Family Responsibility Discrimination, Power Distance, and Emotional Exhaustion: When and Why are There Gender Differences in Work–Life Conflict?
As men take on more family responsibilities over time, with women still shouldering considerably more childcare and housework, an important ethical matter facing organizations is that of providing a supportive environment to foster employee well-being and balance between work and family. Using conservation of resources theory, this multi-source study examines the association between perceived family responsibility discrimination and work–life conflict as mediated by emotional exhaustion. Employee gender and power distance values are tested as moderators of the perceived family responsibility discrimination to emotional exhaustion relationship. Results suggest that male employees who perceive family responsibility discrimination from their supervisor and hold high power distance values experience increased emotional exhaustion and work–life conflict. Female workers who perceive family responsibility discrimination from their supervisor experience increased emotional exhaustion and work–life conflict regardless of whether they have high or low power distance. Findings are consistent with theory-based predictions from conservation of resources theory: resources that are valued and not provided in the work context deplete emotional energies and ultimately trigger work–life conflict. Findings build on the work–life literature by introducing gender and power distance as factors that shape when employees feel the draining effects of family responsibility discrimination.
KeywordsFamily responsibility discrimination Work–life conflict Power distance Gender Emotional exhaustion Conservation of resources
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Tiffany Trzebiatowski and María del Carmen Triana declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Allen, T. D. (2012). The work and family interface. In S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.) (2nd edn., pp. 1163–1198) The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Anderson, S. E., Coffey, B. S., & Byerly, R. T. (2002). Formal organizational initiatives and informal workplace practices: Links to work-family conflict and job-related outcomes. Journal of Management, 28, 787–810.Google Scholar
- Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., & Milkie, M. A. (2006). Changing rhythms of American family life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Calvert, C. T. (2010). Family responsibilities discrimination: Litigation update 2010.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd edn.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Council of Economic Advisers. (2014). Nine facts about American families and work. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/nine_facts_about_family_and_work_real_final.pdf.
- Dipboye, R. L., & Halverson, S. K. (2004). Subtle (and not so subtle) discrimination in organizations. In R. W. Griffin & A. M. O’Leary-Kelly (Eds.), The dark side of organizational behavior (pp. 131–158). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Eagly, A. H. (2013). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Erdogan, B., & Liden, R. C. (2002). Social exchanges in the workplace: A review of recent developments and future research directions in leader-member exchange theory. In L. L. Neider & C. A. Schriesheim (Eds.), Leadership (pp. 65–114). Greenwich: Information Age.Google Scholar
- Gore, S., & Colten, M. E. (1991). Gender, stress, and distress. In J. Eckenrode (Ed.), The social context of coping (pp. 139–163). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Greenglass, E. R., Pantony, K.-L., & Burke, R. J. (1988). A gender-role perspective on role conflict, work stress and social support. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 3, 317–328.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Hobfoll, S. E., & Freedy, J. (1993). Conservation of resources: A general stress theory applied to burnout. In W. Schaufeli, C. Maslach & T. E. Marek (Eds.), Professional burnout: Recent developments in theory and research. Series in Applied Psychology: Social issues and questions (pp. 115–133). Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Hobfoll, S. E., & Shirom, A. (1993). Stress and burnout in the workplace: Conservation of resources. In R. T. Golembiewski (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 41–61). New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
- Hochschild, A., & Machung, A. (2012). The second shift: Working families and the revolution at home. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. (2001). The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing work teams: The mediating role of employee resistance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 557–569.Google Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd edn.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Kossek, E. E., & Lee, K. (2017). Work-family conflict and work-life conflict. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Retrieved from http://business.oxfordre.com/view/https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.001.0001/acrefore-9780190224851-e-52.
- Leung, K. (2001). Different carrots for different rabbits: Effects of individualism-collectivism and power distance on work motivation. In M. Erez, U. Kleinbeck, H. Thierry (Eds.), Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy (pp. 329–339). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1986). Maslach burnout inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Maznevski, M. L., & DiStefano, J. J. (1995). Measuring culture in international management: The cultural perspectives questionnaire. London: Western Business School.Google Scholar
- Rehel, E., & Baxter, E. (2015, February 4). Men, fathers, and work-family balance. Center for American Progress. Retrieved from https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/women/report/2015/02/04/105983/men-fathers-and-work-family-balance/.
- Schaufeli, W., & Enzmann, D. (1998). The burnout companion to study and practice: A critical analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Scott, A. M. (2007). Family responsibility discrimination. Employee Benefit Plan Review, 62, 35–37.Google Scholar