Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 148, Issue 1, pp 117–134 | Cite as

Responsible Leadership: A Mapping of Extant Research and Future Directions

  • Christof MiskaEmail author
  • Mark E. Mendenhall


Recently, the increasing interest in responsible leadership (RL) has produced a research field rich in theoretical and conceptual potential, with diverse research foci, theoretical foundations, and methodological approaches. While these developments have demarcated the field from other leadership-oriented disciplines, they have equally courted fragmentation and ambiguity in terms of the field’s positioning within the greater body of leadership studies. To map the theoretical, methodological, and empirical state of the art of the RL field, we outline recent developments and delineate important research gaps and directions for future theory development and empirical research. We emphasize the transition of RL research from micro-level perspectives with normative roots to research spanning multiple levels of analysis, vis-à-vis both antecedents and outcomes. We discuss the implications of our mapping, highlighting the necessity of not only conceptualizing RL across multiple levels of analysis, but also to actively focus on interactions among RL antecedents and outcomes across these levels. Through these, we aim to contribute to the field by strengthening its conceptual foundations and anchoring it more clearly within leadership studies overall.


Responsible leadership Corporate responsibility Sustainability Multiple levels of analysis Research field development 



Corporate responsibility


Human resource


Responsible leadership


  1. Arora, B., & Puranik, R. (2004). A review of corporate social responsibility in India. Development, 47(3), 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1995). MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire for research. Palo Alto: Mind Garden.Google Scholar
  4. Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bohman, J. F., & Rehg, W. (1997). Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Boyatzis, R. E. (2014). Possible contributions to leadership and management development from neuroscience. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(2), 300–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  10. Caligiuri, P., & Thoroughgood, C. (2015). Developing responsible global leaders through corporate—sponsored international volunteerism programs. Organizational Dynamics, 44(2), 138–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carroll, A. B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: The centerpiece of competing and complementary frameworks. Organizational Dynamics, 44(2), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. (2014). Business and society: Ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management. Mason: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  15. Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coldwell, D. A. L. (2010). Running heading: Interfaces in management freedom, moral orientations and corporate instrumentality: Towards a model of responsible management. The Next Generation Responsible Leaders, 15–22.Google Scholar
  17. Coldwell, D. A. L., Joosub, T., & Papageorgiou, E. (2012). Responsible leadership in organizational crises: An analysis of the effects of public perceptions of selected SA business organizations’ reputations. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(2), 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Delmas, M., & Toffel, M. W. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L., Meuser, J. D., Liden, R. C., & Hu, J. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 36–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional–stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Doh, J. P., Husted, B. W., Matten, D., & Santoro, M. (2010). Ahoy there! Toward greater congruence and synergy between international business and business ethics theory and research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(3), 481–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Doh, J. P., Littell, B., & Quigley, N. R. (2015). CSR and sustainability in emerging markets: Societal, institutional, and organizational influences. Organizational Dynamics, 44(2), 112–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Doh, J. P., & Quigley, N. R. (2014). Responsible leadership and stakeholder management: Influence pathways and organizational outcomes. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(3), 255–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Doh, J. P., & Stumpf, S. A. (2005). Handbook on responsible leadership and governance in global business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Doh, J. P., Stumpf, S. A., & Tymon, W. G. (2011). Responsible leadership helps retain talent in India. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1(Supp. 1)), 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
  27. Du, S., Swaen, V., Lindgreen, A., & Sen, S. (2013). The roles of leadership styles in corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Duarte, F. (2010). Working with corporate social responsibility in Brazilian companies: The role of managers’ values in the maintenance of CSR cultures. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(3), 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone.Google Scholar
  30. Filatotchev, I., & Nakajima, C. (2014). Corporate governance, responsible managerial behavior, and corporate social responsibility: Organizational efficiency versus organizational legitimacy? Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(3), 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Filatotchev, I., & Stahl, G. K. (2015). Towards transnational CSR: Corporate social responsibility approaches and governance solutions for multinational corporations. Organizational Dynamics, 44(2), 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Freeman, R. E. (1997). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. In T. L. Beauchamp & N. E. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory of business (pp. 66–76). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  33. Freeman, R. E., & Auster, E. R. (2011). Values, authenticity, and responsible leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1(Supp. 1)), 1–9.Google Scholar
  34. Freeman, R. E., Martin, K., Parmar, B., Cording, M., & Werhane, P. H. (2006). Leading through values and ethical principles. In R. J. Burke & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Inspiring leaders (pp. 149–174). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13, 32–33.Google Scholar
  37. Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In W. C. Zimmerli, M. Holzinger, & K. Richter (Eds.), Corporate ethics and corporate governance (pp. 173–178). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. D. (2002). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205.Google Scholar
  40. Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2005). Authentic leadership theory and practice: Origins, effects and development (Vol. 3). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  41. Gond, J.-P., Igalens, J., Swaen, V., & El Akremi, A. (2011). The human resources contribution to responsible leadership: An exploration of the CSR–HR interface. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Greenleaf, R. K. (1970). The servant as a leader. Robert K Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership.Google Scholar
  43. Greenleaf, R. K. (2002). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  44. Habermas, J. (1998). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. Habermas, J. (2001). The inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  46. Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2014). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Held, M. (2001). Sustainable development from a temporal perspective. Time & Society, 10(2–3), 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hibbert, P., & Cunliffe, A. (2015). Responsible management: Engaging moral reflexive practice through threshold concepts. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1), 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hill, C. W., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder–agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hiss, S. (2009). From implicit to explicit corporate social responsibility: Institutional change as a fight for myths. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3), 433–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  52. Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., Sully de Luque, M. F., & House, R. J. (2006). In the eye of the beholder: Cross cultural lessons in leadership from Project GLOBE. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1), 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue–contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.Google Scholar
  55. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437.Google Scholar
  56. Jones, J. (2014). Leadership lessons from Levinas: Revisiting responsible leadership. Leadership and the Humanities, 2(1), 44–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ketola, T. (2010). Responsible leadership. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(3), 123–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kobrin, S. J. (2009). Private political authority and public responsibility: Transnational politics, transnational firms, and human rights. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3), 349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kuznetsov, A., Kuznetsova, O., & Warren, R. (2009). CSR and the legitimacy of business in transition economies: The case of Russia. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1), 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lane, H. W., Maznevski, M. L., & Mendenhall, M. E. (2004). Globalization: Hercules meets Buddha. In H. W. Lane, M. L. Maznevski, M. E. Mendenhall, & J. McNett (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of global management: A guide to managing complexity (pp. 3–25). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lawler, E. E., & Conger, J. A. (2015). The sustainable effectiveness model: Moving corporations beyond the philanthropy paradigm. Organizational Dynamics, 44(2), 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Authentic leadership: A positive developmental approach. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 241–261). San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  64. Lynham, S. A., & Chermack, T. J. (2006). Responsible leadership for performance: A theoretical model and hypotheses. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12(4), 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society—a relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2008). Responsible leadership in a globalized world: A cosmopolitan perspective. In A. G. Scherer & G. Palazzo (Eds.), Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship (pp. 430–454). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  67. Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2009). Business leaders as citizens of the world. Advancing humanism on a global scale. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 537–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Maritz, R., Pretorius, M., & Plant, K. (2011). Exploring the interface between strategy–making and responsible leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1(Supp. 1)), 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mendenhall, M. E. (2013). Leadership and the birth of global leadership. In M. E. Mendenhall, J. S. Osland, A. Bird, G. R. Oddou, M. L. Maznevski, M. J. Stevens, & G. K. Stahl (Eds.), Global leadership: Research, practice, and development (2nd ed., pp. 1–20). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  72. Mendenhall, M. E., Osland, J. S., Bird, A., Oddou, G. R., Maznevski, M. L., Stevens, M. J., & Stahl, G. K. (2013). Global leadership: Research, practice and development (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Mendenhall, M. E., Reiche, B. S., Bird, A., & Osland, J. S. (2012). Defining the “global” in global leadership. Journal of World Business, 47(4), 493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80(4), 252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Miska, C., Hilbe, C., & Mayer, S. (2014). Reconciling different views on responsible leadership: A rationality–based approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(2), 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Miska, C., Stahl, G. K., & Mendenhall, M. E. (2013). Intercultural competencies as antecedents of responsible global leadership. European Journal of International Management, 7(5), 550–569.Google Scholar
  77. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
  78. Morgan, G., Campbell, J. L., Crouch, C., Pedersen, O. K., & Whitley, R. (2010). The Oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Osland, J. S., Taylor, S., & Mendenhall, M. E. (2011). Global leadership: Progress and challenges. In R. S. Bhagat & R. M. Steers (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of culture, organizations, and work (pp. 245–271). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Patterson, K. A. (2003). Servant leadership: A theoretical model. Regent University.Google Scholar
  82. Patzer, M., Voegtlin, C., & Scherer, A. G. (2013). Globally responsible leadership: Towards a political conception. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Lake Buena Vista (Orlando), Florida.Google Scholar
  83. Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2002). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oak: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  84. Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P. (2001). Shared leadership: Toward a multi–level theory of leadership. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, 7, 115–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Pearce, C. L., & Stahl, G. K. (2015). Introduction to the special issue: The leadership imperative for sustainability and corporate social responsibility. Organizational Dynamics, 44(2), 83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Pearce, C. L., Wassenaar, C. L., & Manz, C. C. (2014). Is shared leadership the key to responsible leadership? The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(3), 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Pless, N. M. (2007). Understanding responsible leadership: Role identity and motivational drivers. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 437–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Pless, N. M., & Maak, T. (2011). Responsible leadership: Pathways to the future. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1(Supp. 1)), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Pless, N. M., Maak, T., & de Jongh, D. (2011a). Foreword to special issue on “Responsible Leadership”. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1(Supp. 1)), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Pless, N. M., Maak, T., & Stahl, G. K. (2011b). Developing responsible global leaders through international service–learning programs: The Ulysses experience. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10(2), 237–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Pless, N. M., Maak, T., & Waldman, D. A. (2012). Different approaches toward doing the right thing: Mapping the responsibility orientations of leaders. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(4), 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Pless, N. M., Maak, T., Waldman, D. A., & Wang, D. (2014). Development of a measure of responsible leadership. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2014, p. 12973). Academy of Management.Google Scholar
  93. Pless, N. M., Stahl, G. K., & Voegtlin, C. (2015). EGOS sub–theme 57: Responsible leadership: Addressing social, environmental and business implications of leadership. Retrieved April 29, 2015, from
  94. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.Google Scholar
  95. Quigley, N. R., Sully de Luque, M. F., & House, R. J. (2005). Responsible leadership and governance in a global context: Insights from the GLOBE study. In J. P. Doh & S. A. Stumpf (Eds.), Handbook on responsible leadership and governance in global business (pp. 352–379). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  96. Ross, S. A. (1973). The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem. The American Economic Review, 63(2), 134–139.Google Scholar
  97. Sackmann, S. A. (2005). Responsible leadership: A cross–cultural perspective. In J. P. Doh & S. A. Stumpf (Eds.), Handbook on responsible leadership and governance in global business (pp. 307–331). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  98. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. (2009). Introduction to the special issue: Globalization as a challenge for business responsibilities. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3), 327–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Scott, J. (2012). Social network analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  101. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency.Google Scholar
  102. Siegel, D. S. (2014). Responsible leadership. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(3), 221–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Simha, A., & Cullen, J. (2012). Ethical climates and their effects on organizational outcomes—implications from the past, and prophecies for the future. The Academy of Management Perspectives., 26(4), 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.Google Scholar
  105. Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Sonenshein, S. (2007). The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model. The Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1022–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Stahl, G. K., Pless, N. M., & Maak, T. (2013). Responsible global leadership. In M. E. Mendenhall, J. S. Osland, A. Bird, G. R. Oddou, M. L. Maznevski, M. J. Stevens, & G. K. Stahl (Eds.), Global leadership: Research, practice, and development (2nd ed., pp. 240–259). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  108. Stahl, G. K., & Sully de Luque, M. F. (2014). Antecedents of responsible leader behavior: A research synthesis, conceptual framework, and agenda for future research. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(3), 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Treviño, L. K. (1990). A cultural perspective on changing and developing organizational ethics. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 4(2), 195–230.Google Scholar
  110. Treviño, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 56(1), 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Treviño, L. K., den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kish-Gephart, J. J. (2014). (Un) ethical behavior in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 635–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Voegtlin, C. (2011). Development of a scale measuring discursive responsible leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1(Supp.1)), 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Voegtlin, C. (2015). What does it mean to be responsible? Addressing the missing responsibility dimension in ethical leadership research. Leadership, 1742715015578936, 1–29.Google Scholar
  115. Voegtlin, C., Patzer, M., & Scherer, A. G. (2012). Responsible leadership in global business: A new approach to leadership and its multi–level outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Voegtlin, C., & Pless, N. M. (2014). Global governance: CSR and the role of the UN Global Compact. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Waddock, S. A., Bodwell, C., & Graves, S. B. (2002). Responsibility: The new business imperative. The Academy of Management Executive, 16(2), 132–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Waldman, D. A. (2011). Moving forward with the concept of responsible leadership: Three caveats to guide theory and research. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1(Supp.1)), 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Waldman, D. A., Balthazard, P. A., & Peterson, S. J. (2011). Leadership and neuroscience: Can we revolutionize the way that inspirational leaders are identified and developed? The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Waldman, D. A., & Balven, R. (2014). Responsible leadership: Theoretical issues and research directions. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(3), 224–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Waldman, D. A., & Galvin, B. M. (2008). Alternative perspectives of responsible leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 37(4), 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Waldman, D. A., & Siegel, D. S. (2008). Defining the socially responsible leader. Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Waldman, D. A., Siegel, D. S., & Javidan, M. (2006a). Components of CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1703–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Waldman, D. A., Sully de Luque, M. F., Washburn, N., House, R. J., Adetoun, B., Barrasa, A., et al. (2006b). Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: A GLOBE study of 15 countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 823–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Witt, M. A., & Redding, G. (2012). The spirits of corporate social responsibility: Senior executive perceptions of the role of the firm in society in Germany, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea and the USA. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Witt, M. A., & Stahl, G. K. (2015). Foundations of responsible leadership: Asian versus Western executive responsibility orientations toward key stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2534-8.
  127. Woiceshyn, J. (2011). A model for ethical decision making in business: Reasoning, intuition, and rational moral principles. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Xu, S., & Yang, R. (2010). Indigenous characteristics of Chinese corporate social responsibility conceptual paradigm. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 321–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Global Business and Trade, Institute for International BusinessWU ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.College of BusinessUniversity of Tennessee, ChattanoogaChattanoogaUSA

Personalised recommendations