Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 145, Issue 3, pp 457–479 | Cite as

What Should a Manager Like Me Do in a Situation Like This? Strategies for Handling Ethical Problems from the Viewpoint of the Logic of Appropriateness

  • Minna-Maaria HiekkataipaleEmail author
  • Anna-Maija Lämsä
Article

Abstract

In this research, we argue that managers have various strategies for handling complex ethical problems and that these strategies are formed according to the logic of appropriateness. First, we will show through a qualitative empirical study the different strategies that are used for handling ethical problems. Five types of strategies are identified in this study: mediating, principled, isolation, teaching and bystanding. Secondly, we will investigate the types of ethical approaches which managers reveal when handling ethical problems. Thirdly, we will discuss which strategies seem to contribute to the overall ethicality of organisations. To conclude, we suggest that the decisions and actions of managers like the middle managers in this study are influenced by their interpretation of what is appropriate behaviour in the particular situation.

Keywords

Ethical problem Ethical decision making Problem-handling strategies Logic of appropriateness Middle manager Qualitative study Ethics Ethical organisation 

References

  1. Alakavuklar, O. N., & Çakar, U. (2012). The role of ethics on conflict handling styles: A scenario based study. Turkish Journal of Business Ethics, 5(10), 89–116.Google Scholar
  2. Alam, K. F. (1999). Business ethics in New Zealand organisations: A view from the middle and lower level managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 22(2), 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aspers, P. (2009). Empirical phenomenology: A qualitative research approach. The Indo-Pasific Journal of Phenomenology, 9(2), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Auvinen, T. P., Lämsä, A.-M., Sintonen, T., & Takala, T. (2013). Leadership manipulation and ethics in storytelling. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(2), 415–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Badaracco, J. L., & Webb, A. P. (1995). Business ethics: A view from the trenches. California Management Review, 37(2), 8–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bird, F. B., & Waters, J. A. (1989). The moral muteness of managers. California Management Review, 32(1), 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brand, V. (2009). Empirical business ethics research and paradigm analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(4), 429–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butterfield, L. D., Borgen, W. A., Amundson, N. E., & Maglio, A.-S. T. (2005). Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954–2004 and beyond. Qualitative Research, 5(4), 475–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ciulla, J. B. (2004). Leadership ethics: Mapping the territory. In J. B. Ciulla (Ed.), Ethics: The heart of leadership (pp. 1–24). Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  11. Ciulla, J. B. (2005). The state of leadership ethics and the work that lies before us. Business Ethics, 14(4), 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ciulla, J. B., & Forsyth, D. R. (2011). Leadership ethics. In A. Bryman, D. Collinson, K. Grint, B. Jackson, & M. Uhl-Bien (Eds.), The Sage handbook of leadership (pp. 229–241). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Collier, J. (1998). Theorising the ethical organisation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(4), 621–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Craft, J. L. (2013). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 2004–2011. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 221–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dane, E., & Sonenshein, S. (2015). On the role of experience in ethical decision making at work: An ethical expertise perspective. Organisational Psychology Review, 5(1), 74–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dean, K. L., Beggs, J. M., & Keane, T. P. (2010). Mid-level managers, organisational context, and (un)ethical encounters. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dukerich, J. M., Waller, M. J., George, E., & Huber, P. G. (2000). Moral Intensity and managerial problem solving. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(1), 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feldt, T., Huhtala, M., & Lämsä, A.-M. (2012). Johtajan työn eettiset haasteet. In P. Pyöriä (Ed.), Työhyvinvointi ja organisaation menestys (pp. 137–154). Helsinki: Gaudeamus.Google Scholar
  20. Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Geva, A. (2006). A typology of moral problems in business: A framework for ethical management. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gini, A. (2004). Moral leadership and business ethics. In J. B. Ciulla (Ed.), Ethics: The heart of leadership (pp. 27–45). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  24. Greenbaum, R., Quade, M., & Bonner, J. (2015). Why do leaders practice amoral management? A conceptual investigation of the impediments to ethical leadership. Organizational Psychology Review, 5(1), 26–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gremler, D. D. (2004). The critical incident technique in service research. Journal of Service Research, 7(65), 64–89.Google Scholar
  26. Hiillos, M. (2004). Personnel managers and crisis situations: Emotion-handling strategies. Helsingfors. Publication of the Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration. Nr 136.Google Scholar
  27. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Huhtala, M., Feldt, T., Hyvönen, K., & Mauno, S. (2013). Ethical organisational culture as a context for managers’ personal work goals. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(2), 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huhtala, M., Feldt, T., Lämsä, A.-M., Mauno, S., & Kinnunen, U. (2011). Does the ethical culture of organisations promote managers’ occupational well-being? Investigating indirect links via ethical strain. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(2), 231–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Huhtala, M., Puutio, R., Lämsä, A.-M., Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., Hyvönen, K., & Feldt, T. (2010). Eettisesti haastavat tilanteet ja niiden kuormittavuus johtajien työssä. Työelämän tutkimus, 8(1), 13–25.Google Scholar
  31. Jackall, R. (2010). Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Järvinen, P. (2012). On research methods. Tampere: Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy.Google Scholar
  33. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organisations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.Google Scholar
  34. Kangas, M., Lämsä, A.-M., Huhtala, M., & Feldt, T. (2011). Suomalaisten johtajien itsearvioinnit eettisestä johtamistyylistään ja niiden yhteydet eettiseen organisaatiokulttuuriin. Hallinnon tutkimus, 30(2), 95–110.Google Scholar
  35. Kaptein, M. (1998). Ethics management: Auditing and developing the ethical content of organisations. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaptein, M. (1999). Integrity management. European Management Journal, 17(6), 625–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kaptein, M. (2008). Developing and testing a measure for the ethical culture of organisations: The corporate ethical virtues model. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 29(7), 923–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaptein, M. (2011). From inaction to external whistleblowing: The influence of the ethical culture of organisations on employee responses to observed wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3), 513–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. San Fransisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  40. Lämsä, A.-M., & Takala, T. (2000). Downsizing and ethics of personnel dismissals—the case of Finnish managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(4), 389–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Litschka, M., Suske, M., & Brandtweiner, R. (2013). Decision criteria in ethical dilemma situations: empirical examples from Austrian managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(4), 473–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. March, J. G. (1994). A primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  44. March, J.G. & Olsen, J.P. (2009). The logic of appropriateness, working papers, Arena Center for European Studies, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  45. Marsh, C. (2013). Business executives’ perceptions of ethical leadership and its development. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), 565–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Marshall, S. G. (2012). Educational middle change leadership in New Zealand: the meat in the sandwich. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(6), 502–528.Google Scholar
  47. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research. USA: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Martin, S. R., Kish-Gephart, J. J., & Detert, J. R. (2014). Blind forces: Ethical infrastructures and moral disengagement in organisations. Organisational Psychology Review, 4(4), 295–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McNeill, M., & Pedigo, K. (2001). Western Australian managers tell their stories: Ethical challenges in international business operations. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(4), 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Messick, D. M. (1999). Alternative logics for decision-making in social settings. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation, 39(1), 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Middlehurst, R. (2010). Sustaining leadership in challenging times. Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(3), 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mober, P. J. (1998). Predicting conflict strategy with personality traits: Incremental validity and the five factor model. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9(3), 258–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Harding, F. D., Jacobs, T. O., & Fleishman, E. A. (2000). Leadership skills for a changing world: Solving complex social problems. Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), 11–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nash, L. L. (1990). Good intentions aside: A manager’s guide to resolving ethical problems. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  55. Noddings, N. (1984). Caring, a feminine approach to ethics & moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  56. O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A Review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Paine, L. S. (1997). Cases in leadership, ethics and organisational integrity. Chicago: Irwin.Google Scholar
  58. Pedigo, K., & Marshall, V. (2004). International ethical dilemmas confronting Australian managers: Implications for the training and development of employees working overseas. Journal of European Industrial Training, 28(2), 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Power, S. J., & Lundsten, L. L. (2005). Managerial and other white-collar employees’ perceptions of ethical issues in their workplaces. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(2), 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Preston, D., & Price, D. (2012). “I see it as a phase, I don’t see it as a Future”: Academics as managers in a United Kingdom university. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34(4), 409–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rahim, A. M. (2002). Toward a theory of managing organisational conflict. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 13(3), 206–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rahim, A. M., Buntzman, G. F., & White, D. (1999). An empirical study of the stages of moral development and conflict management styles. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 10(2), 154–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rahim, A.-M., Garrett, J. E., & Buntzman, G. F. (1992). Ethics of managing interpersonal conflicts in organisations. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 423–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rest, J. R. (1984). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  65. Selart, M., & Johansen, S. T. (2011). Ethical decision making in organisations: The role of leadership stress. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(2), 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sending, O. J. (2002). Constitution, choice and change: Problems with the “Logic of appropriateness” and its use in constructivist theory. European Journal of International Relations, 8(4), 443–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Silén, M., Kjellström, S., Christensson, L., Sidenvall, B., & Svantesson, M. (2012). What actions promote a positive ethical climate? A critical incident study of nurses’ perceptions. Nursing Ethics, 19(4), 501–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research. Trowbridge, Wiltshire: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  69. Silverman, D. (2014). Interpreting qualitative data. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  70. Solomon, R. C. (2004). Aristotle, ethics and business organisations. Organisational Studies, 25(6), 1021–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sonenshein, S. (2007). The Role of construction, intuition and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model. The Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1022–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tenbrusel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (2004). Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behaviour. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Thiel, E. C., Bagdasarov, Z., Harkrider, L., Jonhson, J. F., & Mumford, M. D. (2012). Leader ethical decision-making in organisations: Strategies for sensemaking. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Treviño, L. (1986). Ethical decision making in organisations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.Google Scholar
  75. Treviño, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 56(1), 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Treviño, L., Butterfield, K., & McGabe, D. L. (1998). The ethical context in organisations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviours. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 447–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Treviño, L. K., Hartman, L. P., & Brown, M. (2000). Moral person and a moral manager. How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, 42(4), 128–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Brown, M. E. (2008). It is lovely at the top: Hierarchical levels, identities and perceptions of organisational ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2), 233–252.Google Scholar
  79. Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organisations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Trochim, W. M. K., & Donnelly, J. P. (2008). Research methods knowledge base. USA: Atomic dog.Google Scholar
  81. Tuomi, J., & Sarajärvi, A. (2009). Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi. Jyväskylä: Kustannusosakeyhtiö Tammi.Google Scholar
  82. Tuunainen, J., & Knuuttila, T. (2008). Determining the norms of science: From epistemological criteria to local struggle on organisational rules. In J. Välimaa & O.-H. Ylijoki (Eds.), Cultural perspectives on higher education (pp. 138–153). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  83. Uhl-Bien, M., & Ospina, S. (2012). Advancing relational leadership research: A dialogue among perspectives. Leadership Horizon Series. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  84. Velasquez, M. G. (1998). Business ethics: Concepts and cases. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  85. Vornanen, R., Jaakola, A.-M., Pölkki, P., Pohjanpalo, H., & Miettinen, J. (2012). Kriittisten palvelujen tutkimus sosiaalipalvelujen tutkimuksessa. Hallinnon tutkimus, 31(3), 203–216.Google Scholar
  86. Waters, J. A., Bird, F., & Chant, P. D. (1986). Everyday moral issues experienced by managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 5(5), 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Weber, M. J., Kopelman, S., & Messick, D. M. (2004). A Conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas: Applying a logic of appropriateness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 281–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wilhelm, H., & Bort, S. (2013). How managers talk about their consumption of popular management concepts: identity, rules and situations. British Journal of Management, 24(3), 428–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Woiceshyn, J. (2011). A model of decision making in business: Reasoning, intuition, and rational moral principles. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Ylijoki, O.-H., & Välimaa, J. (2008). Future challenges. In J. Välimaa & O.-H. Ylijoki (Eds.), Cultural perspectives on higher education (pp. 265–267). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, P., & Suárez-Acosta, M. A. (2014). Employee’s reactions to peer unfair treatment by supervisors: The role of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(4), 537–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessJAMK University of Applied SciencesJyväskyläFinland
  2. 2.JSBE Jyväskylä University School of Business and EconomicsJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations