Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 144, Issue 1, pp 139–152 | Cite as

Sharing the Shared Value: A Transaction Cost Perspective on Strategic CSR Policies in Global Value Chains

  • Aurélien Acquier
  • Bertrand ValiorgueEmail author
  • Thibault Daudigeos
Article

Abstract

This paper explores the conditions favouring or inhibiting the implementation of strategic corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies in the context of global value chains (GVCs). Using transaction cost theory (TCT), we specify the economic and behavioural issues raised by strategic CSR policies. We show that the existence of market rewards for such policies does not constitute a solution per se, but tends to increase the difficulties that value chain members face. Bringing TCT into the analysis of the diffusion of strategic CSR policies in GVCs helps us to make different contributions. We first theoretically identify some limiting conditions of strategic CSR policies in GVCs. We also contribute to developing a more robust theoretical perspective for CSR in GVC research, which remains underdeveloped and mostly driven by empirical case studies. Finally, we shed light on new research questions and topics that could guide major theoretical and empirical investigations in the capacity of GVCs members to bypass the numerous difficulties involved in the implementation of strategic CSR policies.

Keywords

Global value chains Strategic corporate social responsibility Transaction cost theory Asset specificity Governance structure 

Abbreviations

CSR

Corporate social responsibility

GVC

Global value chain

MSI

Multi-stakeholder initiative

NGO

Non-governmental Organisation

TCT

Transaction cost theory

References

  1. Acquier, A., Daudigeos, T., & Valiorgue, B. (2011). Corporate social responsibility as an organizational and managerial challenge: the forgotten legacy of the Corporate Social Responsiveness movement. Management, 14(4), 222–250.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, M., & Skjoett-Larsen, T. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aragon-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. The Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71–88.Google Scholar
  4. Arnold, D. G., & Bowie, N. E. (2003). Sweatshops and respect for persons. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(2), 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arouri, M., & Pijourlet, G. (2015). CSR Performance and the value of cash holdings: International evidence. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2658-5.
  6. Baden, D. A., Harwood, I. A., & Woodward, D. G. (2009). The effect of buyer pressure on suppliers in SMEs to demonstrate CSR practices: an added incentive or counter productive? European Management Journal, 27(6), 429–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bair, J., & Palpacuer, F. (2012). From varieties of capitalism to varieties of activism: The antisweatshop movement in comparative perspective. Social Problems, 59(4), 522–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barrientos, S. (2013). Corporate purchasing practices in global production networks: a socially contested terrain. Geoforum, 44, 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barrientos, S., Gereffi, G., & Rossi, A. (2011). Economic and social upgrading in global production networks: A new paradigm for a changing world. International Labour Review, 150(3–4), 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boje, D. M., & Khan, F. R. (2009). Story-branding by empire entrepreneurs: Nike, child labour, and Pakistan’s soccer ball industry. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 22(1), 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burke, L., & Logsdon, J. M. (1996). How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Planning, 29(4), 495–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chatterji, A., & Levine, D. (2005). Breaking down the wall of codes: Evaluating non-financial performance measurement. California Management Review, 48(2), 29–51.Google Scholar
  15. Ciliberti, F., de Groot, G., de Haan, J., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2009). Codes to coordinate supply chains: SMEs’ experiences with SA8000. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.Google Scholar
  17. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coase, R. H. (1992). The institutional structure of production. The American Economic Review, 82(4), 713–719.Google Scholar
  19. Crane, A., Palazzo, G., Spence, L. J., & Matten, D. (2014). Contesting the value of “creating shared value”. California Management Review, 56, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crook, T. R., & Combs, J. G. (2007). Sources and consequences of bargaining power in supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 546–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Daudigeos, T., & Valiorgue, B. (2010). Les limites du traitement marchand de la responsabilité sociale de l'enteprises, Revue Française de Socio-Economie, (6), 65–86.Google Scholar
  22. Daudigeos, T., & Valiorgue, B. (2011). Conditions for value creation in the marketplace through the management of CSR issues: A negative external effects framework. Business and Society, 50(1), 28–49.Google Scholar
  23. de Bakker, F. G., & den Hond, F. (2008). Introducing the politics of stakeholder influence a review essay. Business and Society, 47(1), 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. de Bakker, F. G., den Hond, F., King, B., & Weber, K. (2013). Social movements, civil society and corporations: Taking stock and looking ahead. Organization Studies, 34(5–6), 573–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dicken, P., Kelly, P. F., Olds, K., & Wai-Chung Yeung, H. (2001). Chains and networks, territories and scales: towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy. Global Networks, 1(2), 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
  27. Eesley, C., & Lenox, M. J. (2006). Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management Journal, 27(8), 765–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Egels-Zandén, N. (2014). Revisiting supplier compliance with MNC codes of conduct: Recoupling policy and practice at Chinese toy suppliers. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(1), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the suitable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Elms, D. K. & Low, P. 2013. Global value chains in a changing world. World Trade Organization Geneva.Google Scholar
  31. Ernst, D., & Ravenhill, J. (1999). Globalization, convergence, and the transformation of international production networks in electronics in East Asia. Business and Politics, 1(1), 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fransen, L. (2011). Why do private governance organizations not converge? A political–institutional analysis of transnational labor standards regulation. Governance, 24(2), 359–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Freeman, E., & Liedtka, J. (1997). Stakeholder capitalism and the value chain. European Management Journal, 15(3), 286–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gawer, A., & Phillips, N. (2013). Institutional work as logics shift: The case of Intel’s transformation to platform leader. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1035–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gereffi, G. (1999). International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain. Journal of International Economics, 48(1), 37–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gereffi, G. (2005). The global economy: organization, governance, and development. The handbook of economic sociology, 2, 160–182.Google Scholar
  37. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gereffi, G., & Lee, J. (2014). Economic and social upgrading in global value chains and industrial clusters: Why governance matters. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2373-7.
  39. Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 13–47.Google Scholar
  40. Grayson, D., & Hodges, A. (2004). Corporate social opportunity!: 7 steps to make corporate social responsibility work for your business. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 479–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Holmström, B., & Roberts, J. (1998). The boundaries of the firm revisited. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 73–94.Google Scholar
  43. Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2007). Strategic corporate social responsibility and value creation among large firms: lessons from the Spanish experience. Long Range Planning, 40(6), 594–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kaplinsky, R. (2004). Spreading the gains from globalization: what can be learned from value-chain analysis? Problems of Economic Transition, 47(2), 74–115.Google Scholar
  45. Kaplinsky, R. (2013). Globalization, poverty and inequality: between a rock and a hard place. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  46. Kaplinsky, R., & Morris, M. (2001). A handbook for value chain research. Ottawa: IDRC.Google Scholar
  47. Khan, F. R., Munir, K. A., & Willmott, H. (2007). A dark side of institutional entrepreneurship: Soccer balls, child labour and postcolonial impoverishment. Organization Studies, 28(7), 1055–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. King, A. (2007). Cooperation between corporations and environmental groups: A transaction cost perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 889–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Knudsen, J. S. (2013). The growth of private regulation of labor standards in global supply chains: mission impossible for western small-and medium-sized firms? Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 387–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Levy, D. L. (2008). Political contestation in global production networks. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 943–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Liebowitz, S. J., & Margolis, S. E. (1995). Path dependence, lock-in, and history. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11, 205.Google Scholar
  52. Locke, R., Amengual, M., & Mangla, A. (2009). Virtue out of necessity? Compliance, commitment, and the improvement of labor conditions in global supply chains. Politics and Society, 37(3), 319–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Locke, R., Kochan, T., Romis, M., & Qin, F. (2007). Beyond corporate codes of conduct: Work organization and labour standards at Nike’s suppliers. International Labour Review, 146(1–2), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lund-Thomsen, P. (2008). The global sourcing and codes of conduct debate: five myths and five recommendations. Development and Change, 39(6), 1005–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lund-Thomsen, P., & Lindgreen, A. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in global value chains: where are we now and where are we going?’. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  56. Lund-Thomsen, P., & Nadvi, K. (2010). Global value chains, local collective action and corporate social responsibility: a review of empirical evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lund-Thomsen, P., Nadvi, K., Chan, A., Khara, N., & Xue, H. (2012). Labour in global value chains: Work conditions in football manufacturing in China, India and Pakistan. Development and Change, 43(6), 1211–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Maloni, M. J., & Brown, M. E. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: an application in the food industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1), 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Manning, S., Boons, F., Von Hagen, O., & Reinecke, J. (2012). National contexts matter: The co-evolution of sustainability standards in global value chains. Ecological Economics, 83, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Marcus, A. A., & Anderson, M. H. (2006). A general dynamic capability: Does it propagate business and social competencies in the retail food industry?*. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Masten, S. E., & Saussier, S. (2000). Econometrics of contracts: an assessment of developments in the empirical literature on contracting. Revue d’économie industrielle, 92(1), 215–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.Google Scholar
  65. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mena, S., & Palazzo, G. (2012). Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(3), 527–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Menard, C. (2000). Institutions, contracts and organizations. Perspectives from New Institutional Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ménard, C. (1996). The economics of hybrid organizations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160(3), 1–32.Google Scholar
  69. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.Google Scholar
  70. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
  71. Neilson, J. (2008). Global private regulation and value-chain restructuring in Indonesian smallholder coffee systems. World Development, 36(9), 1607–1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Neilson, J., & Pritchard, B. (2011). Value chain struggles: institutions and governance in the plantation districts of South India. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  73. Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 56–64.Google Scholar
  74. Orlitzky, M., Siegel, D. S., & Waldman, D. A. (2011). Strategic corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability. Business and Society, 50(1), 6–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, democracy, and the politicization of the corporation. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 773–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Palpacuer, F. (2008). Bringing the social context back in: governance and wealth distribution in global commodity chains. Economy and Society, 37(3), 393–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Perry, P., Wood, S., & Fernie, J. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in garment sourcing networks: Factory management perspectives on ethical trade in Sri Lanka. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2252-2.
  78. Ponte, S., & Gibbon, P. (2005). Quality standards, conventions and the governance of global value chains. Economy and society, 34(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.Google Scholar
  80. Porter, M., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.Google Scholar
  81. Prahalad, C. K. (2009). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid, revised and updated 5th anniversary. Eradicating poverty through profits. New Jersey: FT Press.Google Scholar
  82. Rasche, A., & Gilbert, D. U. (2012). Institutionalizing global governance: the role of the United Nations Global Compact. Business Ethics: A European Review, 21(1), 100–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Reinecke, J., Manning, S., & Von Hagen, O. (2012). The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organization Studies, 33(5–6), 791–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rivera-Santos, M., & Rufín, C. (2010). Odd couples: understanding the governance of firm–NGO alliances. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Russo, A., & Perrini, F. (2010). Investigating stakeholder theory and social capital: CSR in large firms and SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Ruwanpura, K. N., & Roncolato, L. (2006). Child rights: An enabling or disabling right? The nexus between child labor and poverty in Bangladesh. Journal of Developing Societies, 22(4), 359–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: business and society seen from a habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Scherer, A., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Scherer, A., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors-towards a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16, 505–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. (2014). The business firm as a political actor a new theory of the firm for a globalized world. Business and Society, 53(2), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Schleper, M. C., & Busse, C. (2013). Toward a standardized supplier code of ethics: development of a design concept based on diffusion of innovation theory. Logistics Research, 6(4), 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Shelanski, H. A., & Klein, P. G. (1995). Empirical research in transaction cost economics: A review and assessment. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11(2), 335–361.Google Scholar
  94. Soundararajan, V., & Brown, J. A. (2014). Voluntary governance mechanisms in global supply chains: Beyond CSR to a stakeholder utility perspective. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2418-y.
  95. Spence, L. J., & Rinaldi, L. (2014). Governmentality in accounting and accountability: A case study of embedding sustainability in a supply chain. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), 433–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Stigzelius, I., & Mark-Herbert, C. (2009). Tailoring corporate responsibility to suppliers: Managing SA8000 in Indian garment manufacturing. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1), 46–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Tsutsui, K., & Lim, A. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Vogel, D. (2006). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Inst Press.Google Scholar
  99. Vurro, C., Russo, A., & Perrini, F. (2009). Shaping sustainable value chains: Network determinants of supply chain governance models. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 607–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wahl, A., & Bull, G. Q. (2013). Mapping research topics and theories in private regulation for sustainability in global value chains. Journal of Business Ethics124(4), 585–608.Google Scholar
  101. Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269–296.Google Scholar
  102. Williamson, O. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  103. Williamson, O. E. (2008). Outsourcing: Transaction cost economics and supply chain management. Journal of supply chain management, 44(2), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Williamson, O. E., & Winter, S. G. (1993). The nature of the firm: origins, evolution, and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  105. Wilshaw, R., Unger, L., Quynh, C. D., & Thu, T. P. (2013). Labour Rights in Unilever’s Supply Chain: From compliance to good practice. An Oxfam study of labour issues in Unilever’s Viet Nam operations and supply chain. Oxfam Policy and Practice: Private Sector, 10(1), 1–108.Google Scholar
  106. Young, I. M. (2006). Responsibility and global justice: a social connection model. Social Philosophy and Policy, 23(01), 102–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building social business models: lessons from the Grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 308–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aurélien Acquier
    • 1
  • Bertrand Valiorgue
    • 2
    Email author
  • Thibault Daudigeos
    • 3
  1. 1.ESCP EuropeParisFrance
  2. 2.CRCGMEcole Universitaire de ManagementClermont-FerrandFrance
  3. 3.Grenoble Ecole de ManagementGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations