Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 146, Issue 1, pp 77–109 | Cite as

Is Institutional Ownership Related to Corporate Social Responsibility? The Nonlinear Relation and Its Implication for Stock Return Volatility

Article

Abstract

This study examines the relation between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and institutional investor ownership, and the impact of this relation on stock return volatility. We find that institutional ownership does not strictly increase or decrease in CSR; rather, institutional ownership is a concave function of CSR. This evidence suggests that institutional investors do not see CSR as strictly value-enhancing activities. Institutional investors adjust their percentage of ownership when CSR activities go beyond the perceived optimal level. Employing the path analysis, we also examine the mediating effect of institutional ownership on the relation between CSR and stock return volatility. We find that CSR decreases stock return volatility at a decreasing rate through its effect on institutional ownership. Our results remain robust under several different CSR measures and estimation methods.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility Institutional ownership Stock return volatility Socially responsible investing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Harjoto acknowledges the 2015–2017 Denney Academic Chair from the Denney Endowment, Julian Virtue, Rothschild Endowment, and the Funds for Excellence for financial support and release time for this research project. Parts of this paper were completed while Jo was visiting Korea University and Kim was visiting Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

References

  1. Ali, A., Durtschi, C., Lev, B., & Trombley, M. (2004). Changes in institutional ownership and subsequent earnings announcement abnormal returns. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance, 19, 221–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badrinath, S., Gay, G., & Kale, J. (1989). Patterns of institutional investment, prudence and the managerial safety net hypotheses. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 56, 605–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2006). Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 1101–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baron, D., Harjoto, M., & Jo, H. (2011). The economics and politics of corporate social performance. Business and Politics, 13, 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2003). The effect of stakeholder preferences, organizational structure and industry type on corporate community involvement. Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bushee, B. (1998). The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. The Accounting Review, 73, 305–333.Google Scholar
  7. Bushee, B. (2001). Do institutional investors prefer near-term earnings over long-run value? Contemporary of Accounting Research, 18, 207–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bushee, B., & Goodman, T. (2007). Which institutional investors trade based on private information about earnings and returns? Journal of Accounting Research, 45, 289–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bushee, B., & Noe, C. (2000). Corporate disclosure practices, institutional investors, and stock return volatility. Journal of Accounting Research, 38(Supplement), 171–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 946–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. (2010). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues in institutional investor decision making. Toronto, ON: Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants.Google Scholar
  12. Chan, L. K. C., & Lakonishok, J. (1993). Institutional trades and intraday stock price behavior. Journal of Financial Economics, 33, 173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chan, L. K. C., & Lakonishok, J. (1995). The behavior of stock prices around institutional trades. Journal of Finance, 50, 1147–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chatterji, A. K., Levine, D. I., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(1), 125–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chava, S. (2010). Socially responsible investing and expected stock returns. Working Paper. Georgia Institute of Technology. http://www.q-group.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Chava_SRI_v2.pdf.
  16. Chava, S. (2014). Environmental externalities and cost of capital. Management Science,. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1863.Google Scholar
  17. Cochrane, J. H. (2001). Asset Pricing. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Cox, P., Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2004). An empirical examination of institutional investor preferences for corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cox, P., Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Pension funds and corporate social performance. An empirical analysis. Business & Society, 47, 213–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dam, L., & Scholtens, B. (2012). Does ownership type matter for corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20, 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dam, L., & Scholtens, B. (2013). Ownership concentration and CSR policy of European multinational enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dam, L., & Scholtens, B. (2015). Toward a theory of responsible investing: On the economic foundations of corporate social responsibility. Resource and Energy Economics, 41, 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Del Guercio, D. (1996). The distorting effect of the prudent-man laws on institutional equity investments. Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dhaliwal, D., Li, O., Zhang, A., & Yang, Y. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiations of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86, 59–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C., & Mishra, D. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35, 2388–2406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fama, E., & French, K. (1997). Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics, 43, 153–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fernando, C., Sharfman, M., & Uysal, V. (2010). Does greenness matter? The effect of corporate environmental performance on ownership structure, analyst coverage, and firm value. Working Paper. http://www.fma.org/NY/Papers/Environmental_Performance_OU_FMA.pdf.
  28. Fisman, R., Heal, G., & Nair, V. B. (2008). A model of corporate philanthropy, Working Paper, Columbia University and University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  29. Flammer, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 758–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science (in press).Google Scholar
  31. Gillan, S., Hartzell, J., Koch, A., & Starks, L. (2012). Firms’ environmental, social and governance (ESG) choices, performance and managerial motivation. Working Paper. http://www.business.pitt.edu/faculty/papers/koch3.pdf.
  32. Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30, 777–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gompers, P., & Metrick, A. (2001). Institutional investors and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 229–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goss, A., & Roberts, G. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loan. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35, 1794–1810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Graff-Zivin, J., & Small, A. (2005). A Modigliani–Miller theory of altruistic corporate social responsibility. Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy, 5, Article 10.Google Scholar
  36. Harjoto, M., & Jo, H. (2011). Corporate governance and CSR nexus. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heinkel, R., Kraus, A., & Zechner, J. (2001). The effect of green investment on corporate behavior. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36, 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effect of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93, 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, J. (2014). The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts’ perceptions and shifting institutional logics. Strategic Management Journal,. doi: 10.1002/smj.2268.Google Scholar
  40. Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. (2012). The causal effect of corporate governance and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kim, Y., Park, M., & Wier, B. (2012). Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? The Accounting Review, 87, 761–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kim, Y., & Statman, M. (2012). Do corporations invest enough in environmental responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics, 105, 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Konar, S., & Cohen, M. (2001). Does the market value environmental performance? Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lea, S. (1997). Path analysis. University of Exeter. Retrieved from http://www.ex.ac.uk/~SEGLea/multvar2/oldwelcome.html.
  46. Mackey, A., Mackey, T., & Barney, J. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32, 817–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2007). Does it pay to be good? A meta analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Working paper. Harvard Business School. http://stakeholder.bu.edu/Docs/Walsh,%20Jim%20Does%20It%20Pay%20to%20Be%20Good.pdf.
  48. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2001). People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  49. McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 854–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127.Google Scholar
  52. Merton, R. (1987). A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. Journal of Finance, 42, 483–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48, 261–297.Google Scholar
  54. Moskowitz, M. (1972). Choosing socially responsive stocks. Business and Society Review, 10, 71–75.Google Scholar
  55. Navarro, P. (1988). Why do corporations give to charity?”. Journal of Business, 61, 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. O’Barr, W., & Conley, J. (1992). Fortune and foley: The wealth and power of institutional investing. Homewood, IL: Business One, Irwin Publishing.Google Scholar
  57. Orlitzky, M., & Benjamin, J. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: A meta-analytic review. Business and Society, 40, 369–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Orlinzky, M., Schmidt, F., & Rynes, S. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organizational Studies, 24, 403–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Potter, G. (1992). Accounting earnings announcements, institutional investor concentration, and common stock returns. Journal of Accounting Research, 30, 146–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Prior, D., Surroca, J., & Tribo, J. (2008). Are socially responsible managers really ethical? Exploring the relationship between earnings management and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16, 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ramalingegowda, S., & Yu, Y. (2012). Institutional ownership and conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53, 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Roman, R., Hayibor, S., & Agle, B. (1999). The relationship between social performance and financial performance. Business and Society, 38, 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rupert, D. (2004). Statistics and finance: An introduction. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Saiia, D. H., Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2003). Philanthropy as strategy: When corporate charity “Begins at Home”. Business and Society, 42, 169–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Scholtens, B. (2008). A note on the interaction between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Ecological Economics, 68, 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 569–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sias, R. W. (1996). Volatility and the institutional investor. Financial Analysts Journal, 52, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Spicer, B. H. (1978). Investors, corporate social performance, and information disclosure: An empirical study. The Accounting Review, 53, 94–111.Google Scholar
  71. Stage, F., Carter, H., & Nora, A. (2004). Path analysis: An introduction and analysis of a decade of research. Journal of Education Research, 98, 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1996). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review, 10, 540–557.Google Scholar
  74. Waddock, S., & Graves, S. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wang, H., Choi, J., & Li, J. (2008). Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organization Science, 19, 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wright, S. (1921). Correlation and causation. Journal of Agricultural Research, 20, 557–585.Google Scholar
  77. Wright, S. (1923). The theory of path coefficients: A reply to Niles’s criticism. Genetics, 8, 239–255.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pepperdine UniversityMalibuUSA
  2. 2.Santa Clara UniversitySanta ClaraUSA

Personalised recommendations