Advertisement

The Leader as Chief Truth Officer: The Ethical Responsibility of “Managing the Truth” in Organizations

  • Jean-Philippe Bouilloud
  • Ghislain Deslandes
  • Guillaume MercierEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Our aim is to analyze the position of the leader in relation to the ethical dimension of truth-telling within the organization under his/her control. Based on Michel Foucault’s study of truth-telling, we demonstrate that the role of the leader toward the corporation and the imperative of organizational performance place the leader in an ambiguous position: he/she is obliged to take the lead in “telling the truth” internally and externally, but also to bear the consequences of this “truth-telling” for the organization and for himself/herself. In this process of construction and implementing the truth, the leader is organizer and figurehead of the corporation’s truth-telling practices: determining the frontiers between truth that can be said and that which should remain hidden, both inside and outside the corporation; establishing a dialogue based on truth (i.e., an authentic, sincere relationship with all partners); guaranteeing that the rules of truth-telling are respected; and offering a truth which is compatible with the firm’s economic and ethical interest. Invested with the authority—the office—of managing truth within the corporation, the leader can be considered to be the “Chief Truth Officer.” From this perspective, we demonstrate that this role requires specific skills, like courage and practical wisdom.

Keywords

Aletheia Foucault Parrhesia Secrecy Truth-telling Truthfulness 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Allhoff, F. (2003). Business bluffing reconsidered. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(4), 283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrade, J. A. (2015). Reconceptualising whistleblowing in a complex world. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 321–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aristotle. (1934). The Nicomachean ethics. Trans. H. Rackham. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Avolio, J. B., & Gardner, L. W. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root cause of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Badaracco, J. L. (1992). Business ethics: Four spheres of executive responsibility. California Management Review, 34(3), 64–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennis, W., Goleman, D., O’Toole, J., & Biederman, P. W. (2008). Transparency: How leaders create a culture of candor. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carr, A. (1968). Is business bluffing ethical? Harvard Business Review46(1), 143–153.Google Scholar
  9. Carson, T. L. (2005). The morality of bluffing: A reply to Allhoff. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(4), 399–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cassin, B. (1980). Si Parménide. Le traité anonyme De Melisso Xenophane Gorgia. In J. Bollack, Cahiers de philologie, IV. Lille: PUL.Google Scholar
  11. Collinson, D. (2014). Dichotomies, dialectics and dilemmas: New directions for critical leadership studies? Leadership, 10(1), 36–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Contu, A. (2014). Rationality and relationality in the process of whistleblowing: Recasting whistleblowing through readings of Antigone. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(4), 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crane, A., Knights, D., & Starkey, K. (2008). The conditions of our freedom: Foucault, organization, and ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(3), 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deslandes, G. (2012). The care-of-self ethic with continual reference to Socrates: Towards ethical self-management. Business Ethics: A European Review, 21(4), 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dufresne, R. L., & Offstein, E. H. (2008). On the virtues of secrecy in organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(2), 102–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eenkhoorn, P., & Graafland, J. J. (2011). Lying in business: Insights from Hannah Arendt’s ‘Lying in Politics’. Business Ethics: A European Review, 20(4), 359–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elliot, A. L., & Schroth, R. J. (2002). How companies lie: Why Enron is just the tip of the iceberg. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Finkelstein, S., & Boyd, B. K. (1998). How much does the CEO matter? The role of managerial discretion in the setting of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 41(2), 179–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 484–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fleming, P., & Zyglidopoulos, S. C. (2008). The escalation of deception in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(4), 837–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flynn, T. (2007). Foucault as parrhesiast: His last course at the Collège de France (1984). Philosophy and Social Criticism, 12(2/3), 213–229.Google Scholar
  22. Foucault, M. (1969). L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  23. Foucault, M. (1983). Discourse and Truth: The Problematization of Parrhesia. Six lectures given by Michel Foucault at the University of California at Berkeley. Retrieved May 6, 2017, from http://foucault.info/doc/documents/parrhesia/index-html.
  24. Foucault, M. (1984). L’éthique du souci de soi comme pratique de la liberté. In Dits et écrits, vol. IV (1994), nr. 356. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  25. Foucault, M. (2001). L’herméneutique du sujet, Cours au Collège de France 1981–1982. Paris: Hautes études, Gallimard, Le Seuil.Google Scholar
  26. Foucault, M. (2008). Le gouvernement de soi et des autres, Cours au Collège de France 1982–1983. Paris: Hautes études, Gallimard, Le Seuil.Google Scholar
  27. Foucault, M. (2009). Le courage de la vérité, le gouvernement de soi et des autres II, Cours au Collège de France 1983–1984. Paris: Hautes études, Gallimard, Le Seuil.Google Scholar
  28. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, September, 13(32–33), 122–124.Google Scholar
  29. Fulmer, I. S., Barry, B., & Long, D. A. (2009). Lying and smiling: Informational and emotional deception in negotiation. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 691–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gabriel, Y. (2000). Storytelling in organizations: Facts, fictions, and fantasies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gadamer, H. G. (1960). Wahrheit und Methode. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  32. Gagnon, S., & Collinson, D. (2014). Rethinking global leadership development programmes: The interrelated significance of power, context and identity. Organization Studies, 35(5), 645–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Guthey, E., & Jackson, B. (2005). CEO portraits and the authenticity paradox. Journal of Management Studies, 42(5), 1057–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hackett, R. D., & Wang, G. (2012). Virtues and leadership: An integrating conceptual framework founded in Aristotelian and Confucian perspectives on virtues. Management Decision, 50(5), 868–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hannah, D. (2005). Should i keep a secret? The effects of trade secret protection procedures on employees. Obligations to protect trade secrets. Organization Science, 16(1), 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin.Google Scholar
  37. Kaptein, M. (2004). Business codes of multinational firms: What do they say? Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kessler, D. (2001). L’entreprise entre transparence et secret. Pouvoirs, 97(2), 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1993). Credibility: How leaders gain and lose it, why people demand it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  40. Langenberg, S. (2004). Parresiastic stakeholder: A different approach to ethical institutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McMillan, S., Duska, R., Hamilton, R., & Casey, D. (2006). The ethical dilemma of research and development openness versus secrecy. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(3), 279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Melé, D. (2010). Practical wisdom in managerial decision making. Journal of Management Development, 29(7/8), 637–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  44. Miller, J. S. (2009). Opportunistic disclosures of earnings forecasts and non-GAAP earnings measures. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mintzberg, H. (1989). Mintzberg on management: Inside our strange world of organizations. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  46. Mintzberg, H. (1990). The manager’s job. Folklore and fact. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 163–176.Google Scholar
  47. Painter-Morland, M., Deslandes, G. (2015). Authentic leading as relational accountability: Facing up to the conflicting expectations of media leaders. Leadership, 13(4), 424–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Parameshwar, S. (2005). Spiritual leadership through ego-transcendence: Exceptional responses to challenging circumstances. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(5), 689–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pascal, B. (1933). Pensées, Ed. Brunschvicg. Paris: Editions de Cluny.Google Scholar
  50. Plato. (1929). Epistles. Trans. R. G. Bury. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Plato. (1979). Apology of Socrates. Translation T. G. West. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Plato. (2004). The republic. Translation C. D. C. Reeve. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  53. Plutarch. (1918). The Life of Dion. In Lives, vol. 6. Trans. B. Perrin. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Pompa, V. (1992). Managerial secrecy: An ethical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(2), 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Preuss, L., & Dawson, D. (2009). On the quality and legitimacy of green narratives in business: A framework for evaluation. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Provis, C. (2000). Ethics, deception, and labor negotiation. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(2), 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Radoilska, L. (2008). Truthfulness and business. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(1), 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rey, O. (2014). Une question de taille. Paris: Stock.Google Scholar
  59. Ricoeur, P. (2004). Ethique. In M. Canto-Sperber (Ed.), Dictionnaire d’éthique et de philosophie morale (Vol. 1, pp. 689–694). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  60. Schwartz, M. S., Dunfee, T. W., & Kline, M. J. (2005). Tone at the top: An ethics code for directors? Journal of Business Ethics, 58(1–3), 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Simmel, G. (1906). The sociology of secrecy and of the secret societies. American Journal of Sociology, 11, 441–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Simon, H. (1984). Models of bounded rationality (Vol. 3). Cambridge: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
  63. Sims, R. R., & Brinkmann, J. (2003). Enron ethics (or: Culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sison, A. J. G. (2003). The moral capital of leaders: Why virtue matters. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Turilli, M., & Floridi, L. (2009). The ethics of information transparency. Ethics and Information Technology, 11(2), 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vandekerckhove, W., & Langenberg, S. (2012). Can We Organize Courage? Implications from Foucault’s Parrhesia. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 17(2), 35–44.Google Scholar
  67. Walker, M., & Kent, A. (2013). The roles of credibility and social consciousness in the corporate philanthropy-consumer behavior relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(2), 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Weaver, G. R., Trevino, K. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Corporate ethics programs as control systems: Influences of executive commitment and environmental factors. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Weiskopf, R., & Tobias-Miersch, Y. (2016). Whistleblowing, parrhesia and the contestation of truth in the workplace. Organization Studies, 37(11), 1621–1640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Philippe Bouilloud
    • 1
  • Ghislain Deslandes
    • 1
  • Guillaume Mercier
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.ESCP EuropeParisFrance
  2. 2.IÉSEG School of ManagementLilleFrance

Personalised recommendations