Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Disclosures: An Investigation of Investors’ and Analysts’ Perceptions
- 205 Downloads
We conjecture that corporate social responsibility (CSR) can be indicative of managerial ethics and integrity and examine whether equity investors and financial analysts consider CSR performance when they assess firms’ disclosures of actual and forecasted earnings. We find that only adverse CSR performance affects investors’ assessments of these disclosures. In contrast, we find that both positive and adverse CSR performance affect analysts’ forecast revisions in response to firms’ disclosures. We also find that firms with adverse CSR performance exhibit lower disclosure quality and earnings persistence, but do not find that firms with positive CSR performance exhibit higher levels of both measures. This asymmetric result is consistent with investors’, but not analysts’, assessments of the effect of CSR performance on corporate disclosures. Our results are robust to using a three-stage least squares approach to address endogeneity concerns and to a battery of robustness and sensitivity analyses. Overall, our findings suggest that investors and analysts consider CSR when assessing the information in earnings-related corporate disclosures.
KeywordsCorporate social responsibility (CSR) Managerial ethics, managerial integrity, stock price changes Analysts’ reaction Corporate disclosures
We thank Senior Editor, Steven Dellaportas, and two anonymous reviewers for their invaluable comments and guidance. We also thank Shuping Chen, Bin Miao, and Terry Shevlin for kindly sharing the data on disclosure quality. We appreciate feedback from Azizul Islam, Sze Kee Koh, Issam Laguil, and conference participants at the 2015 Annual Meeting of the Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand. We acknowledge our respective universities for financial support.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Kevin Koh has received a research grant from ASEAN CSR Network (ASEAN CSR Vision 2020 Small Grant Fund). Audrey Hsu declares that she has no conflict of interest. Sophia Liu declares that she has no conflict of interest. Yen H. Tong declares that he has no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Bartov, E. & Li, Y. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and the market pricing of corporate earnings. Working Paper, New York: University and National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
- CSR Europe, Deloitte, & Euronext. (2003). Investing in responsible business: The 2003 survey of European fund managers, financial analysts and investor relations officers. Brussels: CSR Europe & Deloitte.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
- Ernst & Young. (2014). Let’s talk: Sustainability. A new point of view for business leaders. Retrieved from http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY_Lets_talk_sustainability_2014-04/$FILE/EY%20Let’s%20talk%20sustainability,%202014-04.pdf.
- Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437.Google Scholar
- Lacy, P., Cooper, T., Hayward, R., & Neuberger, L. (2010). A new era of sustainability: UN Global Compact-Accenture CEO Study study 2010. New York: UN Compact & Accenture.Google Scholar
- Schipper, K. (1991). Analysts’ forecasts. Accounting Horizons, 5, 105–131.Google Scholar
- Szwajkowski, E., & Figlewicz, R. E. (1999). Evaluating corporate performance: A comparison of the fortune reputation survey and the socrates social rating database. Journal of Managerial Issues, 11(2), 137–154.Google Scholar