Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 132, Issue 1, pp 73–90 | Cite as

Driving Water Management Change Where Economic Incentive is Limited

  • Matthew EganEmail author
Article

Abstract

The maintenance of safe and reliable water supplies presents a challenge for communities across the world. This paper responds by exploring how five large food and beverage producing organisations operating in Australia were able to develop some focus on water management at a time of acute drought. Despite weak economic and regulatory drivers, a heterogeneous range of responses was developing across all five organisations. Drawing on Laughlin’s (Organ Stud 12(2):209–232, 1991) model of organisational change, we argue that each reshaped or developed archetypes and subsystems to enable a focus on improving efficiencies. Some were motivated by little more than compliance and so the extent of change was limited. A sense of community pressure was able to drive some change to interpretive schemes in two of the five organisations. Broad cultural change, supported by clear board level mandate, became critical to the survival of new practices. We also demonstrate that management level staff with a passion to champion water efficiency can be instrumental in driving change. This paper contributes to our understanding of water management, and to the factors needed to embed developing practice.

Keywords

Water efficiency Water management Sustainability Organisational change Champions 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The author gratefully acknowledges Professors John Roberts, Geoff Frost, James Guthrie, and Chris Nobes for their guidance.

Ethical Standards

This study draws on data collected from interviews with a range of staff from five case study organisations. Approval for conducting these interviews was obtained from the appropriate university ethics committee. All interviews have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.

References

  1. Adams, C. A. (2002). Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(2), 223–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, C. A., & Frost, G. (2008). Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices. Accounting Forum, 32(4), 288–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, C. A., & McNicholas, P. (2007). Making a difference: Sustainability reporting, accountability and organisational change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 382–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2006). Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: Positioning data to contribute to theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(8), 819–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andersson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. (2000). Individual environmental initiative: Championing natural environmental issues in U.S. business organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 548–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anthony, R. N. (1965). Planning and control systems. A framework for analysis. Boston: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  7. Ball, A. (2005). Environmental accounting and change in UK local government. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(3), 346–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blomquist, T., & Sandstrom, J. (2004). From issues to checkpoints and back: Managing green issues in R&D. Business Strategy and Environment, 13(6), 363–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bouma, J. J., & Kamp-Roelands, N. (2000). Stakeholder’s expectations of an environmental management system: Some exploratory research. The European Accounting Review, 9(1), 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Broadbent, J. (1992). Change in organisations: A case study of the use of accounting information in the NHS. British Accounting Review, 24(4), 343–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Broadbent, J., & Laughlin, R. (1997). Developing empirical research: An example informed by a Habermasian approach. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(5), 622–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Broadbent, J., & Laughlin, R. (2005). Organisational and accounting change: Theoretical and empirical reflections and thoughts on a future research agenda. Journal of Accounting & Organisational Change, 1(1), 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown, C. (2009). The water wizards of Oz. Mises Daily, Ludwig von Mises Institute. Viewed 27 March, 2014, from http://mises.org/daily/3338.
  15. Brown, J., & Fraser, M. (2006). Approaches and perspectives in social and environmental accounting: An overview of the conceptual landscape. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(2), 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. BRW (Business Review Weekly). (2006). Top 1,000 companies. November 9 to December 13 2006, 56–79.Google Scholar
  17. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1992). A behavioural theory of the firm (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Business.Google Scholar
  19. de Rogers, P., Silva, R., & Bahatia, R. (2002). Water is an economic good: How to use prices to promote equity, efficiency and sustainability. Water Policy, 4(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DRET (Australian Government Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism). (2008). Leading practice sustainable development program for the mining industry—Water management. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. Viewed 11 June, 2010, from http://www.ret.gov.au/resources/resources_programs/lpsdp/water/Pages/default.aspx.
  21. Durden, C. (2007). Towards a socially responsible management control system. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(5), 671–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Efferin, S., & Hopper, T. (2007). Management control, culture and ethnicity in a Chinese–Indonesian company. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(1), 223–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Egan, M. (2009). Sydney water sector change and industrial water management. Journal of Accounting & Organisational Change, 5(2), 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Egan, M. (2014). Progress towards institutionalising field-wide water efficiency change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(5), 809–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Egan, M., & Frost, G. (2010). Corporate water reporting. A study of the Australian food, beverage and tobacco sector. Viewed 15 October, 2010, from http://www.cpaaustralia.com.au/cps/rde/xbcr/cpa-site/Corporate-water-reporting.pdf.
  27. Eisenhardt, K. (1991). Better stories and better constructs: The case for rigor and comparative logic. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 620–627.Google Scholar
  28. Erakovic, L., & Powell, M. (2006). Pathways of change: Organizations in transition. Public Administration, 84(1), 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. FSA (Food Science Australia). (2009). Water reuse industry survey, Review and Policy Development Report. Prepared for the Australian Food and Grocery Council.Google Scholar
  30. Fussel, L., & Georg, S. (2000). The institutionalization of environmental concerns. International Studies of Management & Organization, 30(3), 41–58.Google Scholar
  31. Gray, R. (2002). The social accounting project and accounting organizations and society. Privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(7), 687–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gray, R., & Bebbington, J. (2001). Accounting for the environment (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  33. Gray, R., Dey, C., Owen, D., Evans, R., & Zadek, S. (1997). Struggling with the praxis of social accounting. stakeholders, accountability, audits and procedures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(3), 325–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gray, R., Walters, D., Bebbington, J., & Thompson, I. (1995). The greening of enterprise: An exploration of the (non) role of environmental accounting and environmental accountants in organisational change. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 6(3), 211–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022–1054.Google Scholar
  36. Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action. Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hall, M. (2010). Accounting information and managerial work. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(3), 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hazelton, J. (2013). Accounting as a human right: The case of water information. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(2), 267–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Heydon, J. D. (1987). Directors’ duties and the company’s interests. In P. D. Finn (Ed.), Equity and commercial relationships (pp. 120–140). Sydney: Law Book Company.Google Scholar
  40. Holliday, C. O., Schmidheiny, S., & Watts, P. (2002). Walking the talk. The business case for sustainable development. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  41. Hopper, T., & Powell, A. (1985). Making sense of research into the organizational and social aspects of management accounting: A review of its underlying assumptions. Journal of Management Studies, 22(5), 429–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Howell, J. M., & Higgins, C. A. (1990). Champions of technological innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 317–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Langfield-Smith, K. (1997). Management control systems and strategy: A critical review. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(2), 207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lansiluto, A., & Jarvenpaa, M. (2010). Collective action in the implementation of a ‘greener’ performance management system. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 6(2), 200–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Laughlin, R. C. (1991). Environmental disturbances and organizational transitions and transformations: Some alternative models. Organization Studies, 12(2), 209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Macdonald, D. H., Lamontagne, S., & Connor, J. (2005). The economics of water: Taking full account of first use, reuse and the return to the environment. Irrigation and Drainage, 54(S1), S93–S102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Maidique, M. (1980). Entrepreneurs, champions, and technological innovation. Sloan Management Review, 21(2), 59–76.Google Scholar
  48. Martin, J. (1992). Culture in organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Monteiro, S. M., & Aibar-Guzman, B. (2010). Organisational and accounting change within the context of the environmental agenda. Journal of Accounting and Organisational Change, 6(4), 404–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Norris, G., & O’Dwyer, B. (2004). Motivating socially responsive decision making: The operation of management controls in a socially responsive organisation. The British Accounting Review, 36(2), 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. O’Dwyer, B. (2003). Conceptions of corporate social responsibility: The nature of managerial capture. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(4), 523–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Parker, L. D. (2005). Social and environmental accountability research: A view from the commentary box. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(6), 842–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Power, M., & Laughlin, R. (1996). Habermas, law and accounting. Accounting Organisations & Society, 21(5), 441–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Qian, W., Burritt, R. L., & Munroe, G. (2011). Environmental management accounting in local government. A case of waste management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24(1), 93–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Quattrone, P., & Hopper, T. (2001). What does organizational change mean? Speculations on a taken for granted category. Management Accounting Research, 12(4), 403–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Reinhardt, F. L. (2000). Down to earth. Applying business principles to environmental management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  57. Rickhardsson, P., & Welford, R. (1997). Clouding the crisis: The construction of corporate environmental management. In R. Welford (Ed.), Hijacking environmentalism. London: Earthscan Publications Limited.Google Scholar
  58. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 535–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schon, D. A. (1963). Champions for radical new inventions. Harvard Business Review 41(March/April 1963 No. 2), 77–86.Google Scholar
  60. Smith, K. K. (1982). Philosophical problems in thinking about organizational change. In P. S. Goodman, et al. (Eds.), Change in organizations (pp. 316–374). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  61. SWC (Sydney Water Corporation). (2007). Sydney water submission to IPART. Viewed 17 September, 2007, from http://www.sydneywater.com.au/Publications/Reports/SubmissionToIPART.pdf#Page=1.
  62. SWC (Sydney Water Corporation). (2013). Water efficiency report 2011–2012. Viewed 23 February, 2013, from http://www.sydneywater.com.au/water4life/WhatSydneyWaterIsDoing/Initiatives.cfm.
  63. Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  64. Tilt, C. A. (2006). Linking environmental activity and environmental disclosure in organisational change framework. Journal of Accounting & Organisational Change, 2(1), 4–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tucker, B. (2013). Environmental disturbances, organizational transitions and transformations: A view from the dark side. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(3), 242–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tyrrall, D., & Parker, D. (2005). The fragmentation of a railway: A study of organisational change. Journal of Management Studies, 42(3), 507–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Von Mises, L. (1944). Bureaucracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  68. WBCSD (World Business Council for Sustainable Development). (2009). Water version 2. Facts and trends. Viewed 11 June, 2012, from http://www.wbcsd.org/Pages/EDocument/EDocumentDetails.aspx?ID=137&NoSearchContextKey=true.
  69. White, S. (1999). Water demand management and conservation including water losses control. Water Supply, 18(1), 163–175.Google Scholar
  70. WSAA (Water Services Association of Australia). (2009). WSAA Report Card 2008–2009. Viewed 23 February, 2010, from https://www.wsaa.asn.au/Publications/Documents/WSAA%20Report%20Card%202008-09.pdf.
  71. Zakus, D. W., & Skinner, J. (2008). Modelling organizational change in the international olympic committee. European Sport Management Quarterly, 8(4), 421–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Discipline of AccountingThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations