Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 135, Issue 2, pp 381–397 | Cite as

Do Socially Responsible Investment Policies Add or Destroy European Stock Portfolio Value?

Article

Abstract

Using a new dataset of environmental, social, and corporate governance company ratings for the European market, this article examines whether socially responsible stock selection adds or destroys value in terms of portfolio performance. From 2004 to 2012, we find the following: (i) Negative screens excluding unrated stocks from a representative European stock universe allow investors to significantly outperform a passive investment in a diversified European stock benchmark portfolio. (ii) Additional negative screens based on environmental and social scores neither add nor destroy portfolio value, when cut-off rates are not too high. In contrast, governance screens can significantly increase portfolio performance under similar conditions. Thus, investors in the European stock market can do (financially) well while doing (socially) good. (iii) Because of a loss of diversification, positive screens can cause portfolios to underperform the benchmark. This implies that investors should concentrate on eliminating the worst firms. (iv) Our results are robust along several dimensions, namely, choice of performance measure, time, test parametrisation, portfolio weighting scheme, approximation of the risk-free rate, and consideration of transaction costs.

Keywords

Socially responsible investing Portfolio management Negative Screening Bootstrap testing Sustainalytics 

JEL

G11 G12 G20 G23 M14 

References

  1. Andrews, D., & Monahan, J. (1992). An improved heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimator. Economcetrica, 60(4), 953–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Artmann, S., Finter, P., Kempf, A., Koch, S., & Theissen, E. (2012). The cross-section of German stock returns: New data and new evidence. Schmalenbach Business Review, 64(1), 20–43.Google Scholar
  3. Auer, B., & Schuhmacher, F. (2013). Performance hypothesis testing with the Sharpe ratio: The case of hedge funds. Finance Research Letters, 10(4), 196–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett, M. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauer, R., Gunster, N., & Otten, R. (2004). Empirical evidence on corporate governance in Europe. Journal of Asset Management, 5(2), 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauer, R., Koedijk, K., & Otten, R. (2005). International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. Journal of Banking and Finance, 29(7), 1751–1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Behr, P., Guettler, A., & Truebenbach, F. (2012). Using industry momentum to improve portfolio performance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(5), 1414–1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benson, K., Brailsford, T., & Humphrey, J. (2006). Do socially responsible fund managers really invest differently? Journal of Business Ethics, 65, 337–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benson, K., & Humphrey, J. (2008). Socially responsible investment funds: Investor reaction to current and past returns. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(9), 1850–1859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bertrand, P., & Prigent, J. (2011). Omega performance measure and portfolio insurance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(7), 1811–1823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brammer, S., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate Social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregated measures. Financial Management, 35(3), 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brekke, K., & Nyborg, K. (2004). Moral hazard and moral motivation: Corporate social responsibility as labor market screening, economics working paper no. 25/2004, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  13. Capocci, D., & Hübner, G. (2004). Analysis of hedge fund performance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 11(1), 55–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carhart, M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen, K., Chen, Z., & Wei, K. (2009). Legal protection of investors, corporate governance, and the cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance, 15(3), 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen, L., He, S., & Zhang, S. (2011). When all risk-adjusted performance measures are the same. In praise of the Sharpe ratio. Quantitative Finance, 11(10), 1439–1447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cremers, M., & Nair, V. (2005). Governance mechanisms and equity prices. Journal of Finance, 6(6), 2859–2894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Derwall, J., Guenster, N., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K. (2005). The eco-efficiency premium puzzle. Financial Analysts Journal, 61(2), 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Derwall, J., Koedijk, K., & Ter Horst, J. (2011). A tale of values-driven and profit-seeking social investors. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(8), 2137–2147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diltz, J. (1995). Does social screening affect portfolio performance? Journal of Investing, 4(1), 64–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3), 621–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1993). An introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eling, M. (2008). Does the measure matter in the mutual fund industry? Financial Analysts Journal, 64(3), 54–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eling, M., & Schuhmacher, F. (2007). Does the choice of performance measure influence the evaluation of hedge funds? Journal of Banking and Finance, 31(9), 2632–2647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fama, E., & French, K. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fisman, R., Heal, G., & Nair, V. (2006). A model of corporate philanthropy, unpublished manuscript, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  27. Fung, W., & Hsieh, D. (1997). Empirical characteristics of dynamic trading strategies: The case of hedge funds. Review of Financial Studies, 10(2), 275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Galema, R., Plantinga, A., & Scholtens, B. (2008). The stocks at stake: Return and risk in socially responsible investment. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(12), 2646–2654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Geczy, C., Stambaugh, R., & Levin, D. (2005). Investing in socially responsible mutual funds, unpublished manuscript, Wharton School.Google Scholar
  30. Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C., & Mishra, D. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(9), 2388–2406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Götze, F., & Künsch, H. (1996). Second order correctness of the blockwise bootstrap for stationary observations. Annals of Statistics, 24(5), 1914–1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Guerard, J. (1997). Additional evidence on the cost of being socially responsible in investing. Journal of Investing, 6(4), 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hamilton, S., Jo, H., & Statman, M. (1993). Doing well while doing good? The investment performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 49(6), 62–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heinkel, R., Kraus, A., & Zechner, J. (2001). The effect of green investment on corporate behavior. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36(4), 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Henry, Ó. (2002). Long memory in stock returns: Some international evidence. Applied Financial Economics, 12(10), 725–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Herremans, I., Akathaporn, P., & McInnes, M. (1993). An investigation of corporate social responsibility reputation and economic performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(7–8), 587–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hill, R., Ainscough, T., Shank, T., & Manullang, D. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and socially responsible investing: A global perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(1), 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Humphrey, J., Lee, D., & Shen, Y. (2012). Does it cost to be sustainable? Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(3), 626–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jobson, J., & Korkie, B. (1981). Performance hypothesis testing with the Sharpe and Treynor measures. Journal of Finance, 36(4), 889–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kanji, G. (2006). 100 statistical tests (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  43. Kempf, A., & Osthoff, P. (2007). The effect of socially responsible investing on portfolio performance. European Financial Management, 13(5), 908–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kinder, P., Lydenberg, S., & Domini, A. (1992). The social investment almanac: A comprehensive guide to socially responsible investing. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  45. Kinder, P., Lydenberg, S., & Domini, A. (1993). Investing for good: Making money while being socially responsible. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  46. Knoll, M. (2002). Ethical screening in modern financial markets: The conflicting claims underlying socially responsible investment. Business Lawyer, 57(2), 681–726.Google Scholar
  47. Laffont, J., & Martimort, D. (2002). The theory of incentives: The principal-agent model. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Ledoit, O., & Wolf, M. (2008). Robust performance hypothesis testing with the Sharpe ratio. Journal of Empirical Finance, 15(5), 850–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lee, D., Faff, R., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2009). Revisiting the vexing question: Does superior corporate social performance lead to improved financial performance? Australian Journal of Management, 34, 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Liang, B. (2000). Hedge funds: The living and the dead. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35(3), 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Liew, J., & Vassalou, M. (2000). Can book-to-market, size and momentum be risk factors that predict economic growth? Journal of Financial Economics, 57(2), 221–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lo, A., & MacKinlay, A. (1990). Data-snooping biases in tests of financial asset pricing models. Review of Financial Studies, 3(3), 431–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McGuire, J., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Memmel, C. (2003). Performance hypothesis testing with the Sharpe ratio. Finance Letters, 1(1), 21–23.Google Scholar
  55. Ortas, E., Moneva, J., & Salvador, M. (2014). Do social and environmental screens influence ethical portfolio performance? Evidence from Europe. Business Research Quarterly, 17(1), 11–21.Google Scholar
  56. Owen, D. (1990). Towards a theory of social investments: A review essay. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(3), 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pástor, L., Sinha, M., & Swaminathan, B. (2008). Estimating the intertemporal risk-return tradeoff using the implied cost of capital. Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2859–2897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Patterson, C. (1995). The cost of capital—theory and estimation. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  59. Politis, D., & Romano, J. (1992). A circular block-resampling procedure for stationary data. In R. LePage & L. Billard (Eds.), Exploring the limits of bootstrap (pp. 263–270). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  60. Poon, S., & Taylor, S. (1992). Stock returns and volatility: An empirical study of the UK stock market. Journal of Banking and Finance, 16(1), 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008a). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behaviour. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(9), 1723–1742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008b). The price of ethics and stakeholder governance: The performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 302–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Salaber, J. (2007). The determinants of sin stock returns: Evidence on the European market, unpublished manuscript, Paris-Dauphine University.Google Scholar
  64. Sauer, D. (1997). The impact of social-responsibility screens on investment performance: Evidence from the domini 400 social index and domini equity mutual fund. Review of Financial Economics, 6(2), 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schuhmacher, F., & Eling, M. (2011). Sufficient conditions for expected utility to imply drawdown-based performance rankings. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(9), 2311–2318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schuhmacher, F., & Eling, M. (2012). A decision-theoretic foundation for reward-to-risk performance measures. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(7), 2077–2082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sharpe, W. (1966). Mutual fund performance. Journal of Business, 39(1), 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Statman, M. (2006). Socially responsible indexes. Journal of Portfolio Management, 32(3), 100–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Statman, M., & Glushkov, D. (2009). The wages of social responsibility. Financial Analysts Journal, 65(4), 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tirole, J. (2001). Corporate governance. Economcetrica, 69(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Van de Velde, E., Vermeir, W., & Corten, F. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Corporate Governance, 5(3), 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Waddock, S., & Graves, S. (1997). The corporate social performance—financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wimmer, M. (2013). ESG-persistence in socially responsible mutual funds. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 3(1), 9–15.Google Scholar
  74. Yao, Y. (2012). Momentum, contrarian, and the January seasonality. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(10), 2757–2769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LeipzigLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations