Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 138, Issue 1, pp 17–37 | Cite as

Moral Repair in the Workplace: A Qualitative Investigation and Inductive Model

Article

Abstract

The topic of moral repair in the aftermath of breaches of trust and harmdoing has grown in importance within the past few years. In this paper, we present the results of a qualitative study that offers insight into a series of key issues related to offender efforts to repair interpersonal harm in the workplace: (1) What factors motivate offenders to make amends with those they have harmed? (2) In what ways do offenders attempt to make amends? (3) What outcomes emerge from attempts to make amends? Drawing from the findings, we build an inductive model intended to guide future business ethics and management inquiry and research in this area.

Keywords

Moral repair Interpersonal harm Making amends Forgiveness Qualitative research 

References

  1. Andiappan, M., & Treviño, L. K. (2011). Beyond righting the wrong: Supervisor-subordinate reconciliation after an injustice. Human Relations, 64(3), 359–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batson, C. D., Eklund, J. H., Chermok, V. L., Hoyt, J. L., & Ortiz, B. G. (2007). An additional antecedent of empathic concern: Valuing the welfare of the person in need. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bazemore, G. (1998). Restorative justice and earned redemption communities, victims, and offender reintegration. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(6), 768–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2011). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston: Pearson Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Bottom, W. P., Gibson, K., Daniels, S. E., & Murnighan, J. K. (2002). When talk is not cheap: Substantive penance and expressions of intent in rebuilding cooperation. Organization Science, 13(5), 497–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braithwaite, J. (1999). Restorative justice: Assessing optimistic and pessimistic accounts. Crime and Justice., 25, 1–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butterfield, K. D., Treviño, L. K., & Ball, G. A. (1996). Punishment from the manager’s perspective: A grounded investigation and inductive model. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1479–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. DeGeorge, R. T. (2013). Business ethics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Dillon, R. S. (1997). Self-respect: Moral, emotional, political. Ethics., 107, 226–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dillon, R. S. (2001). Self-forgiveness and self-respect. Ethics, 112(1), 53–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dirks, K. T., Lewicki, R. J., & Zaheer, A. (2009). Repairing relationships withinin and between organizations: Building a conceptual foundation. Academy of Management Review, 34, 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eaton, J., Ward Struthers, C., & Santelli, A. G. (2006). Dispositional and state forgiveness: The role of self-esteem, need for structure, and narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(2), 371–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Enright, R. D. (1996). Counseling within the forgiveness triad: On forgiving, receiving forgiveness, and self-forgiveness. Counseling and Values, 40(2), 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Exline, J. J., Deshea, L., & Holeman, V. T. (2007). Is apology worth the risk? Predictors, outcomes, and ways to avoid regret. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26(4), 479–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fehr, R., & Gelfand, M. (2012). The forgiving organization: A multilevel model of forgiveness at work. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 664–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisher, M. L., & Exline, J. J. (2006). Self-forgiveness versus excusing: The roles of remorse, effort, and acceptance of responsibility. Self and Identity, 5(02), 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garvey, S. (1999). Punishment as atonement. UCLA Law Review, 46, 1801–1858.Google Scholar
  19. Gibson, K., Bottom, W., & Murnighan, J. K. (1999). Once bitten: Defection and reconciliation in a cooperative enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(1), 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Giner-Soralla, R., Castrano, E., Espinoza, P., & Brown, R. (2008). Shame expressions reduce the recipient’s insult from outgroup reparation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 519–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gioia, D. A., & Sims, H. P. (1986). Introduction: Social cognition in organizations. In H. P. Sims & D. A. Gioia (Eds.), The thinking organization (pp. 20–48). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
  23. Gonzales, M. H., Manning, D. J., & Haugen, J. A. (1992). Explaining our sins: Factors influencing offender accounts and anticipated victim responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goodstein, J., & Aquino, K. (2010). And restorative justice for all: Redemption, forgiveness, and reintegration in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 624–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goodstein, J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2010). Extending the horizon of business ethics: Restorative justice and the aftermath of unethical behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(3), 453–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gundlach, M., Douglas, S. C., & Martinko, M. J. (2003). The decision to blow the whistle: A social information processing framework. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 107–123.Google Scholar
  28. Hall, J. H., & Fincham, F. D. (2005). Self–forgiveness: The stepchild of forgiveness research. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24(5), 621–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hall, J. H., & Fincham, F. D. (2008). The temporal course of self-forgiveness. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27(2), 174–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hareli, S., & Eisikovits, Z. (2006). The role of communicating social emotions accompanying apologizing in forgiveness. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hareli, S., Shomrat, N., & Biger, N. (2005). The role of emotions in employees’ explanations for failure in the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20, 663–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Holmgren, M. E. (1998). Self-forgiveness and responsible moral agency. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 32, 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hutter, R. (2011). The debt of sin and the sacrific of charity. A Thomistic echo to Gary Anderson’s Sin: A History, Nova et Vertera, 9(1), 133–148.Google Scholar
  34. Jung, S. (2010). Consumption, contrition, and community. Dialog: A Journal of Theology, 49(4), 284–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kanov, J. M., Maitlis, S., Worline, M. C., Dutton, J. E., Frost, P., & Lilius, J. M. (2004). Compassion in organizational life. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 808–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kant, I. (1983). Metaphysical principles of virtue, trans. J Ellington. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  37. Kerr, S., Harlan, A., & Stodgill, R. M. (1974). Preference for motivator and hygiene factors in a hypothetical interview situation. Personnel Psychology, 27(1), 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kidder, D. L. (2007). Restorative justice: Not “rights”, but the right way to heal relationships at work. International Journal of Conflict Management, 18(1), 4–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim, P. H., Dirks, K. T., Cooper, C. D., & Ferrin, D. L. (2006). When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence-vs. integrity-based trust violation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(1), 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kim, P. H., Ferrin, D. L., Cooper, C. D., & Dirks, K. T. (2004). Removing the shadow of suspicion: the effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence-versus integrity-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Konovsky, M. A., & Folger, R. (1991). The effects of procedures, social accounts, and benefits level on victims’ layoff reactions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21(8), 630–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Light, R. J. (1971). Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: Some generalizations and alternatives. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Locke, J. (1955). Second treatise of civil government. Chicago: Gateway Press.Google Scholar
  44. Mackie, J. L. (1982). Cooperation, competition, and moral philosophy. In A. Colman (Ed.), Cooperation and competition in humans and animals. Wokingham: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  45. Margolis, J. D., & Molinsky, A. L. (2008). Navigating the bind of necessary evils: Psychological engagement and the production of interpersonally sensitive behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 847–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Martin, J., Feldman, M. S., Hatch, M. J., & Sitkin, S. B. (1983). The uniqueness paradox in organizational stories. Administrative Science Quarterly., 28, 438–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington DC: American Psychological Association Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McAdams, D. P. (2005). Redemptive self: Stories Americans live by. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. McAdams, D. P., Reynolds, J., Lewis, M., Patten, A. H., & Bowman, P. J. (2001). When bad things turn good and good things turn bad: Sequences of redemption and contamination in life narrative and their relation to psychosocial adaptation in midlife adults and in students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(4), 474–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McCullough, M. E., Kilpatrick, S. D., Emmons, R. A., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Is gratitude a moral affect? Psychological Bulletin, 127, 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mikula, G. (1994). Perspective-related differences in interpretations of injustice by victims and victimizers. In M. L. J. Lerner, & G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the affectional bond: Justice in close relationships (pp. 175–204). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  52. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  53. Mitchell, T. R. (1982). Motivation: New directions for theory, research, and practice. Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 80–88.Google Scholar
  54. Molinsky, A. L., & Margolis, J. D. (2005). Necessary evils and interpersonal sensitivity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Morreim, E. (2000). Sticks and carrots and baseball bats: Economic and other incentives to modify health behavior. In D. Callahan (Ed.), Promoting health behavior: How much freedom? Whose responsibility? (pp. 56–75). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Morrison, B. (2006). School bullying and restorative justice: Toward a theoretical understanding of the role of respect, pride, and shame. Journal of Social Issues, 62(2), 371–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Motowidlo, S. J., Carter, G. W., Dunnette, M. D., Tippins, N., Werner, S., Burnett, J. R., & Vaughan, M. J. (1992). Studies of the structured behavioral interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(5), 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Muller, A. R., Pfarrer, M. D., & Little, L. M. (2014). A theory of collective empathy in corporate philanthropy decisions. Academy of Management Review, 39(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1995). Effective whistle-blowing. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 679–708.Google Scholar
  60. Near, J. P., Rehg, M. T., Van Scotter, J. R., & Miceli, M. P. (2004). Does type of wrongdoing affect the whistle-blowing process? Business Ethics Quarterly., 14, 219–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Petrucci, C. J. (2002). Apology in the criminal justice setting: Evidence for including apology as an additional component in the legal system. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20(4), 337–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Radzik, L. (2007). Offenders, the making of amends and the state. In G. Johnstone & D. Van Ness (Eds.), Handbook of restorative justice (pp. 192–207). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  63. Radzik, L. (2009). Making amends: Atonement in morality, law, and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ren, H., & Gray, B. (2009). Repairing relationship conflict: How violation types and culture influence the effectiveness of restoration rituals. Academy of Management Review, 34, 105–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Roberts, R. (2007). Spiritual emotions. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  66. Schonbach, P. (1990). Account episodes: The management and escalation of conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Sharp, C. (2011). Religion and justice: atonement as an element of justic in both western law and Christian thought. In N. Hosen & R. Mohr (Eds.), Law and Religion in Public Life (pp. 151–164). Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  68. Sharpe, S. (2007). The idea of reparation. In G. Johnstone & D. Van Ness (Eds.), Handbook of restorative justice (pp. 24–40). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  69. Sherman, L. W., & Strang, H. (2007). Restorative justice: The evidence. London: Smith Institute.Google Scholar
  70. Shnabel, N., Nadler, A., Ullrich, J., Dovidio, J. F., & Carmi, D. (2009). Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The needs-based model of reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(8), 1021–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Snow, N. E. (1993). Self-forgiveness. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 27, 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Procedures and techniques for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  73. Struthers, C. W., Dupuis, R., & Eaton, J. (2005). Promoting forgiveness among co-workers following a workplace transgression: The effects of social motivation training. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 37(4), 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Swinburne, R. (1989). Responsibility and atonement (pp. 149–150). Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Takaku, S. (2001). The effects of apology and perspective taking on interpersonal forgiveness: A dissonance-attribution model of interpersonal forgiveness. Journal of Social Psychology, 141(4), 494–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York: Guilford Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tata, J. (2000). She said, he said. The influence of remedial accounts on third-party judgments of coworker sexual harassment. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1133–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tavuchis, N. (1991). Mea Culpa: A society of apology and reconciliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Taylor, G. (1985). Shame, pride, and guilt: The emotions of self-assessment. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  80. Tomlinson, E. C., & Mayer, R. C. (2009). The role of causal attribution dimensions in trust repair. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (1994). Business ETHICS/BUSINESS ethics: One field or two? Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(2), 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Walker, M. U. (2006). Moral repair: Reconstructing moral relations after wrongdoing. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Weeks, T. L., & Pasupathi, M. (2011). Stability and change self-integration for negative events: The role of listener responsiveness and elaboration. Journal of Personality, 79(3), 469–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Weiner, B., Graham, S., Peter, O., & Zmuidinas, M. (1991). Public confession and forgiveness. Journal of Personality, 59(2), 281–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Williston, B. (2012). The importance of self-forgiveness. American Philosophical Quarterly, 49(1), 67–80.Google Scholar
  86. Witvliet, C. V. O., Worthington, E. L, Jr, Root, L. M., Sato, A. F., Ludwig, T. E., & Exline, J. J. (2008). Retributive justice, restorative justice, and forgiveness: An experimental psychophysiology analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(1), 10–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerry Goodstein
    • 1
  • Ken Butterfield
    • 2
  • Nathan Neale
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Management, Information Systems, and EntrepreneurshipWashington State University VancouverVancouverUSA
  2. 2.Department of Management, Information Systems, and EntrepreneurshipWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations