Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 145, Issue 3, pp 659–670 | Cite as

How Ethically Would Americans and Chinese Negotiate? The Effect of Intra-cultural Versus Inter-cultural Negotiations

  • Yu YangEmail author
  • David De Cremer
  • Chao Wang
Article

Abstract

A growing body of research has started to examine how individuals from different countries may differ in their use of ethically questionable tactics during business negotiations. Whereas prior research focused on the main effect of the national culture or nationality of the negotiator, we add a new factor, which is the nationality of the counterpart. Looking at both these variables allows us to examine whether and how people may change their likelihood of using ethically questionable tactics in inter-cultural negotiations as opposed to intra-cultural ones. Results of an experiment (N = 810) show that overall, American participants were less likely than Chinese participants to use ethically questionable tactics in negotiations. However, American participants were more likely to use ethically questionable tactics, particularly those related to false promises and inappropriate information gathering, in inter-cultural negotiations with Chinese counterparts, than in intra-cultural negotiations with American counterparts. By contrast, Chinese participants were less likely to use ethically questionable tactics, particularly those related to false promises and attacking opponent’s network, in inter-cultural negotiations with American counterparts, than in intra-cultural negotiations with Chinese counterparts. Implications and future directions are discussed.

Keywords

Ethically questionable tactics Intra-cultural negotiations Inter-cultural negotiations Americans Chinese 

References

  1. Adair, W. L., & Brett, J. M. (2005). The negotiation dance: Time, culture, and behavioral sequences in negotiation. Organization Science, 16, 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adair, W. L., Okumura, T., & Brett, J. M. (2001). Negotiation behaviors when cultures collide: The U.S. and Japan. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 371–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adair, W. L., Taylor, M. S., & Tinsley, C. H. (2009). Starting out on the right foot: Negotiation schemas when cultures collide. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 2(2), 138–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adler, N. J., & Graham, J. L. (1989). Cross-cultural interaction: The international comparison fallacy? Journal of International Business Studies, 20, 515–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anton, R. J. (1990). Drawing the line: An exploratory test of ethical behavior in negotiations. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1(3), 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Bazerman, M. H., Curhan, J. R., Moore, D. A., & Valley, K. L. (2000). Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 279–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berry, J. W. (Ed.). (2002). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brett, J. M., & Okumura, T. (1998). Inter-and intracultural negotiation: US and Japanese negotiators. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brewer, M. B. (2000). Reducing prejudice through cross-categorization: Effects of multiple social identities. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 165–183). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Brewer, M. B. (2001). Ingroup identification and intergroup conflict: When does ingroup love become outgroup hate? In R. Ashmore, L. Jussim, & D. Wilder (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction (pp. 17–41). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Buhrmester, M. D., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, T. R. (2010). Moral emotions and unethical bargaining: The differential effects of empathy and perspective taking in deterring deceitful negotiation. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(4), 569–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cryder, C. E., Loewenstein, G., & Scheines, R. (2013). The donor is in the details. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(1), 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dees, J. G., & Cramton, P. C. (1991). Shrewd bargaining on the moral frontier: Toward a theory of morality in practice. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(2), 135–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elahee, M., Kirby, S. L., & Nasif, E. (2002). National culture, trust and perceptions about ethical behavior in intra- and cross-cultural negotiations: An analysis of the NAFTA countries. Thunderbird International Business Review, 44(6), 799–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2003). When familiarity breeds accuracy: Cultural exposure and facial emotion recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 276–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Folmer, C. P. R., Klapwijk, A., De Cremer, D., & Van Lange, P. A. (2012). One for all: What representing a group may do to us. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(5), 1047–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Francis, J. N. (1991). When in Rome? The effects of cultural adaptation on intercultural business negotiations. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(3), 403–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fulmer, I. S., Barry, B., & Long, D. A. (2009). Lying and smiling: Informational and emotional deception in negotiation. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 691–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goodman, D., & Segal, G. (2013). China rising: Nationalism and interdependence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Gudykunst, W. B. (2000). Methodological issues in conducting theory-based cross-cultural research. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures (pp. 293–315). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  25. Gunia, B. C., Brett, J. M., Nandkeolyar, A. K., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Paying a price: Culture, trust, and negotiation consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hagendoorn, L., Linssen, H., & Tumanov, S. (Eds.). (2013). Intergroup relations in states of the former Soviet Union: The perception of Russians. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 575–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ikenberry, G. J. (2008). The rise of China and the future of the West. Foreign Affairs, 87(1), 23–37.Google Scholar
  29. Ji, L. J., Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 943–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jourdan, A., Takada, K., & Hirschler, B. (2013). Analysis: Bribery scandal dents Big Pharma sales in China, GSK hardest hit. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/18/us-china-pharma-sales-analysis-idUSBRE98H07620130918.
  31. Kant, I. (1964). Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals (H. J. Paton, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row. (Original work published in 1785).Google Scholar
  32. Lewicki, R. J. (1983). Lying and deception: A behavioral model with applications to negotiations. In M. H. Bazerman & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations (pp. 86–90). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Lewicki, R. J., & Robinson, R. J. (1998). Ethical and unethical bargaining tactics: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(6), 665–682.Google Scholar
  34. Liu, L. A., Friedman, R., Barry, B., Gelfand, M. J., & Zhang, Z. X. (2012). The dynamics of consensus building in intracultural and intercultural negotiations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(2), 269–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ma, Z. (2010). The SINS in business negotiations: Explore the cross-cultural differences in business ethics between Canada and China. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(1), 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moore, D. A. (2004). The unexpected benefits of final deadlines in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1), 121–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morris, M. W., Menon, T., & Ames, D. R. (2001). Culturally conferred conceptions of agency: A key to social perception of persons, groups, and other actors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(2), 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mummendey, A., Klink, A., & Brown, R. (2001). Nationalism and patriotism: National identification and out-group rejection. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(2), 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Natlandsmyr, J. H., & Rognes, J. (1995). Culture, behavior, and negotiation outcomes: A comparative and cross-cultural study of Mexican and Norwegian negotiators. International Journal of Conflict Management, 6, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Connor, K. M., & Carnevale, P. J. (1997). A nasty but effective negotiation strategy: Misrepresentation of a common-value issue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(5), 504–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Okhuysen, G. A., Galinsky, A. D., & Uptigrove, T. A. (2003). Saving the worst for last: The effect of time horizon on the efficiency of negotiating benefits and burdens. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(2), 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (2009). Mutually dependent: Power, trust, affect and the use of deception in negotiation. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(3), 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pew Research Center. (2012). U.S. public, experts differ on China policies: Public deeply concerned about China’s economic power. Retrieved January 30, 2015 from http://www.pewglobal.org/2012/09/18/u-s-public-experts-differ-on-china-policies.
  47. Quillian, L. (1995). Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review, 60, 586–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489(7416), 427–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Rev. edn.). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rivers, C. (2009). Negotiating with the Chinese: EANTS and all. Thunderbird International Business Review, 51(5), 473–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rivers, C., & Lytle, A. L. (2007). Lying, cheating foreigners!! Negotiation ethics across cultures. International Negotiation, 12(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rivers, C., & Volkema, R. (2013). East-West differences in “tricky” tactics: A comparison of the tactical preferences of Chinese and Australian negotiators. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Robinson, R. J., Lewicki, R. J., & Donahue, E. M. (2000). Extending and testing a five factor model of ethical and unethical bargaining tactics: Introducing the SINS scale. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(6), 649–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shao, R., Rupp, D. E., Skarlicki, D. P., & Jones, K. S. (2013). Employee justice across cultures: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 39(1), 263–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith, P. B., & Bond, M. H. (1993). Social psychology across cultures: Analysis and perspectives. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  56. Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–46). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  57. Stroebe, W., Lenkert, A., & Jonas, K. (1988). Familiarity may breed contempt: The impact of student exchange on national stereotypes and attitudes. In W. Stroebe, A. W. Kruglanski, D. Bar-Tal, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup conflict (pp. 167–187). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tinsley, C. H., & Pillutla, M. M. (1998). Negotiating in the United States and Hong Kong. Journal of International Business Studies, 29, 711–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Transparency International. (2015). Corruption Perceptions Index 2014: Results. Retrieved January 30, 2015 from http://www.transparency.org/cpi2014/results.
  60. Uhlmann, E. L., Heaphy, E., Ashford, S. J., Zhu, L., & Sanchez-Burks, J. (2013). Acting professional: An exploration of culturally bounded norms against nonwork role referencing. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(6), 866–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. U.S. Census Bureau. (2015). Trade in goods with China. Retrieved January 30, 2015 from https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html.
  62. Van Lange, P. A., De Cremer, D., Van Dijk, E., & Van Vugt, M. (2007). Self-interest and beyond. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 540–561). Guilford: New York.Google Scholar
  63. Volkema, R. J. (1998). A comparison of perceptions of ethical negotiation behavior in Mexico and the United States. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9(3), 218–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Volkema, R. (1999). Ethicality in negotiations: An analysis of perceptual similarities and differences between Brazil and the United States. Journal of Business Research, 45(1), 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Volkema, R. (2004). Demographic, cultural, and economic predictors of perceived ethicality of negotiation behavior: A nine-country analysis. Journal of Business Research, 57, 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Volkema, R. J., Fleck, D., & Hofmeister-Toth, A. (2004). Ethicality in negotiation: An analysis of attitudes, intentions and outcomes. International Negotiation, 9(2), 315–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wade-Benzoni, K. A. (2002). A golden rule over time: Reciprocity in intergenerational allocation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 1011–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Weeks, W. A., Moore, C. W., McKinney, J. A., & Longenecker, J. G. (1999). The effects of gender and career stage on ethical judgment. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(4), 301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2), 129–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yamagishi, T., Hashimoto, H., & Schug, J. (2008). Preferences versus strategies as explanations for culture-specific behavior. Psychological Science, 19(6), 579–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ye, C., Cronin, J. J., & Peloza, J. (2015). The role of corporate social responsibility in consumer evaluation of nutrition information disclosure by retail restaurants. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(2), 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhang, J. D., Liu, L. A., & Liu, W. (2014). Trust and deception in negotiation: Culturally divergent effects. Management and Organization Review. doi: 10.1111/more.12028.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Entrepreneurship and ManagementShanghaiTech UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Judge Business SchoolUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  3. 3.Department of Business AdministrationUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations