Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 148, Issue 1, pp 183–203 | Cite as

What Good Does Doing Good do? The Effect of Bond Rating Analysts’ Corporate Bias on Investor Reactions to Changes in Social Responsibility

  • Oana Branzei
  • Jeff Frooman
  • Brent McknightEmail author
  • Charlene Zietsma
Original Paper
  • 845 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, we explore how investors reconcile information on firms’ social responsibility with analysts’ assessments of future firm risk in the pricing of long-term bonds. We ask whether investors pay attention to small strides toward and/or small slips away from socially responsible behavior, arguing that analysts’ corporate bias toward gains and against losses influences investor reactions to corporate social responsibility. We hypothesize that analysts notice and reward improvements in social responsibility, yet excuse lapses. We find support for this hypothesis, using a unique dataset of long-term bonds that combines lagged measures of firm-level financial and social performance with bond-specific data pertaining to risk of default and pricing. The empirically robust asymmetry in investor responses to small but often cumulative increases versus decreases in corporate social responsibility reveals an under-examined root cause of longer-term, larger-scale distortions in financial market returns regarding corporate social performance. Our findings elaborate earlier behavioral research on how corporate bias influences analysts’ short-term assessments of economic risk, by theorizing why this corporate bias may influence long-term assessments of social risk. Our work also motivates more critical scrutiny of the role analysts play in revising the future risk of today’s social action versus inaction.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility Corporate bias Long-term debt Long-term risk 

References

  1. Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D. W., & LaFond, R. (2006). The effects of corporate governance on firms’ credit ratings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1–2), 203–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hartfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 446–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, H. K., & Mansi, S. A. (2002). Assessing credit rating agencies by bond issuers and institutional investors. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29(9), 1367–1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balabanis, G., Phillips, H. C., & Lyall, J. (1998). Corporate social responsibility and economic performance in the top British companies: Are they linked? European Business Review, 98(1), 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bansal, P., & DesJardines, M. R. (2014). Business sustainability: It’s about time. Strategic Organization, 12(1), 70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnett, M. L., & King, A. A. (2008). Good fences make good neighbors: A longitudinal analysis of an industry self-regulatory institution. The Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1150–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1304–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barreda-Tarrazona, I., Matallin-Saez, J. C., & Balaguer-Franch, M. R. (2011). Measuring investors’ socially responsible preferences in mutual funds. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(2), 305–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bascle, G. (2008). Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research. Strategic Organization, 6(3), 285–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berry, R. H., & Yeung, F. (2013). Are investors willing to sacrifice cash for morality? Journal of Business Ethics, 117(3), 477–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bhojraj, S., & Sengupta, P. (2003). Effect of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields: The role of institutional investors and outside directors. Journal of Business, 76(3), 455–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bird, R., Hall, A. D., Momente, F., & Reggiani, F. (2007). What corporate social responsibility activitie are valued by the market. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(2), 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bolton, P., Freixas, X., & Shapiro, J. (2012). The credit ratings game. Journal of Finance, 67(1), 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bouquet, C., & Deutsch, Y. (2008). The impact of corporate social performance on a firm’s multinationality. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(4), 755–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1325–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Branzei, O., & Vertinsky, I. (2006). Strategic pathways to product innovation capabilities in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(1), 75–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Marcus, A. J. (2003). Fundamentals of corporate finance. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
  20. Byrne, K. (2005). How do consumers evaluate risk in financial products. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 10(1), 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chatterji, A. K., Levine, D. I., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18(1), 125–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen, Q., & Jiang, W. (2006). Analysts’ weighting of private and public information. Review of Financial Studies, 19, 319–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cooperrider, D. L., & Dutton, J. E. (1999). The organization dimensions of global change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Cox, P., Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2004). An empirical examination of institutional investor preferences for corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. D’Antonio, L., & Johnsen, T. (1997). Expanding socially screened portfolios: An attribution analysis of bond performance. Journal of Investing, 6(4), 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Davidson, W. N., & Worrell, D. L. (1988). The impact of announcements of corporate illegalities on shareholder returns. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Diacon, S. (2004). Investment risk perceptions: Do consumers and advisers agree? The International Journal of Bank Marketing, 22(3), 180–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Diacon, S., & Ennew, C. (2001). Consumer perceptions of financial risk. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 26(3), 389–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Easterwood, J. C., & Nutt, S. R. (1999). Inefficiency in analysts’ earnings forecasts: Systematic misreaction or systematic optimism? The Journal of Finance, 54(5), 1777–1797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Elliott, W. B., Jackson, K. E., Peecher, M. E., & White, B. J. (2014). The unintended effect of corporate social responsibility performance on investors’ estimates of fundamental value. Accounting Review, 89(1), 275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Entine, J. (2003). The myth of social investing: A critique of its practices and consequences for corporate social performance research. Organization & Environment, 16(3), 352–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Epstein, M. J., McEwen, R. A., & Spindle, R. M. (1994). Shareholder preferences concerning corporate ethical performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(6), 447–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fleischer, A. (2009). Ambiguity and the equity of rating systems: United states brokerage firms, 1995–2000. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(4), 555–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fons, J. S. (2008). Rating competition and structured finance. The Journal of Structured Finance, 14(3), 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Frooman, J. (1997). Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth: A meta-analysis of event studies. Business and Society, 36(3), 221–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gao, J. (2008). The evolution of business sustainability: Historical trajectory and structural relationships. PhD: University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.Google Scholar
  39. Girerd-Potin, I., Jimenez-Garces, S., & Louvet, P. (2014). Which dimensions of social responsibility concern financial investors? Journal of Business Ethics, 121(4), 559–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Glac, K. (2009). Understanding socially responsible investing: The effect of decision frames and trade-off options. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 425–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Goss, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2007). The cost of virtue: Corporate social responsibility and the cost of debt financing (Working Paper ed.). Toronto, ON: York University Schulich School of Business.Google Scholar
  43. Graafland, J. J. (2003). Distribution of responsibility, ability and competition. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1–2), 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (2000). Beyond built to last. Stakeholder relations in ‘built-to-last” companies. Business and Society Review, 105(4), 393–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business and Society, 39(3), 254–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Groening, C., & Kanuri, V. K. (2013). Investor reaction to positive and negative corporate social events. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1852–1860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hamilton, B. H., & Nickerson, J. A. (2003). Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organization, 1(1), 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hayward, M. L. A., & Boeker, W. (1998). Power and conflicts of interest in professional firms: Evidence from investment banking. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Herremans, I. M., Akathaporn, P., & McInnes, M. (1993). An investigation of corporate social responsibility reputation and economic performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18, 587–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hirst, D. E., Koonce, L., & Simko, P. J. (1995). Investor reactions to financial analysts’ research reports. Journal of Accounting Research, 33(2), 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hockerts, K., & Moir, L. (2004). Communicating corporate social responsibility to investors: The changing role of the investors relations function. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hummels, H., & Timmer, D. (2004). Investors in need of social, ethical, and environmental information. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jiang, X., Stanford, M. H., & Xie, Y. (2012). Does it matter who pays for bond ratings? Historical evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 607–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437.Google Scholar
  58. King, A., & Lenox, M. (2002). Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Science, 48(2), 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Klein, A. (1990). A direct test of the cognitive bias theory of share price reversals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 13, 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit. New York: Houghton Mufflin.Google Scholar
  61. Lange, D., & Washburn, N. T. (2012). Understanding attributions of corporate social irresponsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 300–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Law, K., Wong, C. S., & Mobley, W. H. (1998). Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 741–755.Google Scholar
  63. Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 817–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2001). People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social performance and financial performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  67. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mazutis, D. (2012). Much ado about nothing? (The lack of) CSR initiative adoption and isomorphism over time. Paper presented at Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  69. McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 854–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. McLachlan, J., & Gardner, J. (2004). A comparison of socially responsible and conventional investors. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Nagy, R. A., & Obenberger, R. W. (1994). Factors influencing individual investor behavior. Financial Analysts Journal, 50(4), 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Palmer, D. (2012). Normal organizational wrongdoing: A critical analysis of theories of misconduct in and by organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Peloza, J. (2006). Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance. California Management Review, 48(2), 52–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Picou, A., & Rubach, M. J. (2006). Does good governance matter to institutional investors? Evidence from the enactment of corporate governance guidelines. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(1), 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Plowman, D. A., Baker, L. T., Beck, T. E., Kulkarni, M., Solansky, S. T., & Travis, D. V. (2007). Radical change accidentally: The emergence and amplification of small change. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 515–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ramnath, S., Rock, S., & Shane, P. (2008). The financial analyst forecasting literature: A taxonomy with suggestions for further research. International Journal of Forecasting, 24, 34–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (1991). Organizational effectiveness, social performance, and economic performance. Research in Corporate Social Performance, 12, 143–153.Google Scholar
  80. Richardson, M., & White, L. J. (2009). The rating agencies: Is regulation the answer? In V. A. Acharya & M. Richardson (Eds.), Restoring financial stability: How to repair a failed system (pp. 101–116). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  81. Ruf, B. M., Muralidhar, K., Brown, R. M., Janney, J. J., & Paul, K. (2001). An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: A stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(2), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ruf, B. M., Muralidhar, K., & Paul, K. (1998). The development of a systematic, aggregate measure of corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 24(1), 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sandbu, M. E. (2012). Stakeholder duties: On the moral responsibility of corporate investors. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(1), 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schipper, K. (1991). Analysts’ forecasts. Accounting Horizons, 5, 105–121.Google Scholar
  85. Sharfman, M. (1996). The construct validity of the Kinder, Lydenberg & Domini social performance ratings data. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3), 287–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 569–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Shaver, J. M. (1998). Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Science, 44(4), 571–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Slawinski, N., & Bansal, P. (2012). Short on time: The role of organizational time orientation in business sustainability. Organization Studies, 33(11), 1537–1563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Spicer, B. H. (1978). Investors, corporate social performance, and information disclosure: An empirical study. Accounting Review, 53(1), 94–111.Google Scholar
  90. Strike, V. M., Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2006). Being good while being bad: Social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 850–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Van der Laan, G., Van Ees, H., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2007). Corporate social and financial performance: An extended stakeholder theory, and empirical test with accounting measures. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(3), 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wang, T., & Bansal, P. (2012). Social responsibility in new ventures: Profiting from a long-term orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1135–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wang, M., Qiu, C., & Kong, D. (2011). Corporate social responsibility, investor behaviors, and stock market returns: Evidence from a natural experiment in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(1), 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. White, L. J. (2010). Markets: The credit rating agencies. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2), 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on Corporate Social Performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(3), 229–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Xia, H. (2014). Can investor-paid credit rating agencies improve the information quality of issuer-paid rating agencies? Journal of Financial Economics, 111(2), 450–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oana Branzei
    • 1
  • Jeff Frooman
    • 2
  • Brent Mcknight
    • 3
    Email author
  • Charlene Zietsma
    • 4
  1. 1.Richard Ivey School of BusinessWestern UniversityLondonCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of Business AdministrationUniversity of New BrunswickFrederictonCanada
  3. 3.DeGroote School of BusinessMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  4. 4.Schulich School of BusinessYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations