You May Not Reap What You Sow: How Employees’ Moral Awareness Minimizes Ethical Leadership’s Positive Impact on Workplace Deviance
Although a growing body of research has shown the positive impact of ethical leadership on workplace deviance, questions remain as to whether its benefits are consistent across all situations. In this investigation, we explore an important boundary condition of ethical leadership by exploring how employees’ moral awareness may lessen the need for ethical leadership. Drawing on substitutes for leadership theory, we suggest that when individuals already possess a heightened level of moral awareness, ethical leadership’s role in reducing deviant actions may be reduced. However, when individuals lack this strong moral disposition, ethical leadership may be instrumental in inspiring them to reduce their deviant actions. To enhance the external validity and generalizability of our findings, the current research used two large field samples of working professionals in both Turkey and the USA. Results suggest that ethical leadership’s positive influence on workplace deviance is dependent upon the individual’s moral awareness—helpful for those employees whose moral awareness is low, but not high. Thus, our investigation helps to build theory around the contingencies of ethical leadership and the specific audience for whom it may be more (or less) influential.
KeywordsEthical leadership Leadership Workplace deviance Moral awareness Substitutes for leadership Social exchange theory Social learning theory Field study Cross-cultural
For trustworthy feedback on previous drafts we are grateful to our action editor, Tobias Goessling and two anonymous reviewers. We would also like to thank Sean Hannah and Scott Reynolds for their insightful conversations, encouragement and guidance.
- Ahn, J., Lee, S., & Yun, S. (2016). Leaders’ core self-evaluation, ethical leadership, and employees’ job performance: The moderating role of employees’ exchange ideology. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3030-0.
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions Sage. CA: Newbury Park.Google Scholar
- Appelbaum, S.H., Deguire, K.J., & Lay, M. (2005). The relationship of ethical climate to deviant workplace behavior. Corporate Governance, 5(4), 43–56.Google Scholar
- Ariely, D. (2012). The (honest) truth about dishonesty. New York: Harper Audio.Google Scholar
- Babalola, M. T., Stouten, J., Camps, J., & Euwema, M. (2017). When do ethical leaders become less effective? The moderating role of perceived leader ethical conviction on employee discretionary reactions to ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3472-z.
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Baron, R. A., & Neuman, J. H. (1998). Workplace aggression—The iceberg beneath the tip of workplace violence: Evidence on its forms, frequency, and targets. Public Administration Quarterly, 21, 446–464.Google Scholar
- Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (1998). Revenge in organizations: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In R. W. Griffin, A. O’Leary-Kelly, & J. M. Collins (Eds.), Dysfunctional behavior in organizations: Non-violent dysfunctional behavior (pp. 49–67). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Chullen, C. L., Dunford, B. B., Angermeier, I., Boss, R. W., & Boss, A. D. (2010). Minimizing deviant behavior in healthcare organizations: The effects of supportive leadership and job design. Journal of Healthcare Management, 55(6), 381–397.Google Scholar
- Chuang, P., & Chiu, S. (2017). When moral personality and moral ideology meet ethical leadership: A three-way interaction model. Ethics and Behavior. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2016.1229604.
- Cole, D. A., Ciesla, J. A., & Steiger, J. H. (2007). The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(4), 381.Google Scholar
- Davis, T. R., & Luthans, F. (1980). A social learning approach to organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 5(2), 281–290.Google Scholar
- Henle, C. A. (2005). Predicting workplace deviance from the interaction between organizational justice and personality. Journal of Managerial Issues, 17(2), 247–263.Google Scholar
- Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2016). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership?: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, first published online August 31, 2016.Google Scholar
- Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc. Google Scholar
- Johns, G., & Saks, A. M. (2014). Organizational behavior at work: Understanding and managing life at work. Toronto: Pearson Canada Inc.Google Scholar
- Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development. The philosophy of moral development (Vol. I). San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2011). Credibility: How leaders gain and lose it, why people demand it (Vol. 244). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Mo, S., & Shi, J. (2017). Linking ethical leadership to employees’ organizational citizenship behavior: Testing the multilevel mediation role of organizational concern. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(1), 151–162.Google Scholar
- Podsakoff, P. M., Niehoff, B. P., MacKenzie, S. B., & Williams, M. L. (1993). Do substitutes for leadership really substitute for leadership? An empirical examination of Kerr and Jermier’s situational leadership model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 1–44.Google Scholar
- Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Sumanth, J. J., & Hannah, S. T. (2014). Developing leadership capacity: An integration and exploration of ethical and authentic leadership antecedents. In L. L. Neider & C. A. Schriesheim (Eds.), Advances in authentic and ethical leadership. (Research in management, vol. 10) (pp. 25–74). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
- Thau, S., Bennett, R. J., Mitchell, M. S., & Marrs, M. B. (2009). How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.Google Scholar
- van den Akker, L., Heres, L., Lasthuizen, K., & Six, F. (2009). Ethical Leadership and trust: It is all about meeting expectations. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(2), 102–122.Google Scholar
- VanSandt, C. V., Shepard, J. M. & Zappe, S. M. (2006). An examination of the relationship between ethical work climate and moral awareness. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(4), 409–432.Google Scholar
- Walumbwa, F. O., Mayer, D. M., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K., & Christensen, A. L. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 204–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wilks, D. C. (2011). Attitudes towards unethical behaviors in organizational settings: An empirical study. Ethics in Progress Quarterly, 2(2), 9–22.Google Scholar
- Yukl, G. A. (2002). Leadership in organizations, Englewood Cliffs (5th ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Zettler, I., & Hilbig, B. (2010). Honesty-humility and a person-situation interaction at work. European Journal of Personality, 24, 569–582.Google Scholar