How Could You be so Gullible? Scams and Over-Trust in Organizations
Trust is a key ingredient of business activities. Scams are spectacular betrayals of trust. When the victim is a powerful organization that does not look vulnerable at first sight, we can suspect that this organization has developed an excessive trust, or over-trust. In this article, we take over-trust as the result of the intentional production of gullibility by the scammer. The analysis of a historically famous scam case, the Elf “Great Sniffer Hoax,” suggests that the victim is made gullible by the scammer through a range of seduction and protection maneuvers that prevent the victim from developing doubts and suspicions. An integrated framework of the production of gullibility in organizations is proposed in order to further our understanding of over-trust. We discuss how these insights might be extended, beyond the case of scams, to more ordinary contexts of business activities.
KeywordsCase study Gullibility Scams Secrecy Trust
No funding was used for this research.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
No informed consent was needed for this research.
- Beech, N., & Sims, D. (2007). Narrative methods for identity research. In A. Pullen, N. Beech & D. Sims (Eds.), Exploring identity—concepts and methods (pp. 288–301). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
- Blumenfeld, W. S., & Leveto, G. A. (1975). Gullibility’s travels. Academy of Management Journal, 18(2), 370–374.Google Scholar
- Burgard, A., & Schlembach, C. (2013). Frames of fraud: A qualitative analysis of the structure and process of victimization on the Internet. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 7(2), 112–124.Google Scholar
- Costas, J., & Grey, C. (2016). Secrecy at work. The hidden architecture of organizational life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., O’Neill, R. M., & Lawrence, K. A. (2001). Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 716–736.Google Scholar
- Gargiulo, M., & Ertug, G. (2006). The dark side of trust. In R. Bachmann & A. Zaheer (Eds.), Handbook of trust research (pp. 165–186). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- Greenspan, S. (2008). Annals of gullibility. Why we get duped and how to avoid it. Connecticut: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Greenspan, S. (2009). Why we continue to fall for these financial scams. The Wall Street Journal reprinted in the Australian Wealth, February 11, 9–12.Google Scholar
- Jones, W., & Burdette, M. P. (1994). Betrayal in relationships. In A. Weber & J. Harvey (Eds.), Perspectives on close relationships (pp. 243–262). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Langfred, C. W. (2004). Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 385–399.Google Scholar
- Lascoumes, P. (1997). Élites irrégulières: essai sur la délinquance d’affaires. Paris, Gallimard, (chapitres 2 et 4).Google Scholar
- Leff, A. A. (1976). Swindling and selling. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Mayer, R. N., Scammon, D. L., & Zick, C. D. (1993). Poisoning the well: Do environmental claims strain consumer credulity? Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 698–703.Google Scholar
- McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59.Google Scholar
- Möllering, G. (2006). Trust: Reason, routine, reflexivity. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Möllering, G. (2013). Process views of trusting and crises. In R. Bachmann and A. Zaheer (Eds.), Handbook of advances in trust research (pp. 285–305). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Péan, P. (1984). V… Enquête sur l’affaire des «avions renifleurs». Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
- Reuter, Y. (1997). L’analyse du récit. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
- Rossiter, J. R. (1979). Does TV advertising affect children? Journal of Advertising Research, 19(1), 49–53.Google Scholar
- Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data (3rd edn.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Stahl, G. K., & Sitkin, S. B. (2005). Trust in mergers and acquisitions. In M. E. Mendenhall (Ed.), Mergers and acquisitions: Managing culture and human resources (pp. 82–102). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar