Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 138, Issue 2, pp 215–229 | Cite as

Acting Out of Compassion, Egoism, and Malice: A Schopenhauerian View on the Moral Worth of CSR and Diversity Management Practices

  • Thomas Köllen
Article

Abstract

In both their external and internal communications, organizations tend to present diversity management (DM) approaches and corporate social responsibility initiatives as a kind of morally ‘good’ organizational practice. With regard to the treatment of employees, both concepts largely assume equality to be an indicator (as well as a goal) of organizational ‘goodness’, e.g. in terms of equal treatment, or affording equal opportunities. Additionally, research on this issue predominantly refers to prescriptive and imperative moralities that address the initiatives themselves, and values them morally. Schopenhauer opposes these moralities by conceptualizing morality as exclusively being based on the incentives of acting instead of the actions themselves. He identifies egoism, compassion, and malice as the sole incentives for every human action, whereby only those actions solely motivated by compassion can be ascribed genuine moral worth. In this context, this article shows that from a Schopenhauerian perspective, CSR and DM initiatives only have a genuine moral worth in so far as the individuals who have initiated or supported their implementation were exclusively motivated by compassion. Stressing the narrative of a business case, if utilized as a façade for true compassion that attaches economic legitimacy to these initiatives, does not necessarily harm their moral worth. The approach and the findings developed in this paper contribute to the discourse on the ethical behavior of organizations, as well as to the discourse on CSR and DM.

Keywords

Business case Compassion, egoism, and malice Corporate social responsibility Diversity management Justice and loving kindness Mitleid 

References

  1. Anderson, E. S. (1999). What is the point of equality? Ethics, 109(2), 287–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babiak, K., & Trendafilova, S. (2011). CSR and environmental responsibility: Motives and pressures to adopt green management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(1), 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 111–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cameron, K., Dutton, J., & Quinn, R. E. (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, A. B. (1998). The four faces of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 100–101(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cartwright, D. E. (1988). Schopenhauer’s compassion and Nietzsche’s pity. Schopenhauer Jahrbuch, 69, 557–567.Google Scholar
  10. Cartwright, D. E. (1999). Schopenhauer’s narrower sense of morality. In C. Janaway (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to schopenhauer (pp. 252–292). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cartwright, D. E. (2004). Historical dictionary of Schopenhauer’s philosophy. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cartwright, D. E. (2008). Compassion and solidarity with sufferers: The metaphysics of mitleid. European Journal of Philosophy, 16(2), 292–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cartwright, D. E. (2012). Schopenhauer on the value of compassion. In B. Vandenbeele (Ed.), A companion to schopenhauer (pp. 249–265). Malden and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Caza, A., & Carroll, B. (2012). Critical theory and positive organizational scholarship. In K. S. Cameron & J. P. Schneider (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 965–978). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. Business and Society, 44(4), 415–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chin, M. K., Hambrick, D. C., & Treviño, L. K. (2013). Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2), 197–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Constantinescu, M., & Kaptein, M. (2014). Mutually enhancing responsibility: A theoretical exploration of the interaction mechanisms between individual and corporate moral responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–15.Google Scholar
  18. Coupland, C. (2006). Corporate social and environmental responsibility in web-based reports: Currency in the banking sector? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 17(7), 865–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cox, T. H., & Blake, S. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness. The Executive, 5(3), 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Cui, J., Jo, H., & Velasquez, M. (2014). The influence of christian religiosity on managerial decisions concerning the environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–29.Google Scholar
  22. Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Danilovic, M., Hensbergen, M., Hoveskog, M., & Zadayannaya, L. (2013). Exploring diffusion and dynamics of corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, n/a-n/a.Google Scholar
  24. Dass, P., & Parker, B. (1999). Strategies for managing human resource diversity: From resistance to learning. The Academy of Management Executive (1993–2005), 13(2), 68–80.Google Scholar
  25. Davis, K., & Frederick, W. C. (1984). Business and society: Management, public policy, ethics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  26. DeGeorge, R. T. (1993). Competing with integrity in international business. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Demuijnck, G. (2014). Universal values and virtues in management versus cross-cultural moral relativism: An educational strategy to clear the ground for business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–19.Google Scholar
  28. Dierksmeier, C. (2013). Kant on virtue. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(4), 597–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1999). Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  30. Evan, W. M., & Freeman, R. E. (1988). A Stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. L. Beauchamp & N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business (pp. 75–84). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  31. Fombrun, C. J. (2005). Building corporate reputation through CSR initiatives: Evolving standards. Corporate Reputation Review, 8(1), 7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fox, M. A. (2006). “Boundless Compassion”: The contemporary relevance of Schopenhauer’s ethics. The European Legacy, 11(4), 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Frederiksen, C. S. (2010). The relation between policies concerning corporate social responsibility (CSR) and philosophical moral theories—An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(3), 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. French, P. A. (1979). The corporation as a moral person. American Philosophical Quarterly, 16(3), 207–215.Google Scholar
  35. French, P. A. (1984). Collective and corporate responsibility. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Frenkel, D. A., & Lurie, Y. (2001). Culpability of corporations-legal and ethical perspectives. Crime Law Quaterly, 45, 465–487.Google Scholar
  37. Garrett, J. (1989). Unredistributable corporate moral responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(7), 535–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gilbert, J., Stead, B., & Ivancevich, J. (1999). Diversity management: A new organizational paradigm. Journal of Business Ethics, 21(1), 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Goodpaster, K. E. (1983). The concept of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 2(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Goodpaster, K. E., & Matthews, J. B. (1982). Can a corporation have a conscience. Harvard Business Review, 60(1), 132–141.Google Scholar
  42. Gotsis, G., & Kortezi, Z. (2013). Ethical paradigms as potential foundations of diversity management initiatives in business organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(6), 948–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Graafland, J. J., Eijffinger, S. C. W., & Smid, H. (2004). Benchmarking of corporate social responsibility: Methodological problems and robustness. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Grosser, K., & Moon, J. (2008). Developments in company reporting on workplace gender equality?: A corporate social responsibility perspective. Accounting Forum, 32(3), 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Guyer, P. (2012). Schopenhauer, Kant and compassion. Kantian Review, 17(03), 403–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hah, K., & Freeman, S. (2013). Multinational enterprise subsidiaries and their CSR: A conceptual framework of the management of CSR in smaller emerging economies. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–12.Google Scholar
  47. Heitner, K. L., Kahn, A. E., & Sherman, K. C. (2013). Building consensus on defining success of diversity work in organizations. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 65(1), 58–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hemingway, C., & Maclagan, P. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Herring, C. (2009). Does diversity pay?: Race, gender, and the business case for diversity. American Sociological Review, 74(2), 208–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Holton, V. (2005). Diversity reporting: How European business is reporting on diversity and equal opportunities. Women in Management Review, 20(1), 72–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Idowu, S. O., & Towler, B. A. (2004). A comparative study of the contents of corporate social responsibility reports of UK companies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 15(4), 420–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Johnston, D., & Malina, M. A. (2008). Managing sexual orientation diversity: The impact on firm value. Group and Organization Management, 33(5), 602–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jones, K. P., King, E. B., Nelson, J., Geller, D. S., & Bowes-Sperry, L. (2013). Beyond the business case: An ethical perspective of diversity training. Human Resource Management, 52(1), 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jones, D. A., Willness, C. R., & Madey, S. (2014). Why are job seekers attracted by corporate social performance? Experimental and field tests of three signal-based mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jordan, N. (2009). Schopenhauer’s politics: Ethics, Jurisprudence and the State. In A. Neill & C. Janaway (Eds.), Better consciousness: Schopenhauer’s philosophy of value (pp. 171–188). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  56. Kaptein, M. (2008a). Developing a measure of unethical behavior in the workplace: A Stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management, 34(5), 978–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kaptein, M. (2008b). Developing and testing a measure for the ethical culture of organizations: The corporate ethical virtues model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(7), 923–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kaptein, M., & Wempe, J. (2002). The balanced company: A theory of corporate integrity. OUP Catalogue.Google Scholar
  59. Kelly, E., & Dobbin, F. (1998). How affirmative action became diversity management: Employer response to antidiscrimination law, 1961 to 1996. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(7), 960–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Klonoski, R. J. (1991). Foundational considerations in the corporate social responsibility debate. Business Horizons, 34(4), 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lauring, J. (2013). International diversity management: Global ideals and local responses. British Journal of Management, 24(2), 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lii, Y.-S., & Lee, M. (2012). Doing right leads to doing well: When the type of CSR and reputation interact to affect consumer evaluations of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lin, C.-P., Lyau, N.-M., Tsai, Y.-H., Chen, W.-Y., & Chiu, C.-K. (2010). Modeling corporate citizenship and its relationship with organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 357–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Livesey, S. M. (2001). Eco-identity as discursive struggle: Royal dutch/shell, brent spar, and Nigeria. Journal of Business Communication, 38(1), 58–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lynch, T. (2009). Legitimating market egoism: The availability problem. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mander, J. (1992). The myth of the corporate conscience. Business and Society Review, 81, 56–63.Google Scholar
  68. Martín-Alcázar, F., Romero-Fernández, P. M., & Sanchez, G. (2013). Workforce diversity in strategic human resource management models: A critical review of the literature and implications for future research. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 20(1), 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. McGuire, J. B., Alison, S., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.Google Scholar
  72. Mestrovic, S. G. (1989). Moral theory based on the ‘heart’ versus the ‘mind’: Schopenhauer’s and Durkheim’s critiques of Kantian ethics. The Sociological Review, 37(3), 431–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Moon, J. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15(5), 296–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Moore, G. (1999). Corporate moral agency: Review and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 21(4), 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Nielsen, A. E., & Thomsen, C. (2009). Investigating CSR communication in SMEs: A case study among Danish middle managers. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(1), 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  78. Phillips, A. (2004). Defending equality of outcome. Journal of Political Philosophy, 12(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Roberson, Q. M., & Park, H. J. (2007). Examining the link between diversity and firm performance: The effects of diversity reputation and leader racial diversity. Group and Organization Management, 32(5), 548–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Robinson, G., & Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. The Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005), 11(3), 21–31.Google Scholar
  81. Schopenhauer, A. (1841a). On the basis of morality (E. F. J. Payne, Trans.). Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  82. Schopenhauer, A. (1841b). The two fundamental problems of ethics (D. E. Cartwright & E. E. Erdmann, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Scott, S. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and the fetter of profitability. Social Responsibility Journal, 3(4), 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Shaw, W. (2009). Marxism, business ethics, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 565–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Simpson, A. V., Clegg, S., & Pitsis, T. (2014). “I Used to Care but Things Have Changed”: A genealogy of compassion in organizational theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23, 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Singal, M. (2014). The business case for diversity management in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 40, 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Solomon, R. C. (1992). Ethics and excellence: Cooperation and integrity in business. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Solomon, R. C. (1998). The moral psychology of business: Care and compassion in the corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 515–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tatli, A. (2011). A multi-layered exploration of the diversity management field: Diversity discourses, practices and practitioners in the UK. British Journal of Management, 22(2), 238–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tatli, A., Vassilopoulou, J., Ariss, A. A., & Özbilgin, M. (2012). The role of regulatory and temporal context in the construction of diversity discourses: The case of the UK, France and Germany. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 18(4), 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2003). Managing ethics in business organizations: Social scientific perspectives. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Valor, C. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and corporate citizenship: Towards corporate accountability. Business and Society Review, 110(2), 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Velasquez, M. (2002). Moral reasoning. In N. E. Bowie (Ed.), The blackwell guide to business ethics (pp. 102–116). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  96. Velasquez, M. (2003). Debunking corporate moral responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 531–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Ven, B. (2008). An ethical framework for the marketing of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 339–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Weber, M. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level measurement approach for CSR. European Management Journal, 26(4), 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Werhane, P. H. (1985). Persons, rights, and corporations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  100. Werhane, P. H. (1989). Corporate and individual moral responsibility: A reply to Jan Garrett. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(10), 821–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wolf, S. (1985). The legal and moral responsibility of organizations. In J. R. Penncock & J. W. Chapman (Eds.), Criminal justice (pp. 267–286). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department Management, Institute for Gender and Diversity in OrganizationsVienna University of Economics and Business (WU)ViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations