar
  29. Davis, J. H., & Ruhe, J. A. (2012). Perceptions of country corruption: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(4), 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dess, G. G., & Robinson, R. B. J. (1984). Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5(3), 265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Association, 48(2), 147–160.Google Scholar
  34. Dullforce, A.-B. (2015). FT 500 2015 Introduction and methodology. Financial times.
  35. Eden, L., & Miller, S. R. (2004). Distance matters: Liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. Advances in International Management, 16, 187–221. Scholar
  36. Elango, B., & Sambharya, R. B. (2004). The influence of industry structure on the entry mode choice of overseas entrants in manufacturing industries. Journal of International Management, 10(1 SPEC ISS.), 107–124. Scholar
  37. Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P., & O’Keefe, R. D. (1984). Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management Science, 30(6), 682–695. Scholar
  38. (2015). Fortune global 500 methodology. Retrieved June 6, 2016 from
  39. Frei, C., & Muethel, M. (2017). Antecedents and consequences of MNE bribery: A multilevel review. Journal of Management Inquiry. Scholar
  40. Gagnon, C., John, E., & Theunissen, R. (2017). Organizational health: A fast track to performance improvement Working on health works. It’s good for your people and for your bottom line. Seattle: McKinsey QuarterlyGoogle Scholar
  41. Galtung, F. (2006). Measuring the immeasurable: Boundaries and functions of (Macro) corruption indice. In C. Sampford, A. Sacklock, C. Connors & F. Galtung (Eds.), Measuring corruption (pp. 101–130). Farnham: Ashgate. Scholar
  42. Gerring, J., & Thacker, S. C. (2005). Do neoliberal policies deter political corruption? International Organization, 59(1), 233–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gosho, M. (2014). Criteria to select a working correlation structure for the generalized estimating equations method. Journal of Statistical Software, 57, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Graycar, A., & Monaghan, O. (2015). Rich country corruption. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(8), 586–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Graycar, A., & Sidebottom, A. (2012). Corruption and control: A corruption reduction approach. Journal of Financial Crime, 19(4), 384–399. Scholar
  46. Greve, H. R., Palmer, D., & Pozner, J. (2010). Organizations gone wild: The causes, processes, and consequences of organizational misconduct. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 53–107. Scholar
  47. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164. Scholar
  48. Harris, J., & Bromiley, P. (2007). Incentives to cheat: The influence of executive compensation and firm performance on financial misrepresentation. Organization Science, 18(3), 350–367. Scholar
  49. Heckman, J. J., & Borjas, G. J. (1980). Does unemployment cause future unemployment? Definitions, questions and answers from a continuous time model of heterogeneity and state dependence. Economica, New Series, 47(187), 247–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Heimann, F., Földes, Á, & Coles, S. (2015). Exporting corruption. Progress Report 2015: Assessing Enforcement of the OECD Convention on Combatting Foreign Bribery. Transparency International, 1–20.Google Scholar
  51. Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., & Lander, M. W. (2009). Structure! agency! (and Other Quarrels): A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hofer, C., Cantor, D. E., & Dai, J. (2012). The competitive determinants of a firm’s environmental management activities: Evidence from US manufacturing industries. Journal of Operations Management, 30(1–2), 69–84. Scholar
  53. Hummel, K., & Schlick, C. (2016). The relationship between sustainability performance and sustainability disclosure—Reconciling voluntary disclosure theory and legitimacy theory. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. Scholar
  54. Husted, B. W. (1999). Wealth, culture, and corruption. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2), 339–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hveem, H. (1973). The global dominance system * Notes on a theory of global political economy. Journal of Peace Research, 10(4), 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jackall, R. (1984). The moral ethos of bureaucracy. State, Culture, and Society, 1(1), 176–200.Google Scholar
  57. Kaal, W. A., & Lacine, T. A. (2014). The effect of deferred and non-prosecution agreements on corporate governance: Evidence from 1993 to 2013. Business Lawyer, 70(1), 1–60.Google Scholar
  58. Katou, A. A. (2013). The relationship between corrupt practices and organizational performance: An empirical investigation. International Journal Business Governance and Ethics, 8(4), 323–347. Scholar
  59. Kaufmann, D., Aart, K., & Mastuzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues (No. 5430).Google Scholar
  60. Kaufmann, D., & Wei, S.-J. (1999). Does “grease money” speed up the wheels of commerce? (No. 7903). NBER Working Papers Series.Google Scholar
  61. Kim, E.-H., & Lyon, T. (2011). when does institutional investor activism increase shareholder value?: The carbon disclosure project. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 11(1).
  62. Kimberly, J. R. (1976). Organizational size and the structuralist perspective: A review, critique, and proposal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(4), 571–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Klein, B., & Leffler, K. B. (1981). The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. The Journal of Political Economy, 89(4), 615–641. Scholar
  64. Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling corruption. Berkeley: Univ of California Press.Google Scholar
  65. Kölbel, J. F., & Busch, T. (2013). The effect of bad news on credit risk: A media based view of the pricing of corporate social responsibility (No. 40). DSF Policy Paper Series.Google Scholar
  66. Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81. Scholar
  67. Krishnan, R., & Kozhikode, R. K. (2015). Status and corporate illegality: Illegal loan recovery practices of commercial banks in India. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1287–1312. Scholar
  68. Kulik, B. W., O’Fallon, M. J., & Salimath, M. S. (2008). Do competitive environments lead to the rise and spread of unethical behavior? Parallels from Enron. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 703–723. Scholar
  69. Kwok, C. C. Y., & Tadesse, S. (2006). The MNC as an agent of change for host-country institutions: FDI and corruption. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 767–785. Scholar
  70. Lambsdorff, J. G. (2006). Measuring corruption—The ZRS (CPI). In C. Sampford, A. Sacklock, C. Connors & F. Galtung (Eds.), Measuring corruption. Fenham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  71. Lange, D. (2008). A multidimensional conceptualization of organizational corruption control. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 710–729. Scholar
  72. Lehman, D. W., & Ramanujam, R. (2009). Selectivity in organizational rule violations. The Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 643–657.Google Scholar
  73. Leiponen, A., & Helfat, C. E. (2010). Research notes and comments. Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 224–236. Scholar
  74. Lewis, B. W., Walls, J. L., & Dowell, G. W. S. (2015). Difference in degrees: CEO characteristics and firm environmental disclosure. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 712–722. Scholar
  75. Lord, N. (2011). Regulating transnational corporate bribery in the UK and Germany. Doctoral dissertation. Cardiff UniversityGoogle Scholar
  76. Lott, J. R. (1996). The level of optimal fines to prevent fraud when reputations exist. Managerial and Decision Economics, 17, 363–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Markham, J. W. Jr. (2011). Lessons for competition law from the economic crisis: The prospect for antitrust responses to the “too-big-to-fail” phenomenon. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 16(2), 261–322.Google Scholar
  78. Martin, K. D., Cullen, J. B., Johnson, J. L., & Parboteeah, K. P. (2007). Deciding to bribe: A cross-level analysis of firm and home country influences on bribery activity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1401–1422. Scholar
  79. Mauro, P. (1998). Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics, 69(2), 263–279. Scholar
  80. McCahery, J. A., & Vermeulen, E. P. M. (2014). Six components of corporate governance that cannot be ignored. European Company & Financial Law Review, 11(2), 160–195. Scholar
  81. McKendall, M., DeMarr, B., & Jones-Rikkers, C. (2002). Ethical compliance programs and corporate illegality: Testing the assumptions of the corporate sentencing guidelines. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(4), 367–383. Scholar
  82. Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672–682. Scholar
  83. Meyer, A. D., & Tsui, A. S. (1993). Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1175–1195. Scholar
  84. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340. Scholar
  85. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. The theory of management policy series. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  86. Misangyi, V. F., Weaver, G. R., & Elms, H. (2008). Ending corruption: The interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 750–770. Scholar
  87. Mishina, Y., Dykes, B., Block, E., & Pollock, T. (2010). Why “good” firms do bad things: The effects of high aspirations, high expectations, and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 701–722. Scholar
  88. Nair, P., & Kamalanabhan, T. J. (2010). Performance pressure and peer reporting of infractions: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Indian Business Research, 2(4), 216–229. Scholar
  89. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Nwabuzor, A. (2005). Corruption and development: New initiatives in economic openness and strengthened rule of law. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(1), 121–138. Scholar
  91. O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Griffin, R. W., & Glew, D. J. (1996). Organization-motivated aggression: A research framework. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 225–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Palmer, D. (2008). Extending the process model of collective corruption. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 107–135. Scholar
  93. Pinto, J., Leana, C. R., & Pil, F. K. (2008). Corrupt organizations or organizations of corrupt individuals?Two types of organizational-level corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 685–709. Scholar
  94. Robertson, C., & Watson, A. (2004). Corruption and change: The impact of foreign direct investment. Strategic Management Journal, 25(4), 385–396. Scholar
  95. Robinson, S. L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (1998). Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 658–672.Google Scholar
  96. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1978). Corruption: A study in political economy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  97. Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Salter, M. S. (2010). Lawful but corrupt: Gaming and the problem of institutional corruption in the private sector corruption in the private sector (No. 11–060).Google Scholar
  99. Schein, E. H. (1988). Organizational socialization and the profession of management. Sloan Management Review, 30(1), 53–65.Google Scholar
  100. Schneider, B., Goldstein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. (1995). The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 747–773. Scholar
  101. Scott, W. R. (1991). Unpacking institutional arguments. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 164–182). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  102. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  103. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Sims, R., & Brinkmann, J. (2003). Enron ethics(or: Culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Snell, R. S. (2000). Studying moral ethos using an adapted Kohlbergian model. Organization Studies. Scholar
  106. Søreide, T. (2006). Corruption in international business transactions: The perspective of Norwegian firms. In S. Rose-Ackerman (Ed.), International handbook on the economics of corruption (pp. 381–417). Bodminm: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  107. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 48(6), 1467–1478. Scholar
  108. Stevenson, D. D., & Wagoner, N. J. (2011). Fcpa sanctions: Too big to debar? Fordham Law Review, 80(2), 775–820.Google Scholar
  109. Stinchcombe, A. (1968). Constructing social theories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  110. Stokman, F. N., Ziegler, R., & Scott, J. (1985). Networks of corporate power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  111. Strachan, J. L., Smith, D. B., & Beedles, W. L. (1983). The price reaction to (Alleged) corporate crime. The Financial Review, 18(2), 121–132. Scholar
  112. Su, W., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2015). Product diversification and financial performance: The moderating role of secondary stakeholders. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 1128–1148. Scholar
  113. Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption around the world: Causes, consequences, scope, and cures. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 45(4), 559–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Thanetsunthorn, N. (2015). The impact of national culture on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from cross-regional comparison. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 4(1), 35–56. Scholar
  115. The Guardian. (2016). Fifa corruption scandal: US releases three guilty plea transcripts. The Guardian. Retrieved August 16, 21016.
  116. Tirole, J. (1996). A theory of collective reputations (with applications to the persistence of corruption and to firm quality). The Review of Economic Studies, 63(1), 1–22. Scholar
  117. Transparency International. (2015). Corruption perceptions index 2014: Short Methodology Note.Google Scholar
  118. Transparency International. (2016). Corruption Perceptions Index 2016: Frequently Asked Questions.Google Scholar
  119. Uhlmann, D. (2013). Deferred prosecution and non-prosecution agreements and the erosion of corporate criminal liability. Maryland Law Review, 72(4), 1295–1344. Scholar
  120. Umphress, E. E., & Bingham, J. B. (2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organization Science, 22(3), 621–640. Scholar
  121. US Commodity Futures Trading Commission. (n.d.). Dodd-Frank Act - CFTC. Retrieved January 24, 2018,
  122. van der Mandele, H., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2015). The inevitability and irreversibility of organizational uncontrollability. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 21(4), 380–405. Scholar
  123. Van Maanen, J. E., & Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1, 960–977.Google Scholar
  124. Vaughan, D. (1999). The dark side of organizations: Mistake, misconduct, and disaster. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 271–305. Scholar
  125. Venard, B. (2009). Organizational isomorphism and corruption: An empirical research in Russia. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 59–76. Scholar
  126. Venard, B., & Hanafi, M. (2008). Organizational isomorphism and corruption in financial institutions: Empirical research in emerging countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 481–498. Scholar
  127. Werbel, J., & Balkin, D. B. (2010). Are human resource practices linked to employee misconduct? A rational choice perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 20(4), 317–326. Scholar
  128. Williamson, O. (1967). Hierarchical control and optimum firm size. The Journal of Political Economy. Scholar
  129. Wooldridge, J. M. (2012). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (5th edn.). Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  130. Zucker, L. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42(5), 726–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Zyglidopoulos, S., Hirsch, P., de Holan, M. P., & Phillips, N. (2017). Expanding research on corporate corruption, management, and organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry, 26(3), 247–253. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leyla Orudzheva
    • 1
  • Manjula S. Salimath
    • 2
    Email author
  • Robert Pavur
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Management and Marketing, College of Business AdministrationTexas A&M University-Central TexasKilleenUSA
  2. 2.Department of Management, College of BusinessUniversity of North TexasDentonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Information Technology and Decision Sciences, College of BusinessUniversity of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations