Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 146, Issue 3, pp 515–528 | Cite as

Responsibility Boundaries in Global Value Chains: Supplier Audit Prioritizations and Moral Disengagement Among Swedish Firms

  • Niklas Egels-ZandénEmail author
Article

Abstract

To address substandard working conditions in global value chains, companies have adopted private regulatory systems governing worker rights. Scholars agree that without onsite factory audits, this private regulation has limited impact at the point of production. Companies, however, audit only a subset of their suppliers, severely restricting their private regulatory attempts. Despite the significance of the placement of suppliers inside or outside firms’ “responsibility boundaries” and despite scholars’ having called for more research into how firms prioritize what suppliers to audit, few, if any, systematic studies have examined the topic. This is problematic, as the placement of firms’ responsibility boundaries determines what suppliers and workers are included in firms’ private regulatory attempts. Based on a study of 12 Swedish firms and the theory of moral disengagement, this paper starts to fill this research gap by exploring how firms’ responsibility boundaries are placed. The paper illustrates how firms’ responsibility boundary placement is best described as a patchwork with firms defining and delimiting their responsibilities differently. The paper also demonstrates that three supplier types (i.e., the worst, morally justified, and immediate suppliers) are particularly likely to be placed inside firms’ responsibility boundaries, while a fourth type (i.e., disregarded suppliers) is likely be placed outside.

Keywords

Audit Code of conduct Moral disengagement Private regulation Responsibility boundary Value chain Worker rights 

References

  1. Ählström, J., & Egels-Zandén, N. (2008). The processes of defining corporate responsibility: A study of Swedish garment retailers’ responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(4), 230–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anner, M. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and freedom of association rights: The precarious quest for legitimacy and control in global supply chains. Politics and Society, 40(4), 609–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baden, D., & Harwood, I. A. (2013). Terminology matters: A critical exploration of corporate social responsibility terms. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(3), 615–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1990). Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bandura, A., Barbaranaelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., & Zsolnai, L. (2000). Corporate transgressions through moral disengagement. Journal of Human Values, 6(1), 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barrientos, S., & Smith, S. (2007). Do workers benefit from ethical trade? Assessing codes of labour practice in global production systems. Third World Quarterly, 28(4), 713–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barsky, A. (2008). Understanding the ethical cost of organizational goal-setting: A review and theory development. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barsky, A. (2011). Investigating the effects of moral disengagement and participation on unethical work behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bartley, T. (2007). Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: The rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. American Journal of Sociology, 113(2), 297–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beaudoin, C. A., Cianci, A. M., & Tsakumis, G. T. (2015). The impact of CFOs’ incentives and earnings management ethics on their financial reporting decisions: The mediating role of moral disengagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(30), 505–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bersoff, D. M. (1999). Explaining unethical behavior among people motivated to act prosaically. Journal of Moral Education, 28(4), 413–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blowfield, M., & Dolan, C. (2008). Stewards of virtue? The ethical dilemma of CSR in African horticulture. Development and Change, 39(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Deephouse, D. L. (1999). To be different or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Egels-Zandén, N. (2007). Suppliers’ compliance with MNCs’ codes of conduct: Behind the scenes at Chinese toy suppliers. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(1), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Egels-Zandén, N. (2014). Revisiting supplier compliance with MNC codes of conduct: Recoupling policy and practice at Chinese toy suppliers. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(1), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Egels-Zandén, N., & Merk, J. (2014). Private regulation and trade union rights: Why codes of conduct have limited impact on trade union rights. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(3), 461–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Egels-Zandén, N., Hulthén, K., & Wulff, G. (2014). Trade-offs in supply chain transparency: The case of Nudie Jeans Co. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eisenhardt, K., & Graebner, M. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eriksson, D., & Svensson, G. (2015). The process of responsibility, decoupling point, and disengagement of moral and social responsibility in supply chains: Empirical findings and prescriptive thoughts. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2429-8.Google Scholar
  24. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row & Peterson.Google Scholar
  25. Fransen, L., & Conzelmann, T. (2014). Fragmented or cohesive transnational private regulation of sustainability standards? A comparative study. Regulation and Governance,. doi: 10.1111/rego.12055.Google Scholar
  26. Greenwood, M. R. (2002). Ethics and HRM: A review and conceptual analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(3), 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hughes, A., Buttle, M., & Wrigley, N. (2007). Organisational geographies of corporate responsibility: A UK–US comparison of retailers’ ethical trading initiatives. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(4), 491–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ip, P.-K. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and crony capitalism in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(1–2), 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson, J. F., & Buckley, M. R. (2015). Multi-level organizational moral disengagement: Directions for future investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(2), 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Khan, F. R., Munir, K. A., & Willmott, H. (2007). A dark side of institutional entrepreneurship: Soccer balls, child labour and postcolonial impoverishment. Organization Studies, 28(7), 1055–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kouchaki, M., Smith-Crowe, K., Brief, A. P., & Sousa, C. (2013). Seeing green: Mere exposure to money triggers a business decision frame and unethical outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(1), 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  33. Lee, T. W. (1999). Understanding qualitative methods in organizational research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Levy, D. L. (2008). Political contestation in global production networks. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 943–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Locke, R. M., Qin, F., & Brause, A. (2007). Does monitoring improve labor standards? Lessons from Nike. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 61(1), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Locke, R. M., Rissing, B. A., & Pal, T. (2013). Complements or substitutes? Private codes, state regulation and the enforcement of labour standards in global supply chains. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 51(3), 519–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Long, B. S., & Driscoll, C. (2008). Codes of ethics and the pursuit of organizational legitimacy: Theoretical and empirical contributions. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lund-Thomsen, P. (2013). Labor agency in the football manufacturing industry of Sialkot, Pakistan. Geoforum, 44, 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1995). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Martin, S. R., Kish-Gephart, J. J., & Detert, J. R. (2014). Blind forces: Ethical infrastructures and moral disengagement in organizations. Organizational Psychology Review,. doi: 10.1177/2041386613518576.Google Scholar
  41. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organization: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moore, C. (2008). Moral disengagement in processes of organizational corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Paharia, N., & Deshpandé, R. (2009). Sweatshop labor is wrong unless the jeans are cute: Motivated moral disengagement. Working Paper 09-079. Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  44. Schrempf-Stirling, J., & Palazzo, G. (2014). Upstream corporate social responsibility: The evolution from contract responsibility to full producer responsibility. Business & Society,. doi: 10.1177/0007650313500233.Google Scholar
  45. Toffel, M. W., Short, J. L., & Ouellet, M. (2012). Reinforcing regulatory regimes: How states, civil society, and codes of conduct promote adherence to global labor standards. Working Paper 13-045. Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  46. Tsang, J. (2002). Moral rationalization and the integration of situational factors and psychological processes in immoral behavior. Review of General Psychology, 6(1), 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Van Buren, H. J., & Greenwood, M. R. (2008). Enhancing employee voice: Are voluntary employer–employee partnerships enough? Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Waddock, S. (2004). Creating corporate accountability: Foundational principles to make corporate citizenship real. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(4), 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. White, J., Bandura, A., & Bero, L. A. (2009). Moral disengagement in the corporate world. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, 16(1), 41–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business Administration, School of Business, Economics and LawUniversity of GothenburgGōteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations