Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 157, Issue 4, pp 1067–1089 | Cite as

Going Beyond Climate Change Risk Management: Insights from the World’s Largest Most Sustainable Corporations

  • Evangeline O. Elijido-TenEmail author
  • Peter Clarkson
Original Paper

Abstract

In this study, we investigate whether firms recognised as superior sustainability performers respond differently to climate change regulatory, physical and other risks/opportunities and examine whether such differences predict sustainability performance in subsequent years. Further, we seek to gain insights from climate change programs and strategies of both superior and inferior sustainability performers. Adopting mixed methods, we use a merged sample from the Top500 world’s largest firms and the Global 100 Most Sustainable Corporations. Our quantitative analyses show that greater awareness of physical and other climate change opportunities is what sets superior performers apart, and that superior future sustainability performance is related to a firm’s stated awareness of these two types of opportunities. Qualitative content analysis of narrative disclosures confirm that superior performers provide more detailed description of climate change strategies that go beyond managing climate change risks. Our study contributes to the limited amount of research highlighting the value of proactively seeking opportunities rather than merely focussing on risk management.

Keywords

Climate change risks and opportunities World’s largest firms Global 100 Most Sustainable Corporations Carbon Disclosure Project Mixed methods 

JEL classification

G14 Q51 Q54 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the research funding provided by the Faculty of Business and Law, Swinburne University of Technology. They are indebted to Niamh Brennan, the participants of 2015 RMIT Accounting for Sustainability Conference, three anonymous reviewers and the section editor, Cory Searcy, for their valuable comments on the earlier version of this paper. They would also like to thank Barbara Bok for her most efficient research assistance.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Involvement of Humans and Animals and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal participants performed by any of the authors. Informed consent is not required as this study uses publicly available data only.

References

  1. Albert, L., Scott, J., & Turan, B. (2015). Turning inward or focusing out? Navigating theories of interpersonal and ethical cognitions to understand ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(2), 467–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bendell, J. (2010). World review. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 40, 6–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Carbon Disclosure Project. (2014). https://www.cdp.net/en-US/Pages/About-Us.aspx. Viewed 30 June.
  6. Chapple, L., Clarkson, P., & Gold, D. (2013). The cost of carbon: Capital market effects of the proposed emission trading scheme (ETS). Abacus, 49(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practice guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, L. H., & Gao, L. S. (2012). The pricing of climate risk. Journal of Financial and Economic Practice, 12(2), 115–131.Google Scholar
  9. Clarkson, M. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarkson, P., Fang, X., Li, Y., & Richardson, G. (2013). The relevance of environmental disclosures: Are such disclosures incrementally informative? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(5), 410–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarkson, P., Li, Y., Pinnuck, M., & Richardson, G. (2015). The valuation relevance of greenhouse gas emissions under the European Union carbon emissions trading scheme. European Accounting Review, 24(3), 551–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarkson, P., Li, Y., Richardson, G., & Vasvari, F. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 33, 303–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarkson, P., Li, Y., Richardson, G., & Vasvari, F. (2011). Does it pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(2), 122–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Depoers, F., Jeanjean, T., & Jérôme, T. (2016). Voluntary disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions: Contrasting the carbon disclosure project and corporate reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 134, 445–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eberlein, B., & Matten, D. (2009). Business responses to climate change regulation in Canada and Germany: Lessons for MNCs from emerging economies. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elijido-Ten, E. (2011). The impact of sustainability and balanced scorecard disclosures on market performance: Evidence from Australia’s Top 100. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 9(1), 59–73.Google Scholar
  17. Elijido-Ten, E. (2013). Exploring the determinants of sustainability commitment level among Australia’s largest firms. Journal of International Business Management and Research, 3(10), 68–89.Google Scholar
  18. Elijido-Ten, E. O. (2017). Does recognition of climate change related risks and opportunities determine sustainability performance? Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 956–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elijido-Ten, E., Kloot, L., & Clarkson, P. (2010). Extending the application of stakeholder influence strategies to environmental disclosures: An exploratory study from a developing country. Accounting, Auditing, Accountability Journal, 23(8), 1032–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freedman, M., & Jaggi, B. (2010). Corporate disclosures: A comparative analysis of companies from the European Union, Japan and Canada. Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, 4, 129–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Galbreath, J., Charles, D., & Oczkowski, E. (2016). The drivers of climate change innovations: Evidence from the Australian wine industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Global Reporting Initiative. (2016). G4 sustainability reporting guidelines. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRIG4-Part1-Reporting-Principles-and-Standard-Disclosures.pdf. Viewed 20 May 2016.
  23. Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Griffin, P., Lont, D., & Sun, Y. (2015). The relevance to investors of greenhouse gas emissions disclosures. Working paper, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
  25. Harjoto, M., Laksmana, I., & Lee, R. (2015). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 641–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hart, S. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hart, S., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 87–99.Google Scholar
  29. Hoffmann, V. H., & Busch, T. (2008). Corporate carbon performance indicators. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12(4), 505–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hunt, C., & Auster, E. (1990). Proactive environmental management: Avoiding the toxic trap. Sloan Management Review, 31(2), 7–18.Google Scholar
  31. IRRC Institute and Trucost. (2009) Carbon risks and opportunities in the S&P 500. Retrieved from http://www.trucost.com/publications.
  32. Jo, H., & Kim, Y. (2008). Ethics and disclosure: A study of the financial performance of firms in the seasoned equity offerings market. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 855–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jung, J., Herbohn, K. F., & Clarkson, P. (2016). Carbon risk, carbon risk awareness and the cost of debt financing. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3207-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kolk, A., Levy, D., & Pinske, J. (2008). Corporate responses in an emerging climate regime: The institutionalization and commensuration of carbon disclosure. European Accounting Review, 17(4), 719–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kolk, A., & Pinske, J. (2005). Business responses to climate change: Identifying emergent strategies. California Management Review, 47(3), 6–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. KPMG. (2015). Currents of change: The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2015. Retrieved from: http://www.kpmg.com/crreporting.
  37. Labatt, S., & White, R. R. (2007). Carbon finance: The financial implications of climate change. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Larcker, D., & Zakolyukina, A. (2012). Detecting deceptive discussions in conference calls. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(2), 495–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lee, D. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and management forecast accuracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 140, 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leech, N., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2011). Beyond constant comparison qualitative data analysis: Using NVivo. School Psychology Quarterly., 26(1), 70–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Thornton, D. (1997). Corporate disclosure of environmental information: Theory and evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14(3), 435–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Liesen, A., Hoepner, A. G., Patten, D. M., & Figge, F. (2015). Does stakeholder pressure influence corporate GHG emissions reporting? Empirical evidence from Europe. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 28(7), 1047–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Matsumura, E., Prakash, R., & Vera-Munoz, S. (2014). Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosure. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 695–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maxwell, J. (1997). Designing a qualitative study. In L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), Handbook of applied social research methods (pp. 69–100). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Merkl-Davies, D. M., Brennan, N. M., & Vourvachis, P. (2015) Text analysis approaches in corporate narrative reporting research. Working paper, University of Bangor.Google Scholar
  46. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Ng, A. K. Y., Wang, T., Yang, Z., Li, K. X., & Jiang, C. (2016). How is business adapting to climate change impacts appropriately? Insight from the commercial port sector. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3179-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. R. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 56–64.Google Scholar
  49. Porter, M., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Prado-Lorenzo, J., Rodriguez-Dominguez, L., Gallego-Álvarez, I., & Garcia-Sánchez, I. (2009). Factors influencing the disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions in companies world-wide. Management Decision, 47(7), 1133–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Roome, N. (1992). Developing environmental management systems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1m, 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Russo, M., & Fouts, P. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2), 534–559.Google Scholar
  53. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business students (4th ed.). Harlow: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  54. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2010). Commission guidance regarding disclosure related to climate change. Final Rule 6290.Google Scholar
  55. Solomon, J., & Maroun, W. (2012). Integrated reporting: The Influence of King III on social, ethical and environmental reporting. London: The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants.Google Scholar
  56. Solomon, J. F., Solomon, A., Norton, S. D., & Joseph, N. L. (2011). Private climate change reporting: An emerging discourse of risk and opportunity? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 24(8), 1119–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Subramaniam, N., Wahyuni, D., Cooper, B. J., Leung, P., & Wines, G. (2015). Integration of carbon risks and opportunities in enterprise risk management systems: Evidence from Australian firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96(1), 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Walsh, P. R. (2010). Is sustainability sustainable? An investigation of the concept of sustainable business and its influence on financial performance and competitive advantage. The International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability, 6(1), 135–148.Google Scholar
  60. Yunus, S., Elijido-Ten, E., & Abhayawansa, S. (2016). Determinants of carbon management strategy adoption: Evidence from Australia’s top 200 publicly listed firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 31(2), 156–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, M. B. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 308–319). Westport: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Swinburne Business School, Faculty of Business and LawSwinburne University of TechnologyHawthornAustralia
  2. 2.UQ Business SchoolThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.Beedie School of BusinessSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations