Advertisement

Unearthing Sedimentation Dynamics in Political CSR: The Case of Colombia

  • Pilar AcostaEmail author
  • Mar Pérezts
Original Paper

Abstract

The stream on political corporate social responsibility (PCSR) argues that companies have recently assumed state-like roles to influence global governance. However, following emerging calls for greater contextualization of CSR, we trace the historic evolution of PCSR in the case of Colombia and argue that such political engagement by firms is not new. Looking beyond a linear chronological account, we reveal the sedimentation process behind PCSR by exploring the archetypical political roles businesses have taken on in providing public goods and acting as regulators, and chart their transformation. Our findings allow us to make two main contributions. First, by unearthing different strata of business and society relations, we enrich the research on PCSR, highlighting its historical sedimentation dynamics. By integrating institutional and historical perspectives, we respond to calls for complementary accounts of one of the premises found in the literature that considers globalization as the starting point of PCSR. Second, our exploration of the past and present of PCSR in Colombia provides scholars and practitioners with an overview of the complex state and stakes of CSR in that country. We also discuss the implications of sedimentation for PCSR theory and future research directions.

Keywords

Political corporate social responsibility Colombia History of CSR Sedimentation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to acknowlege the constructive comments of our editor, Robert Phillips, and two anonymous reviewers. We thank our interviewees who have participated in this study for sharing their time and insights with us. We also thank participants at EGOS 2014, particularly Roy Suddaby, David Chandler and Sebastien Picard, EGOS 2015 and LAEMOS 2016, where earlier versions of this paper were presented. We are also grateful to Aurélien Acquier, Olivier Delbard and Adrian Zicari for their helpful suggestions. Funding was provided by ESCP Europe and its Ph.D programme.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Pilar Acosta and Mar Pérezts declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Acosta, P., Acquier, A., & Delbard, O. (2014). Just do it? The adoption chain management programs from a supplier. Supply Chain Forum: An international Journal, 15(1), 76–91.Google Scholar
  2. Acquier, A., Gond, J., & Pasquero, J. (2011). Rediscovering Howard R. Bowen’s legacy: The unachieved agenda and continuing relevance of social responsibilities of the businessman. Business and Society, 50(4), 607–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agüero, F. (2006). The promotion of CSR in Latin America. In C. Sanborn & F. Portocarrero (Eds.), Philanthropy and social change in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Arango, G. (1991). Mujer, religión e industria: Fabricato 19231982.Google Scholar
  5. Arbeláez, M. A., Estacio, A., & Olivera, M. (2010). Impacto socioeconómico del sector azucarero en la Economía Colombiana. Bogotá.Google Scholar
  6. Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banerjee, S. B. (2010). Governing the global corporation: A critical perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(2), 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bejarano Ávila, J. A. (2007). El despegue cafetero (1900–1928). In J. A. Ocampo Gaviria (Ed.), Historia Económica de Colombia Edición revisada y actualizada (pp. 195–232). Bogotá: Planeta Colombiana Editorial.Google Scholar
  9. Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bucheli, M., & Wadhwani, R. D. (2014). Organizations in time: History, theory, methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Carroll, A. B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: The centerpiece of competing and complementary frameworks. Organizational Dynamics, 44, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Castro Carvajal, B. (2007). Caridad y beneficencia, el tratamiento de la pobreza en Colombia 1870–1930. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.Google Scholar
  13. Castro Carvajal, B. (2009). Prácticas filantrópicas en Colombia, 1870–1960. Historia y Sociedad, 17, 37–68.Google Scholar
  14. Castro Carvajal, B. (2011). La relación entre el Estado y la Iglesia Católica en la asistencia social. Sociedad y Economía, 20, 223–242.Google Scholar
  15. Chandler, D., & Foster, W. M. (2015). A present past: A historical perspective on institutional maintenance and change. In Academy of Management Proceedings (pp. 1–39).Google Scholar
  16. Clegg, S. (1981). Organization and Control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 545–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cooper, D. J., Hinings, B., Greenwood, R., & Brown, J. L. (1996). Sedimentation and transformation in organizational change. The case of Canadian law firms. Organization Studies, 17(4), 623–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crane, A., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Corporations and citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dacin, M. T., & Dacin, P. A. (2008). Traditions as institutionalized practice: Implications for deinstitutionalization. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin-Andersson, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 327–351). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Dávila, C. (1992). Historia empresarial de Colombia: estudios, problemas y perspectivas. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes.Google Scholar
  21. De Bry, F. (2006). Du paternalisme à la responsabilité sociale. European Journal of Economic and social systems, 19(1), 69–84.Google Scholar
  22. Detomasi, D. A. (2007). The multinational corporation and global governance: Modelling global public policy networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3), 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Detomasi, D. A. (2015). The multinational corporation as a political actor. Varieties of capitalism revisited. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), 685–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Djelic, M.-L., & Etchanchu-Schneider, H. (2015). Contextualizing corporate political responsibilities: Neoliberal CSR in historical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2879-7.Google Scholar
  25. Edward, P., & Willmott, H. (2008). Corporate citizenship: Rise or demise of a myth? Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 771–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frynas, J. G., & Stephens, S. (2015). Political corporate social responsibility: Reviewing theories and setting new agendas. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(4), 483–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Griesse, M. A. (2007). The geographic, political, and economic context for corporate social responsibility in Brazil. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(1), 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gutiérrez, R., Avella, L. F., & Villar, R. (2006). Achievements and challenges of corporate social responsibility in Colombia. Asociación de Fundaciones Empresariales. http://afecolombia.org/enus/FoundationDetail/ArtMID/624/ArticleID/2293/Achievements-and-Challenges-of-Corporate-Social-Responsibility-in-Colombia-1.
  29. Gutiérrez, R., & Jones, A. (2004). Corporate social responsibility in Latin America: An overview of its characteristics and effects on local communities. In M. Contreras (Ed.), Corporate social responsibility in Asia and Latin America (pp. 151–187). Washington: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
  30. Jackson, G., & Apostolakou, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: An institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 371–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jamali, D., & Karam, C. M. (2016). CSR in developing countries as an emerging field of study. International Journal of Management Reviews. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12112.Google Scholar
  32. Khan, F. R., & Lund-Thomsen, P. (2011). CSR as imperialism: Towards a phenomenological approach to CSR in the developing world. Journal of Change Management, 11(1), 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kobrin, S. J. (2009). Private political authority and public responsibility: Transnational politics, transnational firms, and human rights. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3), 349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lindgreen, A., Córdoba, J.-R., Maon, F., & Mendoza, J. M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Colombia: Making sense of social strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(S2), 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Logsdon, J. M., Thomas, D. E., & Van Buren, H. J., III. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in large Mexican firms. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21, 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mäkinen, J., & Kasanen, E. (2016). Boundaries between business and politics. A study on the division of moral labor. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(1), 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mäkinen, J., & Kourula, A. (2012). Pluralism in political corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(4), 649–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mayor Mora, A. (1989). Historia de la industria colombiana. 1886–1930. In A. T. Mejía, J. Jaramillo, J .O. Melo, J. A. Bejarano (Eds.), Nueva Historia de Colombia (Vol. V, pp. 333–356). Planeta Bogotá: Colombiana Editorial.Google Scholar
  41. Mills, A. J., Suddaby, R., Foster, W. M., & Durepos, G. (2016). Re-visiting the Historic Turn 10 years later: Current debates in management and organizational history—An introduction. Management and Organizational History, 11(2), 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moog, S., Spicer, A., & Böhm, S. (2015). The politics of multi-stakeholder initiatives: The crisis of the Forest Stewardship Council. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-2033-3.Google Scholar
  43. Morgan, G. (2007). National business systems research: Progress and prospects. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23(2), 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nyberg, D., Spicer, A., & Wright, C. (2013). Incorporating citizens: Corporate engagement with climate change in Australia. Organization, 20, 443–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ocampo Gaviria, J. A. (1987). Una década de grandes transformaciones económicas, 1986–1995. In J. A. Ocampo Gaviria (Ed.), Historia Económica de Colombia (Primera Edición). Bogotá: Editorial Planeta Colombiana. http://www.banrepcultural.org/blaavirtual/economia/histecon/histecon9a.htm.
  46. Ocampo Gaviria, J. A., Avella Gómez, M., Bernal, R. J., & Errázuriz Cox, M. (2007a). La industrialización y el intervencionismo estatal (1945–1980). In J. A. Ocampo Gaviria (Ed.), Historia Económica de Colombia Edición revisada y actualizada (pp. 271–340). Bogotá: Editorial Planeta Colombiana.Google Scholar
  47. Ocampo Gaviria, J. A., Romero Baquero, C. A., & Parra, M. Á. (2007b). La búsqueda, larga e inconclusa, de un nuevo modelo (1981–2006). In J. A Ocampo Gaviria (Ed.), Historia Económica de Colombia Edición revisada y actualizada (pp. 341–418). Bogotá: Editorial Planeta Colombiana.Google Scholar
  48. Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, democracy and the politicization of the corporation. Academy of Management Review, 33, 773–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Paz Rueda, A. L. (2007). La fundación Mac: un aporte a la transformación de lo social. In J. Londoño Motta (Ed.), Mac: Empresa y familia medio siglo de energía (pp. 400–439). Bogotá: Grupo Editorial Norma.Google Scholar
  50. Perez-Batres, L. A., Miller, V. V., & Pisani, M. J. (2010). CSR, sustainability and the meaning of global reporting for Latin American corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(S2), 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pinilla Urzola, A. (2010). World guide to CSR. In W. Visser & N. Tolhurst (Eds.), The world guide to CSR. A country-by-country analysis of corporate sustainability and responsibility (pp. 128–135). Shipley: Greenleaf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Promigas, & DIS. (2012). Las fundaciones empresariales en Colombia Una mirada a su estructura y dinámicas.Google Scholar
  53. Raufflet, E. (2008). Creating the context for corporate responsibility. The experience of Instituto Ethos, Brazil. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 30, 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reficco, E., & Ogliastri, E. (2009). Empresa y sociedad en América Latina: una introducción. Academia, Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 43, 1–25.Google Scholar
  55. Rojas, J. M. (1983). Sociedad y Economía en el Valle del Cauca Empresarios y tecnología en la formación del sector azucarero en Colombia 1860–1980. Bogotá: Fondo de promoción de la cultura del banco Popular y Departamento de publicaciones de la Universidad del Valle.Google Scholar
  56. Rojas, D. M. (2010). Alliance for progress in Colombia. Análisis Político, 80, 91–124.Google Scholar
  57. Rojas, C., & Morales, G. (2006). Private contributions to the public sphere. In C. Sanborn & F. Portocarrero (Eds.), Philanthropy and social change in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Sáenz Rovner, E. (2002). Colombia años 50 Industriales, política y diplomacia. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar
  59. Sanborn, C. (2006). Philanthropy in Latin America. In C. Sanborn & F. Portocarrero (Eds.), Philanthropy and social change in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Scherer, A. G., Baumann-Pauly, D., & Schneider, A. (2012). Democratizing corporate governance: Compensating for the democratic deficit of corporate political activity and corporate citizenship. Business and Society, 52(3), 473–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. (2009). Introduction to the special issue: Globalization as a challenge for business responsibilities. Business Ethics Quarterly, 3, 327–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. (2014). The business firm as a political actor: A new theory of the firm for a globalized world. Business and Society, 53(2), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Seidl, D. (2013). Managing legitimacy in complex and heterogeneous environments: Sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 259–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Scherer, A. G., Rasche, A., Palazzo, G., & Spicer, A. (2016). Managing for political corporate social responsibility: New challenges and directions for PCSR 2.0. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 273–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schmidheiny, S. (2006). A view of corporate citizenship in Latin America. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21(Spring), 21–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schneider, B. R. (2013). Hierarchical capitalism in Latin America. Business, labor and the challenges of equitable development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schrempf-Stirling, J. (2016). State power: Rethinking the role of the state in political corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3198-3.Google Scholar
  70. Schrempf-Stirling, J., & Palazzo, G. (2013). Upstream corporate social responsibility: The evolution from contract responsibility to full producer responsibility. Management Faculty Publications, Paper 39.Google Scholar
  71. Schrempf-Stirling, J., Palazzo, G., & Phillips, R. A. (2016). Historic corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 700–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schrempf-Stirling, J., & Wettstein, F. (2015). Beyond guilty verdicts: Human rights litigation and its impact on corporations’ human rights policies. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2889-5.Google Scholar
  73. Suddaby, R. (2016). Toward a historical consciousness: Following the historic turn in management thought. “Carte blanche”! M@n@gement, 19(1), 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tengblad, S., & Ohlsson, C. (2009). The framing of corporate social responsibility and the globalization of national business systems: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(4), 653–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Urrea, F., & Arango, G. (2000). Culturas empresariales en Colombia. In F. Urrea (Ed.), Innovación y cultura de las organizaciones en tres regiones de Colombia (pp. 41–80). Bogotá: Corporación Calidad.Google Scholar
  76. Villar, R. (2001). El tercer sector en Colombia Evolución, dimensión y tendencias.Google Scholar
  77. Visser, W. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries. In A. Crane, A. Mcwilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 473–479). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Vogel, D. (2010). The private regulation of global corporate conduct: Achievements and limitations. Business and Society, 49(1), 68–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Whelan, G. (2012). The political perspective of corporate social responsibility: A critical research agenda. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 709–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Whitley, R. (1999). Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Whitley, R. (2007). Business systems and organizational capabilities. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business and Economic SciencesUniversidad ICESIValle del CaucaColombia
  2. 2.emlyon Business School and OCE Research CenterÉcullyFrance

Personalised recommendations