Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 147, Issue 2, pp 241–259 | Cite as

Business Cases and Corporate Engagement with Sustainability: Differentiating Ethical Motivations

  • Stefan SchalteggerEmail author
  • Roger Burritt
Article

Abstract

This paper explores links between different ethical motivations and kinds of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities to distinguish between different types of business cases with regard to sustainability. The design of CSR and corporate sustainability can be based on different ethical foundations and motivations. This paper draws on the framework of Roberts (Organization 10:249–265, 2003) which distinguishes four different ethical management versions of CSR. The first two ethical motivations are driven either by a reactionary concern for the short-term financial interests of the business, or reputational, driven by a narcissistic concern to protect the firm’s image. The third responsible motivation works from the inside-out and seeks to embed social and environmental concerns within the firm’s performance management systems, and the fourth, a collaborative motivation, works to bring the outside in and seeks to go beyond the boundaries of the firm to create a dialogue with those who are vulnerable to the unintended consequences of corporate conduct. Management activities based on these different ethical motivations to CSR and sustainability result in different operational activities for corporations working towards sustainability and thus have very different effects on how the company’s economic performance is influenced. Assuming that corporate managers are concerned about creating business cases for their companies to survive and prosper in the long term, this paper raises the question of how different ethical motivations for designing CSR and corporate sustainability relate to the creation of different business cases. The paper concludes by distinguishing four different kinds of business cases with regard to sustainability: reactionary and reputational business cases of sustainability, and responsible and collaborative business cases for sustainability.

Keywords

Business cases Corporate sustainability CSR Ethics Reactionary Reputational Responsible Collaborative 

References

  1. Anderson, A. R. (1998). Cultivating the garden of Eden. Environmental entrepreneuring. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11(2), 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argenti, P. A. (2004). Collaborating with activists. How Starbucks works with NGOs. California Management Review, 47(1), 91–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balmer, J. (2010). The BP Deepwater Horizon débâcle and corporate brand exuberance. Journal of Brand Management, 18(2), 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balmer, J., Powell, S., & Greyser, S. (2011). Explicating ethical corporate marketing. Insights from the BP Deepwater Horizon catastrophe. The ethical brand that exploded and then imploded. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, P. A. (2013). The contribution of Emmanuel Levinas to Corporate Social Responsibility and business ethics in the post-modern era. Journal of International Business Ethics, 6(1/2), 19.Google Scholar
  6. Benn, S., Dunphy, D., & Griffiths, A. (2014). Organizational change for corporate sustainability. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Berry, M., & Rondinelli, D. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental management. A new industrial revolution. The Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 38–50.Google Scholar
  8. Burke, L., & Logsdon, J. M. (1996). How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Planning, 29(4), 495–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burritt, R. L., Moneva, J. M., & Ortas, E. (2013). Socially responsible investment and cleaner production in the Asia Pacific. Does it pay to be good? Journal of Cleaner Production, 52(1), 272–280.Google Scholar
  10. Burritt, R., & Saka, C. (2006). Environmental management accounting applications and eco-efficiency. Case studies from Japan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 1262–1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burritt, R., & Schaltegger, S. (2010). Sustainability accounting and reporting fad or trend? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 23(7), 829–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burritt, R., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Accounting towards sustainability in production and supply chains. The British Accounting Review, 46(4), 327–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Calabretta, G., Durisin, B., & Ogliengo, M. (2011). Uncovering the intellectual structure of research in business ethics. A journey through the history, the classics, and the pillars of journal of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(4), 499–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.Google Scholar
  15. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility. Towards the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. (2014). Business and society. Ethics, sustainability and stakeholder management. Stamford: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  17. Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility. A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). Greenwash and green trust. The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), 489–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cho, C., Michelon, G., & Patten, D. (2012). Enhancement and obfuscation through the use of graphs in sustainability reports. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 3(1), 74–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of ‘best practices’ of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 663–680. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cohen, B., & Winn, M. I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Business Ethics, 16(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Constance, D. H., & Bonanno, A. (2000). Regulating the global fisheries. The World Wildlife Fund, Unilever, and the marine stewardship council. Agriculture and Human Values, 17(2), 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cummins, A. (2004). The marine stewardship council. A multi-stakeholder approach to sustainable fishing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11(2), 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dyck, B., & Schroeder, D. (2005). Management, theology and moral points of view. Towards an alternative to the conventional materialist-individualist ideal-type of management. Journal of Management Studies, 42(4), 705–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Edwards, D. (1998). The link between company environmental and financial performance. London: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Ehnert, I. (2009). Sustainable human resource management. A conceptual and exploratory analysis from a paradox perspective. Heidelberg: Physica.Google Scholar
  29. Epstein, M. J., & Roy, M.-J. (2003). Making the business case for sustainability. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 9, 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Esty, D., & Porter, M. (1998). Industrial ecology and competitiveness. Strategic implications for the firm. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(1), 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2005). Economics language and assumptions. How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 8–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Filatotchev, I & Nakajima, C. (2014). Corporate governance, responsible managerial behavior, and CSR. Organizational efficiency versus organizational legitimacy? Academy of Management Perspectives. http://amp.aom.org/content/early/2014/05/13/amp.2014.0014, Accessed May 13 2014
  33. Fleming, P., Garsten, C., & Roberts, J. (2011). Call for papers. Special issue on ‘in search of corporate responsibility’. Organization, 18, 271–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fleming, P., Roberts, J., & Garsten, C. (2013). In search of corporate social responsibility. Introduction to special issue. Organization, 20, 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fooks, G., Gilmore, A., Collin, A., Colling, J., Holden, C., & Lee, K. (2013). The limits of corporate social responsibility. Techniques of neutralization, stakeholder management and political CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 283–299. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.Google Scholar
  37. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. Heidelberg: The New York Times Magazine.Google Scholar
  38. Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories. Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Glasbergen, P. (2002). The green polder model. Institutionalizing multi-stakeholder processes in strategic environmental decision making. European Environment, 12(6), 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gnan, L., Hinna, A., Monteduro, F., & Scarozza, D. (2013). Corporate governance and management practices. Stakeholder involvement, quality and sustainability tools adoption. Journal of Management and Governance, 17(4), 907–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Graafland, J., & van de Ven, B. (2006). Strategic and moral motivation for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2006(22), 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability… and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gray, R., & Bebbington, J. (2000). Environmental accounting, managerialism and sustainability. Is the planet safe in the hands of business and accounting? Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management, 1, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Griffin, J., & Mahon, J. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36(1), 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Haanaes, K., Michael, D., Jurgens, J., & Rangan, S. (2013). Making sustainability profitable. Harvard Business Review, 91(3), 110–115.Google Scholar
  46. Hahn, R. (2009). The ethical rational of business for the poor. Integrating the concepts bottom of the pyramid, sustainable development, and corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(3), 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability. Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 463–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hamilton, J. T. (1995). Pollution as news. Media and stock market reactions to the toxic release inventory data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28, 98–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hansen, E. G., Gomm, M. L., Bullinger, A. C., & Möslein, K. M. (2010a). A community-based toolkit for designing ride-sharing services. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 5(1), 80–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hansen, E. G., Grosse-Dunker, F., & Reichwald, R. (2010b). Sustainability innovation cube. A framework to evaluate sustainability-oriented innovations. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 683–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Heinze, D., Sibary, S., & Sikula, A. (1999). Relation among Corporate Social Responsibility, financial soundness, and investment value in 22 manufacturing industry groups. Ethics and Behavior, 9(4), 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Helmig, B., Spraul, K., & Ingenhoff, D. (2013). Under positive pressure. How stakeholder pressure affects Corporate Social Responsibility implementation. Business & Society, doi: 10.1177/0007650313477841.Google Scholar
  53. Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hemphill, T. A. (1997). Legislating corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 40(2), 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hendry, J. R., & Vesilind, P. A. (2005). Ethical motivations for green business and engineering. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 7(4), 252–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hockerts, K. (2014). A cognitive perspective on the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment. doi: 10.1002/bse.1813.Google Scholar
  58. Holliday, C., Schmidheiny, S., & Watts, J. (2002). Walking the talk. The business case for sustainable development. Sheffield: Greenleaf.Google Scholar
  59. Hörisch, J., Freeman, E., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Applying stakeholder theory in sustainability management. Links, similarities, dissimilarities, and conceptual framework. Organization & Environment, 27(4), 328–346. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jasch, C. (2009). Environmental and material flow cost accounting. Principles and procedures. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  61. Johnson, M. (2010). Seizing the white space. Growth and renewal through business model innovation. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  62. Jones, K. & Rubin, P. (1999). Effects of harmful environmental events on reputations of firms, http://ssrn.com/abstract=158849.
  63. Joyner, B. E., & Payne, D. (2002). Evolution and implementation. A study of values, business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(4), 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Karnani, A. (2007). The mirage of marketing to the bottom of the pyramid. California Management Review, 49(4), 90–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kiron, D., Kruschwitz, N., Haanes, K., & von Streng Velken, I. (2012). Sustainability nears a tipping point. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(2), 69–74.Google Scholar
  66. Kiron, D., Kruschwitz, N., Reeves, M., & Goh, E. (2013). The benefits of sustainability-driven innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(2), 69–73.Google Scholar
  67. Knoepfel, I. (2001). Dow Jones Sustainability Group Index. A global benchmark for corporate sustainability. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 8(1), 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development moral stages and the idea of justice. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  69. Kolk, A., & Perego, P. (2014). Sustainable bonuses. Sign of corporate responsibility or window dressing? Journal of Business Ethics, 119(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lankoski, L. (2006). Environmental and economic performance. The basic links. In M. Wagner (Ed.), Schaltegger, S (pp. 46–60). Sheffield: Managing the business case for sustainability Greenleaf.Google Scholar
  71. Laufer, W. S. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(3), 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Levinas, E. (1991). Otherwise than being or beyond essence. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lioui, A., & Sharma, Z. (2012). Environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Disentangling direct and indirect effects. Ecological Economics, 78, 100–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lopez, M., Garcia, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance. A study based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies. Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Maunders, K. T., & Burritt, R. L. (1991). Accounting and ecological crisis. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 4(3), 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Mayes, R., Pini, B., & McDonald, P. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and the parameters of dialogue with vulnerable others. Organization, 20(6), 840–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Miles, M., & Covin, J. (2000). Environmental marketing. A source of reputational, competitive, and financial advantage. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Miller, A. (1979). Depression and grandiosity as related forms of narcissistic disturbances. International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 6, 61–76.Google Scholar
  80. Mills, E., Shamshoian, G., Blazek, M., Naughton, P., Seese, R., Tschudi, W., & Sartor, D. (2008). The business case for energy management in high-tech industries. Journal of Energy Efficiency, 1(1), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2013). W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Montalvo, C. (2008). General wisdom concerning the factors affecting the adoption of cleaner technologies. A survey 1990–2007. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(1), 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Montalvo, C., & Kemp, R. (2008). Cleaner technology diffusion. Case studies, modeling and policy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Olve, N.-G., Roy, J., & Wetter, M. (1999). Performance drivers. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  85. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance. A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Palmer, K., Oates, W., & Portney, P. (1995). Tightening environmental standards. The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Parrish, B. D. (2010). Sustainability-driven entrepreneurship. Principles of organization design. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 510–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Pava, M., & Krausz, J. (1996). The association between corporate social-responsibility and financial performance. The paradox of social cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3), 321–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Pearce, B. (2003). Sustainability and business competitiveness. Measuring the benefit for business competitive advantage from social responsibility and sustainability. London: Forum for the Future.Google Scholar
  90. Pellegrini-Masini, G., & Leishman, C. (2011). The role of corporate reputation and employees’ values in the uptake of energy efficiency in office buildings. Energy Policy, 39(9), 5409–5419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Pollitt, D. (2014). Deepwater horizon exposes BP’s PR strengths and weaknesses. Company lacked critical tools in aftermath of oil-rig disaster. Human resource management international digest, 22(7), 23–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.Google Scholar
  93. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995a). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995b). Green and competitive. Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–133.Google Scholar
  95. Pujari, D. (2006). Eco-innovation and new product development understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation, 26(1), 76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Reinhardt, F. L. (1999). Bringing the environment down to earth. Harvard Business Review, 77(4), 149–157.Google Scholar
  97. Rest, J. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger. Google Scholar
  98. Revell, A., Stokes, D., & Chen, H. (2010). Small businesses and the environment. Turning over a new leaf? Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(5), 273–288.Google Scholar
  99. Roberts, J. (2003). The manufacture of corporate social responsibility. Constructing corporate sensibility. Organization, 10(2), 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Roberts, J. (2014). Testing the limits of structuration theory in accounting research. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(2), 135–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Robinson, G., & Dechant, C. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. Academy of Management Perspectives, 11(3), 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 534–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Salzmann, O., Ionescu-Somers, A., & Steger, U. (2005). The business case for corporate sustainability. Literature review and research options. European Management Journal, 231, 27–36. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Schaltegger, S. (2002). A framework for ecopreneurship. Leading bioneers and environmental managers to ecopreneurship. Greener Management International, 38, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Schaltegger, S. (2011). Sustainability as a driver for corporate economic success. Consequences for the development of sustainability management control. Society and Economy, 33(1), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2005). Corporate sustainability. In: H. Folmer & T. Tietenberg (Eds.), International yearbook of environmental and resource economics 2005/2006 (pp. 185–222). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  107. Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. (2012). Business cases for sustainability, the role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Schaltegger, S., & Synnestvedt, T. (2002). The link between “green” and economic success: Environmental management as the crucial trigger between environmental and economic performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 65(4), 339–346.Google Scholar
  109. Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation. Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Schepers, D. H. (2010). Challenges to legitimacy at the forest stewardship council. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Scherer, A., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Schumacher, E. G., & Wasieleski, D. M. (2013). Institutionalizing ethical innovation in organizations. An integrated causal model of moral innovation decision processes. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(1), 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Searcy, D., & Elkhawas, C. (2012). Corporate sustainability ratings. An investigation into how corporations use the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Cleaner Production, 35(November), 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Simpson, R. D., & Bradford, R. L. (1996). Taxing variable cost. Environmental regulation as industrial policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(3), 282–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Steger, U. (Ed.). (2004). The business of sustainability. Building industry cases for corporate sustainability. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  116. Taneja, S. S., Taneja, P. K., & Gupta, R. K. (2011). Researches in corporate social responsibility. A review of shifting focus, paradigms, and methodologies. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(3), 343–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Thorpe, J., & Prakash-Mani, K. (2003). Developing value. The business case for sustainability in emerging markets. Greener Management International, 44(Winter), 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Van Marreweijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability. Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Van Marreweijk, M., & Werre, M. (2003). Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Vel, J. (2014). Trading in discursive commodities. Biofuel brokers’ roles in perpetuating the Jatropha hype in Indonesia. Sustainability, 6(5), 2802–2821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. von Weizsäcker, E. U., Hargroves, K., Smith, M., Desha, C., & Stasinopoulos, P. (2009). Factor Five, transforming the global economy through 80 % improvements in resource productivity. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  122. Wagner, M. (2007). Integration of environmental management with other managerial functions of the firm. Empirical effects on drivers of economic performance. Long Range Planning, 40(6), 611–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Wagner, M. (2010). The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance. A firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecological Economics, 69(7), 1553–1560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Wagner, M., Schaltegger, S., & Wehrmeyer, W. (2001). The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms. What does theory propose and what does empirical evidence tell us? Greener Management International, 34, 95–108.Google Scholar
  125. Walley, N., & Whitehead, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Harvard Business Review, 72(3), 46–51.Google Scholar
  126. Weber, M. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility. A company-level measurement approach for CSR. European Management Journal, 26(4), 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Weick, K. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  128. Whiteman, G., Walker, B., & Perego, O. (2013). Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 307–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Wicks, A., & Freeman, E. (1998). Organization studies and the new pragmatism: positivism, anti-positivism and the search for ethics. Organization Science, 9(2), 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Xepapadeas, A., & de Zeeuw, A. (1999). Environmental policy and competitiveness. The porter hypothesis and the composition of capital. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37(2), 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. York, J. (2009). Pragmatic sustainability. Translating environmental ethics into competitive advantage. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Sustainability Management (CSM)Leuphana University LüneburgLüneburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of Accounting and Corporate GovernanceMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations