Publish, Perish, or Salami Slice? Authorship Ethics in an Emerging Field
- 238 Downloads
Researchers in several academic fields have indicated an increase in academic authorship disputes and the utilization of unethical authorship practices over the past few decades. This trend has been attributed to a variety of factors such as vague authorship guidelines, power disparities between researchers, dissimilar disciplinary and/or journal practices, and a lack of guidance for emerging scholars. As a rapidly emerging academic field, sport management (and its connected sub-fields) maintains the propensity for unclear procedures due to the various departments, schools, and colleges the field calls home (e.g., kinesiology, sport science, education, business), as well as the wide variety of journals that the field’s scholarship resides in. This situation is similar to many emerging or expanding fields as they navigate the university landscape of more established disciplines and fields. Utilizing a three-round Delphi survey method, the current research examined expert opinion on authorship practices in sport management scholarship. Through a combination of open-ended, response, and Likert-type questions, the expert survey attempted to identify areas of consensus and non-consensus in an effort to determine the current status of publication practices in the field, as well as ascertain areas of need for future study and improvement.
KeywordsAuthorship ethics Delphi method Scholarship Sport management
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest pertaining to the current study.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- ABDC. (2015). ABDC journal quality list 2016. Retrieved from: http://www.abdc.edu.au/pages/abdc-journal-quality-list-2016.html.
- American Psychological Association. (2015). Publication practices and responsible authorship. Retrieved from: http://www.apa.org/research/responsible/publication/.
- Authorship guidelines. (2014). Human Kinetics journals: The Journal of Sport Management. Retrieved from: http://journals.humankinetics.com/authorship-guidelines-for-jsm/authorship-guidelines-for-jsm/apaq-authorship-guidelines.
- Brooks, K. W. (1979). Delphi technique: Expanding applications. North Central Association Quarterly, 54, 377–385.Google Scholar
- Chelladurai, P. (2014). Managing organizations for sport and physical activity. Scottsdale, AZ: Holcomb Hathaway.Google Scholar
- Covell, D. (2004). Attachment, allegiance and a convergent application of stakeholder theory to Ivy League Athletics (pp. 14–26). Winter: International Sports Journal.Google Scholar
- Custer, R. L., Scarcella, J. A., & Stewart, B. R. (1999). The modified Delphi technique: A rotational modification. Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 15, 1–10.Google Scholar
- Cyphert, F. R., & Grant, W. L. (1971). The Delphi technique: A case study. Phi Delta Kappan, 52, 272–273.Google Scholar
- Flanagin, A., Carey, L. A., Fontanaroas, P. B., Phillips, S. G., Pace, B. P., Lundberg, G. D., et al. (1998). Prevalence of articles with honorary and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. Journal of the American Medical Association, 360, 1301–1302.Google Scholar
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. London: Pitman Press.Google Scholar
- Guide for authors. (2015). Elsevier—Sport management review. Retrieved from: http://www.elsevier.com/journals/sport-management-review/1441-3523/guide-for-authors#9100.
- Hsu, C.-C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 12(10), 1–8.Google Scholar
- ICMJE. (2015). Defining the role of authors and contributors. Retrieved from: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html.
- Jones, A. (2000). Changing traditions of authorship. In A. Jones & F. McLellan (Eds.), Ethical issues in biomedical publication (pp. 3–29). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- LaFollette, M. C. (1992). Stealing into print—Fraud, plagiarism, and misconduct in scientific publishing. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1975). Introduction. In H. A. Linstone & M. Turoff (Eds.), The Delphi method: Techniques and applications (pp. 1–12). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.Google Scholar
- Ludwig, B. G. (1994). Internationalizing extension: An exploration of the characteristics evident in a state university extension system that achieved internationalization. Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
- Ludwig, B. (1997). Predicting the future: Have you considered using the Delphi methodology? Journal of Extension, 35, 1–4.Google Scholar
- Martino, J. (1983). Technological forecasting for decision making (2nd ed.). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- National Academy of Sciences. (2009). On being a scientist: A guide to responsible conduct in research (3rd ed.). Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Rankings. (2014). Maclean’s. Retrieved from: http://www.macleans.ca/education/unirankings/.
- Safa, M. (2012). Ethics in publication: To be practices or not to be. International Journal of Business and Management Services, 5, 77–84.Google Scholar
- Turoff, M., & Hiltz, S. R. (1996). Computer based Delphi process. In M. Adler & E. Ziglio (Eds.), Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health (pp. 56–88). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
- WAME. (2015). Recommendations on publication ethics policies for medical journals. Retrieved from: http://www.wame.org/about/recommendations-on-publication-ethics-policie.
- Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar