Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 154, Issue 4, pp 955–966 | Cite as

Corporate Essence and Identity in Criminal Law

  • Mihailis E. DiamantisEmail author
Original Paper
  • 108 Downloads

Abstract

How can we know whether we are punishing the same corporation that committed some past crime? Though central to corporate criminal justice, legal theorists and philosophers have yet to address the basic question of how corporate identity persists through time. Simple cases, where crime and punishment are close in time and the corporation has changed little, can mislead us into thinking an answer is always easy to come by. The issue becomes more complicated when corporate criminals undergo any number of transformations—rebranding, spinning-off a division, merging, changing ownership, changing management, swapping lines of business, etc. These changes are common among all corporations, including those trying to conceal or limit liability for past crimes. This article takes a first step toward developing a workable and philosophically satisfying theory of corporate personal identity and discusses its prospects for fulfilling the retributive, rehabilitative, and deterrent purposes of criminal law.

Keywords

Personal identity Corporate crime Successor liability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to my industrious research assistants, Gabriel Fox and Curtis Underwood, and to Kiel Brennan-Marquez, John Rudisill, and Steven Weimer for valuable comments.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Mihailis E. Diamantis declares he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alexander, C., & Cohen, M. (2011). The Causes of Corporate Crime: An Economic Perspective. In A. Barkow & R. Barkow (Eds.), Prosecutors in the Boardroom: Using Criminal Law to Regualte Corporate Conduct 11. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alschuler, A. (1991). Ancient law and the punishment of corporations: Of Frankdpledge and Deodand. Boston University Law Review, 71, 307.Google Scholar
  3. Alschuler, A. (2009). Two ways to think about the punishment of corporations. American Criminal Review, 26, 1359.Google Scholar
  4. Baer, M. (2009). Governing corporate compliance. Boston College Law Review, 50, 949.Google Scholar
  5. Baer, M. (2012). Choosing punishment. Boston University Law Review, 92, 577–641.Google Scholar
  6. Balmer, J. (1998). Corporate identity and the advent of corporate marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 14, 963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Birmingham, R. (1998). From Odysseus to Capgras: Seven episodes of personal identity in law. Syracuse Law Review, 49, 99.Google Scholar
  8. Blackstone, W. (1769). Commentaries on the Laws of England (p. 352). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Blok, S., et al. (2001). Inferences about personal identity. In J. D. Moore & K. Tenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahawa: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/proceedings/2001/cogsci01.pdf.
  10. Braude, S. (1996). Multiple personality and moral responsibility. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Pscychology, 3, 37.Google Scholar
  11. Bucy, P. (1991). Corporate Ethos: A standard for imposing corporate criminal liability. Minnesota Law Review, 75, 1095.Google Scholar
  12. Buell, S. (2011). Potentially perverse effects of corporate civil liability. In A. Barkow & R. Barkow (Eds.), Prosecutors in the Boardroom: Using Criminal Law to Regualte Corporate Conduct 87. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Butler, J. (1763). The analogy of religion, natural and revealed, to the constitution and course of nature. London: John James & Paul Knapton.Google Scholar
  14. Cahill, M. (2011). Punishment pluralism. In M. White (Ed.), Retributivism: Essays on theory and policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Carter, W. (1989). How to change your mind. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 19, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory (p. 427). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Corneliessen, J., et al. (2007). Social Identity, organizational identity and corporate identity: Towards an integrated understanding of processes, patternings and products. British Journal of Management, 18, S1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Freitas, J., et al. (2016). Normative judgments and individual essence, Cognitive Science, 2016, 1–21.Google Scholar
  19. Dewey, J. (1926). The historic background of corporate legal personality. The Yale Law Journal, 35, 655–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diamantis, M. (2016). Corporate criminal minds. Notre Dame Law Review, 91, 2049–2090.Google Scholar
  21. Diamantis, M. (2018). Clockwork corporations: A character theory of corporate punishment. Iowa Law Review, 102, 507–569.Google Scholar
  22. Ermann, M., & Lundman, R. (1996). Corporate and governmental deviance: Origins, patterns, and reactions. In M. Erman & R. Lundman (Eds.), Corporate and governmental deviance: Problems of organizational behavior in contemporary society (p. 115). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Fisse, B. (1991). The attribution of criminal liability to corporations: A statutory model. Sydney Law Review, 13, 277.Google Scholar
  24. Fisse, B., & Braithwaite, J. (1988). The allocation of responsibility for corporate crime: Individualism, collectivism and accountability. Sydney Law Review, 11, 468.Google Scholar
  25. Foerschler, A. (1990). Corporate criminal intent: Toward a better understanding of corporate misconduct. California Law Review, 78, 1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. French, P. (2016). Complicity: That moral monster, troubling matters. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 10, 575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gallois, A. (2016). Identity over time. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-time/.
  28. Hacking, I. (1995). Rewriting the soul: Multiple personality and the sciences of memory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hall, G., et al. (2003). Preschoolers’ use of form class cues to learn descriptive proper names. Child Development, 71, 1547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harlow, J. (1868). Recovery from the passage of an iron bar through the head. History of Psychology, 4, 274–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heenan, J. (2004). Graceful maneuvering: Corporate avoidance of liability through bankruptcy and corporate law. Montana Law Review, 65, 100–133.Google Scholar
  32. Huigens, K. (2002). Street crime, corporate crime, and theories of punishment: A response to brown. Wake Forest Law Review, 37, 1.Google Scholar
  33. Killoren, D. (2010). Moral intuitions, reliability and disagreement. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 4, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kiriakidou, O., & Millward, L. (2000). Corporate identity: External reality or internal fit. Corporate Communications, 5, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lafave, E., & Scott, A. (1986) Criminal law. St. Paul: West Group.Google Scholar
  36. Laufer, W. (1994). Corporate bodies and guilty minds. Emory Law Journal, 43, 647–730.Google Scholar
  37. Laufer, W. (1999). Corporate liability, risk shifting, and the paradox of compliance. Vanderbilt Law Review, 52, 1343.Google Scholar
  38. Laufer, W. (2017). The missing progressive account of corporate criminal law. New York University Journal of Law and Business, 14, 71.Google Scholar
  39. Laufer, W., & Robertson, D. (1997). Corporate ethics initiatives as social control. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lederman, M. (2000). Models for corporate liability. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 4, 641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lewis, D. (1971). Counterparts of persons and their bodies. Journal of Philosophy, 68, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lewis, D. (1976). Survival and identity. In A. Rorty (Ed.), The identities of Person. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lewis, D. (1986). On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  44. List, C., & Pettit, P. (2013). Group agency: The possibility, design, and status of corporate agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Locke, J. (1694). Of identity and diversity. In J. Locke (Ed.), An essay concerning human understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  46. Matthews, G. (1990). Aristotelian essentialism. Philosophical and Phenomenological Review, 50, 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Melewar, T., & Karaosmanoglu, E. (2006). Seven dimensions of corporate identity: A categorization from the practitioner’s perspectives. European Journal of Marketing, 40, 846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moore, J. (1992). Corporate culpability under the federal sentencing guidelines. Arizona Law Review, 34, 743–797.Google Scholar
  49. Moore, M. (1987). The moral worth of retribution. In F. Schoeman (Ed.), Responsibility, character, and the emotions: New essays in moral psychology (p. 179).Google Scholar
  50. Nagel, T. (1979). Brain bisection and the unity of consciousness. In T. Nagel (Ed.), Mortal questions (p. 147). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  51. Needleman, M., & Needleman, C. (1979). Organizational crime: Two models of criminogenesis. Sociological Quarterly, 20, 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Newman, G., et al. (2014). Value judgments and the true self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Newman, G., et al. (2015). Beliefs about the true self explain asymmetries based on moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 39, 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Noonan, H. (2003). Personal identity (pp. 139–142). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. O’Sullivan, J. (2016). Federal white collar crime. St. Paul: West Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  56. Olson, E. (1997). The human animal: Personal identity without psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Parfit, D. (1971). Personal identity. Philosophical Review, 80, 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Perez, A., & del Bosque, I. (2012). The role of CSR in the corporate identity of banking service providers. Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pettit, P. (2007). Responsibility incorporated. Ethics, 117, 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Plutarch. Life of Theseus. (1st Century A.D.).Google Scholar
  61. Radden, J. (1996). Divided minds and successive selves: Ethical issues in disorders of identity and personality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  62. Rawls, J. (1971) A theory of justice. Cambridge :Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Reckard, E. (2013). Wells Fargo’s pressure-cooker sales culture comes at a cost. Los Angeles Times. http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-wells-fargo-sale-pressure-20131222-story.html.
  64. Reid, T. (1785). Of memory. In Essays on the intellectual powers of man. Edinburgh: G.G.J. & J. Robinson.Google Scholar
  65. Rips, L., et al. (2006). Tracing the identity of objects. Psychology Review, 113, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rips, L., & Hespos, S. (2015). Divisions of the physical world: Concepts of Objects and Substances. Psychology Bulletin, 141, 786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Robinson, P. (2013). Intuitions of justice and the utility of desert. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Robinson, P., et al. (2017). Criminal law: Case studies and controversies (pp. 91–92). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
  69. Rostain, T. (2008). General counsel in the age of compliance: Preliminary findings and new research questions. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 52, 465.Google Scholar
  70. Rovane, C. (1998). The bounds of agency: An essay in revisionary metaphysics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Shaw, W. (1980). Intuition and moral philosophy. American Philosophical Quarterly, 18, 127–134.Google Scholar
  72. Simoes, C., et al. (2005). Managing corporate identity: An internal perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Solomon, S. (2013). In Spinoffs, a Chance to Jettison Liabilities. N.Y. Times. Retrieved from https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/03/12/in-spinoffs-a-chance-to-jettison-undesirable-liabilities/?_r=0.
  74. Stout, L. (2002). Bad and not-so-bad arguments for shareholder primacy lecture and commentary on the social responsibility of corporate entities. California Law Review, 75, 1189.Google Scholar
  75. Strohminger, N., & Nichols, S. (2014). The essential moral self. Cognition, 131, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Theunissen, P. (2014). Co-creating corporate identity through dialogue: A pilot study. Public Relations Review, 40, 621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. U.S. Department of Justice. (2008). United States attorneys’ manual. https://www.justice.gov/usam/usam-9-28000-principles-federal-prosecution-business-organizations.
  78. van Reiel, C., & Balmer, J. (1997). Corporate Identity: The Concept, Its Measurement and Management. European Journal of Marketing, 31, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. von Hirsch, A. (1993). Censure and sanctions (pp. 6–19). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Wilkes, K. (1981). Multiplicity and personal identity. British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 32, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wringe, B. (2016). An expressive theory of punishment (p. 7). London: Palgrage Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Law, Department of PhilosophyUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations