How Ethically Would Americans and Chinese Negotiate? The Effect of Intra-cultural Versus Inter-cultural Negotiations
- 1.1k Downloads
A growing body of research has started to examine how individuals from different countries may differ in their use of ethically questionable tactics during business negotiations. Whereas prior research focused on the main effect of the national culture or nationality of the negotiator, we add a new factor, which is the nationality of the counterpart. Looking at both these variables allows us to examine whether and how people may change their likelihood of using ethically questionable tactics in inter-cultural negotiations as opposed to intra-cultural ones. Results of an experiment (N = 810) show that overall, American participants were less likely than Chinese participants to use ethically questionable tactics in negotiations. However, American participants were more likely to use ethically questionable tactics, particularly those related to false promises and inappropriate information gathering, in inter-cultural negotiations with Chinese counterparts, than in intra-cultural negotiations with American counterparts. By contrast, Chinese participants were less likely to use ethically questionable tactics, particularly those related to false promises and attacking opponent’s network, in inter-cultural negotiations with American counterparts, than in intra-cultural negotiations with Chinese counterparts. Implications and future directions are discussed.
KeywordsEthically questionable tactics Intra-cultural negotiations Inter-cultural negotiations Americans Chinese
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Berry, J. W. (Ed.). (2002). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Brewer, M. B. (2000). Reducing prejudice through cross-categorization: Effects of multiple social identities. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 165–183). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Brewer, M. B. (2001). Ingroup identification and intergroup conflict: When does ingroup love become outgroup hate? In R. Ashmore, L. Jussim, & D. Wilder (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction (pp. 17–41). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Goodman, D., & Segal, G. (2013). China rising: Nationalism and interdependence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gudykunst, W. B. (2000). Methodological issues in conducting theory-based cross-cultural research. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures (pp. 293–315). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Hagendoorn, L., Linssen, H., & Tumanov, S. (Eds.). (2013). Intergroup relations in states of the former Soviet Union: The perception of Russians. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Ikenberry, G. J. (2008). The rise of China and the future of the West. Foreign Affairs, 87(1), 23–37.Google Scholar
- Jourdan, A., Takada, K., & Hirschler, B. (2013). Analysis: Bribery scandal dents Big Pharma sales in China, GSK hardest hit. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/18/us-china-pharma-sales-analysis-idUSBRE98H07620130918.
- Kant, I. (1964). Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals (H. J. Paton, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row. (Original work published in 1785).Google Scholar
- Lewicki, R. J. (1983). Lying and deception: A behavioral model with applications to negotiations. In M. H. Bazerman & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations (pp. 86–90). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Lewicki, R. J., & Robinson, R. J. (1998). Ethical and unethical bargaining tactics: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(6), 665–682.Google Scholar
- Pew Research Center. (2012). U.S. public, experts differ on China policies: Public deeply concerned about China’s economic power. Retrieved January 30, 2015 from http://www.pewglobal.org/2012/09/18/u-s-public-experts-differ-on-china-policies.
- Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Rev. edn.). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, P. B., & Bond, M. H. (1993). Social psychology across cultures: Analysis and perspectives. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
- Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–46). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Stroebe, W., Lenkert, A., & Jonas, K. (1988). Familiarity may breed contempt: The impact of student exchange on national stereotypes and attitudes. In W. Stroebe, A. W. Kruglanski, D. Bar-Tal, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup conflict (pp. 167–187). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Transparency International. (2015). Corruption Perceptions Index 2014: Results. Retrieved January 30, 2015 from http://www.transparency.org/cpi2014/results.
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2015). Trade in goods with China. Retrieved January 30, 2015 from https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html.
- Van Lange, P. A., De Cremer, D., Van Dijk, E., & Van Vugt, M. (2007). Self-interest and beyond. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 540–561). Guilford: New York.Google Scholar