Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 154, Issue 1, pp 211–228 | Cite as

The Respective Effects of Virtues and Inter-organizational Management Control Systems on Relationship Quality and Performance: Virtues Win

  • Carole Donada
  • Caroline Mothe
  • Gwenaëlle Nogatchewsky
  • Gisele de Campos Ribeiro
Original Paper
  • 270 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, we evaluate how individual virtues and inter-organizational management control systems (IOMCS) influence buyer–supplier performance through relationship quality. Results from a sample of 232 firms confirm that virtues and IOMCS relate positively to relationship quality and performance, respectively. However, IOMCS lose their positive influence on relationship quality when considered along with virtues. That is, when both variables enter the regression model simultaneously, virtues win. This interesting finding has particular resonance at a time when research on ethics still needs to reinforce its positive effects on the practice of management.

Keywords

Buyer–supplier relationships Inter-organizational management control systems Quality Performance Virtue 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the chair Ethic and governance from the Paris-Dauphine University for its support. They also thank PEAK (Purchasing European Alliance for Knowledge) and Thésame stakeholders: the Fund for Innovation and Industry, UDIMERA, the Rhône-Alpes Regional Council, the Haute-Savoie General Council and The Mont-Blanc Industries competitiveness cluster.

References

  1. Ambrose, E., Marshall, D., & Lynch, D. (2010). Buyer supplier perspectives on supply chain relationships. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30(12), 1269–1290.Google Scholar
  2. Argandona, A. (2015). Humility in management. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(1), 63–71.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. (350-BC). Nicomachean ethics XIX, Loeb Classical Library (H. Rackham, Trans. 1982). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Athanasopoulou, P. (2009). Relationship quality: A critical literature review and research agenda. European Journal of Marketing, 43(5/6), 583–610.Google Scholar
  5. Autry, C. W., Skinner, L. R., & Lamb, C. W. (2008). Interorganizational citizenship behaviors: An empirical study. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(2), 53–74.Google Scholar
  6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.Google Scholar
  7. Bartholomew, S., & Smith, A. D. (2006). Improving survey response rates from chief executive officers in small firms: The importance of social networks. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 83–96.Google Scholar
  8. Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160.Google Scholar
  9. Berry, A. J., Broadbent, J., & Otley, D. (1995). Approaches to control in organisational literature. In A. J. Berry, J. Broadbent, & D. Otley (Eds.), Management control: Theories, issues and practices. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Blome, C., & Paulraj, A. (2013). Ethical climate and purchasing social responsibility: A benevolence focus. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(3), 567–585.Google Scholar
  11. Bocquet, R., Le Bas, C., Mothe, C., & Poussing, N. (2015). CSR, innovation, and firm performance in sluggish growth contexts: A firm-level empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2959-8.Google Scholar
  12. Boles, J. S., Johnson, J. T., & Barksdale, H. C. (2000). How salespeople build quality relationships: A replication and extension. Journal of Business Research, 48(1), 75–81.Google Scholar
  13. Caglio, A., & Ditillo, A. (2008). A review and discussion of management control in inter-firm relationships: Achievements and future directions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(7), 865–898.Google Scholar
  14. Cameron, K. S., Bright, D., & Caza, A. (2004). Exploring the relationships between organizational virtuousness and performance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 766–790.Google Scholar
  15. Cameron, K., Mora, C., Leutscher, T., & Calarco, M. (2011). Effects of positive practices on organizational effectiveness. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(3), 266–308.Google Scholar
  16. Carter, C. R., & Jennings, M. (2004). The role of purchasing in the socially responsible management of the supply chain: A structural equation analysis. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(1), 145–186.Google Scholar
  17. Caza, A., Barker, B. A., & Cameron, K. S. (2004). Ethics and ethos: The buffering and amplifying effects of ethical behavior and virtuousness. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(2), 169–178.Google Scholar
  18. Coletti, A. L., Sedatole, K. L., & Towry, K. L. (2005). The effect of control systems on trust and cooperation in collaborative environments. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 477–500.Google Scholar
  19. Colwell, S. R., Zyphur, M. J., & Schminke, M. (2011). When does ethical code enforcement matter in the inter-organizational context? The moderating role of switching costs. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 47–58.Google Scholar
  20. Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R., & Cowles, D. (1990). Relationship quality in services selling: An interpersonal influence perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 68–81.Google Scholar
  21. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491–512.Google Scholar
  22. Dekker, H. C. (2004). Control of inter-organizational relationships: Evidence on appropriation concerns and coordination requirements. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(1), 27–49.Google Scholar
  23. Dekker, H. C. (2008). Partner selection and governance design in interfirm relationships. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(7), 915–941.Google Scholar
  24. Dekker, H. C., Sakaguchi, J., & Kawai, T. (2013). Beyond the contract: Managing risk in supply chain relations. Management Accounting Research, 24(2), 122–139.Google Scholar
  25. Ding, R., Dekker, H. C., & Groot, T. (2013). Risk, partner selection and contractual control in interfirm relationships. Management Accounting Research, 24(2), 140–155.Google Scholar
  26. Donada, C., & Nogachewsky, G. (2006). Vassal or lord buyers: How to exert management control in asymmetric interfirm transactional relationships? Management Accounting Research, 17(3), 259–287.Google Scholar
  27. Donada, C., Nogachewsky, G., & Pezet, A. (2016). Understanding relational dynamic capability building process. Strategic Organization, 14(2), 93–117.Google Scholar
  28. Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35–51.Google Scholar
  29. Drake, M., & Schlachter, J. T. (2008). A virtue-ethics analysis of supply chain collaboration. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 851–864.Google Scholar
  30. Ferrero, I., & Sison, A. J. (2014). A quantitative analysis of authors, schools and themes in virtue ethics articles in business ethics and management journals (1980–2011). Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(4), 375–400.Google Scholar
  31. Field, A., Miles, J., & Field, Z. (2012). Discovering statistics using R. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Flikkema, M., Jansen, P., & Van der Sluis, L. (2007). Identifying neo-Schumpeterian innovation in service firms: A conceptual essay with a novel classification. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(7), 541–558.Google Scholar
  33. Friman, M., Gärling, T., Millett, B., Mattsson, J., & Johnston, R. (2002). An analysis of international business-to-business relationships based on the commitment–trust theory. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(5), 403–409.Google Scholar
  34. Fynes, B., De Burca, S., & Mangan, J. (2008). The effect of relationship characteristics on relationship quality and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(1), 56–69.Google Scholar
  35. Fynes, B., Voss, C., & de Búrca, S. (2005). The impact of supply chain relationship quality on quality performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 96(3), 339–354.Google Scholar
  36. Gallouj, F., & Weinstein, O. (1997). Innovation in services. Research Policy, 26(4/5), 537–556.Google Scholar
  37. Garbarino, E., & Johnson, M. S. (1999). The different roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships. Journal of Marketing, 63(April), 70–87.Google Scholar
  38. Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 13–47.Google Scholar
  39. Goodman, L. E., & Dion, P. A. (2001). The determinants of commitment in the distributor–manufacturer relationship. Industrial Marketing Management, 30(3), 287–300.Google Scholar
  40. Gotsis, G., & Grimani, K. (2015). Virtue theory and organizational behavior: An integrative framework. Journal of Management Development, 34(10), 1288–1309.Google Scholar
  41. Griffith, D. A., & Zhao, Y. (2015). Contract specificity, contract violation, and relationship performance in international buyer–supplier relationships. Journal of International Marketing, 23(3), 22–40.Google Scholar
  42. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
  43. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  44. Heide, J. B., Kumar, A., & Wathne, K. H. (2014). Concurrent sourcing, governance mechanisms and performance outcomes in industrial value chains. Strategic Management Journal, 35(8), 1164–1185.Google Scholar
  45. Hopwood, A. G. (1996). Looking across rather than up and down: On the need to explore the lateral processing of information. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(6), 589–590.Google Scholar
  46. Huntley, J. K. (2006). Conceptualization and measurement of relationship quality: Linking relationship quality to actual sales and recommendation intention. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(6), 703–714.Google Scholar
  47. Jap, S. D., Manolis, C., & Weitz, B. A. (1999). Relationship quality and buyer–seller interactions in channels of distribution. Journal of Business Research, 46(3), 303–313.Google Scholar
  48. Johnson, J. L. (1999). Strategic integration in industrial distribution channels: Managing the interfirm relationship as a strategic asset. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(1), 4–18.Google Scholar
  49. Kaynak, R., & Sert, T. (2012). The impact of service supplier’s unethical behavior to buyer’s satisfaction: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(2), 219–226.Google Scholar
  50. Langfield-Smith, K. (1997). Management control systems and strategy: A critical review. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(2), 207–232.Google Scholar
  51. Langfield-Smith, K. (2008). The relations between transactional characteristics, trust and risk in the start-up phase of a collaborative alliance. Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 344–364.Google Scholar
  52. MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory (3rd ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  53. Madrid-Guijarro, A., Garcia, D., & Van Auken, H. (2009). Barriers to innovation among Spanish manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(4), 465–488.Google Scholar
  54. Mahama, H. (2006). Management control systems, cooperation and performance in strategic supply relationships: A survey in the mines. Management Accounting Research, 17(3), 315–339.Google Scholar
  55. Meira, J., Kartalis, N. D., Tsamenyi, M., & Cullen, J. (2010). Management controls and inter-firm relationships: A review. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 6(1), 149–169.Google Scholar
  56. Merchant, K. A., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2007). Management control systems: Performance measurement, evaluation and incentives (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall-Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  57. Mohr, J., & Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 135–152.Google Scholar
  58. Niskanen, M., & Niskanen, J. (2010). Small business borrowing and the owner–manager agency costs: Evidence on Finnish data. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(1), 16–31.Google Scholar
  59. Olk, P., & Young, C. (1997). Why members stay in or leave an R&D consortium: Performance and conditions of membership as determinants of continuity. Strategic Management Journal, 18(11), 855–877.Google Scholar
  60. Palmatier, R. W. (2008). Interfirm relational drivers of customer value. Journal of Marketing, 72(4), 76–89.Google Scholar
  61. Plato. (315 BC). The Republic, Book IV (419d–445e).Google Scholar
  62. Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725.Google Scholar
  63. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731.Google Scholar
  64. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.Google Scholar
  65. Riggio, R. E., Zhu, W., Reina, C., & Maroosis, J. A. (2010). Virtue-based measurement of ethical leadership: The leadership virtues questionnaire. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(4), 235.Google Scholar
  66. Saini, A. (2010). Purchasing ethics and inter-organizational buyer–supplier relational determinants: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 439–455.Google Scholar
  67. Sanzo, M. J., Santos, M. L., Vázquez, R., & Álvarez, L. I. (2003). The effect of market orientation on buyer–seller relationship satisfaction. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(4), 327–345.Google Scholar
  68. Shanahan, K. J., & Hyman, M. R. (2003). The development of a virtue ethics scale. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(2), 197–208.Google Scholar
  69. Siguaw, J. A., Simpson, P. M., & Baker, T. L. (1998). Effects of supplier market orientation on distributor market orientation and the channel relationship: The distributor perspective. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 99–111.Google Scholar
  70. Sison, A. J., & Ferrero, I. (2015). How different is neo-Aristotelian virtue from positive organizational virtuousness? Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(S2), S78–S98.Google Scholar
  71. Sjoerdsma, M., & van Weele, A. J. (2015). Managing supplier relationships in a new product development context. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 21(3), 192–203.Google Scholar
  72. Small, M. W. (2013). Business practice, ethics and the philosophy of morals in the Rome of Marcus Tullius Cicero. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(2), 341–350.Google Scholar
  73. Solomon, R. C. (1999). Nietzsche’s virtues: A personal inquiry. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 44, 81–108.Google Scholar
  74. Vélez, M. L., Sánchez, J. M., & Álvarez-Dardet, C. (2008). Management control systems as inter-organizational trust builders in evolving relationships: Evidence from a longitudinal case study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(7), 968–994.Google Scholar
  75. Walter, A., Müller, T. A., Helfert, G., & Ritter, T. (2003). Functions of industrial supplier relationships and their impact on relationship quality. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(2), 159–169.Google Scholar
  76. White, S., & Siu-Yun Lui, S. (2005). Distinguishing costs of cooperation and control in alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 26(10), 913–932.Google Scholar
  77. Yilmaz, C., Sezen, B., & Kabadayı, E. T. (2004). Supplier fairness as a mediating factor in the supplier performance–reseller satisfaction relationship. Journal of Business Research, 57(8), 854–863.Google Scholar
  78. Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141–159.Google Scholar
  79. Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ESSEC Business SchoolCergy-PontoiseFrance
  2. 2.IREGE, University Savoie Mont BlancAnnecy-le-VieuxFrance
  3. 3.PSL Research University, CNRS, UMR (7088), DRM, (MOST)Université Paris-DauphineParisFrance

Personalised recommendations