Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 154, Issue 2, pp 497–515 | Cite as

Character Cues and Contracting Costs: The Relationship Between Philanthropy and the Cost of Capital

  • Leon Zolotoy
  • Don O’SullivanEmail author
  • Jill Klein
Original Paper

Abstract

Prior studies in business ethics highlight the role of philanthropy in shaping stakeholders’ perceptions of a firm’s underlying moral tendencies and values (“character”). Scholars argue that philanthropy-based character inferences influence whether and how stakeholders engage with firms. We extend this line of reasoning to examine the impact of philanthropy on firms’ contracting costs in the capital market. We posit that philanthropy-based character inferences reduce investors’ agency concerns, thereby reducing firms’ cost of capital. We also posit that the strength of the philanthropy–cost of capital relationship is contingent on uncertainty regarding a firm’s character, visibility of a firm, and prevailing philanthropic norms. We test and find support for our arguments in a longitudinal study of philanthropy and the cost of capital. Our findings have implications for business ethics research on corporate philanthropy and corporate social performance and for organizational research on social judgment.

Keywords

Social judgment Character Philanthropy Contracting costs 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

In accordance with the Journal of Business Ethics submission requirements, we note that our paper complies with the journal’s ethical standards.

References

  1. Adams, M., & Hardwick, P. (1998). An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 35, 641–654.Google Scholar
  2. Albuquerque, R., & Wang, N. (2008). Agency conflicts, investment, and asset pricing. Journal of Finance, 63, 1–40.Google Scholar
  3. Amato, L. H., & Amato, C. H. (2007). The effects of firm size and industry on corporate giving. Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 229–241.Google Scholar
  4. Amihud, Y., & Mendelson, H. (1986). Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread. Journal of Financial Economics, 17, 223–249.Google Scholar
  5. Attig, N., Boubakri, N., El Ghoul, S., & Guedhami, O. (2016). Firm internationalization and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 134, 171–197.Google Scholar
  6. Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). ‘Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1304–1320.Google Scholar
  7. Bartkus, B., Morris, S., & Seifert, B. (2002). Governance and corporate philanthropy: Restraining Robin Hood? Business and Society, 41, 319–344.Google Scholar
  8. Bitektine, A. (2011). ‘Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36, 151–179.Google Scholar
  9. Botosan, C. A., & Plumlee, M. A. (2002). ‘A re-examination of disclosure level and the expected cost of equity capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 40, 21–40.Google Scholar
  10. Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2005). Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 29–44.Google Scholar
  11. Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). ‘Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1325–1343.Google Scholar
  12. Bundy, J., & Pfarrer, M. (2014). ‘A burden of responsibility: The role of social approval at the onset of a crisis. Academy of Management Review, 40, 345–369.Google Scholar
  13. Campbell, D., Moore, G., & Metzger, M. (2002). Corporate philanthropy in the U.K. 1985–2000: Some empirical findings. Journal of Business Ethics, 39, 29–41.Google Scholar
  14. Chang, K., Kim, I., & Li, Y. (2014). The heterogeneous impact of corporate social responsibility activities that target different stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 211–234.Google Scholar
  15. Chen, K. C., Chen, Z., & Wei, K. (2011). Agency costs of free cash flow and the effect of shareholder rights on the implied cost of equity capital. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46, 171–207.Google Scholar
  16. Chen, J. C., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2008). Corporate charitable contributions: A corporate social performance or legitimacy strategy? Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 131–144.Google Scholar
  17. Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1–23.Google Scholar
  18. Crampton, W., & Patten, D. (2008). Social responsiveness, profitability and catastrophic events: Evidence on the corporate philanthropic response to 9/11. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 863–873.Google Scholar
  19. Cui, J., Jo, H., & Na, H. (2016). Does corporate social responsibility affect information asymmetry? Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-3003-8.Google Scholar
  20. El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affectthe cost of capital? Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, 2388–2406.Google Scholar
  21. El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Ni, Y., Pittman, J., & Saadi, S. (2012). Does religion matter to equity pricing? Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 491–518.Google Scholar
  22. Falkinger, J. (2008). Limited attention as a scarce resource in information-rich economies. Economic Journal, 118, 1596–1620.Google Scholar
  23. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33, 3–56.Google Scholar
  24. Fein, S., Hilton, J. L., & Miller, D. T. (1990). Suspicion of ulterior motivation and the correspondence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 753–764.Google Scholar
  25. Fiske, S. T., & Cox, M. G. (1979). Person concepts: The effect of target familiarity and descriptive purpose on the process of describing others. Journal of Personality, 47, 136–161.Google Scholar
  26. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social cognition: From brains to culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Flammer, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 758–781.Google Scholar
  28. Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  29. Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A., & Barnett, M. L. (2000). Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review, 105, 85–106.Google Scholar
  30. Fombrun, C. J., & Van Riel, C. B. (2004). Fame and fortune: How successful companies build winning reputations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  31. Frederickson, J. R., & Zolotoy, L. (2016). Competing earnings announcements: Which announcement do investors process first? Accounting Review, 91, 441–462.Google Scholar
  32. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine. Sept. 13thGoogle Scholar
  33. Galaskiewicz, J. (1997). An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the twin cities, 1979–81, 1987–89. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 445–471.Google Scholar
  34. Gan, A. (2006). The impact of public scrutiny on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 217–236.Google Scholar
  35. Gebhardt, W., Lee, C., & Swaminathan, B. (2001). Toward an implied cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 39, 135–176.Google Scholar
  36. Gelb, D. S., & Strawser, J. A. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and financial disclosures: An alternative explanation for increased disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 33, 1–13.Google Scholar
  37. Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30, 777–798.Google Scholar
  38. Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 425–445.Google Scholar
  39. Gooding, A. E. (1975). Quantification of investors’ perceptions of common stocks: Risk and return dimensions. Journal of Finance, 30, 1301–1316.Google Scholar
  40. Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  41. Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business and Society, 39, 254–280.Google Scholar
  42. Greve, H. R. (2003). A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 685–702.Google Scholar
  43. Grullon, G., Kanatas, G., & Weston, J. P. (2004). Advertising, breadth of ownership, and visibility. Review of Financial Studies, 17, 439–461.Google Scholar
  44. Hadlock, C., & Pierce, J. (2010). New evidence on measuring financial constraints: Moving beyond the KZ index. Review of Financial Studies, 23, 1909–1940.Google Scholar
  45. Hamilton, D. L., & Huffman, L. J. (1971). Generality of impression–formation processes for evaluative and nonevaluative judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 200–207.Google Scholar
  46. Harjoto, M. A., & Jo, H. (2015). Legal vs. normative CSR: Differential impact on analyst dispersion, stock return volatility, cost of capital and firm value. Journal of Business Ethics, 128, 1–20.Google Scholar
  47. Harrison, J. S., & Coombs, J. E. (2012). The moderating effects from corporate governance characteristics on the relationship between available slack and community-based firm performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 409–422.Google Scholar
  48. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  49. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & S. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  50. Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125–139.Google Scholar
  51. Huberman, G. (2001). Familiarity breeds investment. Review of Financial Studies, 14, 659–680.Google Scholar
  52. Husted, B. W., Jamali, D., & Saffar, W. (2015). Near and dear? The role of location in CSR engagement. Strategic Management Journal (Forthcoming). doi: 10.1002/smj.2437.
  53. Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2015). The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts’ perceptions and shifting institutional logics. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1053–1081.Google Scholar
  54. Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. Journal of Finance, 48, 65–91.Google Scholar
  55. Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 235–256.Google Scholar
  56. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.Google Scholar
  57. Jia, M., & Zhang, Z. (2014). Donating money to get money: The role of corporate philanthropy in stakeholder reactions to IPOs. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 1118–1152.Google Scholar
  58. Jones, T. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–437.Google Scholar
  59. Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 219–266). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  60. Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107–128.Google Scholar
  61. Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457–501.Google Scholar
  62. Koh, P.-S., Qian, C., & Wang, H. (2014). Firm litigation risk and the insurance value of corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1464–1482.Google Scholar
  63. Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  64. Lange, D., & Washburn, N. (2012). Understanding attributions of corporate social irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 37, 300–326.Google Scholar
  65. Leonidou, C. N., & Skarmeas, D. (2015). Gray shades of green: Causes and consequences of green skepticism. Journal of Business Ethics (Forthcoming). doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2829-4.Google Scholar
  66. Lev, B., Petrovits, C., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2010). Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 182–200.Google Scholar
  67. Liket, K., & Simaens, A. (2015). Battling the devolution in the research on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 126, 285–308.Google Scholar
  68. Love, E. G., & Kraatz, M. S. (2009). Character, conformity, or the bottom line? How and why downsizing affected corporate reputation. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 314–335.Google Scholar
  69. Maas, K., & Liket, K. (2011). Talk the walk: Measuring the impact of strategic philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 445–464.Google Scholar
  70. Madsen, P. M., & Rodgers, Z. J. (2015). Looking good by doing good: The antecedents and consequences of stakeholder attention to corporate disaster relief. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 776–794.Google Scholar
  71. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.Google Scholar
  72. Marquis, C., Glynn, M. A., & Davis, G. F. (2007). Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, 32, 925–945.Google Scholar
  73. Marquis, C., & Lee, M. (2013). Who is governing whom? Executives, governance and the structure of generosity in large U.S. firms. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 483–497.Google Scholar
  74. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 404–424.Google Scholar
  75. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609.Google Scholar
  76. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127.Google Scholar
  77. Miller, G. F. (2007). Sexual selection for moral virtues. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 82, 97–125.Google Scholar
  78. Mishina, Y., Block, E. S., & Mannor, M. J. (2012). The path dependence of organizational reputation: how social judgment influences assessments of capability and character. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 459–477.Google Scholar
  79. Mishina, Y., Dykes, B. J., Block, E. S., & Pollock, T. G. (2010). Why “good” firms do bad things: The effects of high aspirations, high expectations, and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 701–722.Google Scholar
  80. Muller, A., & Kräussl, R. (2011). The value of corporate philanthropy during times of crisis: The sensegiving effect of employee involvement. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 203–220.Google Scholar
  81. Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Earnings, book values and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11, 661–687.Google Scholar
  82. Oikonomou, I., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2014). The financial effects of uniform and mixed corporate social performance. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 898–925.Google Scholar
  83. Parguel, B., Benoît-Moreau, F., & Larceneux, F. (2011). How sustainability ratings might deter “greenwashing”: A closer look at ethical corporate communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 15–28.Google Scholar
  84. Pastor, L., & Veronesi, P. (2005). Rational IPO waves. Journal of Finance, 60, 1713–1757.Google Scholar
  85. Patten, D. (2008). Does the market value corporate philanthropy? Evidence from the response to the, 2004 Tsunami relief effort. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 599–607.Google Scholar
  86. Peeters, G., & Czapinski, J. (1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 33–60.Google Scholar
  87. Rajgopal, S., Shevlin, T., & Zamora, V. (2006). CEOs’ outside employment opportunities and the lack of relative performance evaluation in compensation contracts. Journal of Finance, 61, 1813–1844.Google Scholar
  88. Schuler, D., & Cording, M. (2006). A corporate social performance-corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers. Academy of Management Review, 31, 540–558.Google Scholar
  89. Seifert, B., Morris, S. A., & Bartkus, B. R. (2003). Comparing big givers and small givers: Financial correlates of corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 195–211.Google Scholar
  90. Seifert, B., Morris, S. A., & Bartkus, B. R. (2004). Having, giving, and getting: Slack resources, corporate philanthropy, and firm financial performance. Business and Society, 43, 135–161.Google Scholar
  91. Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558–568.Google Scholar
  92. Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science, 59, 1045–1061.Google Scholar
  93. Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 569–592.Google Scholar
  94. Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131.Google Scholar
  95. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.Google Scholar
  96. Tang, Y., Qian, C., Chen, G., & Shen, R. (2015). How CEO hubris affects corporate social (ir)responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1338–1357.Google Scholar
  97. Taylor, S. (1981). The interface of cognitive and social psychology. In J. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment (pp. 189–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  98. Taylor, S., & Fiske, S. (1978). Salience, attention, attributions: Top of the head phenomena. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 249–288). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  99. Tian, Z., Wang, R., & Yang, W. (2011). Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 197–212.Google Scholar
  100. Tilcsik, A., & Marquis, C. (2013). Punctuated generosity: How mega-events and disasters affect corporate philanthropy in U.S. communities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, 111–148.Google Scholar
  101. Tonello, M., & Turok, J. (2011). The 2011 corporate contributions report. New York: Conference Board.Google Scholar
  102. Trope, Y., & Gaunt, R. (2007). Attribution and person perception. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social psychology: concise (Student ed., pp. 176–194). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  103. Uleman, J. S., & Moskowitz, G. B. (1994). Unintended effects of goals on unintended inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 490–501.Google Scholar
  104. Van Lange, P. A., Ouwerkerk, J. W., & Tazelaar, M. J. (2002). How to overcome the detrimental effects of noise in social interaction: The benefits of generosity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 768–780.Google Scholar
  105. von Schnurbein, G., Seele, P., & Lock, I. (2016). Exclusive corporate philanthropy: Rethinking the nexus of CSR and corporate philanthropy. Social Responsibility Journal, 12, 280–294.Google Scholar
  106. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–319.Google Scholar
  107. Walker, M., Heere, B., Parent, M. M., & Drane, D. (2010). Social responsibility and the Olympic Games: The mediating role of consumer attributions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 659–680.Google Scholar
  108. Walker, M., & Kent, A. (2013). The roles of credibility and social consciousness in the corporate philanthropy-consumer behavior relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 341–353.Google Scholar
  109. Wang, Y., & Berens, G. (2015). The impact of four types of corporate social performance on reputation and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 131, 337–359.Google Scholar
  110. Wang, H., Choi, J., & Li, J. (2008). Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organization Science, 19, 143–159.Google Scholar
  111. Wang, H., & Qian, C. (2011). Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 1159–1181.Google Scholar
  112. Weiner, B. (1980). Human motivation. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  113. Wicks, A. C., Berman, S. L., & Jones, T. M. (1999). The structure of optimal trust: Moral and strategic implications. Academy of Management Review, 24, 99–116.Google Scholar
  114. Wiseman, R., Cuevas-Rodriguez, G., & Gómez-Mejía, L. R. (2012). Towards a social theory of agency. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 202–222.Google Scholar
  115. Wong, P. T., & Weiner, B. (1981). When people ask “why” questions, and the heuristics of attributional search. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 650–663.Google Scholar
  116. Xu, Y., & Malkiel, B. (2003). Investigating the behavior of idiosyncratic volatility. Journal of Business, 76, 613–644.Google Scholar
  117. Zavyalova, A., Pfarrer, M. D., Reger, R. K., & Shapiro, D. L. (2012). Managing the message: The effects of firm actions and industry spillovers on media coverage following wrongdoing. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1079–1101.Google Scholar
  118. Zhang, M., Xie, L., & Xu, H. (2015). Corporate philanthropy and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Melbourne Business SchoolUniversity of MelbourneCarltonAustralia

Personalised recommendations