Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Business Cases and Corporate Engagement with Sustainability: Differentiating Ethical Motivations

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores links between different ethical motivations and kinds of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities to distinguish between different types of business cases with regard to sustainability. The design of CSR and corporate sustainability can be based on different ethical foundations and motivations. This paper draws on the framework of Roberts (Organization 10:249–265, 2003) which distinguishes four different ethical management versions of CSR. The first two ethical motivations are driven either by a reactionary concern for the short-term financial interests of the business, or reputational, driven by a narcissistic concern to protect the firm’s image. The third responsible motivation works from the inside-out and seeks to embed social and environmental concerns within the firm’s performance management systems, and the fourth, a collaborative motivation, works to bring the outside in and seeks to go beyond the boundaries of the firm to create a dialogue with those who are vulnerable to the unintended consequences of corporate conduct. Management activities based on these different ethical motivations to CSR and sustainability result in different operational activities for corporations working towards sustainability and thus have very different effects on how the company’s economic performance is influenced. Assuming that corporate managers are concerned about creating business cases for their companies to survive and prosper in the long term, this paper raises the question of how different ethical motivations for designing CSR and corporate sustainability relate to the creation of different business cases. The paper concludes by distinguishing four different kinds of business cases with regard to sustainability: reactionary and reputational business cases of sustainability, and responsible and collaborative business cases for sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, A. R. (1998). Cultivating the garden of Eden. Environmental entrepreneuring. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11(2), 135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argenti, P. A. (2004). Collaborating with activists. How Starbucks works with NGOs. California Management Review, 47(1), 91–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J. (2010). The BP Deepwater Horizon débâcle and corporate brand exuberance. Journal of Brand Management, 18(2), 97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J., Powell, S., & Greyser, S. (2011). Explicating ethical corporate marketing. Insights from the BP Deepwater Horizon catastrophe. The ethical brand that exploded and then imploded. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, P. A. (2013). The contribution of Emmanuel Levinas to Corporate Social Responsibility and business ethics in the post-modern era. Journal of International Business Ethics, 6(1/2), 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benn, S., Dunphy, D., & Griffiths, A. (2014). Organizational change for corporate sustainability. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M., & Rondinelli, D. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental management. A new industrial revolution. The Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L., & Logsdon, J. M. (1996). How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Planning, 29(4), 495–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burritt, R. L., Moneva, J. M., & Ortas, E. (2013). Socially responsible investment and cleaner production in the Asia Pacific. Does it pay to be good? Journal of Cleaner Production, 52(1), 272–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burritt, R., & Saka, C. (2006). Environmental management accounting applications and eco-efficiency. Case studies from Japan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 1262–1275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burritt, R., & Schaltegger, S. (2010). Sustainability accounting and reporting fad or trend? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 23(7), 829–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burritt, R., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Accounting towards sustainability in production and supply chains. The British Accounting Review, 46(4), 327–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabretta, G., Durisin, B., & Ogliengo, M. (2011). Uncovering the intellectual structure of research in business ethics. A journey through the history, the classics, and the pillars of journal of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(4), 499–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility. Towards the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. (2014). Business and society. Ethics, sustainability and stakeholder management. Stamford: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility. A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). Greenwash and green trust. The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), 489–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, C., Michelon, G., & Patten, D. (2012). Enhancement and obfuscation through the use of graphs in sustainability reports. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 3(1), 74–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of ‘best practices’ of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 663–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B., & Winn, M. I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Business Ethics, 16(1), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constance, D. H., & Bonanno, A. (2000). Regulating the global fisheries. The World Wildlife Fund, Unilever, and the marine stewardship council. Agriculture and Human Values, 17(2), 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, A. (2004). The marine stewardship council. A multi-stakeholder approach to sustainable fishing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11(2), 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyck, B., & Schroeder, D. (2005). Management, theology and moral points of view. Towards an alternative to the conventional materialist-individualist ideal-type of management. Journal of Management Studies, 42(4), 705–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (1998). The link between company environmental and financial performance. London: Earthscan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehnert, I. (2009). Sustainable human resource management. A conceptual and exploratory analysis from a paradox perspective. Heidelberg: Physica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. J., & Roy, M.-J. (2003). Making the business case for sustainability. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 9, 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esty, D., & Porter, M. (1998). Industrial ecology and competitiveness. Strategic implications for the firm. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(1), 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2005). Economics language and assumptions. How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 8–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I & Nakajima, C. (2014). Corporate governance, responsible managerial behavior, and CSR. Organizational efficiency versus organizational legitimacy? Academy of Management Perspectives. http://amp.aom.org/content/early/2014/05/13/amp.2014.0014, Accessed May 13 2014

  • Fleming, P., Garsten, C., & Roberts, J. (2011). Call for papers. Special issue on ‘in search of corporate responsibility’. Organization, 18, 271–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, P., Roberts, J., & Garsten, C. (2013). In search of corporate social responsibility. Introduction to special issue. Organization, 20, 337–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fooks, G., Gilmore, A., Collin, A., Colling, J., Holden, C., & Lee, K. (2013). The limits of corporate social responsibility. Techniques of neutralization, stakeholder management and political CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. Heidelberg: The New York Times Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories. Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasbergen, P. (2002). The green polder model. Institutionalizing multi-stakeholder processes in strategic environmental decision making. European Environment, 12(6), 303–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnan, L., Hinna, A., Monteduro, F., & Scarozza, D. (2013). Corporate governance and management practices. Stakeholder involvement, quality and sustainability tools adoption. Journal of Management and Governance, 17(4), 907–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, J., & van de Ven, B. (2006). Strategic and moral motivation for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2006(22), 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability… and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., & Bebbington, J. (2000). Environmental accounting, managerialism and sustainability. Is the planet safe in the hands of business and accounting? Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management, 1, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J., & Mahon, J. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haanaes, K., Michael, D., Jurgens, J., & Rangan, S. (2013). Making sustainability profitable. Harvard Business Review, 91(3), 110–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R. (2009). The ethical rational of business for the poor. Integrating the concepts bottom of the pyramid, sustainable development, and corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(3), 313–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability. Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 463–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. T. (1995). Pollution as news. Media and stock market reactions to the toxic release inventory data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28, 98–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, E. G., Gomm, M. L., Bullinger, A. C., & Möslein, K. M. (2010a). A community-based toolkit for designing ride-sharing services. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 5(1), 80–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, E. G., Grosse-Dunker, F., & Reichwald, R. (2010b). Sustainability innovation cube. A framework to evaluate sustainability-oriented innovations. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 683–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, D., Sibary, S., & Sikula, A. (1999). Relation among Corporate Social Responsibility, financial soundness, and investment value in 22 manufacturing industry groups. Ethics and Behavior, 9(4), 331–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmig, B., Spraul, K., & Ingenhoff, D. (2013). Under positive pressure. How stakeholder pressure affects Corporate Social Responsibility implementation. Business & Society, doi:10.1177/0007650313477841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, T. A. (1997). Legislating corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 40(2), 53–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, J. R., & Vesilind, P. A. (2005). Ethical motivations for green business and engineering. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 7(4), 252–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockerts, K. (2014). A cognitive perspective on the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment. doi:10.1002/bse.1813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, C., Schmidheiny, S., & Watts, J. (2002). Walking the talk. The business case for sustainable development. Sheffield: Greenleaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hörisch, J., Freeman, E., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Applying stakeholder theory in sustainability management. Links, similarities, dissimilarities, and conceptual framework. Organization & Environment, 27(4), 328–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasch, C. (2009). Environmental and material flow cost accounting. Principles and procedures. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (2010). Seizing the white space. Growth and renewal through business model innovation. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. & Rubin, P. (1999). Effects of harmful environmental events on reputations of firms, http://ssrn.com/abstract=158849.

  • Joyner, B. E., & Payne, D. (2002). Evolution and implementation. A study of values, business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(4), 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karnani, A. (2007). The mirage of marketing to the bottom of the pyramid. California Management Review, 49(4), 90–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiron, D., Kruschwitz, N., Haanes, K., & von Streng Velken, I. (2012). Sustainability nears a tipping point. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(2), 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiron, D., Kruschwitz, N., Reeves, M., & Goh, E. (2013). The benefits of sustainability-driven innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(2), 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoepfel, I. (2001). Dow Jones Sustainability Group Index. A global benchmark for corporate sustainability. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 8(1), 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development moral stages and the idea of justice. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A., & Perego, P. (2014). Sustainable bonuses. Sign of corporate responsibility or window dressing? Journal of Business Ethics, 119(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lankoski, L. (2006). Environmental and economic performance. The basic links. In M. Wagner (Ed.), Schaltegger, S (pp. 46–60). Sheffield: Managing the business case for sustainability Greenleaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, W. S. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(3), 253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1991). Otherwise than being or beyond essence. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lioui, A., & Sharma, Z. (2012). Environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Disentangling direct and indirect effects. Ecological Economics, 78, 100–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, M., Garcia, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance. A study based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies. Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maunders, K. T., & Burritt, R. L. (1991). Accounting and ecological crisis. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 4(3), 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, R., Pini, B., & McDonald, P. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and the parameters of dialogue with vulnerable others. Organization, 20(6), 840–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., & Covin, J. (2000). Environmental marketing. A source of reputational, competitive, and financial advantage. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. (1979). Depression and grandiosity as related forms of narcissistic disturbances. International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 6, 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, E., Shamshoian, G., Blazek, M., Naughton, P., Seese, R., Tschudi, W., & Sartor, D. (2008). The business case for energy management in high-tech industries. Journal of Energy Efficiency, 1(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2013). W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montalvo, C. (2008). General wisdom concerning the factors affecting the adoption of cleaner technologies. A survey 1990–2007. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(1), 7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montalvo, C., & Kemp, R. (2008). Cleaner technology diffusion. Case studies, modeling and policy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olve, N.-G., Roy, J., & Wetter, M. (1999). Performance drivers. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance. A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, K., Oates, W., & Portney, P. (1995). Tightening environmental standards. The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish, B. D. (2010). Sustainability-driven entrepreneurship. Principles of organization design. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 510–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pava, M., & Krausz, J. (1996). The association between corporate social-responsibility and financial performance. The paradox of social cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3), 321–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, B. (2003). Sustainability and business competitiveness. Measuring the benefit for business competitive advantage from social responsibility and sustainability. London: Forum for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini-Masini, G., & Leishman, C. (2011). The role of corporate reputation and employees’ values in the uptake of energy efficiency in office buildings. Energy Policy, 39(9), 5409–5419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, D. (2014). Deepwater horizon exposes BP’s PR strengths and weaknesses. Company lacked critical tools in aftermath of oil-rig disaster. Human resource management international digest, 22(7), 23–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995a). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995b). Green and competitive. Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pujari, D. (2006). Eco-innovation and new product development understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation, 26(1), 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, F. L. (1999). Bringing the environment down to earth. Harvard Business Review, 77(4), 149–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revell, A., Stokes, D., & Chen, H. (2010). Small businesses and the environment. Turning over a new leaf? Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(5), 273–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. (2003). The manufacture of corporate social responsibility. Constructing corporate sensibility. Organization, 10(2), 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. (2014). Testing the limits of structuration theory in accounting research. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(2), 135–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G., & Dechant, C. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. Academy of Management Perspectives, 11(3), 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 534–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salzmann, O., Ionescu-Somers, A., & Steger, U. (2005). The business case for corporate sustainability. Literature review and research options. European Management Journal, 231, 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S. (2002). A framework for ecopreneurship. Leading bioneers and environmental managers to ecopreneurship. Greener Management International, 38, 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S. (2011). Sustainability as a driver for corporate economic success. Consequences for the development of sustainability management control. Society and Economy, 33(1), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2005). Corporate sustainability. In: H. Folmer & T. Tietenberg (Eds.), International yearbook of environmental and resource economics 2005/2006 (pp. 185–222). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. (2012). Business cases for sustainability, the role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 95–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., & Synnestvedt, T. (2002). The link between “green” and economic success: Environmental management as the crucial trigger between environmental and economic performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 65(4), 339–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation. Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schepers, D. H. (2010). Challenges to legitimacy at the forest stewardship council. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E. G., & Wasieleski, D. M. (2013). Institutionalizing ethical innovation in organizations. An integrated causal model of moral innovation decision processes. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(1), 15–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searcy, D., & Elkhawas, C. (2012). Corporate sustainability ratings. An investigation into how corporations use the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Cleaner Production, 35(November), 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R. D., & Bradford, R. L. (1996). Taxing variable cost. Environmental regulation as industrial policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(3), 282–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steger, U. (Ed.). (2004). The business of sustainability. Building industry cases for corporate sustainability. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taneja, S. S., Taneja, P. K., & Gupta, R. K. (2011). Researches in corporate social responsibility. A review of shifting focus, paradigms, and methodologies. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(3), 343–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, J., & Prakash-Mani, K. (2003). Developing value. The business case for sustainability in emerging markets. Greener Management International, 44(Winter), 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Marreweijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability. Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Marreweijk, M., & Werre, M. (2003). Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vel, J. (2014). Trading in discursive commodities. Biofuel brokers’ roles in perpetuating the Jatropha hype in Indonesia. Sustainability, 6(5), 2802–2821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Weizsäcker, E. U., Hargroves, K., Smith, M., Desha, C., & Stasinopoulos, P. (2009). Factor Five, transforming the global economy through 80 % improvements in resource productivity. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M. (2007). Integration of environmental management with other managerial functions of the firm. Empirical effects on drivers of economic performance. Long Range Planning, 40(6), 611–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M. (2010). The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance. A firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecological Economics, 69(7), 1553–1560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M., Schaltegger, S., & Wehrmeyer, W. (2001). The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms. What does theory propose and what does empirical evidence tell us? Greener Management International, 34, 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walley, N., & Whitehead, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Harvard Business Review, 72(3), 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility. A company-level measurement approach for CSR. European Management Journal, 26(4), 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteman, G., Walker, B., & Perego, O. (2013). Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 307–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, A., & Freeman, E. (1998). Organization studies and the new pragmatism: positivism, anti-positivism and the search for ethics. Organization Science, 9(2), 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xepapadeas, A., & de Zeeuw, A. (1999). Environmental policy and competitiveness. The porter hypothesis and the composition of capital. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37(2), 165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York, J. (2009). Pragmatic sustainability. Translating environmental ethics into competitive advantage. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Sustainability Management (CSM), Leuphana University Lüneburg, Scharnhorststr. 1, 21335, Lüneburg, Germany

    Stefan Schaltegger

  2. Department of Accounting and Corporate Governance, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia

    Roger Burritt

Authors
  1. Stefan Schaltegger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roger Burritt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Schaltegger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schaltegger, S., Burritt, R. Business Cases and Corporate Engagement with Sustainability: Differentiating Ethical Motivations. J Bus Ethics 147, 241–259 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2938-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2938-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation