Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 134, Issue 1, pp 117–133 | Cite as

Influence of National Institutions on the Corporate Social Responsibility Practices of Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises in the Food-processing Industry: Differences Between France and Morocco

  • Jamal El Baz
  • Issam Laguir
  • Magalie Marais
  • Raffaele StaglianòEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper analyzes how national institutions impact corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices for small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the food-processing industries of France and Morocco. In this study, CSR practices are defined around two main dimensions: corporate performance (financial vs. global) and the CSR approach (defensive vs. active). Qualitative data were collected during semi-structured interviews with SME managers in charge of CSR issues. We then performed a content analysis. Our study shows that there is a distinct difference between the CSR practices adopted by SMEs in France and Morocco. Indeed, the findings suggest that under the rule-based governance system of France, most SMEs view CSR as an economic tool and it is adopted as an opportunity-seeking perspective anchored in the search for global performance. The findings also show that under the relationship-based governance system of Morocco, SMEs mainly see CSR from a constraint-reducing perspective. However, some Moroccan SMEs have begun to see the economic opportunities of CSR, especially in accessing foreign markets.

Keywords

National institutions SMEs CSR Food-processing industry France Morocco 

Abbreviations

AFNOR

Association française de normalization

CEO

Chief executive officer

CSOs

Corporate social opportunities

CSR

Corporate social responsibility

MNCs

Multinational companies

SMEs

Small- and medium-sized enterprises

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Frank Lasch for very constructive comments. We would also like to thank the section editor of the Journal of Business Ethics, Adam Lindgreen, and the anonymous reviewer for their recommendations. Moreover, we express our thanks to participants at the 2012 ICSB Conference Wellington, New Zealand for several helpful comments. Participation at the 2012 ICSB Conference was supported financially by Labex Entreprendre.

References

  1. Abdirahman, Z.-Z., & Sauvée L. (2011). The adoption of quality standards in food SMEs: A network approach. Paper presented at the The 5th international European forum (Igls-Forum) on system dynamics and innovation in food networks, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria.Google Scholar
  2. Aboudrar, A. (2002). Ethique et Responsabilité sociale de l’Entreprise, les ingrédients de la modernité. In Mezouar A. (Ed.), L’entreprise marocaine et la modernité. Recherche sur les conditions de changement culturel pour un progrès durable. Centre d’Etudes et de Recherche des Dirigeants. Casablanca Ed.Google Scholar
  3. Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447–465.Google Scholar
  4. Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in CSR: A multi-level theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aguilera, R. V., Williams, C., Conley, J., & Rupp, D. (2006). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility. A comparative analysis of the U.K. and the U.S. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(3), 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ahlstrom, D. (2010). Innovation and growth: How business contributes to society. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aiking, H., & Boer, J. (2004). Food sustainability—Diverging interpretations. British Food Journal, 106(5), 359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Antal, A., & Sobczak, A. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in France: A mix of national traditions and international influences. Business and Society, 46(1), 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arvidsson, S. (2010). Communication of corporate social responsibility: A study of the views of management teams in large companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(3), 339–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Atakan, M. G. S., & Eker, T. (2007). Corporate identity of a socially responsible university: A case from the Turkish higher education sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berger-Douce, S. (2008). Rentabilité et pratiques de RSE en milieu PME premiers résultats d’une étude française. Management & Avenir, 15(1), 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boiral, O. (2009). Greening the corporation through organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boliari, N., & Topyan, K. (2007). Conceptualizing institutions and organizations: A critical approach. Journal of Business & Economic Research, 5(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
  15. Bonneveux, E., & Saulquin, J-Y. (2009). L’appropriation de la RSE par les dirigeants de PME. Le réseau comme vecteur de l’apprentissage managerial. Management & Avenir, 23(3), 170–186.Google Scholar
  16. Boutti, R. (2009). L’entreprise marocaine face à des responsabilités sociales et sociétales. Unpublished manuscripts, Université Ibn Zohr, Agadir.Google Scholar
  17. Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1701–1719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Buhr, H., & Grafström, M. (2004) Corporate social responsibility. Unpublished manuscripts. In the Business Press: Package solutions with problems included. paper presented at the 20th EGOS conference, Ljubljana, July, and at the 20th EGOS Conference, Ljubljana, July.Google Scholar
  20. Bush, V., Bush, A. J., & Orr, L. (2010). Monitoring the ethical use of sales technology: An exploratory field investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 239–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Caroll, A. B. (1979). A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.Google Scholar
  23. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Castelló, I., & Lozano, J. (2009). From risk management to citizenship corporate social responsibility: analysis of strategic drivers of change. Corporate Governance, 9(4), 373–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cestone, C., & Cespa, G. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16(3), 741–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chen, S., & Bouvain, P. (2009). Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Clemens, B. (2006). Economic incentives and small firms: Does it pay to be green? Journal of Business Research, 59(4), 492–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Clemens, B., & Douglas, T. (2006). Does coercion drive firms to adopt voluntary green initiatives? Relationships among coercion, superior firm resources, and voluntary green initiatives. Journal of Business Research, 59(4), 483–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Crossland, C. (2007). National institutions and managerial discretion: A taxonomy of 24 countries. Paper presented at the annual meeting of academy of management, August, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  31. Delbard, O. (2008). CSR legislation in France and the European regulatory paradox: An analysis of EU CSR policy and sustainability reporting practice. Corporate Governance, 8(4), 397–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dennis, W. J. (2011). Entrepreneurship, small business and public policy levers. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(2), 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dhaliwal, D., Li, O., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Egri, C. P., & Herman, S. (2000). Leadership in the North American environmental sector: Values, leadership styles and contexts of environmental leaders and their organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 571–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. El Abboubi, M., & El Kandoussi, F. (2009). Le virage de la responsabilité sociale au Maroc. Le cas du secteur agroalimentaire. Reflets et Perspective, 48(4), 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable Corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. European Commission. (2003). Recommendation 2003/361/EC: SME Definition.Google Scholar
  39. Filali-Meknassi, R. (2009). La responsabilité sociale des entreprises : les aspects relatifs au travail, CGEM, Les expertises CGEM Digest, BIT, Casablanca.Google Scholar
  40. Fitzgerald, M. A., Haynes, G. W., Schrank, H. L., & Danes, S. M. (2010). Socially responsible processes of small family business owners: Exploratory evidence from the national family business survey. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(4), 524–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Franks, J., Mayer, C., & Wagner, H. (2006). The origins of the German corporation Finance, ownership and control. Review of Finance, 10(4), 537–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Freeman, R., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and Stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Freisleben, G. (2011). Benefits & burdens of CSR for SMEs. Financial Executive, 27(8), 53–54.Google Scholar
  44. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In T. Beauchamp & N. E. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business (pp. 55–60). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  45. Gedajlovic, E. R., & Shapiro, D. M. (1998). Management and ownership effects: Evidence from five countries. Strategic Management Journal, 19(6), 533–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gherib, J., & Berger-Douce, S. (2012). Entrepreneurial profile and environmental commitment of SMEs: A comparative analysis in France and in Tunisia. International Business Research, 5(7), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Goyer, M. (2006). French speed dating? Short-term impatient capital and the evolution of corporate governance in France. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 3(3), 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Grayson, D., & Hodges, A. (2004). Corporate social opportunity! 7 steps to make corporate social responsibility. Work for your business. Sheffield: Greenleaf.Google Scholar
  49. Habisch, A. (2004). Social responsibility, social capital and SMEs”. In L. Spence, A. Habisch, & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Responsibility and social capital (pp. 25–35). London: Anglo-German Foundation, Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Halme, M., & Laurila, J. (2009). Philanthropy, integration or innovation? Exploring the financial and societal outcomes of different types of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(3), 325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hanna, M. D., Newman, W. R., & Johnson, P. (2000). Linking operational and environmental improvment through employee involvement. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20(2), 148–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hart, S., & Shrivastava, P. (1995). Creating sustainable corporations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 4(3), 154–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Huberman, M. A., & Miles, M. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K Denzin & Lincoln Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 428–444), London/New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  55. Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2001). Toward a model of corporate social strategy formulation. Paper presented at Academy of Management conference, social issues, in management division, August.Google Scholar
  56. Jaakson, K., Vadi, M., & Tamm, K. (2009). Organizational culture and CSR: An exploratory study of Estonian service organizations. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(1), 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jackson, G., & Apostolakou, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in western Europe: CSR as an institutional mirror or a substitute? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 371–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jamali, D., & Mirshak, R. (2007). Social Responsibility (CSR): Theory and practice in a developing country context. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Jenkins, H. (2006). Small business champions for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jenkins, H. (2009). A ‘business opportunity model of corporate social responsibility for small-and medium-sized enterprises. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(1), 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2000). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. In Jensen M. C. (Ed.), A theory of the firm: Governance, residual claims, and organizational forms (pp. 83–135). Cambridge and London.Google Scholar
  62. Johnson, R. D., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Jones, T. M. (1980). Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined. California Management Review, 22(2), 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Jones, B., & Nisbet, P. (2011). Shareholder value versus stakeholder values: CSR and financialization in global food firms. Socio-Economic Review, 9(2), 287–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kang, N., & Moon, J. (2012). Institutional complementarity between corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: A comparative institutional analysis of three capitalisms. Socio- Economic Review, 10, 85–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Krivogorsky, V., & Grudnitski, G. (2010). Country-specific institutional effects on ownership: Concentration and performance of continental European firms. Journal of Management and Governance, 14(2), 167–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Labaronne, D., & Ben Abdelkader, F. (2008). Transition institutionnelle des pays méditerranéens et des pays d’Europe de l’Est. Analyse comparative de l’évolution de leur système de gouvernance. Revue d’Economie Politique, 118(5), 743–775.Google Scholar
  68. Labaronne, D., & Gana-Oueslati, E. (2011). Analyse comparative Maroc-Tunisie du cadre institutionnel de la RSE dans les PME. Revue Management et Avenir, 43, 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lamont, G. (2002). The spirited business: success stories of soul friendly companies. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  70. Lee, M.-D. P. (2011). Configuration of external influences: The combined effects of institutions and stakeholders on corporate social responsibility strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 281–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Levine, M. A. (2008). The Benefits of corporate social responsibility. New York Law Journal, August (13).Google Scholar
  72. M’hamdi, M., & Trid, S. (2009). La responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise au Maroc: une étude empirique auprès des petites et moyennes entreprises de la région de Fes Boulemane. Paper presented at the 11es journées scientifiques du réseau entrepreneuriat, Canada, May.Google Scholar
  73. Maloni, M. J., & Brown, M. E. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: An application in the food industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1), 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Mamic, I. (2004). Implementing codes of conduct: How businesses manage social performance in global Supply Chains. Switzerland: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  75. Martínez-Ferrero, J., Garcia-Sanchez, I. M., & Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B. (2013). Effect of financial reporting quality on sustainability information disclosure. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. Forthcoming. doi: 10.1002/csr.1330.
  76. Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.Google Scholar
  80. Meiseberg, B., & Ehrmann, T. (2012). Lost in translation? The prevalence and performance impact of corporate social responsibility in franchising. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(4), 566–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Mezouar, A. (2002). L’entreprise marocaine et la modernité. Recherche sur les conditions de changement culturel pour un progrès durable. Centre d’Etudes et de Recherche des Dirigeants). Casablanca Ed.Google Scholar
  82. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
  83. Morsing, M., & Perrini, F. (2009). CSR in SMEs: do SMEs matter for the CSR agenda? Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
  84. Murillo, D., & Lozano, J. F. (2006). SMEs and CSR: An approach to CSR in their own words. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Murray, K., & Montanari, J. (1986). Strategic management of the socially responsible firm: integrating management and marketing theory. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 815–827.Google Scholar
  86. Niehm, L. S., Swinney, J., & Miller, N. J. (2008). Community social responsibility and its consequences for family business performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(3), 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Peloza, J. (2006). Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance. California Management Review, 48(2), 52–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Perrini, F., Russo, A., & Tencati, A. (2007). CSR strategies of SMEs and large firms. Evidence from Italy. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(3), 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 2–17.Google Scholar
  90. Quinn, D., & Jones, T. (1995). An agent morality view of business policy. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 22–42.Google Scholar
  91. Reynaud, E., Egri, C. P., Ralston, D. A., Danis, W., Starkus, A., Dabic, M., et al. (2007). The Differences in values between managers of the European founding countries, the new members and the applicant countries: Social orientation or financial orientation? European Management Journal, 25(1), 132–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: an application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Rosenfeld, S. A. (1996). Does cooperation enhance competitiveness? Assessing the impacts of inter-firm collaboration. Research Policy, 25(2), 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Scholes, M. S., Wolfson, M. A., Erickson, M., Maydew, E. L., & Shevlin, T. (2005). Taxes and business strategy: A planning approach (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  95. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  96. Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of firm choice of environmental strategies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 681–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Spence, L. J. (1999). Does size matter? The state of the art in small business ethics. Business Ethics A European Review, 8(3), 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Spence, L. J. (2007). CSR and small business in a European policy context: The five “C”s of CSR and small business research agenda. Business and Society Review, 112(4), 533–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Spence, L. J., & Lozano, J. F. (2000). Communicating about ethics with small firms: experiences from the UK and Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1), 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Steurer, R., Langer, M. E., Konrad, A., & Martinuzzi, A. (2005). Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development I: A theoretical exploration of business-society relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(3), 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. American Review of Political Science, 2, 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Thompson, J. K., & Smith, H. L. (1991). Social responsibility and small business: Suggestions for research. Journal of Small Business Management, 29(1), 30–45.Google Scholar
  104. Visser, W. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 473–499). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  105. Williams, C. A., & Conley, J. (2005). An emerging third way? The erosion of the Anglo-American shareholder value construct. Cornell International Law Journal, 38(2), 493–551.Google Scholar
  106. Windsor, D. (2004). Global corporate social responsibility: International regimes and the constellation of corruption, poverty, and violence. In J. Hooker & Madsen P. (Eds.), International corporate responsibility: Exploring the issues (pp. 43–67), Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University Press.Google Scholar
  107. Young, S., & Marais, M. (2012). A multi-level perspective of CSR reporting: The implications of national institutions and industry risk characteristics. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(5), 432–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Zutshi, A., & Sohal, A. (2004). Environmental management systems adoption by Australian organizations: Part 1: Reasons, benefits and impediments. Technovation, 24(2), 335–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jamal El Baz
    • 1
  • Issam Laguir
    • 2
  • Magalie Marais
    • 2
  • Raffaele Staglianò
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Ecole Supérieure de Technologie (EST) d’AgadirAgadirMorocco
  2. 2.Montpellier Business School (member of Montpellier Research in Management)MontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations