The Moderating Roles of Follower Conscientiousness and Agreeableness on the Relationship Between Peer Transparency and Follower Transparency
- 211 Downloads
Transparency is an underpinning of workplace ethics. However, most of the existing research has focused on the relationship between leader transparency and its consequences. Drawing on social and self-regulation theory research, we examine the antecedents of followers’ transparency. Specifically, we propose that followers have higher levels of transparency when they are working with peers who have a high level of transparency. We further suggest that followers’ conscientiousness and agreeableness moderate the relationship between peer transparency and followers’ transparency. Using a time-lagged design, we provide support for the proposed theoretical model. We found that follower conscientiousness substitutes the social regulation effect (embodied in the relationship between peer and follower transparency), while follower agreeableness enhances this social regulation effect. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are also discussed.
KeywordsTransparency Peer pressure Conscientiousness Agreeableness Ethical behaviors
We thank the William F. Harrah College of Hotel Administration for their support related to this publication.
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Allmon, D. E., Page, D., & Roberts, R. (2000). Detecting, understanding, and controlling for cheating on tests. Research in Higher Education, 32, 725–736.Google Scholar
- Bazerman, M. H., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2011). Ethical breakdowns. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2011/04/ethical-breakdowns.
- Ewing, J. (2015). Volkswagen CEO Martin Winterkorn resigns amid emissions scandal. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/24/business/international/volkswagen-chief-martin-winterkorn-resigns-amid-emissions-scandal.html?action=click&contentCollection=International%20Business®ion=Footer&module=WhatsNext&version=WhatsNext&contentID=WhatsNext&moduleDetail=undefined&pgtype=Multimedia.
- Eysenck, H. J. (1968). Eysenck personality inventory. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.Google Scholar
- John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York, NY: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
- Kelley, R. E. (2008). Rethinking followership. In R. E. Riggio, I. Chaleff, & J. Lipman-Blumen (Eds.), The art of followership (pp. 5–16). San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1992). Blowing the whistle: The organizational and legal implications for companies and employees. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Mischel, W., & Mischel, H. N. (1976). A cognitive social-learning approach to morality and self-regulation. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research, and social issues (pp. 84–107). Austin, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
- Rosenhan, D. L., Moore, B. S., & Underwood, B. (1976). The social psychology of moral behavior. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research and social issues (pp. 241–252). New York: Holt McDougal.Google Scholar
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2003). On assimilating identities to the self: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization and integrity within cultures. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook on self & identity (pp. 253–272). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Tellegen, A. (1985). Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In T. A. Hussain & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders (pp. 681–706). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Treviño, L. K., & Victor, B. (1992). Peer reporting of unethical behavior: A social context perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 38–64.Google Scholar
- Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1987). A theory and measure of ethical climate in organizations. Research in corporate social performance and policy, 9, 51–71.Google Scholar
- Vogelgesang, G. R. (2008). How leader interactional transparency can impact follower psychological safety and role engagement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE.Google Scholar
- Walker, K., & Pagano, B. (2008). Transparency: The clear path to leadership credibility. Burlington, MA: Linkage.Google Scholar
- Zhong, C. B., Liljenquist, K. A., & Cain, D. M. (2009). Moral self-regulation. In D. DeCreamer (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on ethical behavior and decision making (pp. 75–89). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar