Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 153, Issue 3, pp 877–888 | Cite as

About to Burst: How State Self-Regulation Affects the Enactment of Bullying Behaviors

  • Charn P. McAllisterEmail author
  • Pamela L. Perrewé
Original Paper


Past research has demonstrated that employees’ perceptions of abusive supervision are positively associated with the enactment of bullying behaviors. However, an investigation of the factors influencing employees’ decision to bully others at work has yet to be completed. In this study, we propose that the relationship between perceptions of abusive supervision and the enactment of bullying behaviors is mediated by state self-regulation, and that active coping moderates the relationship between state self-regulation and bullying. Further, we analyze how the situational context (e.g., positive or negative) affects employees’ levels of self-regulatory resource depletion and ultimately, the extent to which they engage in bullying behaviors. A moderated mediation analysis using time-separated data (N = 136) provided support for our hypotheses, suggesting that employees’ state self-regulation helps explain why abusive supervision is associated with bullying and that active coping helps to reduce bullying behaviors. Further, the results suggest that negative environments are associated with more bullying. Contributions, practical implications, and future research directions are discussed.


Bullying Abusive supervision Self-regulation Coping 


Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. Allen, V. L., & Greenberger, D. B. (1980). Destruction and perceived control. In A. Baum & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Applications of personal control (pp. 85–109). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, 452–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target’s perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 717–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babalola, M. T., Stouten, J., & Euwema, M. (2016). Frequent change and turnover intention: The moderating role of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 134, 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.Google Scholar
  6. Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Ego depletion and self-control failure: An energy model of the self’s executive function. Self and Identity, 1, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumeister, R. F., & Alquist, J. L. (2009). Is there a downside to good self-control? Self and Identity, 8, 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baumeister, R. F., & Tierney, J. (2011). Willpower: Rediscovering the greatest human strength. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  9. Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Self-regulation, ego depletion, and motivation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 351–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhave, D. P., & Glomb, T. M. (2016). The role of occupational emotional labor requirements on the surface acting-job satisfaction relationship. Journal of Management, 42, 722–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (1996). Beyond distrust: “Getting even” and the need for revenge. In R. M. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 246–260). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Boucher, H. C., & Kofos, M. N. (2012). The idea of money counteracts ego depletion effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 804–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Breaux, D. M., Perrewé, P. L., Hall, A. T., Frink, D. D., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2008). Time to try a little tenderness? The detrimental effects of accountability when coupled with abusive supervision. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 15, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brodsky, C. M. (1976). The harassed worker. Oxford: DC Heath and Co.Google Scholar
  16. Burton, J. P., & Hoobler, J. M. (2011). Aggressive reaction to abusive supervision: The role of interactional justice and narcissism. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burton, J. P., Hoobler, J. M., & Kernan, M. C. (2011). When research setting is important: The influence of subordinate self-esteem on reactions to abusive supervision. Organization Management Journal, 8, 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality—Social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chan, D. (2009). So why ask me? Are self-report data really that bad? In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 309–336). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Demerouti, E., & Rispens, S. (2014). Improving the image of student-recruited samples: A commentary. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., Stillman, T. F., & Gailliot, M. T. (2007). Violence restrained: Effects of self-regulation and its depletion on aggression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 62–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Notelaers, G. (2009). Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Work and Stress, 23, 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. (2003). The concept of bullying at work: The European tradition. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice (pp. 3–30). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  25. Einarsen, S., & Skogstad, A. (1996). Bullying at work: Epidemiological findings in public and private organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ent, M. R., Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (2015). Trait self-control and the avoidance of temptation. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 12–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Folger, R., & Skarlicki, D. P. (1998). A popcorn metaphor for employee aggression. In R. Griffin, A. O’Leary-Kelly, & J. Collins (Eds.), Dysfunctional behavior in organizations: Violent and deviant behavior (pp. 43–81). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  28. Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 992–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fox, J. (1991). Regression diagnostics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Miles, D. (2001). Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gailliot, M. T., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2006). Self-regulatory processes defend against the threat of death: Effects of self-control depletion and trait self-control on thoughts and fears of dying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harris, K. J., Harvey, P., Harris, R. B., & Cast, M. (2013). An investigation of abusive supervision, vicarious abusive supervision, and their joint impacts. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 38–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hauge, L. J., Skogstad, A., & Einarsen, S. (2007). Relationships between stressful work environments and bullying: Results of a large representative sample. Work and Stress, 21, 220–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hauge, L. J., Skogstad, A., & Einarsen, S. (2009). Individual and situational predictors of bullying: Why do perpetrators engage in the bullying of others? Work and Stress, 4, 349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  36. Hershcovis, M. S., Turner, N., Barling, J., Arnold, K. A., Dupre, K. E., Inness, M., et al. (2007). Predicting workplace aggression: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 228–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hochwarter, W. (2014). On the merits of student-recruited sampling: Opinions a decade in the making. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hoel, H., Rayner, C., & Cooper, C. (1999). Workplace bullying. In C. Cooper & L. Robinson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 195–229). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Lanaj, K., Johnson, R. E., & Barnes, C. M. (2014). Beginning the workday yet already depleted? Consequences of late-night smartphone use and sleep. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124, 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lanaj, K., Johnson, R. E., & Wang, M. (2016). When lending a hand depletes the will: The daily costs and benefits of helping. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 1097–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Cognition and motivation in emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 352–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lee, R. T., & Brotheridge, C. M. (2006). When prey turns predatory: Workplace bullying as a predictor of counteraggression/bullying, coping, and well-being. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 165–184.Google Scholar
  43. Lewin, J. E., & Sager, J. K. (2008). Salesperson burnout: A test of the coping-mediational model of social support. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 28, 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lian, H., Brown, D. J., Ferris, D. L., Liang, L. H., Keeping, L. M., & Morrison, R. (2014a). Abusive supervision and retaliation: A self-control framework. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 116–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lian, H., Ferris, D. L., Morrison, R., & Brown, D. J. (2014b). Blame it on the supervisor or the subordinate? Reciprocal relations between abusive supervision and organizational deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 651–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mackey, J. D., Brees, J. R., McAllister, C. P., Zorn, M. L., Martinko, M. J., & Harvey, P. (2016). Victim or culprit? The effects of entitlement and felt accountability on workplace bullying. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3348-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mackey, J. D., Frieder, R. E., Brees, J. R., & Martinko, M. J. (in press). Abusive supervision: A meta-analysis and empirical review. Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206315573997.
  48. Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., Brees, J. R., & Mackey, J. (2013). A review of abusive supervision research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 120–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1159–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2012). Employees’ behavioral reactions to supervisor aggression: An examination of individual and situational factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1148–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Montgomery, D., Peck, E., & Vining, G. (2001). Introduction to linear regression analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  52. Muraven, M. (2010). Building self-control strength: Practicing self-control leads to improved self-control performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 465–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Muraven, M., Gagné, M., & Rosman, H. (2008). Helpful self-control: Autonomy support, vitality, and depletion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 573–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Muraven, M., Shmueli, D., & Burkley, E. (2006). Conserving self-control strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 524–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Muraven, M., Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Self-control as limited resource: Regulatory depletion patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 774–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Robinson, S. L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (1998). Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 658–672.Google Scholar
  60. Sardzoska, E. G., & Tang, T. L. (2011). Work-related behavioral intentions in Macedonia: Coping strategies, work environment, love of money, job satisfaction, and demographic variables. Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shoss, M. K., Jundt, D. K., Kobler, A., & Reynolds, C. (2015). Doing bad to feel better? An investigation of within- and between-person perceptions of counterproductive work behavior as a coping tactic. Journal of Business Ethics, 137, 571–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 269–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2005). The stressor–emotion model of counterproductive work behavior. In S. Fox & P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive behavior. Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 151–174). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Srivastava, R., & Tang, T. L. (2015). Coping intelligence: Coping strategies and organizational commitment among boundary spanning employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stone, E. F., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (1989). Clarifying some controversial issues surrounding statistical procedures for detecting moderator variables: Empirical evidence and related matters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stone-Romero, E. F., & Liakhovitski, D. (2002). Strategies for detecting moderator variables: A review of conceptual and empirical issues. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 21, 333–372.Google Scholar
  67. Stucke, T. S., & Baumeister, R. F. (2006). Ego depletion and aggressive behavior: Is the inhibition of aggression a limited resource. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Subramanian, S. M., & Kumar, V. (2012). Burnout and coping strategies among nurses treating HIV/AIDS, cancer and general patients. Journal of Organization and Human Behavior, 1, 54–61.Google Scholar
  69. Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190.Google Scholar
  70. Trougakos, J. P., Beal, D. J., Cheng, B. H., Hideg, I., & Zweig, D. (2015). Too drained to help: A resource depletion perspective on daily interpersonal citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Twenge, J. M., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (2004). Measuring state self-control: Reliability, validity, and correlations with physical and psychological stress. Unpublished manuscript, San Diego State University.Google Scholar
  72. Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., Twenge, J. M., Nelson, N. M., & Tice, D. M. (2008). Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: A limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 883–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wheeler, A. R., Shanine, K. K., Leon, M. R., & Whitman, M. V. (2014). Student-recruited samples in organizational research: A review, analysis, and guidelines for future research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Xu, E., Huang, X., Lam, C. K., & Miao, Q. (2012). Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediation role of LMX. Journal of Organizational behavior, 33, 531–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yam, K. C., Chen, X., & Reynolds, S. J. (2014). Ego depletion and its paradoxical effects on ethical decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124, 204–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.D’Amore-McKim School of BusinessNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Management, College of BusinessFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations