Abstract
The Basic-Income Guarantee is a governmental programme of income redistribution that enjoys an increasing predicament among academic and political circles. Traditionally, the philosophical defence for this programme has been articulated from the standpoint of social liberalism, republicanism, or communism. Recently, however, libertarian philosopher Matt Zwolinski also tried to reconcile the Basic-Income Guarantee scheme with libertarian ethics. To do so, he resorted to the Lockean proviso: to the extent that the institutionalization of private property impoverishes certain people by depriving their access to natural resources, these people deserve compensation and the most pragmatic way of providing this is through a Basic-Income Guarantee. This paper examines Zwolinski’s arguments and responds by demonstrating that the Basic-Income Guarantee is incompatible with libertarian ethics: the current levels of poverty are not caused by the institutionalization of private property and the Basic-Income Guarantee does not constitute a pragmatic approach to eradicate poverty.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Business.
Beito, D. T. (2000). From mutual aid to the welfare state: Fraternal societies and social services, 1890–1967. University of North Carolina Press
Boettke, P., & Martin, A. (2013). Taking the “G” out of basic-income guarantee: A comparative political economy perspective on basic income. In G. L. Nell (Ed.), Basic income and the free market. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bradford, S. (2016). The global welfare and poverty effects of rich nation immigration barriers. Working Paper Department of Economics Brigham Young University
Burtless, G. (1986). The work response to a guaranteed income: A survey of experimental evidence. Federal Res Bank Boston, 30, 22–59.
Caplan, B. (2012). Why should we restrict immigration? Cato J, 32(1), 5–24.
Clemens, M. A. (2011). Economics and emigration: Trillion-dollar bills on the sidewalk? J Econ Perspect, 25(3), 83–106.
Deaton, A. (2013). The great escape. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2002). Growth is good for the poor. J Econ Growth, 7(3), 195–225.
Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Gaus, G. F. (1999). Social philosophy. New York: M. E Sharpe.
Gauthier, D. (1986). Morals by agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Glaeser, E. (2012). Triumph of the city: How our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Gochenou, Z., & Caplan, B. (2013). An entrepreneurial critique of Georgism. The Rev Austrian Econ, 26(4), 483–491.
Locke, J. (1689). The Second Treatise of Civil Government. England: Awnsham Churchill.
Mack, E. (2006). Non-absolute rights and libertarian taxation. Soc Philos Policy, 23(2), 109–141.
Menger, C. (1871 [2007]). Principles of economics. Auburn: The Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Murray, C. (2006). In our hands: A plan to replace the welfare state. Aei Press.
Negri, A., & Hardt, M. (2004). Multitude. New York: Penguin.
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books
OECD (2017). Taxing wages 2017.
Rallo, J. R. (2015). Contra la renta básica. Barcelona: Deusto.
Raventós, D. (2007). Basic income: The material conditions of freedom. London: Pluto Press.
Romer, P. (2010). Technologies, rules, and progress: The case for charter cities. Washington: Center for global development.
Romer, C. D., & Romer, D. H. (2010). The macroeconomic effects of tax changes: Estimates based on a new measure of fiscal shocks. Am Econ Rev, 100(3), 763–801.
Sala-i-Martín, X. (2006). The world distribution of income: falling poverty and convergence period. The Q J Econ, 121(2), 351–397.
Schmidtz, D. (2005). The elements of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simmons, A. J. (1992). The Lockean theory of rights. Princeton University Press.
Standing, G. (2004). Promoting income security as a right. Anthem Press.
Tomasi, J. (1998). The key to Locke’s Proviso. British J Hist Philos, 6(3), 447–454.
Van Parijs, P. (1997). Real freedom for all: What (if Anything) can justify capitalism?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Parijs, P. and Vanderborght, Y. (2010). Basic Income, Globalization and Migration. Proceedings of the Basic Income International Conference in Seoul National University.
Van Parijs, P., & Vanderborght, Y. (2017). Basic income: A radical proposal for a free society and a sane economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
World Bank (2011). The changing wealth of nations.
World Bank (2016). Poverty and shared prosperity 2016: Taking on inequality.
Zwolinski, M. (2008). libertarianism. the internet encyclopedia of philosophy.
Zwolinski, M. (2014) Externalities all the way down: A response to huemer on land rent. Cato Unbound: The Basic Income and the Welfare State. Cato Institute
Zwolinski, M. (2015). Property Rights, Coercion, and the Welfare State The Libertarian Case for a Basic Income for All. Indepen Rev, 19(4), 515–529.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Juan Ramón Rallo declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
No humans were involved, and therefore, informed consent was not needed.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rallo, J.R. Libertarianism and Basic-Income Guarantee: Friends or Foes?. J Bus Ethics 157, 65–74 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3645-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3645-9