Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 153, Issue 2, pp 519–545 | Cite as

The Role of Corporate Donations in Chinese Political Markets

  • Ming Jia
  • Zhe Zhang
Original Paper

Abstract

Many corporations actively engage in political activities to enhance their relationships with politicians, facilitating access to scarce resources and creating competitive advantages. We investigate corporate donations to explore how they initiate interactions between firms and new local leaders in China. Specifically, we propose that political turnover creates unique opportunities for firms to win over new officials via corporate donations, especially in competitive markets. Moreover, we find that firms that make generous donations at the beginning of a new city secretary’s tenure receive more attention from representatives of new local leaders, especially firms that were politically disadvantaged under a predecessor’s governance. Empirical studies on the turnover of city secretaries between 2001 and 2012 in China strongly support our hypotheses. Consequently, this study improves our understanding of how corporate donations initiate social exchanges between firms and politicians.

Keywords

Political turnover Corporate donation Official visits Initial interaction Corporate political activity Social exchange Chinese political market 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71672139; No. 71372065; No. 71272002), Shaanxi Province Overseas Students (Grant No. 18920004), and Humanities and Social Science Talent Plan of Shaanxi University. The authors also express their appreciation to the editors and three anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and comments. However, the authors are responsible for all errors in the paper.

References

  1. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai, T. (2013), September, 25. Woman who led minister’s fall pleads guilty to bribery. Global Times. Retrieved on October 24, 2016 from http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/813722.shtml.
  3. Balboa, M., & Marti, J. (2007). Factors that determine the reputation of private equity managers in developing markets. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 453–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bednar, M. K. (2012). Watchdog or lapdog? A behavioral view of the media as a corporate governance mechanism. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Bonardi, J. P. (2011). Corporate political resources and the resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Organization, 9(3), 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonardi, J. P., Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2005). The attractiveness of political markets: Implications for firm strategy. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonardi, J. P., Holburn, G. L., & Bergh, R. G. V. (2006). Nonmarket strategy performance: Evidence from US electric utilities. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1209–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, W., Helland, E., & Smith, J. K. (2006). Corporate philanthropic practices. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(5), 855–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buchanan, J. (1988). The economic theory of politics reborn. Challenge, 31, 4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Capron, L., & Chatain, O. (2008). Competitors’ resource-oriented strategies: Acting on competitors’ resources through interventions in factor markets and political markets. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, Y., Li, H., & Zhou, L. (2005). Relative performance evaluation and the turnover provincial leaders in China. Economic Letters, 88(3), 421–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Claessens, S., Feijen, E., & Laeven, L. (2008). Political connections and preferential access to finance: The role of campaign contributions. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 554–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled agreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70(4), 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colak, G., Durnev, A., & Qian, Y. (2016). Political uncertainty and IPO activity: Evidence from U.S. gubernatorial elections. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2281269
  16. Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cooper, M. J., Gulen, H., & Ovtchinnikov, A. V. (2010). Corporate political contributions and stock returns. Journal of Finance, 65(2), 687–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cui, J. (2007). QIC program and model selection in GEE analyses. Stata Journal, 7(2), 209–220.Google Scholar
  20. Deutsch, Y., Keil, T., & Laamanen, T. (2011). A dual agency view of board compensation: The joint effects of outside director and CEO stock options on firm risk. Strategic Management Journal, 32(2), 212–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Devinney, T. M. (2009). Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2), 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96(1), 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fan, J., Wong, P. H., & Zhang, T. J. (2007). Politically-connected CEOs, corporate governance and post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2), 330–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Forsythe, M., Buckley, C., & Ansfield, J. (2014). Investigating family’s wealth, China’s leader signals a change. New York Times. Retrieved on October 24, 2016 from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/20/world/asia/severing-a-familys-ties-chinas-president-signals-a-change.html?_r=0.
  25. Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gouldner, A. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hadani, M., & Schuler, D. A. (2013). In search of El Dorado: The elusive financial returns on corporate political investments. Strategic Management Journal, 34(2), 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hegde, D., & Sampat, B. (2015). Can private money buy public science? Disease group lobbying and federal funding for biomedical research. Management Science, 61(10), 2281–2298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Henisz, W. J., & Zelner, B. A. (2003). The strategic organization of political risks and opportunities. Strategic Organization, 1(4), 451–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hiatt, S., & Park, S. (2013). Lords of the harvest: Third-party influence and regulatory approval of genetically modified organisms. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 923–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hill, M. D., Kelly, G. W., Lockhart, G. B., & Ness, R. A. (2013). Determinants and effects of corporate lobbying. Financial Management, 42(4), 931–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D., & Schuler, D. (2004). Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30(6), 837–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. Stata Journal, 7(3), 281–312.Google Scholar
  35. Janney, J. J., & Folta, T. B. (2003). Signaling through private equity placements and its impact on the valuation of biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 361–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jia, M., & Zhang, Z. (2011). Agency costs and corporate philanthropic disaster response: The moderating role of women on two-tier boards—Evidence from People’s Republic of China. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(9), 2011–2031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jia, M., & Zhang, Z. (2013). The CEO’s representation of demands and the corporation’s response to external pressures: Do politically affiliated firms donate more? Management and Organization Review, 9(1), 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jia, M., & Zhang, Z. (2014). Donating money to get money: The role of corporate philanthropy in stakeholder reactions to IPOs. Journal of Management Studies, 51(7), 1118–1152.Google Scholar
  39. Julio, B., & Yook, Y. (2012). Political uncertainty and corporate investment cycles. Journal of Finance, 67(1), 45–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kozhikode, R. K., & Li, J. T. (2012). Political pluralism, public policies, and organizational choices: Banking branch expansion in India, 1948–2003. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 339–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Li, H., & Zhou, L. A. (2005). Political turnover and economic performance: The incentive role of personnel control in China. Journal of Public Economics, 89(9), 1743–1762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lockett, A., & Thompson, S. (2001). The resource-based view and economics. Journal of Management, 27(6), 723–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lux, S., Crook, T. R., & Woehr, D. J. (2011). Mixing business with politics: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and outcomes of corporate political activity. Journal of Management, 37(1), 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCarty, N., & Rothenberg, L. S. (2000). The time to give: PAC motivations and electoral timing. Political Analysis, 8(3), 239–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moore, M. (2013). China repays companies wrongly targeted by disgraced politician Bo Xilai’s anti-corruption blitz. The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved on October 24, 2016 from http://www.smh.com.au/world/china-repays-companies-wrongly-targeted-by-disgraced-politician-bo-xilais-anticorruption-blitz-20131119-2xt4z.html.
  47. Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, democracy, and the politicization of the corporation. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 773–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Perkins, S. J., & Hendry, C. (2005). Ordering top pay: Interpreting the signals. Journal of Management Studies, 42(7), 1443–1468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Piotroski, J. D., & Zhang, T. (2014). Politicians and the IPO decision: The impact of impending political promotions on IPO activity in China. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(1), 111–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rajagopalan, M., & Takada, K. (2014). Chinese police charge British former head of GSK in China with bribery. Reuters. Retrieved on October 24, 2016 from http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/14/us-china-glaxosmithkline-idUSBREA4D03720140514.
  52. Ryan, T. Y. (1997). Modern regression analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  53. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Siegel, J. (2007). Contingent political capital and international alliances: Evidence from South Korea. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(4), 621–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stratmann, T. (1995). Campaign contributions and congressional voting: Does the timing of contributions matter? Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(1), 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stratmann, T. (1998). The market for congressional votes: Is timing of contributions everything? Journal of Law and Economics, 41(1), 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tilcsik, A., & Marquis, C. (2013). Punctuated generosity: How mega-events and natural disasters affect corporate philanthropy in U.S. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(1), 111–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tonin, M., & Vlassopoulos, M. (2014). Corporate philanthropy and productivity: Evidence from an online real effort experiment. Management Science, 61(8), 1795–1811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang, H., & Qian, C. (2011). Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1159–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Want China Time, (2012). Ban on buying liquor with public funds causes stock slide. Want China Time. Retrieved on October 24, 2016 from http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20120330000056&cid=1202.
  61. Warner, A. G., Fairbank, J. F., & Steensma, H. K. (2006). Managing uncertainty in a formal standards-based industry: A real options perspective on acquisition timing. Journal of Management, 32(2), 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Werner, T. (2015). Gaining access by doing good: The effect of sociopolitical reputation on firm participation in public policy making. Management Science, 61(8), 1989–2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 513–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhai, K. (2014). Liu Han corruption case highlights extensive and tangled web of bribery. South China Moring Post. Retrieved at October 24, 2016 from http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1492363/liu-han-corruption-case-highlights-extensive-and-tangled-web-bribery.
  65. Zhang, Q., & Liu, M. (2010). Local political elite, partial reform symptoms, and the business and market environment in rural China. Business and Politics, 12(1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhang, T., & Xie, H.T. (2013). After Bo Xilai, Businesses in Chongqing struggle to regain footing. Caixin magazine. Retrieved at October 24, 2016 from http://english.caixin.com/2013-10-14/100591759.html.
  67. Zhang, R., Zhu, J., Yue, H., & Zhu, C. (2010). Corporate philanthropic giving, advertising intensity, and industry competition level. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.School of ManagementXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations