Fighting Against Corruption: Does Anti-corruption Training Make Any Difference?
- 110 Downloads
Corruption continues to represent a tenacious challenge to internationally active companies. According to prevailing international anti-corruption standards, a company can be held criminally liable if it does not put all necessary and reasonable organizational measures in place to prevent corruption. The regular training of employees is considered one of the most effective ways to prevent corruption. Employee training is considered helpful in efforts to minimize the risk of employees becoming involved in corrupt behavior. With this idea in mind and building on the fraud triangle model and neutralization theory, this paper examines whether business professionals who have undergone anti-corruption training are more likely to reject prevailing justifications of corrupt practices than are those who have not undergone such training. The empirical analysis in this paper is based on regression models using data obtained from a unique dataset that includes 200 business professionals. The findings provide evidence that training is positively linked to the likelihood of rejecting justifications of corruption. However, the research also suggests that methods of training must become more specific in order to tackle challenging questions regarding the gray areas of ethics and compliance.
KeywordsInternationalization Corruption Corruption prevention Business ethics Ethics training
JEL ClassificationD73 L22 M14 M16 M53
Much of this paper was written while I was a visiting scholar at Boston College’s Carroll School of Management and Bentley University’s Hoffman Center for Business Ethics. I would like to thank both schools for their generous hospitality, as well as Marta Geletkanycz, W. Michael Hoffman, Sandra Waddock, and two anonymous referees for helpful suggestions and comments on earlier versions of the paper. I am grateful to Jens Hogenacker and Martin Messingschlager for their econometric assistance as well as to colleagues at HTW Chur and University of Siegen for their contribution and input into the development of the underlying research project. Funding from the Swiss Commission for Technology and Innovation (CTI) is gratefully acknowledged. The usual disclaimer applies.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Christian Hauser declares that he has no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Bannenberg, B. (2002). Korruption in Deutschland und ihre strafrechtliche Kontrolle: Eine kriminologisch-strafrechtliche Analyse (Polizei + Forschung, Vol. 18). Neuwied: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
- Bryane, M. (2005). Anti-corruption training programmes in central and eastern Europe. Strassbourg: Council of Europe Publ.Google Scholar
- Coleman, J. W. (2006). The criminal elite: Understanding white-collar crime (6th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
- Copes, H. (2014). Techniques of neutralization. In J. M. Miller (Ed.), The encyclopedia of theoretical criminology (pp. 867–871, Wiley series of encyclopedias in criminology and criminal justice). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Copes, H., & Cardwell, S. M. (2014). Accounts theory. In J. M. Miller (Ed.), The encyclopedia of theoretical criminilogy (pp. 1–4, Wiley series of encyclopedias in criminology and criminal justice). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Fointiat, V. (1998). Rationalization in act and problematic behaviour justification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(3), 471–474. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199805/06)28:3<471::AID-EJSP876>3.0.CO;2-C.
- Fuchs, C., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2009). Using single-item measures for construct measurement in management research: Conceptual issues and application guidelines. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 69(2), 195–210.Google Scholar
- Gilman, S. C., & Stout, Jeffrey. (2008). Assessment strategies and practices for integrity and anti-corruption measures: A comparative overview. In B. Head, A. J. Brown, & C. Connors (Eds.), Promoting integrity: Evaluating and improving public institutions (Law, ethics and governance). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Hauser, C., & Nieffer, R. (2018). Korruptionsprävention mittels eines computerbasierten Planspiels. In P. Graf & S. Wolf (Eds.), Korruption und Korruptionsbekämpfung : Die Vermittlung in Lehre , Unterricht und Weiterbildung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- IBA, OECD, & UNODC. (2010). Risks and threats of corruption and the legal profession: Survey 2010. http://www.oecd.org/corruption/anti-bribery/46137847.pdf.
- Kassem, R., & Higson, A. (2012). The new fraud triangle model. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 3(3), 191–195.Google Scholar
- Maesschalck, J., & de Schrijver, A. (2016). Researching and improving the effectiveness of ethics training. In A. Lawton (Ed.), Ethics in public policy and management: A global research companion (pp. 198–212). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Miller, W. L., Grødeland, Å. B., & Koshechkina, T. Y. (2001). A culture of corruption? Coping with government in post-communist Europe. New York: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
- Nuijten, M., & Anders, G. (2007). Corruption and the secret of law: A legal anthropological perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
- Pfister, J. (2009). The individual level. In J. Pfister (Ed.), Managing organizational culture for effective internal control (pp. 145–158, Contributions to Management Science). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag HD.Google Scholar
- Reinmann-Rothmeier, G., & Mandl, H. (2001). Virtuelle Seminare in Hochschule und Weiterbildung: Drei Beispiele aus der Praxis. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
- Röhrich, R. (2008). Fraud-Management als Prävention von Haftungsrisiken. In R. Röhrich (Ed.), Methoden der Korruptionsbekämpfung: Risiken erkennen—Schäden vermeiden. Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
- Routley, L. (2013). Negotiating corruption: NGOs, governance and hybridity in West Africa (Interventions). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Shaw, W. H. (2016). Business ethics: A textbook with cases (9th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
- Smallridge, J. L., & Roberts, J. R. (2013). Crime specific neutralizations: An empirical examination of four types of digital piracy. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 7(2), 125–140.Google Scholar
- Transparency International. (2015). Exporting Corruption Report. Progress Report 2015: Assessing Enforcement of the OECD Convention on Combating Foreign Bribery. Berlin.Google Scholar
- Transparency International. (2016). Corruption Perceptions Index 2015. Berlin.Google Scholar
- Trevino, L. K., den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kish-Gephart, J. J. (2014). (Un)ethical behavior in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 635–660. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Velasquez, M. (2004). Is corruption always corrupt? In G. G. Brenkert (Ed.), Corporate integrity & accountability. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- West, J. P., & Berman, E. M. (2004). Ethics training in U.S. cities: Content, pedagogy, and impact. Public Integrity, 6(3), 189–206.Google Scholar