Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 135, Issue 3, pp 445–459 | Cite as

Green Microfinance in Europe

Article

Abstract

Microfinance institutions (MFIs) are alternative financial providers offering financial services to people typically excluded from the standard banking sector. While most MFIs are active in developing countries, there is also a young and developing microfinance sector in Europe; however, very little literature exists on this MFI segment. In this paper, we analyze the environmental performance of 58 European MFIs. Our results suggest that the size of the MFI, investor concern for environmental performance and, to a lesser extent, donor interest, are closely related to the institution’s environmental performance. Moreover, providing loans larger than microcredits is linked to better environmental performance. This could suggest that the additional revenues generated from these loans, also called cross-subsidies, could help MFIs to strengthen their environmental bottom line. Finally, no evidence suggests that profit status explains environmental performance.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility Europe Environment Microcredit Microfinance 

References

  1. Allet, M. (2012). Measuring the environmental performance of microfinance: a new tool. Cost Management, 26(2), 6–17.Google Scholar
  2. Allet, M. (2014). Why do microfinance institutions go green? Journal of Business Ethics, 122(3), 405–424.Google Scholar
  3. Allet, M., & Hudon, M. (2013). Green microfinance: Characteristics of microfinance institutions involved in environmental management. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1942-5.
  4. Armendáriz, B., & Morduch, J. (2010). The economics of microfinance (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Armendàriz, B., & Szafarz, A. (2011). On mission drift in microfinance institutions. In B. Armendàriz & M. Labie (Eds.), The handbook of microfinance (pp. 341–366). London-Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Babiak, K., & Trendafilova, S. (2011). CSR and environmental responsibility: motives and pressures to adopt green management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(1), 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bansal, K., & Roth, P. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bendig, M., Unterberg, M., & Sarpong, B. (2012). Overview of the microcredit sector in European Union. European Microfinance Network (EMN) 2010–2011, 27 December 2012.Google Scholar
  9. Botti, F., & Corsi F. (2010). A social performance analysis of Italian microfinance. CEB Working Paper No. 10/020 2010.Google Scholar
  10. Botti, F., & Corsi, F. (2011). Measuring the social performance of microfinance in Europe. Working Papers CEB No. 11-037, September 2011.Google Scholar
  11. Carroll, A. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and performance. In R. Kolb (Ed.), Encyclopedia of business ethics and society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Chiu, T. K. (2014). Putting responsible finance to work for Citi microfinance. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(2), 219–234.Google Scholar
  13. Commission, European. (2005). Cohesion policy in support of growth and jobs. Brussels: Communicatin of the European Commission.Google Scholar
  14. Coupland, C. (2006). Corporate social and environmental responsibility in web-based reports: Currency in the banking sector? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 17, 865–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cowton, C., & Thompson, P. (1999). Ethical banking: A comprehensive and indispensable guide to ethical banking. London: Books General Book.Google Scholar
  16. Cozarenco, A., & Szafarz, A. (2013). Female access to credit in France: How microfinance institutions import disparate treatment from banks. Working Papers CEB 13-037, ULB—Universite Libre de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  17. Cull, R., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Morduch, J. (2009). Microfinance meets the market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1), 167–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. D’Amato, A., & Roome, N. (2009). Toward an integrated model of leadership for corporate responsibility and sustainable development: a process model of corporate responsibility beyond management innovation. Corporate Governance, 9(4), 421–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doligez, F., & Lapenu, C. (2006). Stakes of measuring social performance in microfinance. SPI3 Discussion Paper No. 1. Paris: CERISE Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
  20. Du, X., Jian, W., Zeng, Q., & Du, Y. (2014). Corporate environmental responsibility in polluting industries: Does religion matter? Journal of Business Ethics, 124, 485–507.Google Scholar
  21. Elsayed, K., & Paton, D. (2007). The impact of financial performance on environmental policy: Does firm life cycle matter? Business Strategy and the Environment, 18, 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Erlandsson, J., & Tillman, A.-M. (2009). Analysing influencing factors of corporate environmental information collection, management and communication. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 800–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. European Commission. (2003). Micro-credit for small businesses and business creation: Bridging a market gap, DG Enterprise 2003, European Commission.Google Scholar
  24. Forcella, D. (2013). European Green Microfinance, a first look. EMN Research paper 2013.Google Scholar
  25. GreenMicrofinance. (2007). Microfinance and the environment: Setting the research and policy agenda. Roundtable May 5–6, 2006. Philadelphia: GreenMicrofinance-LLC.Google Scholar
  26. Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1996). The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: An empirical approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(3), 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hudon, M. (2009). Should access to credit be a right? Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jawahar, I., & McLaghlin, G. (2001). Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: an organizational life cycle approach. The Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 397–414.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, S. (1998). Microfinance North and South: Contrasting Current Debates. Journal of International Development, 10(6), 799–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Komatsu, S., Kaneko, S., & Ghosh, P. (2011). Are micro-benefits negligible? The implications of the rapid expansion of Solar Home Systems (SHS) in rural Bangladesh for sustainable development. Energy policy, 39(7), 4022–4031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Konar, S., & Cohen, M. (2001). Does the market value environmental performance? Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lapenu, C., Konini, Z., & Razakaharivelo, C. (2009). Evaluation de la performance sociale: les enjeux d’une finance responsible. Revue Tiers-Monde, 197, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lefebvre, E., Lefebvre, L., & Talbot, S. (2003). Determinants and impacts of environmental performance in SMEs. R and D Management, 33(3), 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meng, X. H., Zeng, S. X., Tam, C. M., & Xu, X. D. (2013). Whether top executives’ turnover influences environmental responsibility: From the perspective of environmental information disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 341–353.Google Scholar
  36. Miles, M., & Govin, J. (2000). Environmental marketing: a source of reputation, competitive, and financial advantage. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.Google Scholar
  38. Prior, F., & Argandoña, A. (2009). Credit accessibility and corporate social responsibility in financial institutions: The case of microfinance. Business Ethics, 18(4), 349–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rippey, P. (2009), Microfinance and climate change: Threats and opportunities. CGAP Focus Note 53. Washington, DC: CGAP.Google Scholar
  40. Russo, M., & Fouts, P. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scholtens, B. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in the International Banking Industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scholtens, B., & Dam, L. (2007). Banking on the Equator: Are banks that adopted the Equator principles different from non-adopters? World Development, 35(8), 1307–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schuite, G. J., & Pater, A. (2008). The triple bottom line for microfinance. Bunnik: Triodos Facet.Google Scholar
  44. Stanwick, P., & Stanwick, S. (1998). The relationship between corporate social performance, and organizational size, empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van Elteren, A. (2007). Environmental and social risk management and added value at MFIs and MFI funds: The FMO approach. The Hague: Netherlands Development Finance Company (FMO).Google Scholar
  46. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. (1997). The corporate social performance—Financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wahba, H. (2008). Does the market value corporate environmental responsibility? An empirical examination. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weber, O., Koellner, T., et al. (2008). The relation between sustainability performance and financial performance of firms. Progress in Industrial Ecology, 5(3), 236–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wenner, M. (2002). Microenterprise growth and environmental protection. Microenterprise Development Review, 4(2), 1–8.Google Scholar
  50. Williamson, D., Lynch-Wood, G., & Ramsay, J. (2006). Drivers of environmental behaviour in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 317–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Willums, J. (1999, May 3). Social responsibility and shareholder value. Business Week, p. 85.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FNRS, CERMiUniversité Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)BrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.CERMiUniversité Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations