Voluntary Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Contrasting the Carbon Disclosure Project and Corporate Reports
- 3.3k Downloads
As global warming continues to attract growing levels of attention, various stakeholders (states, general public, investors, and lobbyists) have put climate change on corporate agendas and expect firms to disclose relevant greenhouse gas (GHG) information. In this paper, we investigate the consistency of the GHG information voluntarily disclosed by French listed firms through two different communication channels: corporate reports (CR) and the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP). More precisely, we contrast the amounts of GHG emissions reported and the methodological explanations provided (named ‘traceability’) in each channel. Consistent with a stakeholder theory perspective, we find that GHG amounts are significantly lower in the CR than in the CDP. We also find that firms increase the CR figures’ traceability when there is a discrepancy between disclosures in the two channels. We suggest that the aim of this greater traceability is to enhance information credibility across the different channels used.
KeywordsCommunication channels GHG emissions Stakeholder theory Traceability Voluntary disclosure
Carbon Disclosure Project
Carbon Disclosure Standards Board
Corporate social responsibility
Global Reporting Initiative
Management Discussion and Analysis
Ordinary least squares
- Carbon Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB) (2011). Inventory of national and regional developments on climate change related disclosure. http://www.cdsb.net/sites/cdsbnet/files/attachments/consistency-paper-iunctad-isar-committtee.pdf.
- Carbon Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB) (2012). The case for consistency in corporate climate change-related reporting. http://www.cdsb.net/sites/cdsbnet/files/the-case-for-consistency-in-climate-change-related-reporting.pdf.
- Chu, C. I., Chatterjee, B., & Brown, A. (2013). The current status of greenhouse gas reporting by Chinese companies: A test of legitimacy theory. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(2), 114–139.Google Scholar
- Cornelissen, J. (2011). Corporate communication: A guide to theory and practice (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Ertimur, Y., Francis, J., Gonzales, A. & Schipper, K. (2010). Credibility, commitment and voluntary environmental disclosures. Duke University, Working paper. Retrieved from http://jindal.utdallas.edu/files/Francis-Paper.pdf.
- European Commission (2010). Company GHG emissions reporting—A study on methods and initiatives.Google Scholar
- Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder perspective. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
- Gibassier, D. & Journeault, M. (2014). Carbon accounting: From conflict of legitimacies to the interplay of legitimacies. MASOP Conference (Paris).Google Scholar
- Griffin, P. A., Lont, D. H. & Sun, Y. (2012). The relevance to investors of greenhouse gas emission disclosure. UC Davis Graduate School of Management Research Paper No. 01-11. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1735555.
- Ioannou, I. & Serafeim, G. (2011). The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. Harvard Business School Research Working Paper No. 11-100.Google Scholar
- Peters, G. F. & Romi, A. M. (2013). Does the voluntary adoption of corporate governance mechanisms improve environmental risk disclosures? Evidence from greenhouse gas emission accounting. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–30. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1886-9.
- Rahman, S. (2012). Impression management motivations, strategies and disclosure credibility of corporate narratives. Journal of Management Research, 4(3), 1–14.Google Scholar
- Ranganathan, J. (2011). GHG protocol: The gold standard for accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. Retrieved form http://insights.wri.org/news/2011/10/ghg-protocol-gold-standard-accounting-greenhouse-gas-emissions.