The Effect of Top Management Trustworthiness on Turnover Intentions via Negative Emotions: The Moderating Role of Gender
- 225 Downloads
Based on a field study (N = 303), this paper explores the differential role that perceived top management trustworthiness has on female and male employees’ negative emotions and turnover intentions in organizations. A theoretical model is established that explicates a negative indirect effect of perceived top management trustworthiness on employee turnover intentions through employee negative emotions. The results reveal that there is a negative relationship between perceived top management trustworthiness and employee negative emotions and resulting turnover intentions and that this effect is stronger for female employees than for male employees. These results demonstrate the pivotal role played by top management trustworthiness, provide an explanation for the turnover gender gap, and highlight the subjectivity in reactions to trustworthiness perceptions. The implications for organizations are discussed in line with the need for top management to positively influence employees and particularly women, to retain them in their workforce.
KeywordsGender Negative emotions Top management Trustworthiness Turnover intentions
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Basch, J., & Fisher, C. D. (1998). Affective events—emotions matrix: A classification of work events and associated emotions. In Paper presented at the First Conference on Emotions in Organizational Life, San Diego.Google Scholar
- Burns, A. B., Brown, J. S., Sachs-Ericsson, N., Plant, E. A., Curtis, J. T., Fredrickson, B. L., et al. (2008). Upward spirals of positive emotion and coping: Replication, extension, and initial exploration of neurochemical substrates. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(2), 360–370. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.08.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Chemers, M. M. (1997). An integrative theory of leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence, Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Colquitt, J. A., & Salam, S. C. (2009). Foster trust through ability, benevolence, and integrity. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Handbook of principles of organizational behavior (2nd ed., pp. 389–403). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Jones, K. A., & Judge, W. Q. (2002). CEO trustworthiness: A source of competitive advantage. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 1, 57–78.Google Scholar
- Kim, P. H., Dirks, K. T., Cooper, C. D., & Ferrin, D. L. (2006). When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- vs. integrity-based trust violation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(1), 49–65. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- LaFrance, M., & Banaji, M. (1992). Toward a reconsideration of the gender-emotions relationship. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Emotion and social behavior (pp. 178–201). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Mahajan, A., Bishop, J. W., & Scott, D. (2012). Does trust in top management mediate top management communication, employee involvement and organizational commitment relationships? Journal of Managerial Issues, 24(2), 173–190.Google Scholar
- Newman, A., Kiazad, K., Miao, Q., & Cooper, B. (2014). Examining the cognitive and affective trust-based mechanisms underlying the relationship between ethical leadership and organisational citizenship: A case of the head leading the heart? Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 113–123. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1803-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- O’Neill, J. W., Harrison, M. M., Cleveland, J., Almeida, D., Stawski, R., & Crouter, A. C. (2009). Work-family climate, organizational commitment, and turnover: Multilevel contagion effects of leaders. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(1), 18–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.10.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., & LePine, M. A. (2007). Differential challenge stressor–hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 438–454. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Riedl, R., Hubert, M., & Kenning, P. (2010). Are there neural gender differences in online trust? An fMRI study on the perceived trustworthiness of eBay offers. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 397–428.Google Scholar
- Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-expanded form. Iowa City: University of Iowa.Google Scholar
- Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1–74.Google Scholar