Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance: The Mediating Role of Productivity
- 3.7k Downloads
This study treats firm productivity as an accumulation of productive intangibles and posits that stakeholder engagement associated with better corporate social performance helps develop such intangibles. We hypothesize that because shareholders factor improved productive efficiency into stock price, productivity mediates the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Furthermore, we argue that key stakeholders’ social considerations are more valuable for firms with higher levels of discretionary cash and income stream uncertainty. Therefore, we hypothesize that those two contingencies moderate the mediated process of corporate social performance with financial performance. Our analysis, based on a comprehensive longitudinal dataset of the U.S. manufacturing firms from 1992 to 2009, lends strong support for these hypotheses. In short, this paper uncovers a productivity-based, context-dependent mechanism underlying the relationship between corporate social performance and financial performance.
KeywordsCorporate social responsibility Corporate financial performance Total factor productivity Stakeholder management Discretionary cash Organizational risk
This research project is generously supported by a Summer Research Grant awarded by the Stuart School of Business, Illinois Institute of Technology. This project is also supported by the Research Bureau at People's Bank of China, and the Major Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 13&ZD016), and the Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 12AZD095).
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications Inc.Google Scholar
- Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2014). Causality and Endogeneity: Problems and Solutions. In D. V. Day (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Leadership and Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bartelsman, E., & Gray, W. (2001). NBER Productivity Database. Retrieved from, www.nber.org.
- Becker, B., & Gerhart, B. (1996). The impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and prospects. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 779–801.Google Scholar
- Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488–506.Google Scholar
- Clarkson, M. B. E. (1994). A Risk-based Model of Stakeholder Theory. In: Proceedings of the second toronto conference on stakeholder theory, Toronto: Centre for Corporate Social Performance & Ethics, University of TorontoGoogle Scholar
- Dimson, E., Karakaş, O., & Li, X. (2015). Active Ownership. Review of Financial Studies, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- Elfenbein, D. W., & McManus, B. (2010). A greater price for a greater good? Evidence that Consumers pay more for charity-linked products. American Economic Journal, 2(2), 28–60.Google Scholar
- Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Review, 84(1), 66–83.Google Scholar
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for Stakeholders: Survival, Reputation, and Success. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Griliches, Z. (1994). Productivity, R&D, and the Data Constraint. The American Economic Review., 84(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
- Hanbrick, D. C. (1983). High Profit Strategies in Mature Capital Goods Industries: A Contingency Approach. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 687–707.Google Scholar
- Hawn, O., Chatterji, A., & Mitchell, W. (2014). How firm performance moderates the effect of changes in status on investor perceptions: Additions and deletions by the Dow Jones sustainability index. Boston University School of Management Research Paper No. 2418300.Google Scholar
- Huselid, M. A. (1995). The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635–672.Google Scholar
- Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers. American Economic Review, 76, 323–329.Google Scholar
- Leuven, E., & Sianesi, B. (2014). PSMATCH2: Stata Module to Perform Full Mahalanobis and Propensity Socre Matching, Common Support Graphing, and Covariate Imbalance Testing. http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html, 2007.
- Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2009). Does it pay to be good and does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1866371.
- Miller, K. D., & Bromiley, P. (1990). Strategic Risk and Corporate Performance: An Analysis of Alternative Risk Measures. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 756–779.Google Scholar
- Miller, K. D., & Leiblein, M. J. (1996). Corporate Risk-Return Relations: Returns Variability versus Downside Risk. Academy of Management Journal, 12, 133–143.Google Scholar
- Ogden, S., & Watson, R. (1999). Corporate Performance and Stakeholder Management: Balancing Shareholder and Customer Interests in The U.K. Privatized Water Industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 526–538.Google Scholar
- Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.Google Scholar
- Russo, M. V. (1991). The Multidivisional Structure as an Enabling Device: A Longitudinal Study of Discretionary Cash as a Strategic Resource. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 718–733.Google Scholar
- Steindel, C., & Stiroh, K. J. (2001). Productivity: What Is It, and Why Do We Care About It? Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report.Google Scholar
- Stultz, R. M. (2002). Risk management and derivatives. New York: Southwestern College Publications.Google Scholar
- Tirole, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Tsai, W., & Ghosha, S. (1998). Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476.Google Scholar
- Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1996). Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–672.Google Scholar
- Whitener, E. M. (2001). Do “High Commitment” Human Resource Practices Affect Employee Commitment? A Cross-Level Analysis Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling. Journal of Management, 27, 515–535.Google Scholar
- Wolfe, R., & Aupperle, K. E. (1991). Introduction to Corporate Social Performance: Methods for Evaluating An Elusive Construct. In J. E. Post (Ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy (pp. 265–268). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Yasar, M., Raciborski, R., & Poi, B. (2008). Production Function Estimation in Stata Using the Olley And Pakes Method. The Stata Journal, 8(2), 221–231.Google Scholar