Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 160, Issue 3, pp 641–656 | Cite as

How Could You be so Gullible? Scams and Over-Trust in Organizations

  • Hervé LarocheEmail author
  • Véronique Steyer
  • Christelle Théron
Original Paper

Abstract

Trust is a key ingredient of business activities. Scams are spectacular betrayals of trust. When the victim is a powerful organization that does not look vulnerable at first sight, we can suspect that this organization has developed an excessive trust, or over-trust. In this article, we take over-trust as the result of the intentional production of gullibility by the scammer. The analysis of a historically famous scam case, the Elf “Great Sniffer Hoax,” suggests that the victim is made gullible by the scammer through a range of seduction and protection maneuvers that prevent the victim from developing doubts and suspicions. An integrated framework of the production of gullibility in organizations is proposed in order to further our understanding of over-trust. We discuss how these insights might be extended, beyond the case of scams, to more ordinary contexts of business activities.

Keywords

Case study Gullibility Scams Secrecy Trust 

Notes

Funding

No funding was used for this research.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

No informed consent was needed for this research.

References

  1. Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2015). Phishing for phools: The economics of manipulation and deception. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Audi, R. (2008). Some dimensions of trust in business practices: From financial and product representation to licensure and voting. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barton, M. A., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2009). Overcoming dysfunctional momentum: Organizational safety as a social achievement. Human Relations, 62(9), 1327–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beech, N., & Sims, D. (2007). Narrative methods for identity research. In A. Pullen, N. Beech & D. Sims (Eds.), Exploring identity—concepts and methods (pp. 288–301). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, G. G., Oppenheimer, R. J., & Bastien, A. (2002). Trust deterioration in an international buyer-supplier relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(1), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett, J. R. (1983). Corporate sponsored image films. Journal of Business Ethics, 2(1), 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bews, N. F., & Rossouw, G. J. (2002). A role for business ethics in facilitating trustworthiness. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(4), 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blumenfeld, W. S., & Leveto, G. A. (1975). Gullibility’s travels. Academy of Management Journal, 18(2), 370–374.Google Scholar
  9. Brien, A. (1998). Professional ethics and the culture of trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(4), 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burgard, A., & Schlembach, C. (2013). Frames of fraud: A qualitative analysis of the structure and process of victimization on the Internet. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 7(2), 112–124.Google Scholar
  11. Carmona, S., Donoso, R., & Reckers, P. M. (2013). Timing in accountability and trust relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 481–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Castaldo, S., Premazzi, K., & Zerbini, F. (2010). The meaning(s) of trust. A content analysis on the diverse conceptualizations of trust in scholarly research on business relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(4), 657–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, C., & Pinch, T. (1992). The anatomy of a deception: Fraud and finesse in the Mock Auction sales ‘con’. Qualitative Sociology, 15(2), 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, M. A., & Dienhart, J. (2013). Moral and amoral conceptions of trust, with an application in organizational ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Costas, J., & Grey, C. (2014). Bringing secrecy into the open: Towards a theorization of the social processes of organizational secrecy. Organization Studies, 35(10), 1423–1447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Costas, J., & Grey, C. (2016). Secrecy at work. The hidden architecture of organizational life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cowton, C. J. (1998). The use of secondary data in business ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(4), 423–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deighton, J., & Grayson, K. (1995). Marketing and seduction: Building exchange relationships by managing social consensus. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(4), 660–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(4), 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., O’Neill, R. M., & Lawrence, K. A. (2001). Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 716–736.Google Scholar
  21. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elangovan, A. R., & Shapiro, D. L. (1998). Betrayal of trust in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 547–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eriksson, P., & Kovalainen, A. (2008). Qualitative methods in business research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Friedman, M. (1992). Confidence swindles of older consumers. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 26(1), 20–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fryxell, G. E., Dooley, R. S., & Vryza, M. (2002). After the ink dries: The interaction of trust and control in US-based international joint ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 39(6), 865–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fulmer, C. A., & Gelfand, M. J. (2012). At what level (and in whom) we trust: Trust across multiple organizational levels. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1167–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gargiulo, M., & Ertug, G. (2006). The dark side of trust. In R. Bachmann & A. Zaheer (Eds.), Handbook of trust research (pp. 165–186). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  28. Gibson, D. R. (2014). Enduring illusions. The social organization of secrecy and deception. Sociological Theory, 32(4), 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goel, S., Bell, G. G., & Pierce, J. L. (2005). The perils of Pollyanna: Development of the over-trust construct. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(1–3), 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goel, S., & Karri, R. (2006). Entrepreneurs, effectual logic, and over-trust. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(4), 477–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  32. Greenspan, S. (2008). Annals of gullibility. Why we get duped and how to avoid it. Connecticut: Praeger.Google Scholar
  33. Greenspan, S. (2009). Why we continue to fall for these financial scams. The Wall Street Journal reprinted in the Australian Wealth, February 11, 9–12.Google Scholar
  34. Greenwood, M., & Van Buren, H. J. (2010). Trust and stakeholder theory: Trustworthiness in the organization-stakeholder relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 425–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Howard-Grenville, J. A. (2007). Developing issue-selling effectiveness over time: Issue selling as resourcing. Organization Science, 18(4), 560–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Inderst, R., & Ottaviani, M. (2013). Sales talk, cancellation terms and the role of consumer protection. Review of Economic Studies, 80(3), 1002–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ingenhoff, D., & Sommer, K. (2010). Trust in companies and in CEOs: A comparative study of the main influence. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Vaidyanath, D. (2002). Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 28(3), 413–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Irlenbusch, B., & Ter Meer, J. (2013). Fooling the nice guys: Explaining receiver credulity in a public good game with lying and punishment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 93, 321–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jaswal, V. K. (2010). Believing what you’re told: Young children’s trust in unexpected testimony about the physical world. Cognitive Psychology, 61(3), 248–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jones, W., & Burdette, M. P. (1994). Betrayal in relationships. In A. Weber & J. Harvey (Eds.), Perspectives on close relationships (pp. 243–262). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  43. Kimmel, A. J., & Audrain-Pontevia, A. F. (2010). Analysis of commercial rumors from the perspective of marketing managers: Rumor prevalence, effects, and control tactics. Journal of Marketing Communications, 16(4), 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 569–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kujala, J., Lehtimäki, H., & Pučėtaitė, R. (2016). Trust and distrust constructing unity and fragmentation of organisational culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(4), 701–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Langenderfer, J., & Shimp, T. A. (2001). Consumer vulnerability to scams, swindles, and fraud: A new theory of visceral influences on persuasion. Psychology & Marketing, 18(7), 763–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Langfred, C. W. (2004). Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 385–399.Google Scholar
  48. Lascoumes, P. (1999). Au nom du progrès et de la nation: les «avions renifleurs». La science entre l’escroquerie et le secret d’Etat. Politix, 12(48), 129–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lascoumes, P. (1997). Élites irrégulières: essai sur la délinquance d’affaires. Paris, Gallimard, (chapitres 2 et 4).Google Scholar
  50. Lee, J., & Soberon-Ferrer, H. (1997). Consumer vulnerability to fraud: Influencing factors. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 31(1), 70–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Leff, A. A. (1976). Swindling and selling. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  52. Lehtimäki, H., & Karintaus, K. (2013a). The social embeddedness of strategy implementation. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 2(2), 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lehtimäki, H., & Karintaus, K. (2013b). Building organizational advantage: Social capital in multinational enterprises. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 23(4/5), 314–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lewis, M. K. (2012). New dogs, old tricks. Why do Ponzi schemes succeed? Accounting Forum, 36(4), 294–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Maguire, S., & Phillips, N. (2008). ‘Citibankers’ at Citigroup: A study of the loss of institutional trust after a merger. Journal of Management Studies, 45(2), 372–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Maitlis, S., & Lawrence, T. B. (2007). Triggers and enablers of sensegiving in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mayer, R. N., Scammon, D. L., & Zick, C. D. (1993). Poisoning the well: Do environmental claims strain consumer credulity? Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 698–703.Google Scholar
  59. McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59.Google Scholar
  60. Michalos, A. C. (2003). The impact of trust on business, international security and the quality of life. In Essays on the quality of life. Social indicators research series (Vol. 19). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Molina-Morales, F. X., Martínez-Fernández, M. T., & Torlò, V. J. (2011). The dark side of trust: The benefits, costs and optimal levels of trust for innovation performance. Long Range Planning, 44(2), 118–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Möllering, G. (2006). Trust: Reason, routine, reflexivity. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  63. Möllering, G. (2013). Process views of trusting and crises. In R. Bachmann and A. Zaheer (Eds.), Handbook of advances in trust research (pp. 285–305). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  64. Nooteboom, B. (2002). Trust: Forms, foundations, functions, failures and figures. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Olekalns, M., Kulik, C. T., & Chew, L. (2014). Sweet little lies: Social context and the use of deception in negotiation. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(1), 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Patzelt, H., & Shepherd, D. A. (2008). The decision to persist with underperforming alliances: The role of trust and control. Journal of Management Studies, 45(7), 1217–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Péan, P. (1984). V… Enquête sur l’affaire des «avions renifleurs». Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  69. Pentland, B. T. (1999). Building process theory with narrative: From description to explanation. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 711–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pinsker, D. M., McFarland, K., & Pachana, N. A. (2010). Exploitation in older adults: Social vulnerability and personal competence factors. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 29(6), 740–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Reuter, Y. (1997). L’analyse du récit. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
  72. Rosanas, J. M., & Velilla, M. (2003). Loyalty and trust as the ethical bases of organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(1), 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rossiter, J. R. (1979). Does TV advertising affect children? Journal of Advertising Research, 19(1), 49–53.Google Scholar
  74. Rotter, J. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rouleau, L. (2005). Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: How middle managers interpret and sell change every day. Journal of Management Studies, 42(7), 1413–1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rouleau, L., & Balogun, J. (2011). Middle managers, strategic sensemaking, and discursive competence. Journal of Management Studies, 48(5), 953–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schaper, M. T., & Weber, P. (2012). Understanding small business scams. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 20(3), 333–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shapiro, S. P. (1987). The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology, 93(3), 623–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data (3rd edn.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  82. Skinner, D., Dietz, G., & Weibel, A. (2014). The dark side of trust: When trust becomes a ‘poisoned chalice’. Organization, 21(2), 206–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Small, B., & Mallon, M. (2007). Science, society, ethics, and trust: Scientists’ reflections on the commercialization and democratization of science. International Studies of Management and Organization, 37(1), 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sonenshein, S. (2006). Crafting social issues at work. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1158–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stagner, R. (1958). The gullibility of personnel managers. Personnel Psychology, 11(3), 347–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Stahl, G. K., & Sitkin, S. B. (2005). Trust in mergers and acquisitions. In M. E. Mendenhall (Ed.), Mergers and acquisitions: Managing culture and human resources (pp. 82–102). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Stolowy, H., Messner, M., Jeanjean, T., & Baker, C. R. (2014). The construction of a trustworthy investment opportunity: Insights from the Madoff Fraud. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(2), 354–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Swift, T. (2001). Trust, reputation and corporate accountability to stakeholders. Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(1), 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Teoh, S. H., & Wong, T. J. (2002). Why new issues and high-accrual firms underperform: The role of analysts’ credulity. The Review of Financial Studies, 15(3), 869–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Thorgren, S., & Wincent, J. (2011). Interorganizational trust: Origins, dysfunctions and regulation of rigidities. British Journal of Management, 22(1), 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Volery, T., & Mansik, S. (1998). The role of trust in creating effective alliances: A managerial perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(9), 987–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Weick, K. E. (1988). Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations. Journal of management studies, 25(4), 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Weick, K. E. (2007). The generative properties of richness. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Zahra, S. A., Yavuz, R. I., & Ucbasaran, D. (2006). How much do you trust me? The dark side of relational trust in new business creation in established companies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(4), 541–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zhong, W., Su, C., Peng, J., & Yang, Z. (2017). Trust in interorganizational relationships: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Management, 43(4), 1050–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hervé Laroche
    • 1
    Email author
  • Véronique Steyer
    • 2
  • Christelle Théron
    • 3
  1. 1.ESCP EuropeParis Cedex 11France
  2. 2.i3 - CRG, Ecole Polytechnique, CNRSPalaiseauFrance
  3. 3.TSM-Research, Université Toulouse Capitole, CNRSToulouse Cedex 9France

Personalised recommendations