Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 137, Issue 2, pp 269–284 | Cite as

Market Orientation and CSR: Performance Implications

  • Timothy KiesslingEmail author
  • Lars Isaksson
  • Burze Yasar
Article

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become of great interest to both researchers and practitioners alike with much discussion on whether the costs outweigh the performance implications. CSR has become a firm strategic tool (not only an ethical concept) as firms recognize that the customer value proposition and CSR is integrated with the focus on how to differentiate the firm from the view of the customer. We utilized market orientation (MO) theory as our foundation for our research as it explains how organizations adapt to their customer environment to develop competitive advantages. With the current customer focus on CSR, MO assists the field in identifying a possible firm differentiation. Our research found that firms that ranked high on CSR correlated positively to performance. We also found our theoretically developed constructs of firm customer orientation (CO) and firm market orientation correlated with the firm adopting CSR. The results also indicated that CSR positively mediates CO and MO to firm performance. As past research had mixed results over the direct relation of MO to performance, our research suggests that CSR may be the missing variable to explain the MO/Performance relationship.

Keywords

CSR Customer orientation Customer interaction Market orientation Performance 

References

  1. Agarwal, S., Erramilli, M., & Dev, C. (2003). Market orientation and performance in service firms: Role of innovation. Journal of Services Marketing, 17(1), 68–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alhakimi, W., & Baharun, R. (2010). An integrative model of market orientation constructs in consumer goods industry: An empirical evidence. International Management Review, 6(2), 40–54.Google Scholar
  3. Appiah-Adu, K., & Singh, S. (1998). Customer orientation and performance: A study of SMEs. (small and medium-sized businesses). Management Decision, 36(5–6), 385(310).Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atuahene-Gima, K., & Ko, A. (2001). An empirical investigation of the effect of market orientation and entrepreneurship orientation alignment on product innovation. Organization Science, 12(1), 54–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Augusto, M., & Coelho, F. (2009). Market orientation and new-to-the-world products: Exploring the moderating effects of innovativeness, competitive strength, and environmental forces. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(1), 94–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aziz, N. A., & Yassin, N. M. (2010). How will market orientation and external environment influence the performance among SMEs in the agro-food sector in Malaysia?(Report). International Business Research, 3(3), 154(111).Google Scholar
  8. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barney, J. B., & Hansen, M. H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baron, D. P. (1995). Integrated strategy—Market and nonmarket components. California Management Review, 37(2), 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berkhout, T., & Rowlands, I. H. (2007). The voluntary adoption of green electricity by ontario-based companies: The importance of organizational values and organizational context. Organization Environment, 20(3), 281–303. doi: 10.1177/1086026607306464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berry, L. (1983). Relationship marketing in emerging perspectives on servcies marketing. Chicago: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar
  13. Berry, L., & Parasuraman, A. (1991). Marketing service. Competing through quality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  14. Beverland, M., Farrelly, F., & Woodhatch, Z. (2004). The role of value change management in relationship dissolution: Hygiene and motivational factors. Journal of Marketing Management, 20(9–10), 927–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bondy, K., Moon, J., & Matten, D. (2012). An Institution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in multi-national corporations (MNCs): Form and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–19. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1208-7.
  16. Carroll, A. (2000). Ethical challenges for business in the new millennium: Coporate social responsibility and models of management morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(1), 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen, Y., Li, P., & Evans, K. (2012). Effects of interaction and entrepreneurial orientation on organizational performance: Insights into market driven and market driving. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(6), 1019–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. The Journal of Marketing, 58, 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Day, G. (1999). Misconceptions about market orientation. Journal of Market-Focused Management, 4(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Day, G., & Moorman, C. (2013). Regaining customer relevance: The outside-in turnaround. Strategy & Leadership, 41(4), 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Day, G., & Wensley, R. (1983). Marketing theory with a strategic orientation. The Journal of Marketing, 47, 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), 1027–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Demirbag, M., Koh, C. L., Tatoglu, E., & Zaim, S. (2006). TQM and market orientation’s impact on SMEs’ performance. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 106(8), 1206–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. DeTienne, K., Agle, B., Phillips, J., & Ingerson, M.-C. (2012). The impact of moral stress compared to other stressors on employee fatigue, job satisfaction, and turnover: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-1197-y.
  26. Dickson, P. (1992). Toward a general theory of competitive rationality. Journal of Marketing, 56(1), 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation—Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
  28. Drucker, P. F. (1984). The new meaning of corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 26, 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Eggert, A., Ulaga, W., & Schultz, F. (2006). Value creation in the relationship life cycle: A quasi-longitudinal analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(1), 20–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Galunic, D. C. (2000). Coevolving: At last, a way to make synergies work. Harvard Business Review, 78, 91–101.Google Scholar
  32. Ellis, P. D. (2010). Is market orientation affected by the size and diversity of customer networks? Management International Review, 50(3), 325(321).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fombrun, C. J. (2000). Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Freeman, R. E. (Ed.). (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder perspective. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  35. Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “The corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits., New York Times Magazine, September 13.Google Scholar
  37. Gadenne, D., Kennedy, J., & McKeiver, C. (2009). An empirical study of environmental awareness and practices in SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gebhardt, G. F., Carpenter, G. S., & Sherry, J. F. (2006). Creating a market orientation: A longitudinal, multifirm, grounded analysis of cultural transformation. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the organization. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 108–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Groza, M. D., Pronschinske, M. R., & Walker, M. (2011). Perceived organizational motives and consumer responses to proactive and reactive CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(4), 639–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gummesson, E. (2008). Extending the service-dominant logic: From customer centricity to balanced centricity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 15–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future: Breakthrough strategies for seizing control of your industry and creating the markets of tomorrow. Boston: Harvard business school press.Google Scholar
  43. Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1998). Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation a missing link? The Journal of marketing, 62, 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Heikkurinen, P. (2010). Image differentiation with corporate environmental responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17, 142–152 Hill, Griffith, & Lim. (2008). Principles of econometrics (3rd edition ed.): Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  46. Hill, R. P., Ainscough, T., Shank, T., & Manullang, D. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and socially responsible investing: A global perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hosmer, L. (1994). Strategic planning as if ethics mattered. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 17–34.Google Scholar
  48. Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2008). Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 781–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hult, G. T. M., Kethcen, D. J., & Arrfelt, M. (2007). Strategic supply chain management: Improving performance through a culture of competitiveness and knowledge development. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10), 1035–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hur, W. M., Kim, H., & Woo, J. (2013). How CSR leads to corporate brand equity: Mediating mechanisms of corporate brand credibility and reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–12.Google Scholar
  51. Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hyvönen, S., & Tuominen, M. (2007). Channel collaboration, market orientation and performance advantages: Discovering developed and emerging markets. International Review of Retail, Distribution & Consumer Research, 17(5), 423–445. doi: 10.1080/09593960701631482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jackson, K. T. (2004). Building Reputational Capital, Strategies for Integrity and Fair Play that Improve the Bottom Line. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Jacobson, K. “Whose corporations? Our corporations!” Huffington Post, April 5, 2012 from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ken-jacobson/whose-corporations-our-co_b_1405832.html.
  55. Kang, J. (2009). Corporate social responsibility? Not my business any more: The CEO horizon problem in corporate social performance. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2009, 1–6.Google Scholar
  56. Kaplan, R and D. Norton. (1992) The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, January–February, 71 & 80.Google Scholar
  57. Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. (2005). Market orientation: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., & Muller, K. E. (1988). Applied regression analysis and other multivariate analysis methods. Boston: PWS-Kent Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  59. Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kolk, A., & Pinske, J. (2006). Stakeholder mismanagement and corporate social responsibility crises. European Management Journal, 24(1), 59(14).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (Eds.). (2005). Corporate social responsibility. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  62. KPMG. (2011). KPMG International survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2011. KPMG, 1(1).Google Scholar
  63. Kumar, V., Jones, E., Venkatesan, R., & Leone, R. P. (2011). Is market orientation a source of sustainable competitive advantage or simply the cost of competing? Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lam, S. K., Kraus, F., & Ahearne, M. (2010). The diffusion of market orientation throughout the organization: A social learning theory perspective. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lee, S.-Y. (2008). Drivers for the participation of small and medium-sized suppliers in green supply chain initiatives (p. 3). Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.Google Scholar
  66. Lev, B., Petrovits, C., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2011). Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 182–200.Google Scholar
  67. Liao, S.-H., Chang, W.-J., Wu, C.-C., & Katrichis, J. M. (2010). A survey of market orientation research (1995–2008). doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.09.003. Industrial Marketing Management, (in press), Corrected Proof.
  68. Liao, S. H., Chang, W. J., Wu, C. C., & Katrichis, J. M. (2011). A survey of market orientation research (1995–2008). Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Liebeskind, J. P. (1996). Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of organization. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lopez, M. V., Garcia, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the dow jones sustainability index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2009). The debate over doing good: Corporate social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Marketing, 73, 198–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lusch, R., Vargo, S., & O’Brien, M. (2007). Competing through service: Insights from service-dominant logic. Journal of Retailing, 83(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Marcel, J. (2009). Why top management team characteristics matter when employing a chief operating officer: A strategic contingency perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 30(6), 647–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. McCulloch, J., & Huston, M. (1985). Miscellanea: On heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 53(2), 483.Google Scholar
  76. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127.Google Scholar
  78. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2011). Creating and capturing value. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1480–1495. doi: 10.1177/0149206310385696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Melo, T., & Garrido-Morgado, A. (2012). Corporate reputation: A combination of social responsibility and industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(1), 11–31. doi: 10.1002/csr.260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Menguc, B., & Auh, S. (2006). Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(1), 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Miller, D. J. (2004). Firms’ technological resources and the performance effects of diversification: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 25(11), 1097–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Moon, S.-G., & deLeon, P. (2007). Contexts and corporate voluntary environmental behaviors: Examining the EPA’s green lights voluntary program. Organization Environment, 20(4), 480–496. doi: 10.1177/1086026607309395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Moratis, L., & Cochius, T. (2011). What is social responsibility (according to ISO 26000)? ISO 26000: The business guide to the new standard on social responsibility, 9(26), 18.Google Scholar
  84. Mulyanegara, R. C. (2010). Market orientation and brand orientation from customer perspective an empirical examination in the non-profit sector (Report). International Journal of Business and Management, 5(7), 14(10).Google Scholar
  85. Murray, K. B., & Montanari, J. R. (1986). Strategic management of the socially responsible Firm: Integrating management and marketing theory. The Academy of Management Review, 11, 815–827.Google Scholar
  86. Naffziger, D. W., Ahmed, N. U., & Montagno, R. V. (2003). Perceptions of environmental consciousness in U.S. small business: An empirical study. SAM Advanced Management Journal (07497075), 68(2), 23.Google Scholar
  87. Narver, J., Slater, S., & MacLachlan, D. (2004). Responsive and proactive market orientation and new-product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(5), 334–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Neilsen, E. H., & Rao, M. V. H. (1987). The strategy-legitimacy nexus: A thick description. The Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 523–533.Google Scholar
  89. Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1987). A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55(3), 703–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Nielsen, A. E., & Thomsen, C. (2010). Sustainable development: The role of network communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9999(9999), n/a.Google Scholar
  91. Noland, J., & Phillips, R. (2010). Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Öberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B., & Gruber, V. (2011). Why don’t consumers care about CSR?: A qualitative study exploring the role of CSR in consumption decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(4), 449–460. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0925-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies (01708406), 24(3), 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Oudan, T. (2012). Market orientation -transforming trade and firm performance. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 4(2), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Palmer, A., & Bejou, D. (1994). Buyer-seller relationships: A conceptual model and empirical investigation. Journal of Marketing Management, 10(6), 495–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Peloza, J. (2006). Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance. Management Review, 48(2), 52–72.Google Scholar
  97. Peloza, J., & Papania, L. (2008). The missing link between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Stakeholder salience and identification. Corporate Reputation Review, 11, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Pinto, J., & Curto, J. (2007). The organizational configuration concept as a contribution to the performance explanation: The case of the pharmaceutical industry in Portugal. European Management Journal, 25(1), 60–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Porter, T. B. (2008). Managerial applications of corporate social responsibility and systems thinking for achieving sustainability outcomes. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 25(3), 397–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (Eds.). (2006). Strategy & Society. The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. (Vol. December): Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  101. Ramani, G., & Kumar, V. (2008). Interaction orientation and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 72(1), 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Ramchander, S., Schwebach, R. G., & Staking, K. I. M. (2012). The informational relevance of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from DS400 index reconstitutions. Strategic Management Journal, 33(3), 303–314. doi: 10.1002/smj.952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Ruekert, R. W. (1992). Developing a market orientation: An organizational strategy perspective. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 9(3), 225–245. doi: 10.1016/0167-8116(92)90019-H.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Sandvik, I., & Sandvik, K. (2003). The impact of market orientation on product innovativeness and business performance. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20(4), 355–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Semenova, N., Hassel, L. G., & Nilsson, H. (2008). The Value Relevance of Environmental and Social Performance. Paper presented at the Global Conference on Business and Finance 2008, Costa Rica. http://www.pwc.com/sv_SE/se/hallbar-utveckling/assets/sammanfattning_six300.pdf.
  106. Siegel, D. S., & Vitaliano, D. F. (2007). An empirical analysis of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economics Management Strategy, 16(3), 773(720).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Simpson, W. G., & Kohers, T. (2002). The link between corporate social and financial performance: Evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(2), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Sivadas, E., & Dwyer, F. R. (2000). An examination of organizational factors influencing new product success in internal and alliance-based processes. Journal of marketing, 64(1), 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (2000). Intelligence generation and superior customer value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 120–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Smirnova, M., Henneberg, S. C., Ashnai, B., Naudé, P., & Mouzas, S. (2011). Understanding the role of marketing–purchasing collaboration in industrial markets: The case of Russia. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(1), 54–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Smith, J. (2012). The company with the best CSR reputations. Forbes. Retrieved December 10, 2012 from http://www.forbes.com/sites/jacquelynsmith/2012/12/10/the-companies-with-the-best-csr-reputations/.
  112. Song, M., Wang, T., & Parry, M. (2010). Do market information processes improve new venture performance? Journal of Business Venturing, 25(6), 556–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Stainer, L. (2006). Performance management and corporate social responsibility: The strategic connection. Strategic Change, 15, 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Taylor, C. R., Kim, K. H., Ko, E., Park, M. H., Kim, D. R., & Moon, H. I. (2008). Does having a market orientation lead to higher levels of relationship commitment and business performance? Evidence from the Korean robotics industry. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(7), 825–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Thadewald, T., & Büning, H. (2007). Jarque–Bera test and its competitors for testing normality—A power comparison. Journal of Applied Statistics, 34(1), 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Ulaga, W. (2003). Capturing value creation in business relationships: A customer perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(8), 677–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Vargo, S., & Lusch, R. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Walls, J. L., Berrone, P., & Phan, P. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strategic Management Journal, 33, 885–913. doi: 10.1002/smj.1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Wang, T. G., & Wei, H. L. (2005). The importance of market orientation, learning orientation, and quality orientation capabilities in TQM: An example from Taiwanese software industry. Total Quality Management, 16(10), 1161–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Wieseke, J., Ahearne, M., Lam, S. K., & Dick, R. V. (2009). The role of leaders in internal marketing. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 123–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Wood, D. J. (2010). Measuring corporate social performance: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 50–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Ziek, P. (2009). Making sense of CSR communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(3), 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bilkent UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Bond UniversityGold CoastAustralia
  3. 3.TED UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations