Whistleblowing and Information Ethics: Facilitation, Entropy, and Ecopoiesis
- 768 Downloads
This paper analyses whistleblowing from the perspective of Floridi’s information ethics (IE). Although there is a vast body of literature on whistleblowing using micro-ethical (egopoietic) or meso-ethical (sociopoietic) frameworks, whistleblowing has previously not been researched using a macro-ethical or ecopoietic framework. This paper is the first to explicitly do so. Empirical research suggests whistleblowing is a process rather than a single decision and action. I argue this process evolves depending on how whistleblowing is facilitated (positively or negatively) throughout that process, i.e. responding to whistleblowers and providing information about whistleblowing activity. The paper develops a typology of whistleblowing facilitation to complement Floridi’s IE. The findings suggest that for whistleblowing to be beneficial to the informational environment, facilitation must filter out untrue whistleblowing, and achieve closure with the whistleblower, especially when whistleblowing is mistaken or deliberately false. I also find that publishing information about whistleblowing activity can be beneficial for the informational environment, but only if all organizations or all regulators do so.
KeywordsEcopoiesis Floridi Information ethics Whistleblowing
This research was funded by the University of Greenwich, Business School, Work and Employment Relations Unit (WERU).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The author confirms there is no conflict of interest.
Research Involving Human and Animal Participants
This research did not involve human participants and/or animals.
- ACCA. (2016). Effective speak-up arrangements for whistleblowers. London: Association of Chartered Certified Accountants.Google Scholar
- BIS. (2015). Whistleblowing: Prescribed persons guidance. London: Department for Business, Innovation & Skills.Google Scholar
- Brown, A. J. (Ed.). (2008). Whistleblowing in the Australian Public Sector. Canberra: ANU E Press.Google Scholar
- Brown, A.J. (2012). World online whistleblowing survey, stage 1 results release—Australian adult population sample. Retrieved March 2, 2014, from http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/418638/Summary_Stage_1_Results_Australian_Population_Sample_FULL.pdf.
- Brown, A. J., & Latimer, P. (2011). Whistleblower legislation in Australia—Analysis and reform. In M. Arzulowicz & W. W. Gasparski (Eds.), Whistleblowing: In defense of proper action (pp. 137–157). New Brunswick NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Brown, A. J., Lewis, D., Moberly, R., & Vandekerckhove, W. (Eds.). (2014a). International handbook on whistleblowing research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Brown, A. J., Meyer, D. P., Wheeler, C., & Zuckerman, J. (2014b). Whistleblower support in practice: Towards an integrated research model. In A. J. Brown, D. Lewis, R. Moberly, & W. Vandekerckhove (Eds.), International handbook on whistleblowing research (pp. 457–494). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Council of Europe (2014). Recommendation on the protection of whistleblowers. CM/REC (2014)/7.Google Scholar
- Donkin, M., Smith, R., & Brown, A. J. (2008). How do officials report? Internal and external whistleblowing. In A. J. Brown (Ed.), Whistleblowing in the Australian public sector (pp. 83–108). Canberra: ANU E Press.Google Scholar
- FCA. (2015). Whistleblowing in deposit-takers, PRA-designated investment firms and insurers. Policy Statement PS15/24. London: Financial Conduct Authority.Google Scholar
- Floridi, L. (2008). Information ethics, its nature and scope. In J. van den Hoven & J. Weckert (Eds.), Information technology and moral philosophy (pp. 40–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Floridi, L. (2011a). Is whistleblowing wrong? The Philosopher’s Magazine, 53, 20–21.Google Scholar
- Gibney, E. (2013). ‘Death threats’ in Thailand for UK whistleblower. Times Higher Education. Retrieved May 27, 2016, from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/death-threats-in-thailand-for-uk-whistleblower/2006659.article.
- Guardian. (2013). NHS whistleblower claims he was forced to quit then gagged. The Guardian. Retrieved May 27, 2016, from http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/feb/14/nhs-whistleblower-quit-gagged.
- Lewis, D. (Ed.). (2010). A global approach to public interest disclosure. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1984). The relationship among beliefs, organizational position, and whistle-blowing status: A discriminate analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 27(4), 687–705.Google Scholar
- Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1992). Blowing the whistle. The organizational and legal implications for companies and employees. New York: Lexington.Google Scholar
- Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1994). Whistleblowing: Reaping the benefits. Academy of Management Executive, 8(3), 65–72.Google Scholar
- Moberly, R., & Wylie, L. E. (2011). An empirical study of whistleblower policies in United States corporate codes of ethics. In D. Lewis & W. Vandekerckhove (Eds.), Whistleblowing and democratic values (pp. 27–55). London: International Whistleblowing Research Network.Google Scholar
- Near, J. P., Miceli, M. P., & Dworkin, T. M. (2008). Whistleblowing in organizations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- PCaW. (2013). Whistleblowing: The inside story. London: Pubic Concern at Work/University of Greenwich.Google Scholar
- Radack, J., & McClellan, K. (2011). The criminalization of whistleblowing. The Labor & Employment Law Forum, 2(1), 57–77.Google Scholar
- Vandekerckhove, W. (2006). Whistleblowing and organizational social responsibility. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Vandekerckhove, W. (2010). European whistleblower protection: Tiers or tears? In D. Lewis (Ed.), A global approach to public interest disclosure (pp. 15–35). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Vandekerckhove, W. (2012). UK public attitudes to whistleblowing. London: University of Greenwich.Google Scholar
- Vandekerckhove, W., Brown, A. J., & Tsahuridu, E. E. (2014). Managerial responsiveness to whistleblowing: Expanding the research horizon. In A. J. Brown, D. Lewis, R. Moberly, & W. Vandekerckhove (Eds.), International handbook on whistleblowing research (pp. 298–327). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Vandekerckhove, W., & Rumyantseva, N. (2014). Freedom to speak up review qualitative research. Commissioned research report by the Department of Health. London: University of Greenwich.Google Scholar
- Vaughn, R. G. (2013). The successes and failures of whistleblower laws. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Whistleblowing Commission. (2013). Code of practice. London: Public Concern at Work.Google Scholar