Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 155, Issue 1, pp 163–171 | Cite as

The Costs and Benefits of Adjunct Justice: A Critique of Brennan and Magness

  • Steven ShulmanEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

In their controversial 2016 paper in this journal, Brennan and Magness argue that fair pay for part-time, adjunct faculty would be unaffordable for most colleges and universities and would harm students as well as many adjunct faculty members. In this critique, I show that their cost estimates fail to take account of the potential benefits of fair pay for adjunct faculty and are based on implausible assumptions. I propose that pay per course for new adjunct faculty members should be tied to pay per course for new full-time non-tenure track instructors or to pay per course for new assistant professors. That framework for adjunct faculty justice yields an aggregate cost range of $18.5–$27.9 billion, one-third to one-half lower than the range computed by Brennan and Magness. Its opportunity cost would not be borne by students since students and faculty are complements, not substitutes, in the educational process. Instead it could be financed by reducing spending on non-educational purposes. Current adjunct faculty members would be protected from job displacement in this justice framework. The real obstacle to achieving justice for adjunct faculty is the priorities of university administrators, not budget constraints or opportunity costs.

Keywords

Academic labor markets Adjunct faculty Contingent faculty Fair pay Higher education Justice Educational ethics Non-tenure track faculty Part-time faculty 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author of this paper declares that he received no funding for this paper and has no conflict of interests in its publication.

References

  1. American Association of University Professors (AAUP). (2016). “Higher education at a crossroads: the economic value of tenure and the security of the profession.” Academe (March–April).Google Scholar
  2. Bettinger, E. P., & Long, B. T. (2006). The increasing use of adjunct instructors at public institutions: are we hurting students? In R. G. Ehrenberg (Ed.), What’s happening to public higher education?. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brennan, J., Phillip, M., (2016a). “Estimating the cost of justice for adjuncts: a case study in university business ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics. Online at http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-016-3013-1.
  4. Brennan, J., Phillip, M., (2016b). “Are adjunct faculty exploited: some grounds for skepticism.” Journal of Business Ethics. Online at http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10551-016-3322-4.
  5. Brown, C. (1999). Minimum wages, employment, and the distribution of income. In O. C. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 3(B)). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  6. Chronicle of Higher Education (CHE). (2016). Almanac of higher education 201617. Online at http://www.chronicle.com/specialreport/The-Almanac-of-Higher/51.
  7. Coalition on the Academic Workforce (CAW). (2012). A portrait of part-time faculty members. Online at http://www.academicworkforce.org/CAW_portrait_2012.pdf.
  8. Colorado State University (CSU). (2016). 201617 Catalog. Mission statement online at http://catalog.colostate.edu/general-catalog/welcome/mission-values/.
  9. Ehrenberg, R. G., & Zhang, L. (2006). Do tenured and tenure-track faculty matter? In R. G. Ehrenberg (Ed.), What’s happening to public higher education?. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Harris, M., (2015). “What is the typical teaching load for university faculty?” Blog post on Higher Ed Professor. Online at http://higheredprofessor.com/2015/05/11/what-is-the-typical-teaching-load-for-university-faculty/.
  11. Hogler, R., (2004). Employment relations in the United States: Law, policy and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Katz, L., (1986). “Efficiency wage theories: a partial evaluation.” NBER Macroeconomics Annual, NBER and MIT Press. Online at http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/lkatz/files/efficiency_wage_theories_a_partial_evaluation.pdf.
  13. Katz, L. F., Krueger, A. B., (2016). “The rise and nature of alternative work arrangements in the United States, 1995–2015.” Online at https://krueger.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/akrueger/files/katz_krueger_cws_-_march_29_20165.pdf.
  14. Kezar, A., Maxey, D., (2012). “Selected research on connections between non-tenure track faculty and student learning.” The Delphi Project on the Changing Faculty and Student Success. Online at http://www.uscrossier.org/pullias/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Delphi-NTTF_Annotated-Research-Summary_2013WebPDF.pdf.
  15. Kezar, A., Maxey, D. (2014). “Faculty matter: so why doesn’t everyone think so?” The NEA Higher Education Journal. Fall. Online at https://www.nea.org/assets/docs/HE/e-Kezar.pdf.
  16. Schuster, J. H., & Finkelstein, M. J. (2006). The American faculty: the restructuring of academic work and careers. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  17. USA Today, NCAA Finances. 2014–15. Online at http://sports.usatoday.com/ncaa/finances/.
  18. U.S. Department of Education (USDOE), National Center for Education Statistics. 2015. Digest of Education Statistics. Online at https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/current_tables.asp.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and Center for the Study of Academic LaborColorado State UniversityFt CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations