Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 132, Issue 1, pp 185–202 | Cite as

MacIntyrean Virtue Ethics in Business: A Cross-Cultural Comparison

  • Mario FernandoEmail author
  • Geoff Moore
Article

Abstract

This paper seeks to establish whether the categories of MacIntyrean virtue ethics as applied to business organizations are meaningful in a non-western business context. It does so by building on research reported in Moore (Organ Stud, 33(3): 363–387, 2012) in which the application of virtue ethics to business organizations was investigated empirically in the UK, based on a conceptual framework drawn from MacIntyre’s work (After Virtue 2007). Comparing these results with an equivalent study in Sri Lanka, the paper finds that the categories are meaningful but that there are both similarities to and considerable differences in the content of these categories from the UK study. The paper draws on aspects of institutional theory to explore and explain these findings. Overall, there is supportive evidence that the categories of MacIntyrean virtue ethics are generalizable, and so can be used to characterize problems of organizational virtue and vice around the world, while providing evidence that there may be polities which are more conducive to the ‘practice-like conduct of production’ (Keat, Philos Manag, 7(1): 77–91, 2008).

Keywords

Virtue ethics Alasdair MacIntyre Institutional theory UK Sri Lanka 

References

  1. Batten, J., Hettihewa, S., & Mellor, R. (1999). Factors affecting ethical management: Comparing a developed and a developing economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 19(1), 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Battilana, J., & D’Aunno, T. (2009). Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In T. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 31–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beabout, G. (2012). Management as a domain-relative practice that requires and develops practical wisdom’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 405–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beadle, R. (2013). Managerial work in a practice-embodying institution: The role of calling, the virtue of constancy. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(4), 679–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beadle, R., & Moore, G. (2011). MacIntyre: Neo-Aristotelianism and organization theory. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 32, 85–121.Google Scholar
  6. Braverman, H. (1974). Labour and monopoly capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bright, D., Winn, B., & Kanov, J. (2014). Reconsidering virtue: Differences of perspective in virtue ethics and the positive social sciences. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(4), 445–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cameron, K., Bright, D., & Caza, A. (2004). Exploring the relationships between organizational virtuousness and performance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 766–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carter, J. R. (1979). Religiousness of Sri Lanka. Colombo: Marga.Google Scholar
  10. Central Bank of Sri Lanka. (2013). Key economic indicators. Retrieved from http://www.cbsl.gov.lk/pics_n_docs/10_pub/_docs/efr/annual_report/AR2012/English/3_KEI.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2013.
  11. Clegg, S. (2010). The state, power and agency: Missing in action in Institutional Theory? Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(4), 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crockett, C. (2005). Grounding the theory of virtue. Unpublished PhD Thesis, The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.Google Scholar
  13. Crockett, C. (2008). MacIntyre: From transliteration to translation. Philosophy of Management, 7(1), 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crockett, C. & Anderson, A. (2008). A grounded theory of virtue: From purpose to praxis. Working paper.Google Scholar
  15. Dawson, D. (2014). Two forms of virtue ethics: Two sets of virtuous action in the fire service dispute? Journal of Business Ethics. doi:  10.1007/s10551-014-2121-z.
  16. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
  18. Freeman, M. A. (1997). Demographic correlates of individualism and collectivism: A study of social values in Sri Lanka. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28(3), 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gabriel, G. E., & Cornfield, D. B. (1995). Segmentation and standardization of income determination in developing nations: An analysis of urban-rural differences in income determinants in Sri Lanka. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 43(4), 717–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gerhart, B. (2009). How much does national culture constrain organizational culture? Management and Organization Review, 5(2), 241–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  22. Haig, B. D. (1996). Grounded theory as scientific method. In A. Neiman (Ed.), Philosophy of education (pp. 281–290). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  23. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The globe study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Jones, A. (1997). Balasuriya’s ideas on Asia’s future jolt the single-path Vatican view. National Catholic Reporter, 33(16), 9–11.Google Scholar
  25. Kalupahana, D. (2008). Ethics in early Buddhism. Delhi, India: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Keat, R. (2000). Cultural goods and the limits of the market. London, UK: MacMillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keat, R. (2008). Practices, firms and varieties of Capitalism. Philosophy of Management, 7(1), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koehn, D. (1998). Virtue ethics, the firm and moral psychology. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 497–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kumarasinghe, S., & Hoshino, H. (2010). The role and perceptions of middle managers and their influence on business performance: The case of Sri Lanka. International Business Research, 3(4), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lynch, C. (1999). The ‘good girls’ of Sri Lankan modernity: Moral orders of nationalism and capitalism. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 6(1), 55–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice, which rationality?. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  32. MacIntyre, A. (1994). A partial response to my critics. In J. Horton & S. Mendus (Eds.), After MacIntyre (pp. 283–304). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  33. MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue (3rd ed.). London, UK: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  34. MacIntyre, A. (2010). Intolerance, censorship and other requirements of rationality. Lecture delivered at London Metropolitan University, 28 October. Retrieved, from www.londonmet.ac.uk/research-units/hrsj/events/public-events/. Accessed 20 July 2013.
  35. McCloskey, D. (2006). The bourgeois virtues. Ethics for an age of commerce. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mele, D. (2009). Integrating personalism into virtue-based business ethics: The personalist and the common good principles. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moore, G. (2008). Re-imagining the morality of management: A modern virtue ethics approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 483–511.Google Scholar
  38. Moore, G. (2012). Virtue in business: Alliance Boots and an empirical exploration of MacIntyre’s conceptual framework. Organization Studies, 33(3), 363–387.Google Scholar
  39. Moore, G., & Beadle, R. (2006). In search of organizational virtue in business: Agents, goods, practices, institutions and environments. Organization Studies, 27(3), 369–389.Google Scholar
  40. Munday, J. (2008). Introducing translation studies: Theories and applications (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Nanayakkara, G. (1997). Some reflections of Buddhism on morality in business and management. Sri Lankan Journal of Management, 2(3), 217–232.Google Scholar
  42. Nelson, R., & Gopalan, S. (2003). Do organizational cultures replicate national cultures? Isomorphism, rejection and reciprocal opposition in the corporate values of three countries. Organization Studies, 24(7), 1115–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nida, E. A. (1969). Science of translation. Language, 45(3), 483–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Niles, F. S. (1994). The work ethic in Australia and Sri Lanka. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134(1), 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Palanski, M., Kahai, S., & Yammarino, F. (2011). Team virtues and performance: An examination of transparency, behavioral integrity, and trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(2), 201–216.Google Scholar
  47. Rahula, W. (1993). History of Buddhism in Ceylon. Dehiwela: Buddhist Cultural Centre.Google Scholar
  48. Ranasinghe, S. (1996). Entrepreneurship education and training in Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka Journal of Management, 1(3), 262–277.Google Scholar
  49. Rego, A., Ribeiro, N., & Cunha, M. (2010). Perceptions of organizational virtuousness and happiness as predictors of organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schumacher, E. F. (2011). Small is beautiful: A study of economics as if people mattered. London, UK: Random House.Google Scholar
  51. Senaratne, C. D. (2009). Sinhala-english code-mixing in Sri Lanka: A sociolinguistic study. Published PhD Dissertation, Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate Institute of Linguistics (LOT).Google Scholar
  52. Seo, M. G., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247.Google Scholar
  53. Sison, A. (2011). Aristotelian citizenship and corporate citizenship: Who is a citizen of the corporate polis? Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sison, A., & Fontrodona, J. (2012). The common good of the firm in the Aristotelian–Thomistic tradition. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 211–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Slote, M. (1996). From morality to virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Slote, M. (2001). Morals from motives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Solomon, R. (2004). Aristotle, ethics and business organizations. Organization Studies, 25(6), 1021–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Swanton, C. (2003). Virtue ethics, a pluralistic view. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tambiah, S. J. (1992). Buddhism betrayed? Religion, politics, and violence in Sri Lanka. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  60. Tennekoon, S. (1988). Rituals of development: The accelerated Mahavali development program of Sri Lanka. American Ethnologist, 15, 294–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–129). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tsoukas, H., & Cummings, S. (1997). Marginalization and recovery: The emergence of Aristotelian themes in organization studies. Organization Studies, 18(4), 655–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. US Department of State. (2013). 2013 Investment climate statement—Sri Lanka. Retrieved from http://www.state.gov/e/eb/rls/othr/ics/2013/204735.htm. Accessed 28 Aug 2013.
  64. Van De Ven, B. (2011). Banking after the crisis: Toward an understanding of banking as professional practice. Ethical Perspectives, 18(4), 541–568.Google Scholar
  65. Von Krogh, G., Haefliger, S., Spaeth, S., & Wallin, M. (2012). Carrots and rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open source software. MIS Quarterly, 36(2), 649–676.Google Scholar
  66. Welch, B. (1947). The generalization of ‘Student’s’ problem when several different population variance are involved. Biometrika, 34(1–2), 28–35.Google Scholar
  67. Wijewardene, H., & Wimalasiri, J. (1996). In search of an Asian style of management. Sri Lankan Journal of Management, 1(2), 125–140.Google Scholar
  68. Xenikou, A., & Simosi, M. (2006). Organizational culture and transformational leadership as predictors of business unit performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(6), 566–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management, Operations and MarketingUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia
  2. 2.Durham University Business SchoolDurham UniversityDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations