Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 144, Issue 4, pp 783–797 | Cite as

“This Position Requires Some Alteration of Your Brain”: On the Moral and Legal Issues of Using Neurotechnology to Modify Employees

  • Patrick D. Hopkins
  • Harvey L. Fiser
Article

Abstract

Employers have long had programs for improving employee attitude and performance, from the simple such as free coffee in the break room to the more extensive such as gyms, counseling, team-building seminars, and skills training. Employees have also long used techniques for making themselves more competitive and productive for purposes of securing new positions or promotions. But what about more direct means of altering employee performance? Neurotechnology could allow for more powerful and precise methods of screening for desired traits and for modifying abilities—from memory to motivation to morality. In this paper, we examine the moral and legal issues of using neurotechnology in the employment context. We identify major types of technologies, the areas of employment where they might be used, and the moral and legal principles most likely to frame debates about use. We do not recommend a specific moral judgment but instead introduce the issues, describe the major possible policies that could be implemented to deal with employment neurotechnology, compare those policies to current ones, and lay out an analytical framework for further discussion based on the broad effectiveness of neurotechnology, balancing interests of employers and employees, and existing ethical and legal principles.

Keywords

Adderall Americans with Disabilities Act Brain scans Cognitive enhancement Employment law Nootropics 

References

  1. ADA 42 U.S.C. 12101, et seq.Google Scholar
  2. ADAA 42 U.S.C. 12112, et seq.Google Scholar
  3. Appel, J. M. (2008). When the boss turns pusher: A proposal for employee protections in the age of cosmetic neurology. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(8), 616–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basham, M. (2012–2013). Unmasking Tonto: Can Title VII “make it” in Hollywood? American Indian Law Review 37, 549.Google Scholar
  5. Berks, P. (2000). Social change and the judicial response: The handbook exception to employment-at-will. Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, 4(231), 235–236.Google Scholar
  6. Cellan-Jones, R. (2015). Office puts chips under staff’s skin. BBC.com. Retrieved July 5, 2015 from http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-31042477.
  7. Civil Rights Acts of 1964. Title VII. 42 U.S.C. §2000e-2 (a)(1), et seq.Google Scholar
  8. Coleman v. Keystone Freight Corp., 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 15734 (3d Cir. 2005).Google Scholar
  9. Crockett, M., Clark, L., Tabinia, G., Lieberman, M. D., & Robbins, T. W. (2008). Serotonin modulates behavioral reactions to unfairness. Science, 320(5884), 1739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Dreu, C., Greer, L., Van Kleef, G., Shalvi, S., & Handgraaf, M. (2011). Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism. PNAS, 108(4), 1262–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dimatteo, L. A., Bird, R. C., & Colquitt, J. A. (2011). Justice, employment, and the psychological contract. Oregon Law Review, 90, 449–451.Google Scholar
  12. Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Elliott, L. (2008). Economics: Whatever happened to Keyne’s 15-h working week? The Guardian.com. Retrieved July 5, 2015 from http://www.theguardian.com/business/2008/sep/01/economics.
  14. Fernando Mendez v. City of Chicago, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 6353 (7th Cir. 2006).Google Scholar
  15. Fulgoni-Britton, R., & Schroeder, J. P. (2014). Tackling the challenges of accommodating pregnant workers under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Federal Lawyer, 61, 35–37.Google Scholar
  16. Garner, B. A. (Ed.). (2014). Black’s law dictionary (10th ed.). Eagan, MN: Thomson West.Google Scholar
  17. GINA 42 U.S.C.A. 2000ff.Google Scholar
  18. Glannon, W. (2006). Psychopharmacology and memory. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32, 74–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Griswold, A. (2014). Companies are hiring autistic workers to boost the bottom line. Slate. Retrieved July 5, 2015 from http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2014/03/28/autism_at_work_companies_like_sap_and_freddie_mac_are_hiring_people_with.html.
  20. Grubb v. Southwest Airlines, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 21412 (5th Cir. 2008).Google Scholar
  21. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 108(4), 814–823, 828–834.Google Scholar
  22. Ilieva, P., & Farah, M. (2013). Enhancement stimulants: Perceived motivational and cognitive advantages. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Int’l Union, United Auto., Aerospace & Agric. Implement Workers of Am. v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 1991, 499 U.S. 187.Google Scholar
  24. Ivey v. First Quality Retail Service, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 19860 (11th Cir. 2012).Google Scholar
  25. Jackson v. City of Chicago, 414 F.3d 806 (7th Cir. 2005).Google Scholar
  26. Karim, A. (2010). The truth about lying: Inhibition of the anterior prefrontal cortex improves deceptive behavior. Cerebral Cortex, 20(1), 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Laurin v. The Providence Hospital, 150 F.3d 52 (1st Cir. 1998).Google Scholar
  28. Lavilleon, G., Lacroix, M. M., Rondi-Reig, L., & Benchenane, K. (2015). Explicit memory creation during sleep demonstrates a causal role of place cells in navigation. Nature Neuroscience, 18(4), 493–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McCarthy, N. (2014). A 40 hour work week in the United States actually lasts 47 hours. Forbes.com. Retrieved July 5, 2015 from http://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2014/09/01/a-40-hour-work-week-in-the-united-states-actually-lasts-47-hours/.
  30. McGaugh, J., & Roozendal, B. (2008). Drug enhancement of memory consolidation: Historical perspective and neurobiological implications. Psychopharmacology, 202, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mehta, M. A. (2000). Methylphenidate enhances working memory by modulating discrete frontal and parietal lobe regions in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(6), RC65.Google Scholar
  32. Miller, S. D. (2001). Revitalizing the FLSA. Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal, 19(1), 1–124.Google Scholar
  33. Niccolini, R. R., & Basau, N. (2009). Disability and accommodation in the healthcare workplace. Journal of Health and Life Science Law, 2, 93–120.Google Scholar
  34. Pagliarini, T. (2014). It can’t get that ugly: Why employers should be able to take aesthetics into consideration. Roger Williams University Law Review, 19, 277–314.Google Scholar
  35. Parkinson, C. N. (1955). Parkinson’s law. The economist. Retrieved July 5, 2015 from http://www.economist.com/node/14116121.
  36. Roetter v. Michigan Dept. of Corrections, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 1343 (6th Cir. 2012).Google Scholar
  37. Sandoval, P. (1988). Employee testing: Reconciling the twin goals of productivity and fairness. DePaul Business and Commercial Law Journal, 10, 299.Google Scholar
  38. Sen, S., Kranzler, H. R., Didwania, A. K., Schwartz, A. C., Amarnath, S., Kolars, J. C., et al. (2013). Effects of the 2011 duty hour reforms on interns and their patients: A prospective longitudinal cohort study. JAMA Internal Medicine, 173(8), 657–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith, A. (2002). Effects of caffeine on human behavior. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 40(9), 1243–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stone, A., & Wright, T. (2013). When your face doesn’t fit: Employment discrimination against people with facial disfigurements. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(3), 515–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tassy, S. (2012). Disrupting the right prefrontal cortex alters moral judgement. Social Cognition and Affective Neuroscience, 7(3), 282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Terbeck, S., Kahane, G., McTavish, S., Savulescu, J., Cowen, P.J., & Hewstone, M. (2012). Propranolol reduces implicit negative racial bias. Psychopharmacology, 222, 419–424.Google Scholar
  43. Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §2000e-2(e)(1)(2012).Google Scholar
  44. US Department of Labor. DOL.gov. Employee Polygraph Protection Act. Retrieved July 5, 2015 from http://www.dol.gov/whd/polygraph/.
  45. US Department of Labor. DOL.gov. Workplace Safety & Health. Retrieved July 5, 2015 from http://www.dol.gov/opa/aboutdol/lawsprog.htm#safety.
  46. Vincent, N., & Jane, E. (2014). Put down the smart drugscognitive enhancement is ethically risky business. The conversation. Retrieved July 5, 2015 from https://theconversation.com/put-down-the-smart-drugs-cognitive-enhancement-is-ethically-risky-business-27463.
  47. Wang, J. (2014). Targeted enhancement of cortical-hippocampal brain networks and associative memory. Science, 345(6200), 1054–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wesensten, N. (2005). Performance and alertness effects of caffeine, dextroamphetamine, and modafinil during sleep deprivation. Journal of Sleep Research, 14(3), 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Young, L. (2010). Disruption of the right temporoparietal junction with transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces the role of beliefs in moral judgments. PNAS, 107(15), 6753–6758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyMillsaps CollegeJacksonUSA
  2. 2.Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities & Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Mississippi Medical CenterJacksonUSA
  3. 3.Else School of ManagementMillsaps CollegeJacksonUSA

Personalised recommendations