Advertisement

Self-Sacrificial Leadership and Employee Behaviours: An Examination of the Role of Organizational Social Capital

  • Ahmed Mohammed Sayed MostafaEmail author
  • Paul A. Bottomley
Original Paper

Abstract

Drawing on social exchange theory, this study examines a mechanism, namely organizational social capital (OSC), through which self-sacrificial leadership is related to two types of employee behaviours: organizational citizenship behaviours (OCBs) and counterproductive behaviours (CPBs). The results of two different studies (a field study and an experimental study) in Egypt showed that self-sacrificial leadership is positively related to OSC which, in turn, is positively related to OCBs and negatively related to CPBs. Overall, the findings suggest that self-sacrificial leaders are more likely to achieve desirable employee behaviours through improving the quality of social relationships among employees.

Keywords

Self-sacrificial leadership Organizational social capital Organizational citizenship behaviours Counterproductive behaviours 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, R. (2010). Organizational social capital, structure and performance. Human Relations, 63(5), 583–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrews, R., & Mostafa, A. M. S. (2017). Organizational goal ambiguity and senior public managers’ engagement: Does organizational social capital make a difference? International Review of Administrative Sciences.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317701824.Google Scholar
  5. Arnold, K. A., & Loughlin, C. (2010). Individually considerate transformational leadership behaviour and self-sacrifice. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(8), 670–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Avolio, B. J., & Locke, E. E. (2002). Contrasting different philosophies of leader motivation: Altruism versus Egoism. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(2), 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1995). Multifactor leadership questionnaire report. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.Google Scholar
  8. Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. J. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bolino, M. C., & Klotz, A. C. (2015). The paradox of the unethical organizational citizen: The link between organizational citizenship behaviour and unethical behaviour at work. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 45–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2002). Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 505–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bottomley, P., Mostafa, A. M. S., Gould-Williams, J. S., & Leon-Cazares, F. (2016). The impact of transformational leadership on organizational citizenship behaviours: The contingent role of public service motivation. British Journal of Management, 27, 390–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carson, T. L. (2003). Self-Interest and business ethics: Some lessons of the recent corporate scandals. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 389–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, L., Zheng, W., Yang, B., & Bai, S. (2016). Transformational leadership, social capital and organizational innovation. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 37(7), 843–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen, S., & Choi, C. J. (2005). A social exchange perspective on business ethics: An application to knowledge. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Choi, Y., & Mai-Dalton, R. R. (1998). On the leadership function of self-sacrifice. The Leadership Quarterly, 9, 475–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Choi, Y., & Mai-Dalton, R. R. (1999). The model of followers’ responses to self-sacrificial leadership: An empirical test. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 397–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Choi, Y., & Yoon, J. (2005). Effects of leaders’ self-sacrificial behaviour and competency on followers’ attribution of charismatic leadership among Americans and Koreans. Current Research in Social Psychology, 11, 51–69.Google Scholar
  19. Chuang, C.-H., Chen, S.-J., & Chuang, C.-W. (2013). Human resource management practices and organizational social capital: The role of industrial characteristics. Journal of Business Research, 66, 678–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Coyle-Shapiro, J., & Shore, L. (2007). The employee organization relationship: Where do we go from here? Human Resource Management Review, 17(2), 166–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behaviour and counterproductive work behaviour. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1241–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (2002). Alliance constellations: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 445–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Cremer, D., Mayer, D. M., van Dijke, M., Schouten, B. C., & Bardes, M. (2009). When does self-sacrificial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on followers’ prevention focus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 887–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. De Cremer, D., & van Knippenberg, D. (2004). Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader self-confidence. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 95, 140–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. De Cremer, D., & van Knippenberg, D. (2005). Cooperation as a function of leader self-sacrifice, trust, and identification. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26, 355–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. De Cremer, D., van Knippenberg, D., van Dijke, M. H., & Bos, A. E. R. (2006). Self-sacrificial leadership and follower self-esteem: When collective identification matters. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 10, 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Den Hartog, D. N., & Belschak, F. D. (2012). Work engagement and machiavellianism in the ethical leadership process. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dipboye, R. L. (1990). Laboratory vs. field research in industrial and organizational psychology. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5, 1–34.Google Scholar
  29. Ekeh, P. P. (1974). Social exchange theory: The two traditions. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Geuens, M., & de Pelsmacker, P. (2017). Planning and conducting experimental advertising research and questionnaire design. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Halverson, S. K., Holladay, C. L., Kazama, S. M., & Quinones, M. A. (2004). Self-sacrificial behavior in crisis situations: The competing roles of behavioural and situational factors. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Joseph, J. (2015). Self-interest and altruism: Pluralism as a basis for leadership in business. Business and Management Studies, 1(2), 106–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kelloway, E. K., Loughlin, C., Barling, J., & Nault, A. (2002). Self-reported counterproductive behaviours and organizational citizenship behaviours: Separate but related constructs. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1–2), 143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Klotz, A. C., & Bolino, M. C. (2013). Citizenship and counterproductive work behaviour: A moral licensing view. Academy of Management Review, 38(2), 292–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lawler, E. J. (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107(2), 321–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lazega, E., & Pattison, P. E. (1999). Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: A case study. Social Networks, 21, 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leana, C. R., & Pil, F. K. (2006). Social capital and organizational performance: Evidence from urban public schools. Organization Science, 17(3), 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Leana, C. R., & Van Buren, H. (1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 538–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behaviour and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Li, R., Zhang, Z.-Y., & Tian, X.-M. (2016). Can self-sacrificial leadership promote subordinate taking charge? The mediating role of organizational identification and the moderating role of risk aversion. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 758–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lykken, D. T. (1968). Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A., & Epitropaki, O. (2016). Leader–member exchange (LMX) and performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 69, 67–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Matteson, J. A., & Irving, J. A. (2006). Servant versus self-sacrificial leadership: A behavioral comparison of two follow-oriented leadership theories. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 2(1), 36–51.Google Scholar
  45. McKenna, R., & Brown, T. (2011). Does sacrificial leadership have to hurt? The realities of putting others first. Organization Development Journal, 29(3), 39–50.Google Scholar
  46. Miao, Q., Newman, A., Schwarz, G., & Xu, L. (2013). Participative leadership and the organizational commitment of civil servants in China: The mediating effects of trust in supervisor. British Journal of Management, 24, S76–S92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nahapiet, J., & Ghosal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Paillé, P., Mejía-Morelos, J. H., Marché-Paillé, A., Chen, C. C., & Chen, Y. (2016). Corporate greening, exchange process among co-workers, and ethics of care: An empirical study on the determinants of pro-environmental behaviours at coworkers-level. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(3), 655–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Parzefall, M.-R., & Kuppelwieser, V.-G. (2012). Understanding the antecedents, the outcomes and the mediating role of social capital: An employee perspective. Human Relations, 65(4), 447–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pastoriza, D., & Arino, M. A. (2013). Does the ethical leadership of supervisors generate internal social capital? Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pastoriza, D., Arino, M. A., & Ricart, J. E. (2008). Ethical managerial behavior as antecedent of organizational social capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pastoriza, D., Arino, M. A., & Ricart, J. E. (2009). Creating an ethical work context: A pathway to generate social capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 477–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pirlott, A. G., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2016). Design approaches to experimental mediation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66(1), 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 5, 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(4), 717–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sachdeva, S., Iliev, R., Ekhtiari, H., & Dehghani, M. (2015). The role of self-sacrifice in moral dilemmas. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0127409.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Samnani, A.-K., Salamon, S. D., & Singh, P. (2014). Negative affect and counterproductive workplace behaviour: The moderating role of moral disengagement and gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(2), 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schmidt, S. (2009). Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13, 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Singh, N., & Krishnan, V. R. (2008). Self-sacrifice and transformational leadership: Mediating role of altruism. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 29(3), 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a Casual Chain: Why Experiments are Often More Effective than Mediational Analyses in Examining Psychological Processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Turnipseed, D. L. (2008). Are good soldiers good? Exploring the link between organization citizenship behaviour and personal ethics. Journal of Business Research, 55, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. van Knippenberg, B., & van Knippenberg, D. (2005). Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Walumbwa, F. O., Mayer, D. M., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K., & Christensen, A. L. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 204–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wayne, S. J., & Green, S. A. (1993). The effects of leader–member exchange on employee citizenship and impression management behaviour. Human Relations, 46(12), 1431–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Williams, L. J., Vandenberg, R. J., & Edwards, J. R. (2009). 12 structural equation modeling in management research: A guide for improved analysis. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 543–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yukl, G. A. (1989). Leadership in organizations. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  69. Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmed Mohammed Sayed Mostafa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Paul A. Bottomley
    • 2
  1. 1.Warwick Business SchoolUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
  2. 2.Cardiff Business SchoolCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations