Corporate Essence and Identity in Criminal Law
- 108 Downloads
How can we know whether we are punishing the same corporation that committed some past crime? Though central to corporate criminal justice, legal theorists and philosophers have yet to address the basic question of how corporate identity persists through time. Simple cases, where crime and punishment are close in time and the corporation has changed little, can mislead us into thinking an answer is always easy to come by. The issue becomes more complicated when corporate criminals undergo any number of transformations—rebranding, spinning-off a division, merging, changing ownership, changing management, swapping lines of business, etc. These changes are common among all corporations, including those trying to conceal or limit liability for past crimes. This article takes a first step toward developing a workable and philosophically satisfying theory of corporate personal identity and discusses its prospects for fulfilling the retributive, rehabilitative, and deterrent purposes of criminal law.
KeywordsPersonal identity Corporate crime Successor liability
Many thanks to my industrious research assistants, Gabriel Fox and Curtis Underwood, and to Kiel Brennan-Marquez, John Rudisill, and Steven Weimer for valuable comments.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Mihailis E. Diamantis declares he has no conflict of interest.
- Alexander, C., & Cohen, M. (2011). The Causes of Corporate Crime: An Economic Perspective. In A. Barkow & R. Barkow (Eds.), Prosecutors in the Boardroom: Using Criminal Law to Regualte Corporate Conduct 11. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Alschuler, A. (1991). Ancient law and the punishment of corporations: Of Frankdpledge and Deodand. Boston University Law Review, 71, 307.Google Scholar
- Alschuler, A. (2009). Two ways to think about the punishment of corporations. American Criminal Review, 26, 1359.Google Scholar
- Baer, M. (2009). Governing corporate compliance. Boston College Law Review, 50, 949.Google Scholar
- Baer, M. (2012). Choosing punishment. Boston University Law Review, 92, 577–641.Google Scholar
- Birmingham, R. (1998). From Odysseus to Capgras: Seven episodes of personal identity in law. Syracuse Law Review, 49, 99.Google Scholar
- Blackstone, W. (1769). Commentaries on the Laws of England (p. 352). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Blok, S., et al. (2001). Inferences about personal identity. In J. D. Moore & K. Tenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahawa: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/proceedings/2001/cogsci01.pdf.
- Braude, S. (1996). Multiple personality and moral responsibility. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Pscychology, 3, 37.Google Scholar
- Bucy, P. (1991). Corporate Ethos: A standard for imposing corporate criminal liability. Minnesota Law Review, 75, 1095.Google Scholar
- Buell, S. (2011). Potentially perverse effects of corporate civil liability. In A. Barkow & R. Barkow (Eds.), Prosecutors in the Boardroom: Using Criminal Law to Regualte Corporate Conduct 87. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Butler, J. (1763). The analogy of religion, natural and revealed, to the constitution and course of nature. London: John James & Paul Knapton.Google Scholar
- Cahill, M. (2011). Punishment pluralism. In M. White (Ed.), Retributivism: Essays on theory and policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory (p. 427). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- De Freitas, J., et al. (2016). Normative judgments and individual essence, Cognitive Science, 2016, 1–21.Google Scholar
- Diamantis, M. (2016). Corporate criminal minds. Notre Dame Law Review, 91, 2049–2090.Google Scholar
- Diamantis, M. (2018). Clockwork corporations: A character theory of corporate punishment. Iowa Law Review, 102, 507–569.Google Scholar
- Ermann, M., & Lundman, R. (1996). Corporate and governmental deviance: Origins, patterns, and reactions. In M. Erman & R. Lundman (Eds.), Corporate and governmental deviance: Problems of organizational behavior in contemporary society (p. 115). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Fisse, B. (1991). The attribution of criminal liability to corporations: A statutory model. Sydney Law Review, 13, 277.Google Scholar
- Fisse, B., & Braithwaite, J. (1988). The allocation of responsibility for corporate crime: Individualism, collectivism and accountability. Sydney Law Review, 11, 468.Google Scholar
- Gallois, A. (2016). Identity over time. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-time/.
- Hacking, I. (1995). Rewriting the soul: Multiple personality and the sciences of memory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Heenan, J. (2004). Graceful maneuvering: Corporate avoidance of liability through bankruptcy and corporate law. Montana Law Review, 65, 100–133.Google Scholar
- Huigens, K. (2002). Street crime, corporate crime, and theories of punishment: A response to brown. Wake Forest Law Review, 37, 1.Google Scholar
- Lafave, E., & Scott, A. (1986) Criminal law. St. Paul: West Group.Google Scholar
- Laufer, W. (1994). Corporate bodies and guilty minds. Emory Law Journal, 43, 647–730.Google Scholar
- Laufer, W. (1999). Corporate liability, risk shifting, and the paradox of compliance. Vanderbilt Law Review, 52, 1343.Google Scholar
- Laufer, W. (2017). The missing progressive account of corporate criminal law. New York University Journal of Law and Business, 14, 71.Google Scholar
- Lewis, D. (1976). Survival and identity. In A. Rorty (Ed.), The identities of Person. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Lewis, D. (1986). On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
- List, C., & Pettit, P. (2013). Group agency: The possibility, design, and status of corporate agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Locke, J. (1694). Of identity and diversity. In J. Locke (Ed.), An essay concerning human understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Moore, J. (1992). Corporate culpability under the federal sentencing guidelines. Arizona Law Review, 34, 743–797.Google Scholar
- Moore, M. (1987). The moral worth of retribution. In F. Schoeman (Ed.), Responsibility, character, and the emotions: New essays in moral psychology (p. 179).Google Scholar
- Nagel, T. (1979). Brain bisection and the unity of consciousness. In T. Nagel (Ed.), Mortal questions (p. 147). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Noonan, H. (2003). Personal identity (pp. 139–142). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- O’Sullivan, J. (2016). Federal white collar crime. St. Paul: West Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
- Olson, E. (1997). The human animal: Personal identity without psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Plutarch. Life of Theseus. (1st Century A.D.).Google Scholar
- Radden, J. (1996). Divided minds and successive selves: Ethical issues in disorders of identity and personality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Rawls, J. (1971) A theory of justice. Cambridge :Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Reckard, E. (2013). Wells Fargo’s pressure-cooker sales culture comes at a cost. Los Angeles Times. http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-wells-fargo-sale-pressure-20131222-story.html.
- Reid, T. (1785). Of memory. In Essays on the intellectual powers of man. Edinburgh: G.G.J. & J. Robinson.Google Scholar
- Robinson, P., et al. (2017). Criminal law: Case studies and controversies (pp. 91–92). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Rostain, T. (2008). General counsel in the age of compliance: Preliminary findings and new research questions. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 52, 465.Google Scholar
- Rovane, C. (1998). The bounds of agency: An essay in revisionary metaphysics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Shaw, W. (1980). Intuition and moral philosophy. American Philosophical Quarterly, 18, 127–134.Google Scholar
- Solomon, S. (2013). In Spinoffs, a Chance to Jettison Liabilities. N.Y. Times. Retrieved from https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/03/12/in-spinoffs-a-chance-to-jettison-undesirable-liabilities/?_r=0.
- Stout, L. (2002). Bad and not-so-bad arguments for shareholder primacy lecture and commentary on the social responsibility of corporate entities. California Law Review, 75, 1189.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Justice. (2008). United States attorneys’ manual. https://www.justice.gov/usam/usam-9-28000-principles-federal-prosecution-business-organizations.
- von Hirsch, A. (1993). Censure and sanctions (pp. 6–19). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar