Retail Chains’ Corporate Social Responsibility Communication
- 1.1k Downloads
This study examines determinants of retail chains’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication on their web pages. The theoretical foundation for the study is signaling theory, which suggests that firms will communicate about their CSR efforts when this is profitable for them and when such communication makes it possible for outsiders to distinguish good from bad performers. Based on this theory, I develop hypotheses about retail chains’ CSR signaling. The hypotheses are tested in a sample of 208 retail chains in the Norwegian market. As hypothesized, I find that foreign chains, chains using private brands, and vertically integrated chains are more likely to signal, but I find no relationship between pricing and signaling. In further analysis using chains’ CSR memberships and certifications as the measure of signals, only the relationship between organizational form and signaling is replicated. In total, the findings give partial support to signaling theory.
KeywordsCorporate social responsibility Communication Retail Web pages Signaling theory Franchising
- Andhøyregistrene. (2011). Handelshus i Norge 2011. Lysaker: Andhøyregistrene.Google Scholar
- Bakan, J. (2005). The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Bernstein, S., & Sheen, A. (2013). The operational consequences of private equity buyouts: Evidence from the restaurant industry. Retrieved from http://www.stanford.edu/~shaib/BernsteinSheenDecember%208th.pdf.
- Berrone, P., Gelabert, L., & Fosfuri, A. (2009). The impact of symbolic and substantive actions on environmental legitimacy. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1349063.
- Eco-Lighthouse. (2014). About Eco-Lighthouse. Retrieved April 2, 2014, from http://eco-lighthouse.org/artikler/.
- Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.Google Scholar
- Elfenbein, D. W., & McManus, B. (2010). A greater price for a greater good? Evidence that consumers pay more for charity-linked products. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2(2), 28–60.Google Scholar
- Ethical Trading Initiative Norway. (2014). About IEH. Retrieved April 2, 2014, from http://etiskhandel.no/English/About_IEH/index.html.
- Fuchs, D., Kalfagianni, A., & Arentsen, M. (2009). Retail power, private standards, and sustainability in the global food system. In J. Clapp & D. Fuchs (Eds.), Corporate Power in Global Agrifood Governance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Gamer, M., Lemon, J., & Fellows, I. (2012). Irr: Various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement. R package version 0.84. Google Scholar
- Global Reporting Initiative. (2013). G3.1 Guidelines. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from https://www.globalreporting.org/reporting/latest-guidelines/g3-1-guidelines/Pages/default.aspx.
- Hoffman, T. S., & O’Riain, M. J. (2012). Landscape requirements of a primate population in a human-dominated environment. Frontiers in Zoology, 9(1).Google Scholar
- Jin, G. Z., & Leslie, P. (2009). Reputational incentives for restaurant hygiene. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 1(1), 237–267.Google Scholar
- Kalnins, A., & Lafontaine, F. (2013). Too far away? The effect of distance to headquarters on business establishment performance. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 5(3), 157–179.Google Scholar
- Kumar, N., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2007). Private label strategy: how to meet the store brand challenge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Levy, M., & Weitz, B. (2012). Retailing management (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.Google Scholar
- Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2004). Practical resources for assessing and reporting intercoder reliability in content analysis research projects. Retrieved October 25, 2013, from http://ils.indiana.edu/faculty/hrosenba/www/Research/methods/lombard_reliability.pdf.
- Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2009). Does it pay to be good…And does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1866371.
- Nordic Ecolabelling. (2014). The Nordic Ecolabel´s requirements. Retrieved April 2, 2014, from http://www.nordic-ecolabel.org/criteria/.
- R Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
- Retriever, A. S. (2013). Atekst. Retrieved April 5, 2013, from http://www.mediearkivet.no/.
- Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Kumar, N. (2009). Don’t be undersold! Harvard Business Review, 87(12), 90–95.Google Scholar
- Tagesson, T., Blank, V., Broberg, P., & Collin, S.-O. (2009). What explains the extent and content of social and environmental disclosures on corporate websites: a study of social and environmental reporting in Swedish listed corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(6), 352–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.Google Scholar
- Wooldridge, J. M. (2013). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (5th ed.). Mason: South-Western, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar