Advertisement

Institutionalization of the Contents of Sustainability Assurance Services: A Comparison Between Italy and United States

  • Carlos Larrinaga
  • Adriana Rossi
  • Mercedes Luque-Vilchez
  • Manuel Núñez-Nickel
Original Paper
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

A descriptive-exploratory analysis of assurance practices is presented in this paper, by analysing the patterns of sustainability assurance reporting in two national contexts with different levels of assurance activity (Italy and the U.S.) over a period of 11 years (2003/2013). The study is based on theoretical insights drawn from institutional sociology and normativity production. It is framed both in the Italian situation, where assurance statements consistently include a narrow set of formal and procedural communications, and in an unsettled situation in the U.S., where assurance activity is more incipient, but where experimentation in substantial assurance disclosure practices has more room to develop. Its main implication is that the diffusion of sustainability assurance and the creation of sustainability assurance disclosure norms are not without its cost: information quality does not increase with patterned practice. The results also point towards the noteworthy role of specific professionals in the earlier and later stages of assurance practice norms. They reveal a significant influence of non-Big4 firms (mainly certification bodies and consulting and engineering firms) in the diffusion of sustainability assurance disclosure norms. In contrast, the Big4 firms appear to be positively associated with the narrowing down of the assurance focus to a selected subset of this activity in later stages of the development of the assurance norm. In this regard, this study provides insight into the circumstantial—but relevant—carrier role of the Big4 firms in determining what “assurance” means.

Keywords

Sustainability assurance content Disclosure practices Assurance patterns Normativity Italy United States 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación (Grant Number ECO2015-65782-P) and Consejería de Educación, Junta de Castilla y León (Grant Number BU058P17).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. ACCA. (2004). ACCA UK awards for sustainability reporting: Report of the judges. ACCA. http://www.accaglobal.com/sustainability.
  2. AccountAbility. (2003). AA1000AS Assurance Standard. http://www.coc-runder-tisch.de/inhalte/texte_grundlagen/Assurance_Standard.pdf.
  3. Accountability. (2008). AA1000AS Assurance Standard. London: Accountability. https://www.accountability.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/AA1000AS_italian.pdf.
  4. Adams, C. A., & Evans, R. (2004). Accountability, completeness, credibility and the audit expectations gap. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 14, 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aerts, W., & Cormier, D. (2009). Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aerts, W., Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2006). Intra-industry imitation in corporate environmental reporting: An international perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(3), 299–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Albareda, L., Tencati, A., Lozano, J. M., & Perrini, F. (2006). The government’s role in promoting corporate responsibility: A comparative analysis of Italy and UK from the relational state perspective. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 6(4), 386–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Alcacer, J., & Chung, W. (2014). Location strategies for agglomeration economies. Strategic Management Journal, 35(12), 1749–1761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beattie, V., McInnes, B., & Fearnley, S. (2004) A methodology for analysing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: A comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes. Accounting Forum, 28(3), 205–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bebbington, J., Kirk, E. A., & Larrinaga, C. (2012). The production of normativity: A comparison of reporting regimes in Spain and the UK. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(2), 78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berg, B., & Lune., H. (2012). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (8th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
  12. Boiral, O. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A + GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1036–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boiral, O., & Gendron, Y. (2011). Sustainable development and certification practices: Lessons learned and prospects. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(5), 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boiral, O., Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., & Brotherton, M. C. (2017). Assessing and improving the quality of sustainability reports: The auditors’ perspective. Journal of Business Ethics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3516-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bouten, L., Everaert, P., & Roberts, R. W. (2012). How a two-step approach discloses different determinants of voluntary social and environmental reporting? Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 39(5-6), 567–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Branco, M. C., Delgado, C., Gomes, S. F., & Eugénio, T. C. P. (2014). Factors influencing the assurance of sustainability reports in the context of the economic crisis in Portugal. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(3), 237–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Casey, R. J., & Grenier, J. H. (2015). Understanding and contributing to the enigma of corporate social responsibility (CSR) assurance in the United States. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 34(1), 97–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chelli, M., Durocher, S., & Fortin, A. (2016). Normativity in environmental reporting: A comparison of three regimes. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 285–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cho, C. H., Michelon, G., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2014). CSR report assurance in the USA: An empirical investigation of determinants and effects. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 5(2), 130–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7), 639–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Christensen, J., & Kent, P. (2016). The decision to outsource risk management services. Accounting and Finance, 56(4), 985–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. CorporateRegister. (2008). Assurance view: The CSR Assurance Statement Report. CorporateRegister.com, London. https://www.corporateregister.com/pdf/AssureView.pdf.
  23. CorporateRegister. (2013). CRPerspectives 2013, CorporateRegister.com. London. https://3blmedia.com/News/CSR/CorporateRegistercoms-Survey-CR-Perspectives-2013.
  24. Dando, N., & Swift, T. (2003). Transparency and assurance minding the credibility gap. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Deegan, C., Barry, J. C., & Shelly, M. (2006). An investigation of TBL report assurance statements: UK and European evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(4), 329–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Djelic, M. L., & Quack, S. (2008). Institutions and transnationalization. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), Organizational institutionalism (pp. 299–324). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Etzion, D., & Ferraro, F. (2010). The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organization Science, 21(5), 1092–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. European Commission. (2003). Recommendation 2003/361/EC as regards size criteria defined for the SME. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32003H0361.
  29. Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fuhrmann, S., Ott, C., Looks, E., & Guenther, T. W. (2017). The contents of assurance statements for sustainability reports and information asymmetry. Accounting and Business Research, 47(4), 369–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gendron, Y., Cooper, D., & Townley, B. (2007). The construction of auditing expertise in measuring government performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 101–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gray, R. (2006). Does sustainability reporting improve corporate behaviour? Wrong question? Right time? Accounting and Business Research, 36(suppl 1), 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability… and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organizations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The Big Five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Guidry, R. P., & Patten, D. M. (2010). Market reactions to the first-time issuance of corporate sustainability reports: Evidence that quality matters. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 1(1), 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Habisch, A., Patelli, L., Pedrini, M., & Schwartz, C. (2011). Different talks with different folks: A comparative survey of stakeholder dialog in Germany, Italy, and the US. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(3), 381–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hodge, K., Subramaniam, N., & Stewart, J. (2009). Assurance of sustainability reports: Impact on report users’ confidence and perceptions of information credibility. Australian Accounting Review, 19(3), 178–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hummel, K., Schlick, C., & Fifka, M. (2017). The role of sustainability performance and accounting assurors in sustainability assurance engagements. Journal of Business Ethics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3410-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. IAASB. (2003). International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3000—Assurance engagements other than audits or reviews of historical information. New York:International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).Google Scholar
  42. Jones, M. J., & Shoemaker, P. A. (1994). Accounting narratives: A review of empirical studies of content and readability. Journal of Accounting Literature, 13(1), 142–184.Google Scholar
  43. Kend, M. (2015). Governance, firm-level characteristics and their impact on the client’s voluntary sustainability disclosures and assurance decisions. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 6(1), 54–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kolk, A., & Perego, P. (2010). Determinants of the adoption of sustainability assurance statements: An international investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(3), 182–198.Google Scholar
  45. KPMG. (2011). KPMG International survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2011. Amsterdam: KPMG International. http://www.econsense.de/sites/all/files/Survey-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2011.pdf.
  46. KPMG. (2013). KPMG International survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2013. Amsterdam: KPMG International. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2015/08/kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2013.pdf.
  47. KPMG (2015). KPMG International survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2013. Amsterdam: KPMG International. https://home.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2015/12/KPMG-survey-of-CR-reporting-2015.pdf.
  48. Levy, D. L., Brown, H. S., & De Jong, M. (2010). The contested politics of corporate governance the case of the global reporting initiative. Business and Society, 49(1), 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lieberman, M. B., & Asaba, S. (2006). Why do firms imitate each other? Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 366–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lu, C., Qiao, J., & Chang, J. (2017). Herfindahl–Hirschman Index based performance analysis on the convergence development. Cluster Computing, 20(1), 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Manetti, G., & Becatti, L. (2009). Assurance services for sustainability reports: Standards and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2013). W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mock, T. J., Rao, S. S., & Srivastava, R. P. (2013). The development of worldwide sustainability reporting assurance. Australian Accounting Review, 23(4), 280–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. O’Dwyer, B. (2003). Conceptions of corporate social responsibility: The nature of managerial capture. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 16(4), 523–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. O’Dwyer, B. (2011). The case of sustainability assurance: Constructing a new assurance service. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(4), 1230–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. O’Dwyer, B., & Owen, D. (2007). Seeking stakeholder-centric sustainability assurance. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 25, 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. O’Dwyer, B., Owen, D., & Unerman, J. (2011). Seeking legitimacy for new assurance forms: The case of assurance on sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(1), 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. O’Dwyer, B., & Owen, D. L. (2005). Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: a critical evaluation. The British Accounting Review, 37(2), 205–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Perego, P. (2009). Causes and consequences of choosing different assurance providers: An international study of sustainability reporting. International Journal of Management, 26(3), 412–425.Google Scholar
  60. Perego, P., & Kolk, A. (2012). Multinationals’ accountability on sustainability: The evolution of third-party assurance of sustainability reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(2), 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Peters, G. F., & Romi, A. M. (2013). Discretionary compliance with mandatory environmental disclosures: Evidence from SEC filings. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(4), 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Peters, G. F., & Romi, A. M. (2015). The association between sustainability governance characteristics and the assurance of corporate sustainability reports. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 34(1), 163–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Peterson, R. A. (1994). A meta-analysis of Cronbach’s coefficient alpha. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Potter, W. J., & Levine Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27(3), 258–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rossi, A., & Tarquinio, L. (2017). An analysis of sustainability report assurance statements: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(6), 578–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sahlin-Andersson, K., & Engwall, L. (2002). Carriers, flows, and sources of management knowledge. In K. Sahlin-Andersson & L. Engwall (Eds.), The expansion of management knowledge. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Scheneider, B. A. (2013). Assurance opportunities broaden. Journal of Accountancy, 215(5), 32–36.Google Scholar
  68. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  69. Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 937–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Smith, J., Haniffa, R., & Fairbrass, J. (2011). A conceptual framework for investigating ‘capture’ in corporate sustainability reporting assurance. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(3), 425–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Suddaby, R., Cooper, D. J., & Greenwood, R. (2007). Transnational regulation of professional services: Governance dynamics of field level organizational change. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(4–5), 333–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zadek, S., Raynard, P., Forstater, M., & Oelschlaegel, J. (2004). The future of sustainability assurance. ACCA Research Report No. 86. London: Certified Accountants Educational Trust. http://www.comunicarseweb.com.ar/sites/default/files/biblioteca/pdf/1301088199_FOSA_-_Full_Report.pdf.
  73. Zhou, S., Simnett, R., & Green, W. J. (2016). Assuring a new market: The interplay between country-level and company-level factors on the demand for greenhouse gas (GHG) information assurance and the choice of assurance provider. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 35(3), 141–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zorio, A., García Benau, M. A., & Sierra, L. (2013). Sustainability development and the quality of assurance reports: Empirical evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(7), 484–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos Larrinaga
    • 1
  • Adriana Rossi
    • 2
  • Mercedes Luque-Vilchez
    • 1
  • Manuel Núñez-Nickel
    • 3
  1. 1.Departamento de Economía y Administración de EmpresasUniversidad de BurgosBurgosSpain
  2. 2.Department of Economics StudiesUniversita degli Studi Gabriele d’Annunzio Chieti e PescaraPescaraItaly
  3. 3.Department of Business AdministrationUniversidad Carlos III de MadridGetafe, MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations