Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 134, Issue 4, pp 709–726 | Cite as

Institutional Investors, Political Connections, and the Incidence of Regulatory Enforcement Against Corporate Fraud

  • Wenfeng WuEmail author
  • Sofia A. Johan
  • Oliver M. Rui
Article

Abstract

We investigate two under-explored factors in mitigating the risk of corporate fraud and regulatory enforcement against fraud, namely institutional investors and political connections. The role of institutional investors in the effective monitoring of a firm’s management is well established in the literature. We further observe that firms that have a large proportion of their shares held by institutional investors have a lower incidence of enforcement actions against corporate fraud. The importance of political connections for enterprises, whether in a developed market such as the United States or an emerging market such as China, has been established by previous studies. However, we find evidence of another positive effect of political connections: they may reduce the incidence of enforcement action against corporate fraud. We also find that political connections play a more significant role in reducing regulatory enforcement incidents against non-state-owned enterprises and firms in weaker legal environments, whereas institutional ownership plays a more important role in reducing regulatory enforcement incidents against state-owned enterprises.

Keywords

Fraud Political connections Institutional investor China 

Abbreviations

CEO

Chief executive officer

CSRC

China securities regulatory commission

SOEs

State-owned enterprises

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Edward Lee, Douglas Cumming and Wenxuan Hou (the editors), referees, Yick Ho Yin and participants in “2013 Journal of Business Ethics Special Issue Conference Sustainable and Ethical Entrepreneurship, Corporate Finance and Governance, and Institutional Reform in China” for the helpful comments and suggestions. Wenfeng Wu acknowledges financial support from the National Science Fund Committee of China (No. 71222203). Oliver Rui acknowledges financial support from the National Science Fund Committee of China (71372203) grant and the research grant from CEIBS.

References

  1. Adhikari, A., Derashid, C., & Zhang, H. (2006). Public policy, political connections, and effective tax rates: Longitudinal evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25, 574–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Admati, A. R., Pfleiderer, P., & Zechner, J. (1994). Large shareholder activism, risk sharing, and financial market equilibrium. Journal of Political Economy, 102(6), 1097–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aggarwal, R., Hu, M., Yang, J. (2013). Fraud, market reaction and role of institutional investors in Chinese listed firms. Georgetown University, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  4. Agrawal, A., & Mandelker, G. (1990). Large shareholders and the monitoring of managers. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 25, 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barontini, R., & Caprio, L. (2006). The effect of family control on firm value and performance: Evidence from continental Europe. European Financial Management, 12(5), 689–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beasley, M. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Accounting Review, 71, 443–465.Google Scholar
  7. Beasley, M., Carcello, J., Hermanson, D., & Lapides, P. (2000). Fraudulent financial reporting: Consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 14(4), 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell, T. B., Szykowny, J., & Willingham, J. J. (2000). A decision aid for assessing the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(1), 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berkman, H., Cole, R. A., Fu, J.L. (2012). Improving corporate governance where the state is the controlling block holder: Evidence from China. European Journal of Finance, Forthcoming. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1020170.
  10. Bortolotti, B., & Faccio, M. (2009). Government control of privatized firms. Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 2907–2939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, G. M., Firth, M., Gao, D. N., & Rui, O. M. (2005). Is China’s securities regulatory agency a toothless tiger? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(6), 451–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, G., Firth, M., Gao, D. N., & Rui, O. M. (2006). Ownership structure, corporate governance and fraud: evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 424–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen, S., Sun, Z., Tang, S., & Wu, D. (2011). Government intervention and investment efficiency: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(2), 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC). (2000). Experimental rules on open-end mutual funds. Beijing, China: The CSRC.Google Scholar
  15. Claessens, S., Feijen, E., & Laeven, L. (2008). Political connections and preferential access to finance: The role of campaign contributions. Journal of Financial Economics, 88, 554–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clarke, D., Murrell, P., & Whiting, S. (2008). The role of law in China’s economic development. In Loren. Brandt & Thomas. Rawski (Eds.), China’s great economic transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Conyon, M., & He, L. (2011). Executive compensation and corporate governance in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(4), 1158–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Correia, M. M. (2012). Political connections, SEC enforcement and accounting quality. Stanford University, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  19. DeAngelo, L. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: an analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Démurger, S., Sachs, J. D., Woo, W. T., Bao, S., Chang, G., & Mellinger, A. (2002). Geography, economic policy, and regional development in China. Asian Economic Papers, 1(1), 146–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dinc, I. S. (2005). Politicians and banks: political influences on government-owned banks in emerging markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 77, 453–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ding, S., Jia, C., Li, Y., & Yu, Z. (2011). Reactivity and passivity after enforcement actions: Better late than never. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 337–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Faccio, M. (2006). Politically Connected Firms. American Economic Review, 96, 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Faccio, M., Masulis, R., & McConnell, J. J. (2006). Political connections and corporate bailouts. Journal of Finance, 61, 2597–2635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fan, J., Rui, O. M., & Zhao, M. (2008). Public governance and corporate finance: Evidence from corruption cases. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36, 343–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fan, G., Wang, X., & Zhu, H. (2010). NERI index of marketization of China’s Provinces 2009 Report. Beijing: Economic Science Press.Google Scholar
  28. Firth, M., Rui, O. M., & Wu, W. (2011). Cooking the books: Recipes and costs of falsified financial statements in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(2), 371–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fisman, R. (2001). Estimating the value of political connections. American Economic Review, 91, 1095–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Francis, B. B., Hasan, I., & Sun, X. (2009). Political connections and the process of going public: Evidence from China. Journal of International Money and Finance, 28, 696–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Franks, J., & Mayer, C. (2001). Ownership and control of german corporations. Review of Financial Studies, 14(4), 934–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gillan, S. L., & Starks, L. T. (2003). Corporate governance, corporate ownership, and the role of institutional investors: A global perspective. Journal of Applied Finance, 13, 4–22.Google Scholar
  33. Goldman, E., Rocholl, J., & So, J. (2009). Do politically connected boards affect firm value? Review of Financial Studies, 22, 2331–2360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gong, T. (2004). Dependent judiciary and unaccountable judges: Judicial corruption in contemporary China. China Review, 4(2), 33–54.Google Scholar
  35. Hartzell, J. C., & Starks, L. T. (2003). Institutional investors and executive compensation. Journal of Finance, 58, 2351–2374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hou, W., & Moore, G. (2010). Player and referee roles held jointly: The effect of state ownership on China’s regulatory enforcement against fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 317–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnson, S., & Mitton, T. (2003). Cronyism and capital controls: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Financial Economics, 67, 351–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kang, J., & Shivdasani, A. (1995). Firm performance, corporate governance and top executive turnover in Japan. Journal of Financial Economics, 38, 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Karpoff, J. M., Lee, D. S., & Martin, G. S. (2008). The cost to firms of cooking the books. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43(3), 581–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Karpoff, J. M., & Lott, J. R. (1993). The reputational penalty firms bear from committing criminal fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 36, 757–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Khawaja, A., & Mian, A. (2005). Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 1371–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Klapper, L., Laeven, L., & Love, I. (2006). Corporate governance provisions and firm ownership: Firm-level evidence from Eastern Europe. Journal of International Money and Finance, 25(3), 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54, 471–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Leuz, C., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (2006). Political relationships, global financing, and corporate transparency: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(2), 411–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Loebbecke, J. K., Eining, M. M., & Willingham, J. J. (1989). Auditors’ experience with material irregularities: Frequency, nature, and detectability. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 9, 1–28.Google Scholar
  46. McMillan, J. (1995). China’s Nonconformist Reforms. In Edward. P. Lazear (Ed.), Economic transition in Eastern Europe and Russia: Realities of reform (pp. 419–433). Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
  47. Millar, C., Eldomiaty, T., Chong Ju, C., & Hilton, B. (2005). Corporate governance and institutional transparency in emerging markets. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Money Week (2012). The big shareholders of huahai pharmaceutical counterwork: Mutual funds support Chen Baohua, August 9, 2012 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  49. Naughton, B. (2007). The Chinese economy: Transitions and growth. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  50. North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22, 435–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pitelis, C. N. (2013). Towards a more ‘ethically correct’ governance for economic sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 655–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Securities Times (2012). The new elected director of gree electric appliances Mr. Feng Jiyong: This is a historical day, May 28, 2012 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  54. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 95, 461–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Uzun, H., Szewczyk, S. H., & Varma, R. (2004). Board composition and corporate fraud. Financial Analysts Journal, 60, 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wu, W., Wu, C., & Rui, O. M. (2012a). Ownership and the value of political connections: Evidence from China. European Financial Management, 18(4), 695–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wu, W., Wu, C., Zhou, C., & Wu, J. (2012b). Political connections, tax benefits and firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(3), 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yao, Y., & Liu, Z. (2009). Can institutional investors play a monitoring role in China? Journal of Financial Research, 6, 128–143. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  59. Yu, F., & Yu, X. (2012). Corporate lobbying and fraud detection. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(6), 1865–1891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang, W. (1993). Decision rights, residual claim and performance: A theory of how the Chinese economy works. Oxford: Mimeo, Nuffield College.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Antai College of Economics and ManagementShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Schulich School of BusinessYork UniversityOntarioCanada
  3. 3.Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC)TilburgThe Netherlands
  4. 4.China–Europe International Business SchoolShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations