Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 154, Issue 1, pp 243–261 | Cite as

The Impact of Locus of Control, Moral Intensity, and the Microsocial Ethical Environment on Purchasing-Related Ethical Reasoning

  • Jocelyn HusserEmail author
  • Jean-Marc Andre
  • Véronique Lespinet-Najib
Report of Empirical Research
  • 339 Downloads

Abstract

This study uses a sample of 242 European professional purchasers to examine the six characteristics of the decision-making process developed by Jones (Acad Manag Rev 16:366–395, 1991). The illustration mobilizes six original scenarios reproducing typical purchasing situations. Two versions of each scenario were used, one representing low moral intensity and the other showing high moral intensity. Two populations were sampled: one of 120 purchasers responding to the first version of the questionnaire and a second of 122 different purchasers responding to version two. Each version contained three low-moral-intensity scenarios and three high-moral-intensity scenarios. The research also investigates two concepts suggested by Hannah et al. (Acad Manag Rev 36(4):663–685, 2011): examining the complexity of ethical decision-making through scenarios and microsocial professional ethical contexts. The findings reveal that neither traditional individual characteristics (gender, age, experience) nor standard company characteristics (type of activity, company size) have a real impact on two stages of Rest’s (Moral development: Advances in research and theory. Praeger Press, New York, 1986) model (awareness and intention). They also show that internal locus of control and a high microsocial ethical environment have a positive impact on purchaser awareness and intention to act ethically for four of the six dimensions: magnitude of consequences, social consensus, temporal immediacy, and concentration of effect. Moral intensity factors also have a positive impact on these four dimensions. The two other dimensions (probability of effect and proximity) are not related to the independent variables.

Keywords

Microsocial ethical environment of proximity Ethical decision-making Locus of control Moral intensity Supplier–purchaser relationships 

References

  1. Anquetil, A. (2012). L’éthique des affaires et le scepticisme moral. RIMHE: Revue Interdisciplinaire Management, Homme(s) & Entreprise, 1(1), 71–82.Google Scholar
  2. Arbouche, M. (2013). Ethique des vertus et management. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  3. Babin, J. B., Griffin, M., & Boles, J. S. (2004). Buyer reactions to ethical beliefs in the retail environment. Journal of Business Research, 57(10), 1155–1163.Google Scholar
  4. Bampton, R., & Maclagan, P. (2009). Does a ‘care orientation’ explain gender differences in ethical decision making? A critical analysis and fresh findings. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(2), 179–191.Google Scholar
  5. Barnett, T. (2001). Dimensions of moral intensity and ethical decision-making: An empirical study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1038–1057.Google Scholar
  6. Barnett, T., & Valentine, S. (2004). Issue contingencies and marketers’ recognition of ethical issues, ethical judgments and behavioral intentions. Journal of Business Research, 57(4), 338–346.Google Scholar
  7. Beauvois, J.-L., Joule, R.-V., & Monteil, J.-M. (2002). Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales. Tome 8. Rennes: Presses Universitaires.Google Scholar
  8. Bruel, O. (2008). Politique d’achat et gestion des approvisionnements. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
  9. Calvi, R., Paché, G., & Jarniat, P. (2010). Lorsque la fonction achats devient stratégique. Revue française de gestion, 6, 119–138.Google Scholar
  10. Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Wadsworth, L. L. (2002). The impact of moral intensity dimensions on ethical decision making: Assessing the relevance of orientation. Journal of Managerial Issues, 14(1), 15–30.Google Scholar
  11. Cavanagh, G. F., & Fritzsche, D. J. (1985). Using vignettes in business ethics research. In Lee E. Preston (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  12. Chen, I. J., Paulraj, A., & Lado, A. A. (2004). Strategic purchasing, supply management, and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 505–523.Google Scholar
  13. Cormier, D., Ledoux, M. J., & Magnan, M. (2011). The informational contribution of social and environmental disclosures for investors. Management Decision, 49(8), 1276–1304.Google Scholar
  14. Craft, J. L. (2013). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 2004–2011. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 221–259.Google Scholar
  15. Dubinsky, A. J., & Loken, B. (1989). Analyzing ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Business Research, 19(2), 83–107.Google Scholar
  16. Dzuranin, A. C., Shortridge, R. T., & Smith, P. A. (2013). Building ethical leaders: A way to integrate and assess ethics education. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1), 101–114.Google Scholar
  17. Eckerd, S., & Hill, J. A. (2012). The buyer-supplier social contract: Information sharing as a deterrent to unethical behaviors. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(2), 238–255.Google Scholar
  18. Elango, B., Paul, K., Kundu, S. K., & Paudel, S. K. (2010). Organizational ethics, individual ethics, and ethical intentions in international decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 543–561.Google Scholar
  19. Ellram, L. M., & Carr, A. S. (1994). Strategic purchasing: A history and review of the literature. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 30(2), 10–18.Google Scholar
  20. Ellram, L. M., & Liu, B. (2002). The financial impact of supply management. Supply Chain Management Review, 6(6), 30–37.Google Scholar
  21. Eweje, G., & Brunton, M. (2010). Ethical perceptions of business students in a New Zealand university: Do gender, age and work experience matter? Business Ethics: A European Review, 19(1), 95–111.Google Scholar
  22. Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 87–96.Google Scholar
  23. Ford, J. B., LaTour, M. S., & Henthorne, T. L. (2000). Cognitive moral development and Japanese procurement executives: Implications for industrial marketers. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(6), 589–600.Google Scholar
  24. Forte, A. (2005). Locus of control and the moral reasoning of managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(1), 65–77.Google Scholar
  25. Frey, B. F. (2000). The impact of moral intensity on decision making in a business context. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(3), 181–195.Google Scholar
  26. Fritzsche, D. J., & Becker, H. (1984). Linking management behavior to ethical philosophy: An empirical investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 4(1), 166–175.Google Scholar
  27. Gautier, L. (2001). Fonctions implicites des chartes d’éthique des entreprises. Revue française de gestion, 70–76.Google Scholar
  28. Gibbert, M., & Golfetto, F. (2004). The industrial supplier as a competence marketer: Upstream and downstream implications at Siemens. In IMP conference, Copenhagen, September.Google Scholar
  29. Grisel, L., & Osset, P. (2008). L’analyse du cycle de vie d’un produit ou d’un service. Paris: AFNOR Editions.Google Scholar
  30. Haines, R., Street, M. D., & Haines, D. (2008). The influence of perceived importance of an ethical issue on moral judgment, moral obligation, and moral intent. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 387–399.Google Scholar
  31. Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., & May, D. R. (2011). Moral maturation and moral conation: A capacity approach to explaining moral thought and action. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 663–685.Google Scholar
  32. Hardt, C. W., Reinnecke, N., & Spiller, P. (2007). Inventing the 21st century purchasing organization. McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 114–124.Google Scholar
  33. Hegarty, W. H., & Sims, H. P. (1979). Organizational philosophy, policies, and objectives related to unethical decision behavior: A laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(3), 331.Google Scholar
  34. Herington, C., & Weaven, S. (2008). Improving consistency for DIT results using cluster analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 499–514.Google Scholar
  35. Ho, Y. H., & Christian, C. J. (2012). A review of research on ethical decision-making of purchasing professionals. Information Management and Business Review, 4(2), 72–78.Google Scholar
  36. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.Google Scholar
  37. Husser, J. (2014). L’impact de la constitution des chartes d’éthique en achat. Vie & Sciences de l’Entreprise, 195–196(3), 56–76.Google Scholar
  38. Husser, J., Gautier, L., André, J. M., & Lespinet-Najib, V. (2014). Linking purchasing to ethical decision-making: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(2), 327–338.Google Scholar
  39. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision-making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395.Google Scholar
  40. Jones, T. M., & Huber, V. L. (1992). Issue contingency in ethical decision making. Paper presented at the 3rd annual conference of the international association for business and society, Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
  41. Jones, T. M., & Ryan, L. V. (1998). The effect of organizational forces on individual morality: Judgment, moral approbation, and behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 431–445.Google Scholar
  42. Jung, C. G. (1923). Psychological types: Or the psychology of individuation. New York: Harcourt and Brace.Google Scholar
  43. Knouse, S. B., & Giacalone, R. A. (1992). Ethical decision-making in business: Behavioral issues and concerns. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 369–377.Google Scholar
  44. Kolk, A. (2016). The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 23–34.Google Scholar
  45. Krambia-Kapardis, M., & Zopiatis, A. A. (2008). Unchartered territory: Investigating individual business ethics in Cyprus. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(2), 138–148.Google Scholar
  46. Lavorata, L., Nillès, J. J., & Pontier, S. (2005). Une méthode qualitative innovante pour le marketing. Applications au comportement éthique du vendeur en B to B. Décisions Marketing, 37, 67–75.Google Scholar
  47. Levenson, H. (1973). Multidimensional locus of control in psychiatric patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 41(3), 397.Google Scholar
  48. Lin, C., & Ho, Y. H. (2009). Cultural influences on moral reasoning capacities of purchasing managers: A comparison across the Taiwan Strait. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 37(2), 203–208.Google Scholar
  49. Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(3), 185–204.Google Scholar
  50. Marta, J., Singhapakdi, A., & Kraft, K. (2008). Personal characteristics underlying ethical decisions in marketing situations: A survey of small business managers. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(4), 589–606.Google Scholar
  51. May, D. R., & Pauli, K. P. (2002). The role of moral intensity in ethical decision making: A review and investigation of moral recognition, evaluation, and intention. Business and Society, 41(1), 84–117.Google Scholar
  52. McMahon, J. M., & Harvey, R. J. (2006). An analysis of the factor structure of Jones’ Moral Intensity Construct. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(4), 381–404.Google Scholar
  53. McMahon, J. M., & Harvey, R. J. (2007). The effect of moral intensity on ethical judgment. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4), 335–357.Google Scholar
  54. Moles, A., & Rohmer, E. (1976). Micropsychologie et vie quotidienne. Paris: Denoel.Google Scholar
  55. Murphy, P. R., Smith, J. E., & Daley, J. M. (1992). Executive attitudes, organizational size and ethical issues: Perspectives on a service industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(1), 11–19.Google Scholar
  56. Narasimhan, R., & Das, A. (2001). The impact of purchasing integration and practices on manufacturing performance. Journal of Operations Management, 19(5), 593–609.Google Scholar
  57. Nguyen, N. T., Basuray, M. T., Smith, W. P., Kopka, D., & McCulloh, D. N. (2008). Moral issues and gender differences in ethical judgment using Reidenbach and Robin’s (1990) multidimensional ethics scale: Implications in teaching business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 417–430.Google Scholar
  58. Nillès, J. J. (2002). Comment mesurer l’éthique des logisticiens? Entreprise Ethique, 17(1), 10–19.Google Scholar
  59. O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.Google Scholar
  60. Oumlil, A. B., & Balloun, J. L. (2009). Ethical decision-making differences between American and Moroccan managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 457–478.Google Scholar
  61. Paché, G. (2009). Quels impacts de la crise sur la logistique? Revue Française de Gestion, 3, 51–57.Google Scholar
  62. Paolillo, J. G., & Vitell, S. J. (2002). An empirical investigation of the influence of selected personal, organizational and moral intensity factors on ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 35, 375–413.Google Scholar
  63. Prajogo, D., Chowdhury, M., Yeung, A. C. L., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2012). The relationship between supplier management and firm’s operational performance: A multi-dimensional perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 136(1), 123–130.Google Scholar
  64. Razzaque, M. A., & Hwee, T. P. (2002). Ethics and purchasing dilemma: A Singaporean view. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(4), 307–326.Google Scholar
  65. Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger Press.Google Scholar
  66. Robin, D. P., Reidenbach, R. E., & Forrest, P. J. (1996). The perceived Importance of an ethical issue as an influence on the ethical decision-making of ad managers. Journal of Business Research, 35, 17–28.Google Scholar
  67. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
  68. Ruegger, D., & King, E. W. (1992). A study of the effect of age and gender upon student business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(3), 179–186.Google Scholar
  69. Saini, A. (2010). Purchasing ethics and inter-organizational buyer-supplier relational determinants: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 439–455.Google Scholar
  70. Sen, S., Basligil, H., Sen, C. G., & Baraçli, H. (2008). A framework for defining both qualitative and quantitative supplier selection criteria considering the buyer-supplier integration strategies. International Journal of Production Research, 46(7), 1825–1845.Google Scholar
  71. Serwinek, P. J. (1992). Demographic and related differences in ethical views among small businesses. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(7), 555–566.Google Scholar
  72. Singhal, V. R., & Hendricks, K. B. (2002). How supply chain glitches torpedo shareholder value. Supply Chain Management Review, 6(1), 18–24.Google Scholar
  73. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Franke, G. R. (1999). Antecedents, consequences, and mediating effects of perceived moral intensity and personal moral philosophies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(1), 19–36.Google Scholar
  74. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Kraft, K. L. (1996). Moral intensity and ethical decision-making of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 245–255.Google Scholar
  75. Street, M. D., Douglas, S. C., Geiger, S. W., & Martinko, M. J. (2001). The impact of cognitive expenditure on the ethical decision-making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 256–277.Google Scholar
  76. Sweeney, B., Arnold, D., & Pierce, B. (2010). The impact of perceived ethical culture of the firm and demographic variables on auditors’ ethical evaluation and intention to act decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 531–551.Google Scholar
  77. Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist mode. Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 601–617.Google Scholar
  78. Turner, G. B., Taylor, G. S., & Hartley, M. F. (1995). Ethics, gratuities and professionalization of the purchasing function. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(9), 751–760.Google Scholar
  79. Valentine, S., & Bateman, C. R. (2011). The impact of ethical ideologies, moral intensity, and social context on sales-based ethical reasoning. Journal of Business Research, 102(1), 155–168.Google Scholar
  80. Valentine, S., & Hollingworth, D. (2012). Moral intensity, issue importance, and ethical reasoning in operations situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 509–523.Google Scholar
  81. Valentine, S. R., & Rittenburg, T. L. (2007). The ethical decision making of men and women executives in international business situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 125–134.Google Scholar
  82. Wells, D. (2004). How ethical are ethical purchasing policies? Journal of Academic Ethics, 2(1), 119–140.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CERGAM, AMGSM-IAE AixAix Marseille UniversitéAix en ProvenceFrance
  2. 2.Laboratoire IMS-Cognitique, Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Cognitique, Bordeaux INPUniversité de BordeauxTalenceFrance

Personalised recommendations