Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 153, Issue 3, pp 615–628 | Cite as

The More You Care, the Worthier I Feel, the Better I Behave: How and When Supervisor Support Influences (Un)Ethical Employee Behavior

  • Francesco Sguera
  • Richard P. Bagozzi
  • Quy N. Huy
  • R. Wayne Boss
  • David S. Boss
Article
  • 722 Downloads

Abstract

This article investigates the effects of perceived supervisor support on ethical (organizational citizenship behaviors) and unethical employee behavior (counterproductive workplace behavior) using a multi-method approach (one experiment and one field survey with multiple waves and supervisor ratings of employees). Specifically, we test the mediating mechanism (i.e., supervisor-based self-esteem) and a boundary condition (i.e., employee task satisfaction) that moderate the relationship between support and (un)ethical employee behaviors. We find that supervisor-based self-esteem fully mediates the relationship between supervisor support and (un)ethical employee behavior and that employee task satisfaction intensifies the relationship between supervisor support and supervisor-based self-esteem.

Keywords

Perceived supervisor support Ethical and unethical employee behavior Supervisor-based self-esteem Task satisfaction Organizational citizenship behavior Counterproductive workplace behavior 

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: CA Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed, A., II, & Lim, V. K. G. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 123–141.Google Scholar
  3. Aronson, E., & Mettee, D. R. (1968). Dishonest behavior as a function of differential levels of induced self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(21), 121.Google Scholar
  4. Bagozzi, R. P., Sekerka, L. E., Hill, V., & Sguera, F. (2013). The role of moral values in instigating morally responsible decisions. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49(1), 69–94.Google Scholar
  5. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, T. E., & Kernan, M. C. (2003). Matching commitment to supervisors and organizations to in-role and extra-role performance. Human Performance, 16(4), 327–348.Google Scholar
  7. Bhanthumnavin, D. (2003). Perceived social support from supervisor and group members’ psychological and situational characteristics as predictors of subordinate performance in Thai work units. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14(1), 79–97.Google Scholar
  8. Brockner, J. (1988). Self-esteem at work: Research, theory, and practice. Lexington: Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.Google Scholar
  9. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on psychological science, 6(1), 3–5.Google Scholar
  10. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, C., & Chiu, S. (2008). An integrative model linking supervisor support and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 23(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
  12. Cherrington, D. J., Reitz, H. J., & Scott, W. E. (1971). Effects of contingent and noncontingent reward on the relationship between satisfaction and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(6), 531.Google Scholar
  13. Cheung, M. F. Y., Wu, W.-P., Chan, A. K. K., & Wong, M. M. L. (2008). Supervisor–subordinate guanxi and employee work outcomes: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 77–89.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, T. R., Panter, A. T., Turan, N., Morse, L., & Kim, Y. (2014). Moral character in the workplace. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 943.Google Scholar
  15. Cojuharenco, I., & Sguera, F. (2015). When empathic concern and perspective taking matter for ethical judgment: The role of time hurriedness. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(3), 717–725.Google Scholar
  16. Cole, M., Bruch, H., & Vogel, B. (2006). Emotion as mediators of the relations between perceived supervisor support and psychological hardiness on employee cynicism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 463.Google Scholar
  17. Crilly, D., Schneider, S. C., & Zollo, M. (2008). Psychological antecedents to socially responsible behavior. European Management Review, 5(3), 175–190.Google Scholar
  18. Daniel, T. L., & Esser, J. K. (1980). Intrinsic motivation as influenced by rewards, task interest, and task structure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(5), 566.Google Scholar
  19. Dunegan, K. J., Uhl-Bien, M., & Duchon, D. (2002). LMX and subordinate performance: The moderating effects of task characteristics. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(2), 275–285.Google Scholar
  20. Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565–573.Google Scholar
  21. Ferris, D. L., Brown, D. J., & Heller, D. (2009a). Organizational supports and organizational deviance: The mediating role of organization-based self-esteem. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(2), 279–286.Google Scholar
  22. Ferris, D. L., Brown, D. J., Lian, H., & Keeping, L. M. (2009b). When does self-esteem relate to deviant behavior? The role of contingencies of self-worth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1345–1353.Google Scholar
  23. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of dissonance cognitive. Evanston: Row.Google Scholar
  24. Foa, E. B., & Foa, U. G. (1980). Resource theory: Interpersonal behavior as exchange. In K. K. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 77–94). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  25. Foot, P. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. Oxford Review, 5, 5–15.Google Scholar
  26. George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good–doing good: a conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310.Google Scholar
  27. George, J. M., Reed, T. F., Ballard, K. A., Colin, J., & Fielding, J. (1993). Contact with AIDS patients as a source of work-related distress: Effects of organizational and social support. Academy of Management Journal, 36(1), 157–171.Google Scholar
  28. Graf, R. G. (1971). Induced self-esteem as a determinant of behavior. The Journal of social psychology, 85(2), 213–217.Google Scholar
  29. Griffin, M. A., Patterson, M. G., & West, M. A. (2001). Job satisfaction and teamwork: The role of supervisor support. Journal of organizational behavior, 22(5), 537–550.Google Scholar
  30. Hammer, L. B., Kossek, E., Yragui, N. L., Bodner, T. E., & Hanson, G. C. (2009). Development and validation of a multidimensional measure of family supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSB). Journal of Management, 35(4), 837–856.Google Scholar
  31. Han, Y., & Altman, Y. (2008). Supervisor and subordinate guanxi: A grounded investigation in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 91–104.Google Scholar
  32. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  33. Howell, J. P., & Dorfman, P. W. (1981). Substitutes for leadership: Test of a construct. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 714–728.Google Scholar
  34. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, I6I, 1–55.Google Scholar
  35. Huy, Q. N. (1999). Emotional capability, emotional intelligence, and radical change. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 325–345.Google Scholar
  36. Huy, Q. N. (2002). Emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change: The contribution of middle managers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(1), 31–69.Google Scholar
  37. Huy, Q. N. (2005). An emotion-based view of strategic renewal. Advances in strategic management, 22(3), 37.Google Scholar
  38. Isen, A. M., & Baron, R. A. (1991). Positive affect as a factor in organizational behavior. In B. M. Staw, L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (13th ed, pp. 1–53). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  39. Jacobs, G., Belschak, F. D., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2014). (Un)Ethical behavior and performance appraisal: The role of affect, support, and organizational justice. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  40. Jokisaari, M., & Nurmi, J. E. (2009). Change in newcomers’ supervisor support and socialization outcomes after organizational entry. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 527–544.Google Scholar
  41. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1999). LISREL 8.30. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  42. Kaptein, M. (2008). Developing a measure of unethical behavior in the workplace: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management, 34(5), 978–1008.Google Scholar
  43. Kerr, S., & Jermier, J. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational behavior and human performance, 22(3), 375–403.Google Scholar
  44. Korman, A. K. (1970). Toward an hypothesis of work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54(1), 31.Google Scholar
  45. Korman, A. K. (1976). Hypothesis of work behavior revisited and an extension. Academy of Management Review, 1(1), 50–63.Google Scholar
  46. Kottke, J., & Sharafinski, C. (1988). Measuring perceived supervisory and organizational support. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48(4), 1075.Google Scholar
  47. Landry, G., & Vandenberghe, C. (2009). Role of commitment to the supervisor, leader-member exchange, and supervisor-based self-esteem in employee-supervisor conflicts. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(1), 5–28.Google Scholar
  48. Leary, M. R. (2007). Motivational and emotional aspects of the self. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 317–344.Google Scholar
  49. Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131–142.Google Scholar
  50. Lewin, K. (1943). Defining the ‘field at a given time’. Psychological Review, 50(3), 292.Google Scholar
  51. Lloyd, K. J., Boer, D., Keller, J. W., & Voelpel, S. (2015). Is my boss really listening to me? The impact of perceived supervisor listening on emotional exhaustion, turnover intention, and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(3), 509–524.Google Scholar
  52. Lord, R. G., Brown, D. J., & Freiberg, S. J. (1999). Understanding the dynamics of leadership: The role of follower self-concepts in the leader/follower relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78(3), 167–203.Google Scholar
  53. Maertz, C., Griffeth, R., Campbell, N., & Allen, D. (2007). The effects of perceived organizational support and perceived supervisor support on employee turnover. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(8), 1059.Google Scholar
  54. Malatesta, R. M. (1995). Understanding the dynamics of organizational and supervisory commitment using a social exchange framework. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, Detroit.Google Scholar
  55. Matta, F. K., Erol-Korkmaz, H. T., Johnson, R. E., & Biçaksiz, P. (2014). Significant work events and counterproductive work behavior: The role of fairness, emotions, and emotion regulation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(7), 920–944.Google Scholar
  56. Mayer, D. M. (2010). From proscriptions to prescriptions: A call for including prosocial behavior in behavioral ethics. In M. Schminke (Ed.), Managerial ethics: managing the psychology of morality (pp. 257–271). New York: Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  57. Olson, D. M., & Borman, W. C. (1989). More evidence on relationships between the work environment and job performance. Human Performance, 2(2), 113–130.Google Scholar
  58. Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), 411–419.Google Scholar
  59. Parker, S.K., Collins, C.G., & Grant, A. (2008). The role of positive affect in making things happen. Paper presented at the Annual SIOP Conference, San Francisco, USA.Google Scholar
  60. Pierce, J. L., & Gardner, D. G. (2004). Self-esteem within the work and organizational context: A review of the organization-based self-esteem literature. Journal of Management, 30(5), 591–622.Google Scholar
  61. Pierce, J. L., Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., & Dunham, R. B. (1989). Organization-based self-esteem: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 622–648.Google Scholar
  62. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996). Meta-analysis of the relationships between Kerr and Jermier’s substitutes for leadership and employee job attitudes, role perceptions, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 380.Google Scholar
  63. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731.Google Scholar
  64. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.Google Scholar
  65. Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(1), 119–125.Google Scholar
  66. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of applied psychology, 87(4), 698–714Google Scholar
  67. Robinson, S. L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (1998). Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 658–672.Google Scholar
  68. Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 66.Google Scholar
  69. Sekerka, L. E., Bagozzi, R. P., & Charnigo, R. (2009). Facing ethical challenges in the workplace: Conceptualizing and measuring professional moral courage. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 565–579.Google Scholar
  70. Sguera, F., Bagozzi, R. P., Huy, Q. N., Boss, R. W., & Boss, D. S. (2016). Curtailing the harmful effects of workplace incivility: The role of structural demands and organization-provided resources. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95, 115–127.Google Scholar
  71. Shanock, L. R., & Eisenberger, R. (2006). When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates’ perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 689.Google Scholar
  72. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422.Google Scholar
  73. Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource management Review, 12(2), 269–292.Google Scholar
  74. Stinglhamber, F., & Vandenberghe, C. (2003). Organizations and supervisors as sources of support and targets of commitment: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(3), 251–270.Google Scholar
  75. Thomson, J. J. (1976). Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem. The Monist, 59(2), 204–217.Google Scholar
  76. Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2004). Putting the self into self-conscious emotions: A theoretical model. Psychological Inquiry, 15(2), 103–125.Google Scholar
  77. Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.Google Scholar
  78. Umphress, E. E., & Bingham, J. B. (2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organization Science, 22(3), 621–640.Google Scholar
  79. Van Dyne, L., Vandewalle, D., Kostova, T., Latham, M. E., & Cummings, L. L. (2000). Collectivism, propensity to trust and self-esteem as predictors of organizational citizenship in a non-work setting. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(1), 3–23.Google Scholar
  80. Weiss, H., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes, and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews, 18, 1–74.Google Scholar
  81. Whelpley, C. E., & McDaniel, M. A. (2016). Self-esteem and counterproductive work behaviors: a systematic review. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(4), 850–863.Google Scholar
  82. Zeni, T. A., MacDougall, A. E., Chauhan, R. S., Brock, M. E., & Buckley, M. R. (2013). In search of those boundary conditions that might influence the effectiveness of supportive supervision. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(3), 317–323.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesco Sguera
    • 1
  • Richard P. Bagozzi
    • 2
  • Quy N. Huy
    • 3
  • R. Wayne Boss
    • 4
  • David S. Boss
    • 5
  1. 1.UCP, Católica-Lisbon School of Business and EconomicsLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Ross School of BusinessUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.INSEADSingaporeSingapore
  4. 4.Leeds School of BusinessUniversity of Colorado at BoulderBoulderUSA
  5. 5.Ohio College of BusinessAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations