Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 148, Issue 3, pp 673–688 | Cite as

Firm-Level Determinants of Political CSR in Emerging Economies: Evidence from India

  • Vikrant Shirodkar
  • Eshani Beddewela
  • Ulf Henning Richter


Multinational companies (MNCs) frequently adopt corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities that are aimed at providing ‘public goods’ and influencing the government in policymaking. Such political CSR (PCSR) activities have been determined to increase MNCs’ socio-political legitimacy and to be useful in building relationships with the state and other key external stakeholders. Although research on MNCs’ PCSR within the context of emerging economies is gaining momentum, only a limited number of studies have examined the firm-level variables that affect the extent to which MNCs’ subsidiaries in emerging economies pursue PCSR. Using insights from resource dependence theory, institutional theory, and the social capital literature, we argue that MNCs’ subsidiaries that are critically dependent on local resources, have greater ties to managers of related businesses and to policymakers, and that those that are interdependent on the MNCs’ headquarters and other foreign subsidiaries, are more likely to be involved in PCSR. We obtain support for our hypotheses using a sample of 105 subsidiaries of foreign firms that operate in India. Our findings enhance our understanding of the factors that determine MNCs’ political CSR in emerging economies.


Political corporate social responsibility Corporate political activity Resource dependency theory Institutional theory Social capital India 



Corporate social responsibility


Multinational corporation


Non-governmental organization


Political corporate social responsibility


Resource dependence theory


  1. Aggarwal, A. (2008). Emerging markets labor supply in the Indian IT industry. Communications of the ACM, 51(12), 21–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anand, J., & Delios, A. (1996). Competing globally: How Japanese MNCs have matched goals and strategies in India and China. The Columbia Journal of World Business, 31(3), 50–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arora, B., Kazmi, A., & Bahar, S. (2012). Performing citizenship: An innovative model of financial services for rural poor in India. Business and Society, 51(3), 450–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (2002). Managing across borders : the transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  6. Baur, D., & Schmitz, H. P. (2012). Corporations and NGOs: When accountability leads to co-optation. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baysinger, B. D., & Woodman, R. W. (1982). Dimensions of the public affairs/government relations function in major American corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beddewela, E., & Fairbrass, J. (2015). Seeking legitimacy through CSR: Institutional pressures and corporate responses of multinationals in Sri Lanka. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2478-z.Google Scholar
  9. Bennett, R. J. (1995). The logic of local business associations: An analysis of voluntary chambers of commerce. Journal of Public Policy, 15(03), 251–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bennett, R. J. (1998). Explaining the membership of voluntary local business associations: The example of British Chambers of Commerce. Regional Studies, 32(6), 503–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berg, N., & Holtbrügge, D. (2001). Public affairs management activities of german multinational corporations in India. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(1), 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Björkman, I., & Budhwar, P. (2007). When in Rome…?: Human resource management and the performance of foreign firms operating in India. Employee Relations, 29(6), 595–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blumentritt, T. (2003). Foreign subsidiaries’ government affairs activities: The influence of managers and resources. Business and Society, 42(2), 202–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blumentritt, T., & Nigh, D. (2002). The integration of subsidiary political activities in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1), 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blumentritt, T., & Rehbein, K. (2008). The political capital of foreign subsidiaries. Business & Society, 47: 242–263.Google Scholar
  16. Boddewyn, J. J. (2007). The internationalization of the public-affairs function in U.S. Multinational Enterprises. Business and Society, 46(2), 136–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Boddewyn, J. J., & Doh, J. (2011). Global strategy and the collaboration of MNEs, NGOs, and governments for the provisioning of collective goods in emerging markets. Global Strategy Journal, 1(3–4), 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Casciaro, T., & Piskorski, M. J. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2), 167–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chang, S.-J., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. (2010). From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Child, J., & Tsai, T. (2005). The dynamic between firms’ environmental strategies and institutional constraints in emerging economies: Evidence from China and Taiwan. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 95–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coca-Cola. (2012). Anandana: Coca-Cola India Foundation. Retrieved, from 16 April, 2013
  22. Cottrill, M. T. (1990). Corporate social responsibility and the marketplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(9), 723–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dauvergne, P., & Lister, J. (2010). The power of big box retail in global environmental governance: bringing commodity chains back into IR. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 39(1), 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. (1999). Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: transactional, institutional, and experience influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10), 915–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Detomasi, D. (2007). The multinational corporation and global governance: Modelling global public policy networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3), 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Detomasi, D. (2008). The political roots of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 807–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dhanesh, G. S. (2012). Better stay single? Public relations and CSR leadership in India. Public Relations Review, 38(1), 141–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dieleman, M., & Boddewyn, J. J. (2012). Using organization structure to buffer political ties in emerging markets: A case study. Organization Studies, 33(1), 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dikova, D. (2009). Performance of foreign subsidiaries: does psychic distance matter? International Business Review, 18(1), 38–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dorfman, L., Cheyne, A., Friedman, L. C., Wadud, A., & Gottlieb, M. (2012). Soda and tobacco industry corporate social responsibility campaigns: how do they compare? PLoS Medicine, 9(6), e1001241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Drahos, P., & Braithwaite, J. (2001). The globalisation of regulation. Journal of Political Philosophy, 9(1), 103–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dubini, P., & Aldrich, H. E. (1991). Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(5), 305–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Economist, T. (2012). India’s telecoms scandal: Can you prepone my 2G spot? Retrieved, from 17 April, 2013
  34. Eden, L., & Molot, M. A. (2002). Insiders, outsiders and host country bargains. Journal of International Management, 8(4), 359–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ellison, B., Moller, D., & Rodriguez, M. (2002). Hindustan Lever re-invents the wheel. IESE, University of Navarra: Barcelona (unpublished).Google Scholar
  36. Fooks, G. J., & Gilmore, A. B. (2013). Corporate philanthropy, political influence, and health policy. PLoS One, 8(11), e80864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fooks, G. J., Gilmore, A., Collin, J., Holden, C., & Lee, K. (2013). The limits of corporate social responsibility: Techniques of neutralization, stakeholder management and political CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 283–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fooks, G. J., Gilmore, A. B., Smith, K. E., Collin, J., Holden, C., & Lee, K. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and access to policy élites: an analysis of tobacco industry documents. PLoS Medicine, 8(8), e1001076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Galaskiewicz, J. (1985). Interorganizational relations. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 281–304. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gautam, R., & Singh, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility practices in India: a study of top 500 companies. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 2(1), 41–56.Google Scholar
  41. Gond, J.-P., Kang, N., & Moon, J. (2011). The government of self-regulation: On the comparative dynamics of corporate social responsibility. Economy and Society, 40(4), 640–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Griffin, J. J., & Dunn, P. (2004). Corporate public affairs: Commitment, resources, and structure. Business and Society, 43(2), 196–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hillman, A. J. (2003). Determinants of political strategies in U.S. multinationals. Business and Society, 42(4), 455–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hillman, A. J., & Hitt, M. A. (1999). Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. The Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 825–842.Google Scholar
  45. Hillman, A. J., & Wan, W. P. (2005). The determinants of MNE subsidiaries’ political strategies: evidence of institutional duality. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3), 322–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hills, J., & Welford, R. (2005). Coca-Cola and water in India. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 12(3), 168–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hond, F., Rehbein, K., Bakker, F. G., & Lankveld, H. K. V. (2013). Playing on two chessboards: Reputation effects between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate political activity (CPA). Journal of Management Studies, (In Press). doi:  10.1111/joms.12063
  49. Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wight, M. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kanuk, L., & Berenson, C. (1975). Mail surveys and response rates: A literature review. Journal of Marketing Research, 12(4), 440–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Keillor, B. D., Boller, G. W., & Ferrell, O. C. (1997). Firm-level political behavior in the global marketplace. Journal of Business Research, 40(2), 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Keillor, B. D., & Hult, G. (2004). Predictors of firm-level political behavior in the global business environment: an investigation of specific activities employed by US firms. International Business Review, 13(3), 309–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Khan, A. F. (1981). Managerial responses to social responsibility challenge. Indian Management, 20(9), 13–19.Google Scholar
  54. Khan, A. F., & Atkinson, A. (1987). Managerial attitudes to social responsibility: A comparative study in India and Britain. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(6), 419–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2000). Industry self-regulation without sanctions: the chemical industry’s responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 698–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kochanek, S. A. (1996). Liberalisation and business lobbying in India. Journal of Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 34(3), 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81.Google Scholar
  58. Kozhikode, R. K., & Li, J. (2012). Political pluralism, public policies, and organizational choices: Banking branch expansion in India, 1948–2003. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 339–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Krishna, C. G. (1992). Corporate social responsibility in India. New Delhi: Mittal Publications.Google Scholar
  60. Li, J. J., Poppo, L., & Zhou, K. Z. (2008a). Do managerial ties in China always produce value? Competition, uncertainty, and domestic vs. foreign firms. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4), 383–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Li, J. J., Zhou, K. Z., & Shao, A. T. (2008b). Competitive position, managerial ties, and profitability of foreign firms in China: An interactive perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(2), 339–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. London, T., & Hart, S. L. (2004). Reinventing strategies for emerging markets: beyond the transnational model. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 350–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Luo, Y. (2001). Toward a cooperative view of MNC-host government relations: Building blocks and performance implications. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Luo, Y. (2006). Political behavior, social responsibility, and perceived corruption: a structuration perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 747–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Malatesta, D., & Smith, C. R. (2011). Resource dependence, alternative supply sources, and the design of formal contracts. Public Administration Review, 71(4), 608–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mascarenhas, B. (1984). The coordination of manufacturing interdependence in multinational companies. Journal of International Business Studies, 15(3), 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. The Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Maxwell, J. W., Lyon, T. P., & Hackett, S. C. (2000). Self-regulation and social welfare: The political economy of corporate environmentalism*. The Journal of Law and Economics, 43(2), 583–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. McDaniel, P. A., & Malone, R. E. (2009). Creating the “desired mindset”: Philip Morris’s efforts to improve its corporate image among women. Women and Health, 49(5), 441–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. McDaniel, P. A., & Malone, R. E. (2012). British American Tobacco’s partnership with Earthwatch Europe and its implications for public health. Global Public Health, 7(1), 14–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.Google Scholar
  73. Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Peng, M. W. (2009). Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Meyer, K. E., & Su, Y.-S. (2014). Integration and responsiveness in subsidiaries in emerging economies. Journal of World Business (In Press). doi:  10.1016/j.jwb.2014.04.001
  75. Meznar, M. B., & Nigh, D. (1995). Buffer or Bridge? Environmental and organizational determinants of public affairs activities in American firms. Academy of Management Journal, 38(4), 975–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Mishra, S., & Suar, D. (2010). Does corporate social responsibility influence firm performance of Indian companies? Journal of Business Ethics, 95(4), 571–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Mohan, A. (2001). Corporate citizenship. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2001(2), 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Moon, C.-I. (1988). Complex interdependence and transnational lobbying: South Korea in the United States. International Studies Quarterly, 32(1), 67–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.Google Scholar
  80. Nambiar, P., & Chitty, N. (2014). Meaning making by managers: Corporate discourse on environment and sustainability in India. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(3), 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Narwal, M., & Sharma, T. (2008). Perceptions of corporate social responsibility in India: An empirical study. Journal of Knowledge Globalization, 1(1), 5.Google Scholar
  82. North, D. C. (1996). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.Google Scholar
  83. O’Donnell, S. W. (2000). Managing foreign subsidiaries: agents of headquarters, or an interdependent network? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 525–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Palazzo, G., & Richter, U. (2005). CSR business as usual? The case of the tobacco industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, democracy, and the politicization of the corporation. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 773–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. (2000). Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 486–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 920–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations : a resource dependence perspective. Stanford: Stanford Business Books.Google Scholar
  90. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations : a resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.Google Scholar
  91. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., & Lee, J.-Y. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Puck, J. F., Rogers, H., & Mohr, A. T. (2013). Flying under the radar: Foreign firm visibility and the efficacy of political strategies in emerging economies. International Business Review, 22(6), 1021–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Ramamurti, R. (2001). The obsolescing ‘Bargaining Model’? MNC-host developing country relations revisited. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1), 23–39. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Rao, H. (1994). The social construction of reputation: certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Rasche, A., & Esser, D. (2006). From stakeholder management to stakeholder accountability. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(3), 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Rehbein, K., & Schuler, D. (2013). Linking corporate community programs and political strategies: A resource-based view. Business & Society (In Press). doi:  10.1177/0007650313478024.
  97. Rettab, B., Brik, A., & Mellahi, K. (2009). A study of management perceptions of the impact of corporate social responsibility on organisational performance in emerging economies: The case of Dubai. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(3), 371–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Richter, U. H. (2011). Drivers of change: A multiple-case study on the process of institutionalization of corporate responsibility among three multinational companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Rizopoulos, Y. A., & Sergakis, D. E. (2010). MNEs and policy networks: Institutional embeddedness and strategic choice. Journal of World Business, 45(3), 250–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Roth, K., & Morrison, A. J. (1990). An empirical analysis of the integration-responsiveness framework in global industries. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(4), 541–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Sadrieh, F., & Annavarjula, M. (2005). Firm-specific determinants of corporate lobbying participation and intensity. International Journal of Public Administration, 28(1), 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Saner, R., Yiu, L., & Søndergaard, M. (2000). Business diplomacy management: A core competency for global companies. Academy of Management Executive, 14(1), 80–92.Google Scholar
  103. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Sengupta, M. (2012). Anna hazare and the idea of Gandhi. The Journal of Asian Studies, 71(03), 593–601. doi: 10.1017/S0021911812000617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Sheng, S., Zhou, K. Z., & Li, J. J. (2011). The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Shrivastava, H., & Venkateswaran, S. X. (2000). The business of social responsibility: The why, what, and how of corporate social responsibility in India. New Delhi: Books for Change.Google Scholar
  108. Srivastava, R. K., Fahey, L., & Christensen, H. K. (2001). The resource-based view and marketing: The role of market-based assets in gaining competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 27(6), 777–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Strike, V. M., Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2006). Being good while being bad: social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 850–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Subramaniam, M., & Watson, S. (2006). How interdependence affects subsidiary performance. Journal of Business Research, 59(8), 916–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.Google Scholar
  112. Sun, P., Mellahi, K., & Thun, E. (2010). The dynamic value of MNE political embeddedness: The case of the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7), 1161–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Taylor, M. (2000). Cultural variance as a challenge to global public relations: A case study of the Coca-Cola scare in Europe. Public Relations Review, 26(3), 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Tesler, L. E., & Malone, R. E. (2008). Corporate philanthropy, lobbying, and public health policy. American Journal of Public Health, 98(12), 2123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Udayasankar, K. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and firm size. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. UNCTAD. (2014). Investing in the SDGs: An action plan world investment report 2014 (Vol. 2014). Geneva: UNCTAD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Upadhya, C. (2004). A new transnational capitalist class? Capital flows, business networks and entrepreneurs in the Indian software industry. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(48), 5141–5151.Google Scholar
  119. Valente, M., & Crane, A. (2010). Public responsibility and private enterprise in developing countries. California Management Review, 52(3), 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Waddock, S., & Smith, N. (2000). Relationships: The real challenge of corporate global citizenship. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Wang, H., & Qian, C. (2011). Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1159–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Yang, J. S., & Malone, R. E. (2008). Working to shape what society’s expectations of us should be: Philip Morris’ societal alignment strategy. Tobacco Control, 17(6), 391–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Zhao, M. (2012). CSR-based political legitimacy strategy: Managing the state by doing good in China and Russia. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(4), 439–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vikrant Shirodkar
    • 1
  • Eshani Beddewela
    • 2
  • Ulf Henning Richter
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Business, Management and EconomicsUniversity of SussexBrightonUK
  2. 2.University of HuddersfieldHuddersfieldUK
  3. 3.Nottingham University Business School ChinaNingboChina

Personalised recommendations