Advertisement

Fighting Against Corruption: Does Anti-corruption Training Make Any Difference?

  • Christian Hauser
Original Paper
  • 319 Downloads

Abstract

Corruption continues to represent a tenacious challenge to internationally active companies. According to prevailing international anti-corruption standards, a company can be held criminally liable if it does not put all necessary and reasonable organizational measures in place to prevent corruption. The regular training of employees is considered one of the most effective ways to prevent corruption. Employee training is considered helpful in efforts to minimize the risk of employees becoming involved in corrupt behavior. With this idea in mind and building on the fraud triangle model and neutralization theory, this paper examines whether business professionals who have undergone anti-corruption training are more likely to reject prevailing justifications of corrupt practices than are those who have not undergone such training. The empirical analysis in this paper is based on regression models using data obtained from a unique dataset that includes 200 business professionals. The findings provide evidence that training is positively linked to the likelihood of rejecting justifications of corruption. However, the research also suggests that methods of training must become more specific in order to tackle challenging questions regarding the gray areas of ethics and compliance.

Keywords

Internationalization Corruption Corruption prevention Business ethics Ethics training 

JEL Classification

D73 L22 M14 M16 M53 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Much of this paper was written while I was a visiting scholar at Boston College’s Carroll School of Management and Bentley University’s Hoffman Center for Business Ethics. I would like to thank both schools for their generous hospitality, as well as Marta Geletkanycz, W. Michael Hoffman, Sandra Waddock, and two anonymous referees for helpful suggestions and comments on earlier versions of the paper. I am grateful to Jens Hogenacker and Martin Messingschlager for their econometric assistance as well as to colleagues at HTW Chur and University of Siegen for their contribution and input into the development of the underlying research project. Funding from the Swiss Commission for Technology and Innovation (CTI) is gratefully acknowledged. The usual disclaimer applies.

Funding

This study was co-funded by Swiss Commission for Technology and Innovation (CTI).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Christian Hauser declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Adam, A. M., & Rachman-Moore, D. (2004). The methods used to implement an ethical code of conduct and employee attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(3), 223–242.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-1774-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C., & Albrecht, C. C. (2008). Current trends in fraud and its detection. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective, 17(1), 2–12.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19393550801934331.Google Scholar
  3. Alvarez, K., Salas, Eduardo, & Garofano, Christina M. (2004). An integrated model of training evaluation and effectiveness. Human Resource Development Review, 3(4), 385–416.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484304270820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anand, V., Ashforth, B. E., & Joshi, M. (2005). Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Academy of Management Executives, 19(4), 9–23.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2004.13837437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Argandoña, A. (1997). The 1996 ICC report on extortion and bribery in international business transactions. Business Ethics: A European Review, 6(3), 134–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Argandoña, A. (2005). Corruption and companies: The use of facilitating payments. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(3), 251–264.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0133-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organisations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25001-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ashforth, B. E., Gioia, D. A., Robinson, S. L., & Trevino, L. K. (2008). Re-viewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 670–684.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.32465714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Azar, O. H. (2003). The implications of tipping for economics and management. International Journal of Social Economics, 30(10), 1084–1094.  https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290310492878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bannenberg, B. (2002). Korruption in Deutschland und ihre strafrechtliche Kontrolle: Eine kriminologisch-strafrechtliche Analyse (Polizei + Forschung, Vol. 18). Neuwied: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
  11. Becker, K., Hauser, C., & Kronthaler, F. (2013). Fostering management education to deter corruption: What do students know about corruption and its legal consequences? Crime, Law and Social Change, 60(2), 227–240.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-013-9448-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bierstaker, J. L., Albrecht, C., Turnbull, C., Zhang, Y., & Skousen, C. J. (2010). The relationship between South Korean chaebols and fraud. Management Research Review, 33(3), 257–268.  https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171011030408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bloodgood, J. M., Turnley, W. H., & Mudrack, P. E. (2010). Ethics instruction and the perceived acceptability of cheating. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(1), 23–37.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0345-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bryane, M. (2005). Anti-corruption training programmes in central and eastern Europe. Strassbourg: Council of Europe Publ.Google Scholar
  15. Coleman, J. W. (2006). The criminal elite: Understanding white-collar crime (6th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Conlin, M., Lynn, M., & O’Donoghue, T. (2003). The norm of restaurant tipping. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52(3), 297–321.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(03)00030-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Copes, H. (2014). Techniques of neutralization. In J. M. Miller (Ed.), The encyclopedia of theoretical criminology (pp. 867–871, Wiley series of encyclopedias in criminology and criminal justice). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Copes, H., & Cardwell, S. M. (2014). Accounts theory. In J. M. Miller (Ed.), The encyclopedia of theoretical criminilogy (pp. 1–4, Wiley series of encyclopedias in criminology and criminal justice). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Cressey, D. R. (1950). The criminal violation of financial trust. American Sociological Review, 15(6), 738–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.Google Scholar
  21. Cromwell, P., & Thurman, Q. (2003). The devil made me do it: Use of neutralizations by shoplifters. Deviant Behavior, 24(6), 535–550.  https://doi.org/10.1080/713840271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kaptein, M. (2008). Spiraling down into corruption: A dynamic analysis of the social identity processes that cause corruption in organizations to grow. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 133–146.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9617-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dorminey, J., Fleming, A. S., Kranacher, M.-J., & Riley, R. A. (2012). The Evolution of fraud theory. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(2), 555–579.  https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-50131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fointiat, V. (1998). Rationalization in act and problematic behaviour justification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(3), 471–474.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199805/06)28:3<471::AID-EJSP876>3.0.CO;2-C.
  25. Fritsche, I. (2005). Predicting deviant behavior by neutralization: Myths and findings. Deviant Behavior, 26(5), 483–510.  https://doi.org/10.1080/016396290968489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fuchs, C., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2009). Using single-item measures for construct measurement in management research: Conceptual issues and application guidelines. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 69(2), 195–210.Google Scholar
  27. Gentile, M. C. (2017). Giving Voice To Values: A global partnership with UNGC PRME to transform management education. The International Journal of Management Education., 15(2B), 121–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gilman, S. C., & Stout, Jeffrey. (2008). Assessment strategies and practices for integrity and anti-corruption measures: A comparative overview. In B. Head, A. J. Brown, & C. Connors (Eds.), Promoting integrity: Evaluating and improving public institutions (Law, ethics and governance). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  29. Gordon, K., & Miyake, M. (2001). Business approaches to combating bribery: A study of codes of conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(3/4), 161–173.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012517622479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hauser, C., & Hogenacker, J. (2014). Do firms proactively take measures to prevent corruption in their international operations? European Management Review, 11(3–4), 223–237.  https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hauser, C., & Kronthaler, F. (2013). Neue Märkte, neue Risiken: Empirische Evidenz zum Korruptionsrisiko für den international aktiven Mittelstand. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 83(SI 4), 37–60.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04092-5_3.Google Scholar
  32. Hauser, C., & Nieffer, R. (2018). Korruptionsprävention mittels eines computerbasierten Planspiels. In P. Graf & S. Wolf (Eds.), Korruption und Korruptionsbekämpfung : Die Vermittlung in Lehre , Unterricht und Weiterbildung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  33. Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  34. Hogan, C. E., Rezaee, Z., Riley, R. A., & Velury, K. (2008). Financial statement fraud: Insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27(2), 231–252.  https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2008.27.2.231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hooker, J. (2009). Corruption from a cross-cultural perspective. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 16(3), 251–267.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600910977346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huang, S. Y., Lin, C.-C., Chiu, A.-A., & Yen, D. C. (2016). Fraud detection using fraud triangle risk factors. Information Systems Frontiers.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9647-9.Google Scholar
  37. IBA, OECD, & UNODC. (2010). Risks and threats of corruption and the legal profession: Survey 2010. http://www.oecd.org/corruption/anti-bribery/46137847.pdf.
  38. Jonson, E. P., McGuire, L., & Cooper, B. (2016). Does teaching ethics do any good? Education + Training, 58(4), 439–454.  https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-11-2015-0110.Google Scholar
  39. Kaptein, M. (2009). Ethics programs and ethical culture: A next step in unraveling their multi-faceted relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 261–281.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9998-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kaptein, M. (2015). The effectiveness of ethics programs: The role of scope, composition, and sequence. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 415–431.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2296-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kassem, R., & Higson, A. (2012). The new fraud triangle model. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 3(3), 191–195.Google Scholar
  42. Köbis, N. C., van Prooijen, J.-W., Righetti, F., Lange, Van, & Paul, A. M. (2015). “Who doesn’t?” The impact of descriptive norms on corruption. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0131830.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lange, D. (2008). A multidimensional conceptualization of organizational corruption control. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 710–729.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.32465742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lau, C. L. L. (2010). A step forward: Ethics Education matters! Journal of Business Ethics, 92(4), 565–584.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0173-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lin, I. Y., & Namasivayam, K. (2011). Understanding restaurant tipping systems: a human resources perspective. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 23(7), 923–940.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111111167533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maesschalck, J., & de Schrijver, A. (2016). Researching and improving the effectiveness of ethics training. In A. Lawton (Ed.), Ethics in public policy and management: A global research companion (pp. 198–212). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Maruna, S., & Copes, H. (2005). What have we learned from five decades of neutralization research? Crime and Justice, 32(1), 221–320.  https://doi.org/10.1086/655355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. May, D. R., Luth, M. T., & Schwoerer, C. E. (2014). The influence of business ethics education on moral efficacy, moral meaningfulness, and moral courage: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(1), 67–80.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1860-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mayhew, B. W., & Murphy, P. R. (2009). The impact of ethics education on reporting behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(3), 397–416.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9854-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mayhew, B. W., & Murphy, P. R. (2014). The impact of authority on reporting behavior. Rationalization and Affect. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(2), 420–443.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McKercher, B., Weber, K., & Du Cros, H. (2008). Rationalising inappropriate behaviour at contested sites. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 16(4), 369.  https://doi.org/10.2167/jost778.0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McKinney, J. A., & Moore, C. W. (2008). International bribery: Does a written code of ethics make a difference in perceptions of business professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(1–2), 103–111.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9395-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Miller, W. L., Grødeland, Å. B., & Koshechkina, T. Y. (2001). A culture of corruption? Coping with government in post-communist Europe. New York: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Murphy, P. R. (2012). Attitude, machiavellianism and the rationalization of misreporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(4), 242–259.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Murphy, P. R., & Dacin, M. T. (2011). Psychological pathways to fraud: Understanding and preventing fraud in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(4), 601–618.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0741-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nuijten, M., & Anders, G. (2007). Corruption and the secret of law: A legal anthropological perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  57. Pacini, C., Swingen, J. A., & Rogers, H. (2002). The role of the OECD and EU Conventions in combating bribery of foreign public officials. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(4), 385–405.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015235806969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Palmer, D. E., & Zakhem, A. (2001). Bridging the gap between theory and practice: Using the 1991 federal sentencing guidelines as a paradigm for ethics training. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(1/2), 77–84.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006471731947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pelletier, K. L., & Bligh, M. C. (2006). Rebounding from corruption: Perceptions of ethics program effectiveness in a public sector organization. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 359–374.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9027-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pfister, J. (2009). The individual level. In J. Pfister (Ed.), Managing organizational culture for effective internal control (pp. 145–158, Contributions to Management Science). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag HD.Google Scholar
  61. Rabl, T. (2012). Do contextual factors matter? Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 82(S6), 5–32.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-012-0629-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rabl, T., & Kühlmann, T. M. (2008). Understanding corruption in organizations: Development and empirical assessment of an action model. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 477–495.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9898-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rabl, T., & Kühlmann, T. M. (2009). Why or why not? Rationalizing corruption in organizations. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 16(3), 268–286.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600910977355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rae, K., & Subramaniam, N. (2008). Quality of internal control procedures. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(2), 104–124.  https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900810839820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reinmann-Rothmeier, G., & Mandl, H. (2001). Virtuelle Seminare in Hochschule und Weiterbildung: Drei Beispiele aus der Praxis. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  66. Ritter, B. A. (2006). Can business ethics be trained? A study of the ethical decision-making process in business students. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(2), 153–164.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9062-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Röhrich, R. (2008). Fraud-Management als Prävention von Haftungsrisiken. In R. Röhrich (Ed.), Methoden der Korruptionsbekämpfung: Risiken erkennen—Schäden vermeiden. Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
  68. Rose-Ackerman, S. (2004). Governance and corruption. In B. Lomborg & J. J. Myers (Eds.), Global crises, global solutions (pp. 301–343). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Routley, L. (2013). Negotiating corruption: NGOs, governance and hybridity in West Africa (Interventions). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  70. Ruiz, P., Martinez, R., Rodrigo, J., & Diaz, C. (2015). Level of coherence among ethics program components and its impact on ethical intent. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(4), 725–742.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2064-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Salvador, R., & Folger, R. G. (2009). Business ethics and the brain. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schuchter, A., & Levi, M. (2013). The fraud triangle revisited. Security Journal, 29(2), 107–121.  https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2013.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33(1), 46–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shaw, W. H. (2016). Business ethics: A textbook with cases (9th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  75. Smallridge, J. L., & Roberts, J. R. (2013). Crime specific neutralizations: An empirical examination of four types of digital piracy. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 7(2), 125–140.Google Scholar
  76. Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Gift giving, bribery and corruption: Ethical management of business relationships in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(2), 121–132.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005960026519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Svensson, J. (2003). Who must pay bribes and how much? Evidence from a cross-section of Firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 207–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Thorne LeClair, D., & Ferrell, L. (2000). Innovation in experiential innovation in experiential business ethics training. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3), 313–322.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006266526120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Transparency International. (2015). Exporting Corruption Report. Progress Report 2015: Assessing Enforcement of the OECD Convention on Combating Foreign Bribery. Berlin.Google Scholar
  81. Transparency International. (2016). Corruption Perceptions Index 2015. Berlin.Google Scholar
  82. Trevino, L. K., den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kish-Gephart, J. J. (2014). (Un)ethical behavior in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 635–660.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2004). Ethics training and businesspersons' perceptions of organizational ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(4), 391–400.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-5591-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. van Montfort, A., Beck, L., & Twijnstra, A. (2013). Can integrity be taught in public organizations? Public Integrity, 15(2), 117–132.  https://doi.org/10.2753/PIN1099-9922150201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Velasquez, M. (2004). Is corruption always corrupt? In G. G. Brenkert (Ed.), Corporate integrity & accountability. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  86. Verma, P., Mohapatra, S., & Löwstedt, J. (2016). Ethics training in the Indian IT sector: Formal, informal or both? Journal of Business Ethics, 133(1), 73–93.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2331-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Waples, E. P., Antes, A. L., Murphy, S. T., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). A meta-analytic investigation of business ethics instruction. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 133–151.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9875-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Warren, D. E., Gaspar, J. P., & Laufer, W. S. (2014). Is formal ethics training merely cosmetic? A study of ethics training and ethical organizational culture. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(1), 85–117.  https://doi.org/10.5840/beq2014233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Watson, D. M. (2003). Cultural dynamics of corporate fraud. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 10(1), 40–54.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600310797522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Weber, J. (1990). Measuring the impact of teaching ethics to future managers: A review, assessment, and recommendations. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(3), 183–190.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wells, J. T. (2017). Corporate fraud handbook: Prevention and detection (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. West, J. P., & Berman, E. M. (2004). Ethics training in U.S. cities: Content, pedagogy, and impact. Public Integrity, 6(3), 189–206.Google Scholar
  93. Whaley, J. E., Douglas, A. C., & O’Neill, M. A. (2014). What’s in a tip? The creation and refinement of a restaurant-tipping motivations scale: A consumer perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 37, 121–130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Zyglidopoulos, S. C. (2016). Toward a theory of second-order corruption. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25(1), 3–10.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492615579914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zyglidopoulos, S. C., Fleming, P. J., & Rothenberg, S. (2009). Rationalization, overcompensation and the escalation of corruption in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(Suppl 1), 65–73.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9685-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.PRME Business Integrity Action CenterUniversity of Applied Sciences HTW ChurChurSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations