Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 148, Issue 2, pp 411–435 | Cite as

Anti-consumption for Environmental Sustainability: Conceptualization, Review, and Multilevel Research Directions

  • Nieves García-de-Frutos
  • José Manuel Ortega-EgeaEmail author
  • Javier Martínez-del-Río
Article

Abstract

Given the potential that environmentally oriented anti-consumption (EOA) has in achieving environmental sustainability, the authors draw upon marketing, management, environmental, and psychology studies to conceptualize and delimit EOA, differentiating it from other (related but distinct) phenomena. In addition, the authors review the available literature at the individual (micro) level and summarize research on the antecedents and meanings of broad and specific/strict EOA practices with different targets. Furthermore, the authors propose an agenda for future research, which reflects on EOA not only at the individual (micro) level, but also lays out new opportunities for EOA work at organizational (meso), industry, and national (macro) levels. The work presented here hopes to spark multilevel research on EOA, its antecedents and consequences, and reactions to EOA phenomena.

Keywords

Anti-consumption Conceptualization Environmental sustainability Literature review Multilevel Research agenda 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Prof. Scott J. Vitell and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments during the review process and to Dr. Stephanie Bertels for her invaluable developmental feedback on early versions of this paper. In addition, the authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Science (National R&D Project ECO2011-24921) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF/FEDER), from the University of Almería’s (UAL, ceiA3) predoctoral grant program, and CySOC.

References

  1. Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2009). How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households’ direct and indirect energy use and savings? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(5), 711–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Gifford, R., & Vlek, C. (2009). Factors influencing car use for commuting and the intention to reduce it: A question of self-interest or morality? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(4), 317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexander, S., & Ussher, S. (2012). The voluntary simplicity movement: A multi-national survey analysis in theoretical context. Journal of Consumer Culture, 12(1), 66–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen, D. T., & Shonnard, D. R. (2011). Sustainable engineering: Concepts, design and case studies. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Arnould, E. J. (2007). Should consumer citizens escape the market? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), 96–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Autio, M., & Heinonen, V. (2004). To consume or not to consume? Young people’s environmentalism in the affluent Finnish society. Young, 12(2), 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Autio, M., Heiskanen, E., & Heinonen, V. (2009). Narratives of ‘green’ consumers—The antihero, the environmental hero and the anarchist. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 8(1), 40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ballantine, P. W., & Creery, S. (2010). The consumption and disposition behaviour of voluntary simplifiers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(1), 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psychosocial determinants of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barr, S., Gilg, A. W., & Ford, N. (2005). The household energy gap: Examining the divide between habitual-and purchase-related conservation behaviours. Energy Policy, 33(11), 1425–1444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baudrillard, J. (1970). The consumer society: Myths and structure. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Bekin, C., Carrigan, M., & Szmigin, I. (2005). Defying marketing sovereignty: Voluntary simplicity at new consumption communities. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(4), 413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bekin, C., Carrigan, M., & Szmigin, I. (2007). Beyond recycling: Commons-friendly waste reduction at new consumption communities. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(5), 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Black, I. (2010). Sustainability through anti-consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 403–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Black, I. R., & Cherrier, H. (2010). Anti-consumption as part of living a sustainable lifestyle: Daily practices, contextual motivations and subjective values. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 9(12), 437–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bogomolova, S., & Millburn, S. (2012). Reasons for non-consideration of brands and the role of prior experience. Journal of Brand Management, 19(4), 304–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bortoleto, A. P., Kurisu, K. H., & Hanaki, K. (2012). Model development for household waste prevention behaviour. Waste Management, 32(12), 2195–2207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Botetzagias, I., Malesios, C., & Poulou, D. (2014). Electricity curtailment behaviors in Greek households: Different behaviors, different predictors. Energy Policy, 69, 415–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bowen, F., & Aragon-Correa, J. A. (2014). Greenwashing in Corporate Environmentalism Research and Practice: The Importance of What We Say and Do. Organization and Environment, 27(2), 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Braunsberger, K., & Buckler, B. (2011). What motivates consumers to participate in boycotts: Lessons from the ongoing Canadian seafood boycott. Journal of Business Research, 64(1), 96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carey, L., Shaw, D., & Shiu, E. (2008). The impact of ethical concerns on family consumer decision-making. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(5), 553–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Caruana, R., & Chatzidakis, A. (2014). Consumer social responsibility (CnSR): Toward a multi-level, multi-agent conceptualization of the “other CSR”. Journal of Business Ethics, 21(4), 1–16.Google Scholar
  25. Casadesus-Masanell, R., Crooke, M., Reinhardt, F., & Vasishth, V. (2009). Households’ willingness to pay for “green” goods: Evidence from Patagonia’s introduction of organic cotton sportswear. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18(1), 203–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cervellon, M. C. (2012). Victoria’s dirty secrets: Effectiveness of green not-for-profit messages targeting brands. Journal of Advertising, 41(4), 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chatzidakis, A., & Lee, M. S. W. (2013). Anti-Consumption as the study of reasons against. Journal of Macromarketing, 62(2), 145–147.Google Scholar
  28. Cherrier, H. (2009). Anti-consumption discourses and consumer-resistant identities. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cherrier, H., Black, I. R., & Lee, M. (2011). Intentional non-consumption for sustainability? Consumer resistance and/or anticonsumption? European Journal of Marketing, 45(11–12), 1757–1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cherrier, H., Szuba, M., & Özçağlar-Toulouse, N. (2012). Barriers to downward carbon emission: Exploring sustainable consumption in the face of the glass floor. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3–4), 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Chouinard, Y., & Brown, M. S. (1997). Going organic: Converting Patagonia’s cotton product line. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 1(1), 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Connolly, J., & Prothero, A. (2008). Green consumption: Life politics, risks and contradictions. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(1), 117–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Corral-Verdugo, V., Carrus, G., Bonnes, M., Moser, G., & Sinha, J. B. (2008). Environmental beliefs and endorsement of sustainable development principles in water conservation toward a new human interdependence paradigm scale. Environment and Behavior, 40(5), 703–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Craig-Lees, M., & Hill, C. (2002). Understanding voluntary simplifiers. Psychology and Marketing, 19(2), 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Cromie, J. G., & Ewing, M. T. (2009). The rejection of brand hegemony. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 218–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Delmas, M. A., & Cuerel Burbano, V. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Dobscha, S., & Ozanne, J. L. (2001). An ecofeminist analysis of environmentally sensitive women using qualitative methodology: The emancipatory potential of an ecological life. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 20(2), 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Dolnicar, S., Hurlimann, A., & Grün, B. (2012). Water conservation behavior in Australia. Journal of Environmental Management, 105, 44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Eckhardt, G. M., Belk, R., & Devinney, T. M. (2010). Why don’t consumers consume ethically? Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 426–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ek, K., & Söderholm, P. (2010). The devil is in the details: Household electricity saving behavior and the role of information. Energy Policy, 38(3), 1578–1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks. In: The triple bottom line of 21st century.Google Scholar
  43. Ettenson, R., & Klein, J. G. (2005). The fallout from French nuclear testing in the South Pacific—A longitudinal study of consumer boycotts. International Marketing Review, 22(2), 199–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Evans, D. (2011). Thrifty, green or frugal: Reflections on sustainable consumption in a changing economic climate. Geoforum, 42(5), 550–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Flammer, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 758–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Foden, M. (2012). Everyday consumption practices as a site for activism? Exploring the motivations of grassroots reuse groups. People, Place and Policy Online, 6(3), 148–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Fujii, S. (2006). Environmental concern, attitude toward frugality, and ease of behavior as determinants of pro-environmental behavior intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4), 262–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gadenne, D., Sharma, B., Kerr, D., & Smith, T. (2011). The influence of consumers’ environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviours. Energy Policy, 39(12), 7684–7694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. García-de-Frutos, N., & Ortega-Egea, J. M. (2015). An integrative model of consumers’ reluctance to buy foreign products: Do social and environmental country images play a role? Journal of Macromarketing, 35(2), 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., Blanton, H., & Russell, D. W. (1998). Reasoned action and social reaction: Willingness and intention as independent predictors of health risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1164–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Harland, P., Staats, H., & Wilke, H. A. (1999). Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(12), 2505–2528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hoffmann, S. (2011). Anti-consumption as a means to save jobs. European Journal of Marketing, 45(11/12), 1702–1714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hoffmann, S. (2014). Does national culture impact consumer boycott prevalence? A multi-country study. European Journal of International Management, 8(2), 141–159.Google Scholar
  54. Hoffmann, S., & Hutter, K. (2012). Carrotmob as a new form of ethical consumption. The nature of the concept and avenues for future research. Journal of Consumer Policy, 35(2), 215–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hoffmann, S., Mai, R., & Smirnova, M. (2011). Development and validation of a cross-nationally stable scale of consumer animosity. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hogg, M. K., Banister, E. N., & Stephenson, C. A. (2009). Mapping symbolic (anti-) consumption. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 148–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hooley, G., Broderick, A., & Möller, K. (1998). Competitive positioning and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 6(2), 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hori, S., Kondo, K., Nogata, D., & Ben, H. (2013). The determinants of household energy-saving behavior: Survey and comparison in five major Asian cities. Energy Policy, 52, 354–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Howard-Grenville, J., Buckle, S. J., Hoskins, B. J., & George, G. (2014). Climate change and management. Academy of Management Journal, 57(3), 615–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Huneke, M. E. (2005). The face of the unconsumer: An empirical examination of the practice of voluntary simplicity in the United States. Psychology and Marketing, 22(7), 527–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Isenhour, C. (2010). On conflicted Swedish consumers: The effort to stop shopping and neoliberal environmental governance. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 454–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Iyer, R., & Muncy, J. A. (2009). Purpose and object of anti-consumption. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 160–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Jackson, T. (2005). Live better by consuming less? Is there a “double dividend” in sustainable consumption? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(1–2), 19–36.Google Scholar
  64. Jaffee, D., & Newman, S. (2013). A bottle half empty: Bottled water, commodification, and contestation. Organization and Environment, 26(3), 318–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Jansson, J., Marell, A., & Nordlund, A. (2010). Green consumer behavior: Determinants of curtailment and eco-innovation adoption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(4), 358–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kalamas, M., Cleveland, M., Laroche, M., & Laufer, R. (2006). The critical role of congruency in prototypical brand extensions. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 14(3), 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Karlin, B., Davis, N., Sanguinetti, A., Gamble, K., Kirkby, D., & Stokols, D. (2014). Dimensions of conservation exploring differences among energy behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 46(4), 423–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kaynak, R., & Eksi, S. (2011). Ethnocentrism, religiosity, environmental and health consciousness: Motivators for anti-consumers. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 4(8), 31–50.Google Scholar
  69. Kim, H., Choo, H. J., & Yoon, N. (2013). The motivational drivers of fast fashion avoidance. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 17(2), 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. King, B. G. (2008). A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 395–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Klein, J. G., Smith, N. C., & John, A. (2004). Why we boycott: Consumer motivations for boycott participation. Journal of Marketing, 68(3), 92–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kozinets, R. V. (2002). Can consumers escape the market? Emancipatory illuminations from burning man. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(1), 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Kozinets, R. V., Handelman, J. M., & Lee, M. S. W. (2010). Don’t read this; or, who cares what the hell anticonsumption is, anyways? Consumption Markets and Culture, 13(3), 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Latouche, S. (2010). Degrowth. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 519–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Lee, M. S. W., Fernandez, K. V., & Hyman, M. R. (2009a). Anti-consumption: An overview and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 145–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Lee, M. S. W., Motion, J., & Conroy, D. (2009b). Anti-consumption and brand avoidance. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lee, M., Roux, D., Cherrier, H., & Cova, B. (2011). Anti-consumption and consumer resistance: Concepts, concerns, conflicts and convergence. European Journal of Marketing, 45(11/12), 1680–1687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Leonard-Barton, D. (1981). Voluntary simplicity lifestyles and energy conservation. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(3) 243–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Lounsbury, M., Ventresca, M., & Hirsch, P. M. (2003). Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: A cultural–political perspective on US recycling. Socio-Economic Review, 1(1), 71–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Low, W., & Davenport, E. (2007). To boldly go… Exploring ethical spaces to re-politicise ethical consumption and fair trade. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(5), 336–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Martinsson, J., Lundqvist, L. J., & Sundström, A. (2011). Energy saving in Swedish households: The (relative) importance of environmental attitudes. Energy Policy, 39(9), 5182–5191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. McCracken, G. (1986). Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. Journal of consumer research, 13, 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. McNamara, G., Deephouse, D. L., & Luce, R. A. (2003). Competitive positioning within and across a strategic group structure: The performance of core, secondary, and solitary firms. Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Mizobuchi, K., & Takeuchi, K. (2013). The influences of financial and non-financial factors on energy-saving behaviour: A field experiment in Japan. Energy Policy, 63, 775–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Moisander, J., & Pesonen, S. (2002). Narratives of sustainable ways of living: Constructing the self and the other as a green consumer. Management Decision, 40(4), 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Moraes, C., Carrigan, M., & Szmigin, I. (2012). The coherence of inconsistencies: Attitude–behaviour gaps and new consumption communities. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(1–2), 103–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Moraes, C., Szmigin, I., & Carrigan, M. (2010). Living production-engaged alternatives: An examination of new consumption communities. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 13(3), 273–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Nelson, M. R., Rademacher, M. A., & Paek, H. J. (2007). Downshifting consumer = upshifting citizen? An examination of a local freecycle community. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Nijssen, E. J., & Douglas, S. P. (2004). Examining the animosity model in a country with a high level of foreign trade. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(1), 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Noblet, C. L., Thøgersen, J., & Teisl, M. F. (2014). Who attempts to drive less in New England? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 23, 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2003). Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. Journal of environmental psychology, 23(4), 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Oreg, S., & Katz-Gerro, T. (2006). Predicting proenvironmental behavior cross-nationally values, the theory of planned behavior, and value-belief-norm theory. Environment and Behavior, 38(4), 462–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Ortega-Egea, J. M., & García-de-Frutos, N. (2013). Toward consumption reduction: An environmentally motivated perspective. Psychology and Marketing, 30(8), 660–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Ozanne, L. K., & Ballantine, P. W. (2010). Sharing as a form of anti-consumption? An examination of toy library users. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 485–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Papaoikonomou, E. (2013). Sustainable lifestyles in an urban context: Towards a holistic understanding of ethical consumer behaviours. Empirical evidence from Catalonia, Spain. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(2), 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Papaoikonomou, E., Cascon-Pereira, R., & Ryan, G. (2014). Constructing and communicating an ethical consumer identity: A social identity approach. Journal of Consumer Culture,. doi: 10.1177/1469540514521080.Google Scholar
  97. Papaoikonomou, E., Valverde, M., & Ryan, G. (2012). Articulating the meanings of collective experiences of ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(1), 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Parsons, E. C. M., & Rawles, C. (2003). The resumption of whaling by Iceland and the potential negative impact in the Icelandic whale-watching market. Current Issues in Tourism, 6(5), 444–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Peattie, K., & Peattie, S. (2009). Social marketing: A pathway to consumption reduction? Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 260–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Peñaloza, L., & Price, L. L. (1993). Consumer resistance: A conceptual overview. Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 123–128.Google Scholar
  101. Piacentini, M. G., & Banister, E. N. (2009). Managing anti-consumption in an excessive drinking culture. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Poortinga, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Wiersma, G. (2003). Household preferences for energy-saving measures: A conjoint analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(1), 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Ramus, C. A., & Montiel, I. (2005). When are corporate environmental policies a form of greenwashing? Business and Society, 44(4), 377–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Richetin, J., Perugini, M., Conner, M., Adjali, I., Hurling, R., Sengupta, A., & Greetham, D. (2012). To reduce and not to reduce resource consumption? That is two questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(2), 112–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Rindell, A., Strandvik, T., & Wilén, K. (2014). Ethical consumers’ brand avoidance. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 23(2), 114–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Sandıkcı, Ö., & Ekici, A. (2009). Politically motivated brand rejection. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 208–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Sarabia-Sánchez, F. J., Rodríguez-Sánchez, C., & Hyder, A. (2014). The role of personal involvement, credibility and efficacy of conduct in reported water conservation behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 206–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Schneider, F., Kallis, G., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2010). Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 511–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Schreurs, J., Martens, P., & Kok, G. (2012). Living with less as a transformation process: A qualitative study of consumer behavior reform through spending reduction. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 15(2), 188–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221–279). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  111. Sebastiani, R., Montagnini, F., & Dalli, D. (2013). Ethical consumption and new business models in the food industry. Evidence from the Eataly case. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), 473–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Sen, S., Gürhan‐Canli, Z., & Morwitz, V. (2001). Withholding consumption: A social dilemma perspective on consumer boycotts. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 399–417. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Sharp, A., Høj, S., & Wheeler, M. (2010). Proscription and its impact on anti-consumption behaviour and attitudes: The case of plastic bags. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 470–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Shaw, D., & Black, I. (2010). Market based political action: A path to sustainable development? Sustainable Development, 18(6), 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Shaw, D., & Moraes, C. (2009). Voluntary simplicity: An exploration of market interactions. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Shaw, D., & Newholm, T. (2002). Voluntary simplicity and the ethics of consumption. Psychology and Marketing, 19(2), 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Shaw, D., Newholm, T., & Dickinson, R. (2006). Consumption as voting: An exploration of consumer empowerment. European Journal of Marketing, 40(9/10), 1049–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Shaw, D., & Riach, K. (2011). Embracing ethical fields: Constructing consumption in the margins. European Journal of Marketing, 45(7/8), 1051–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Sine, W. D., & Lee, B. H. (2009). Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the US wind energy sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 123–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81–98.Google Scholar
  121. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.Google Scholar
  122. Sütterlin, B., Brunner, T. A., & Siegrist, M. (2011). Who puts the most energy into energy conservation? A segmentation of energy consumers based on energy-related behavioral characteristics. Energy Policy, 39(12), 8137–8152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Sweeney, J. C., Kresling, J., Webb, D., Soutar, G. N., & Mazzarol, T. (2013). Energy saving behaviours: Development of a practice-based model. Energy Policy, 61, 371–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Szmigin, I., Carrigan, M., & McEachern, M. G. (2009). The conscious consumer: Taking a flexible approach to ethical behaviour. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 224–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Verlegh, P. W., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. (1999). A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(5), 521–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Walther, C. S., & Sandlin, J. A. (2013). Green capital and social reproduction within families practising voluntary simplicity in the US. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(1), 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Wang, Z., Zhang, B., Yin, J., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Determinants and policy implications for household electricity-saving behaviour: Evidence from Beijing, China. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3550–3557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Witkowski, T. H. (2010). A brief history of frugality discourses in the United States. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 13(3), 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Wu, D. E., Thomas, J. B., Moore, M., & Carroll, K. (2013). Voluntary simplicity: The Great American Apparel Diet. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 17(3), 294–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. York, J. G., & Lenox, M. J. (2013). Exploring the sociocultural determinants of de novo versus de alio entry in emerging industries. Strategic Management Journal, 35(13), 1930–1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Yuksel, U., & Mryteza, V. (2009). An evaluation of strategic responses to consumer boycotts. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 248–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Zamwel, E., Sasson-Levy, O., & Ben-Porat, G. (2014). Voluntary simplifiers as political consumers: Individuals practicing politics through reduced consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(2), 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Zavestoski, S. (2002a). Guest editorial: Anticonsumption attitudes. Psychology and Marketing, 19(2), 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Zavestoski, S. (2002b). The social–psychological bases of anticonsumption attitudes. Psychology and Marketing, 19(2), 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., & Zhou, G. (2013). Antecedents of employee electricity saving behavior in organizations: An empirical study based on norm activation model. Energy Policy, 62, 1120–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nieves García-de-Frutos
    • 1
  • José Manuel Ortega-Egea
    • 1
    Email author
  • Javier Martínez-del-Río
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economics & BusinessUniversity of Almería (ceiA3)AlmeríaSpain

Personalised recommendations