Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 132, Issue 2, pp 415–431 | Cite as

The Effectiveness of Ethics Programs: The Role of Scope, Composition, and Sequence

Article

Abstract

Organizations are faced with the question, not only whether to adopt an ethics program, but also which components to adopt when. This study shows that unethical behavior occurs less frequently in organizations that have an ethics program than in organizations that do not have an ethics program. Nine components of ethics programs were identified and examined. The results show that there is a direct relationship between the number of components adopted and the frequency of observed unethical behavior. No relationship was found between pre-employment screening and unethical behavior, while the strongest relationship was discerned between accountability policies and unethical behavior. The study further reveals that the best sequence for adopting components of an ethics program is (1) a code of ethics, (2) ethics training and communication, (3) accountability policies, (4) monitoring and auditing, and (5) investigation and correction policies—all of which are directly related to less unethical behavior—followed by (6) an ethics office(r), (7) ethics report line, and (8) incentive policies—all of which are indirectly related to less unethical behavior. With the exception of pre-employment screening, this sequence corresponds closely to the pattern of adoption of organizations in the U.S.

Keywords

Ethics program Code Officer Hotline Monitoring Training 

References

  1. Bacharach, S. B., Bamberger, P. A., & Sonnenstuhl, W. J. (2002). Driven to drink: Managerial control, work-related risk factors, and employee problem drinking. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 637–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball, G. A., Treviño, L. K., & Sims, H. P. (1994). Just and unjust punishment: Influences on subordinate performance and citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barker, R. A. (1993). An evaluation of the ethics program at General Dynamics. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baucus, M. S., & Beck-Dudley, C. L. (2005). Designing ethical organizations: Avoiding the long-term negative effects of rewards and punishments. Journal of Business Ethics, 56, 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beeri, I., Dayan, R., Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Werner, S. B. (2013). Advancing ethics in public organizations: The impact of an ethics program on employees’ perceptions and behaviors in a regional council. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berenbeim, R. (1992). Corporate ethics programs. New York: Conference Board.Google Scholar
  7. Bird, F. B., & Waters, J. A. (1989). The moral muteness of managers. California Management Review, 32, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blodgett, M. S. (2011). Substantive ethics: Integrating law and ethics in corporate ethics programs. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boatright, J. (2003). Ethics and the conduct of business (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Brenner, S. N. (1992). Ethics programs and their dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 391–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, T. S., Jones, J. W., Terris, W., & Steffy, B. D. (1987). The impact of pre-employment integrity testing on employee turnover and inventory shrinkage losses. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2, 136–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Delaney, J. T., & Sockell, D. (1992). Do company ethics training make a difference? An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 719–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Desio, P. (2008). An overview of the organizational guidelines. Washington, DC: United States Sentencing Guidelines.Google Scholar
  15. Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., Burris, E. R., & Andiappan, M. (2007). Managerial modes of influence and counterproductivity in organizations: A longitudinal business-unit-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 993–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deutsch Salamon, S., & Robinson, S. L. (2008). Trust that binds: The impact of collective felt trust on organizational performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 593–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ethics Resource Center. (2007). Leading Corporate Integrity: Defining the role of the chief ethics and compliance officer. Washington, DC: ERC.Google Scholar
  18. Ethics Resource Center. (2011). 2011 National Business Ethics Survey: Workplace ethics in transition. Arlington: ERC.Google Scholar
  19. Falkenberg, L., & Herremans, I. (1995). Ethical behaviors in organizations directed by the formal or informal systems. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feldheim, M., & Wang, X. (2004). Ethics and public trust: Results from a national survey. Public Integrity, 6, 63–75.Google Scholar
  21. Felo, A. J. (2001). Ethics programs, board involvement, and potential conflicts of interest in corporate governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 32, 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Felo, A. J. (2007). Board oversight of corporate ethics programs and disclosure transparency. Accounting and the Public Interest, 7, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenberg, J. (1997). The STEAL motive: Managing the social determinants of employee theft. In R. A. Giacalone & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in organizations (pp. 85–108). SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  24. Hollinger, R. C., & Clark, J. P. (1983). Deterrence in the workplace: Perceived certainty, perceived severity and employee theft. Social Forces, 62, 398–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Joseph, J. (2002). Integrating business ethics and compliance programs: A study of ethics officers in leading organizations. Business and Society Review, 107, 309–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaptein, M. (1998). Ethics management: Auditing and developing the ethical content of organizations. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaptein, M. (2002). Guidelines for the development of an ethics safety net. Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaptein, M. (2008). Development of a measure of unethical behavior in the workplace: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management, 34, 978–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaptein, M. (2009). Ethics programs and ethical culture: A next step in unraveling their multi-faceted relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 261–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaptein, M. (2011a). Towards effective codes: Testing the relationship with unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaptein, M. (2011b). Understanding unethical behavior by unravelling ethical culture. Human Relations, 64, 843–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaptein, M., & Schwartz, M. (2008). The effectiveness of business codes: A critical examination of existing studies and the development of an integrated research model. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Katz-Navon, T., Naveh, E., & Stern, Z. (2005). Safety climate in healthcare organizations: A multidimensional approach. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 1075–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Khurana, R., & Nohria, N. (2008). It’s time to make management a true profession. Harvard Business Review, 86(10), 70–77.Google Scholar
  35. Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Koonmee, K., Singhapakdi, A., Virakul, B., & Lee, D. J. (2009). Ethics institutionalization, quality of work life, and employee job-related outcomes: A survey of human resource managers in Thailand. Journal of Business Research, 63, 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. KPMG. (2008). Business Code of the Global 200: Their prevalence, content and embedding. Amsterdam: KPMG.Google Scholar
  38. Langlois, L., & Lapointe, C. (2010). Can ethics be learned? Results from a three-year action-research project. Journal of Educational Administration, 48, 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. MacLean, T. L., & Behman, M. (2010). The dangers of decoupling: The relationship between compliance programs, legitimacy perceptions, and institutionalized misconduct. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1499–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. MacLean, T. L., Litzky, B. E., & Holderness, D. K. (2014). When organizations don’t walk their talk: A cross-level examination of how decoupling formal ethics programs affects organizational members. Journal of Business Ethics (to be published). Google Scholar
  41. Majluf, N. S., & Navarrete, C. M. (2011). A two-component compliance and ethics program model: An empirical application to Chilean corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 567–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. (2009). How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McKendall, M., DeMarr, B., & Jones-Rikkers, C. (2002). Ethical compliance programs and corporate illegality: Testing the assumptions of the corporate sentencing guidelines. Journal of Business Ethics, 37, 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Metzger, M., Dalton, D. R., & Hill, J. W. (1993). The organization of ethics and the ethics of organizations: The case for expanded organizational ethics audits. Business Ethics Quarterly, 3, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Murphy, P. E. (1988). Implementing business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 907–915.Google Scholar
  46. Paine, L. S. (1994). Managing for organizational integrity. Harvard Business Review, 72, 106–117.Google Scholar
  47. Park, H., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2013). The impact of ethics programmes and ethical culture on misconduct in public service organizations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26, 520–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pelletier, K. L., & Bligh, M. C. (2006). Rebounding from corruption: Perceptions of ethics program effectiveness in a public sector organization. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 359–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Proenca, E. J. (2004). Ethics orientation as a mediator of organizational integrity in health services organization. Health Care Management Review, 29, 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reynolds, S. J., & Bowie, N. E. (2004). A Kantian perspective on the characteristics of ethics programs. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14, 275–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Román, S., & Munuera, J. L. (2005). Determinants and consequences of ethical behavior: An empirical study of salespeople. European Journal of Marketing, 39, 473–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ruiz, P., Martinez, R., Rodrigo, J., & Diaz, C. (2014). Level of coherence among ethics program components and its impact on ethical intent. Journal of Business Ethics, 120, 95–108.Google Scholar
  53. Schweitzer, M. E., Ordóñez, L., & Douma, B. (2004). Goal setting as a motivator of unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 422–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sims, R. R. (1991). The institutionalization of organizational ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 493–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Singh, J. B. (2006). Ethics programs in Canada’s largest corporations. Business and Society Review, 111, 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Singh, J. B. (2011). Changes and trends in Canadian corporate ethics programs. Business and Society Review, 116, 257–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith-Crowe, K., Tenbrunsel, A. E., Chan-Serafin, S. A., Brief, P., Umphress, E. E., & Joseph, J. (2014). The ethics “fix”: when formal systems make a difference. Journal of Business Ethics (to be published).Google Scholar
  58. Stansbury, J., & Barry, B. (2007). Ethics programs and the paradox of control. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17, 239–261.Google Scholar
  59. Stucke, M. E. (2014). In search of effective ethics & compliance programs. In Legal Studies Research Paper Series: Research Paper #229. Knoxville: The University of Tennessee.Google Scholar
  60. Tobin, G. R., Breidenbach, W. C., Klapheke, M. M., Bentley, F. R., Pidwell, D. J., & Simmons, P. D. (2005). Ethical considerations in the early composite tissue allograft experience: A review of the Louisville ethics program. Transplantation Proceedings, 37, 1392–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617.Google Scholar
  62. Treviño, L. K. (2005). Out of touch: The CEO’s role in corporate misbehavior. Brooklyn Law Review, 70, 1195–1211.Google Scholar
  63. Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2001). Organizational justice and ethics program ‘follow-through’: Influences on employees’ harmful and helpful behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11, 651–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2003). Managing ethics in business organizations: Social scientific perspectives. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., Gibson, D. G., & Toffler, B. L. (1999). Managing ethics and legal compliance: What works and what hurts. California Management Review, 41, 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32, 951-990.Google Scholar
  67. Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2004). Ethics training and businesspersons’ perceptions of organizational ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 381–390.Google Scholar
  68. Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2008). Ethics programs, perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Warren, D. E., Gaspar, J. P., & Laufer, W. S. (2014). Is formal ethics training merely cosmetic? A study of ethics training and ethical organizational culture. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24, 85–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Weaver, G. R., & Treviño, L. K. (1999). Compliance and values oriented ethics programs: Influences on employees’ attitudes and behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9, 315–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999a). Corporate ethics programs as control systems: Influences of executive commitment and environmental factors. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999b). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management values, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 539–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999c). Corporate ethics practices in the mid-1990s. Journal of Business Ethics, 18, 282–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Weber, J. (1993). Institutionalizing ethics into business organizations: A model and research agenda. Business Ethics Quarterly, 3, 419–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Weber, J. (2006). Implementing an organizational ethics program in an academic environment: The challenges and opportunities for the Duquesne University Schools of Business. Journal of Business Ethics, 65, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Weber, J., & Wasieleski, D. M. (2013). Corporate ethics and compliance programs: A report, analysis and critique. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 609–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zey-Ferrell, M., Weaver, K. M., & Ferrell, O. C. (1979). Predicting unethical behavior among marketing practitioners. Human Relations, 32, 557–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business-Society ManagementRSM Erasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations