“If Only My Coworker Was More Ethical”: When Ethical and Performance Comparisons Lead to Negative Emotions, Social Undermining, and Ostracism
Drawing on social comparison theory, we investigate employees’ ethical and performance comparisons relative to a similar coworker and subsequent emotional and behavioral responses. We test our theoretically driven hypotheses across two studies. Study 1, a cross-sectional field study (N = 310 employee–coworker dyads), reveals that employees who perceive they are more ethical than their coworkers (i.e., more ethical comparison) experience negative emotions toward the comparison coworkers and those feelings are even stronger when the employees perceive they are lower performers than their coworkers (i.e., lower-performance comparison). Results also reveal that negative emotions mediate the indirect relationship between being more ethical than a coworker, but also being a lower performer than that coworker onto (a) social undermining and (b) ostracism. Study 2, a 2 × 2 between-subjects experimental design (N = 121), provides further support for our moderated mediation model. Results reveal that participants experience negative emotions when they receive information that they are more ethical than a comparison participant. Negative emotions are amplified if the participant is told they were a lower performer than the comparison participant. Those participants indicate their desire to mistreat and ignore the comparison participant if given the opportunity. Thus, we find support for our hypotheses using a multi-method design.
KeywordsBehavioral ethics Social comparison theory Social undermining Ostracism
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All of the study’s authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
There is no external funding to report.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the studies.
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Biernat, M., & Billings, L. S. (2001). Standards, expectancies, and social comparison. In A. Tesser & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of intraindividual processes (pp. 257–283). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
- Brenner, S. N., & Molander, E. A. (1977). Is the ethics of business changing? Harvard Business Review, 55(1), 57–71.Google Scholar
- Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 504–553). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Folger, R. (1998). Fairness as a moral virtue. In Schminke, M. (Ed.) Managerial ethics: Moral management of people and processes (pp. 13–34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Folger, R. (2001). Fairness as deonance. In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. P. Skarlicki (Eds.), Research in social issues in management (pp. 3–33). New York: Information Age.Google Scholar
- Folger, R. G., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Folger, R. G., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. Advances in Organizational Justice, 1, 1–55.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2018). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Kant, I. (1785/1948). Groundwork of metaphysics and morals, translated by H. Paton as Moral Law. London, UK: Hutchingson.Google Scholar
- Kant, I. (1797/1991). The metaphysics of morals (M. Gregor, Trans). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Mettee, D. R., & Smith, G. (1977). Social comparison and interpersonal attraction: The case for dissimilarity. In J. M. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 115–142). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
- Peeters, G. (1983). Relational and informational patterns in social cognition. Current Issues in European Social Psychology, 1, 201–237.Google Scholar
- Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Statistical conclusion validity and internal validity. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference (pp. 33–63). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Tesser, A. (1986). Some effects of self-evaluation maintenance on cognition and action. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 435–464). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1–32). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Treviño, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2011). Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Wojciszke, B., & Dowhyluk, M. (2003). Emotional responses toward own and others’ behavioral acts related to competence and morality. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 34(3), 143–151.Google Scholar
- Wojciszke, B., & Szymków, A. (2003). Emotions related to others’ competence and morality. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 34(3), 135–142.Google Scholar
- Wolfe, D. M. (1988). Is there integrity in the bottom line: Managing obstacles to executive integrity. In S. Srivastva (Ed.), Executive integrity: The search for high human values in organizational life (pp. 140–171). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar