Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 155, Issue 4, pp 941–950 | Cite as

International Business as a Possible Civilizing Force in a Cosmopolitan World

  • Norman E. BowieEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The effect of capitalism on the quality of life has been much debated. Albert O. Hirschman has classified the views of the impact of capitalism on the quality of life as civilizing, destructive, and feeble. I believe that multinational corporations (MNCs) should be and could be a civilizing force in today’s cosmopolitan but turbulent world. A number of initiatives will be discussed with special emphasis on business contributions to human rights and to the achievement of past and present United Nations (UN) initiatives. As MNCs undertake these initiatives, they will do well by doing good.

Keywords

Civilizing capitalism Destructive capitalism Human rights Multinational corporations (MNCs) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) UN Global Compact 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arnold, D. G. (2010). Transnational corporations and the duty to respect basic human rights. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(3), 371–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bédard, J., Nelson, T. G., Saltzstein, S. L., and Spaziano, J. L. (2013). US Supreme Court greatly restricts scope of alien tort claims; Holds statute does not apply extraterritorially. Skadden Insights April 23. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP. https://www.skadden.com/insights/publications/2013/04/us-supreme-court-greatly-restricts-scope-of-alien.
  3. Cragg, W. (2012). Ethics, enlightened self-interest, and the corporate responsibility to respect human rights: A critical look at the justificatory foundations of the UN framework. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(1), 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cragg, W., Arnold, D. G., & Muchlinski, P. (Eds.). (2012). Special Issue: Human rights and business (Vol. 22, No. 1). Cambridge: Business Ethics Quarterly.Google Scholar
  5. Eccles, B. (2015). UN Sustainable Development Goals: Good for business. Forbes October 20. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bobeccles/2015/10/20/un-sustainable-development-goals-good-for-business/#1cba42202b50.
  6. Hartman, L. P., Arnold, D. G., & Waddock, S. (2003). Rising above sweatshops: An introduction to the text and to the issues. In L. P. Hartman, D. G. Arnold, & S. Waddock (Eds.), Rising above sweatshops: Innovative approaches to global labor challenges. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  7. Hirschman, A. O. (1982). Rival interpretations of market society: civilizing, destructive, or feeble? Journal of Economic Literature, 20(4), 1463–1484.Google Scholar
  8. Polman, P. (2016). Universal human rights: The foundations of the global goals. Huffington Post, The Blog. (original date August 2, 2016, updated February 7, 2017.) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-polman/universal-human-rights_b_9185284.html.
  9. Prahalad, C. K. (2006). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Prahalad, C. K., & Hart, S. L. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid (Vol. 26, pp. 54–67). Strategy+Business. http://www.strategy-business.com/article/11518.
  11. Ruggie, J. (2011). Guiding principles on business and human rights: Implementing the United Nations “protect, respect and remedy” framework. Advance Edited Version, March 21. Human Rights Council, Seventeenth Session. Document A/HRC/17/31. https://www.business-humanrights.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/ruggie/ruggie-guiding-principles-21-mar-2011.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations